IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,371,335
Granted Patent B2
US 12,371,335 · App. 17/550,857 · Granted Jul 29, 2025

Ammonia production from carbon-and water-derived hydrogen

Inventors: Ahmad O. Khowaiter (Dhahran, SA); Mourad Younes (Dhahran, SA); Aqil Jamal (Dhahran, SA); Gerard De Nazelle (Dhahran, SA); Aadesh Harale (Dhahran, SA)
Assignee: Saudi Arabian Oil Company
C01C1/0488C01B3/025C25B1/04C01B2203/0205C01B2203/0283C01B2203/068
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,371,335
App. No.
17/550,857
Granted
Jul 29, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

Methods and systems for ammonia production are provided. An exemplary method includes electrolyzing water to form H 2 and O 2 ; contacting a reformer feed stream including hydrocarbons, O 2 from electrolysis, and an oxidant stream including O 2 and N 2 to form a reformed stream including H 2 , CO, CO 2 , and N 2 ; contacting the reformed stream with a water-gas shift catalyst to form a shifted stream including H 2 , CO 2 , and N 2 ; separating the shifted stream to form a captured stream including CO 2 and an ammonia production feed stream including H 2 and N 2 ; and reacting the ammonia production feed stream, and optionally H 2 from electrolysis, to form ammonia.

Claims (16)

1. A method for producing ammonia using a system comprising:

an electrolyzer configured to electrolyze water to form a first electrolysis stream comprising H 2 and a second electrolysis stream comprising O 2 ;

a reformer configured to contact a reformer feed stream comprising hydrocarbons, at least a portion of the second electrolysis stream comprising O 2 , and an oxidant stream comprising O 2 and N 2 under conditions suitable to form a reformed stream comprising H 2 , CO, CO 2 , and N 2 ;

a water-gas shift reactor configured to contact at least a portion of the reformed stream with a water-gas shift catalyst under conditions suitable to form a shifted stream comprising H 2 , CO 2 , and N 2 ;

a carbon capture unit configured to separate at least a portion of the shifted stream to form a captured stream comprising CO 2 and an ammonia production feed stream comprising H 2 and N 2 ;

an ammonia production unit configured to react at least a portion of the ammonia production feed stream comprising H 2 and N 2 , and optionally at least a portion of the first electrolysis stream comprising H 2 , to form a product stream comprising ammonia;

an O 2 liquefaction unit configured to liquefy at least a portion of the second electrolysis stream comprising O 2 to form liquid O 2 ;

an O 2 storage facility configured to store the liquid O 2 ; and

an O 2 gasification unit configured to gasify at least a portion of the liquid O 2 and provide the gasified O 2 to the reformer;

the method comprising:

detecting a decreased amount of the first electrolysis stream formed by the electrolyzer; and then

increasing an amount of the reformer feed stream contacted in the reformer, relative to an amount of the oxidant stream contacted in the reformer; and

increasing an amount of the gasified O 2 contacted in the reformer, relative to an amount of the oxidant stream contacted in the reformer;

wherein, after increasing the amount of the contacted reformer feed stream and the contacted gasified O 2 :

a molar ratio of a total amount of H 2 present in the first electrolysis stream and H 2 present in the shifted stream to a total amount of N 2 present in the reformed stream is at least about 2.5; and

a rate of formation of the product stream is at least 50% of a maximum rate of formation of the product stream corresponding to a maximum rate of formation of the first electrolysis stream.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Dec 16, 2021
From: KHOWAITER, AHMAD O.; YOUNES, MOURAD; JAMAL, AQIL; DE NAZELLE, GERARD; HARALE, AADESH
To: SAUDI ARABIAN OIL COMPANY
Reel/Frame 058409/0525 →
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20230183083A1 · Jun 15, 2023
References Cited (54)
US 5714132A · Kapoor · 1998 [cited by examiner]
US 7772450B2 · Iaccino et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 8586500B2 · Kuperman et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8628744B2 · Flytzani-Stephanopoulos · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 11110434B2 · Jiang et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11478784B2 · Gascon et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20010006615A1 · Badano · 2001 [cited by applicant]
US 20120100062A1 · Nakamura et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20130108538A1 · Ostuni · 2013 [cited by examiner]
US 20160149244A1 · Abe · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 20180215618A1 · Kang · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20190308183A1 · Agblevor et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20200016578A1 · Mikhajlov · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20200172394A1 · Han et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20220119720A1 · Bielenberg · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20220401915A1 · Koh et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20230041936A1 · Cho et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20230092115A1 · Han et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20230234841A1 · Chae et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20240050933A1 · Yavuz · 2024 [cited by applicant]
CN 103586030A · 2014 [cited by applicant]
CN 104258864A · 2015 [cited by applicant]
CN 105561998A · 2016 [cited by applicant]
CN 113562701 · 2021 [cited by applicant]
DE 202010012734U1 · 2012 [cited by examiner]
EP 3988205A1 · 2022 [cited by applicant]
GB 2573885 · 2019 [cited by applicant]
KR 1020180043936A · 2018 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2016069385A1 · 2016 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2018026246A1 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2019020376 · 2019 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2019043875A1 · 2019 [cited by examiner]
WO WO2021122584 · 2021 [cited by applicant]
International Search Report and Written Opinion in International Appln. No. PCT/US2022/052654, mailed on Jan. 22, 2024, 13 pages. [cited by applicant]
Berenschot, “Oxygen synergy for hydrogen production” TESN118016—Waterstofversneller, Dec. 2019, 97 pages. [cited by applicant]
Esposito, “Membraneless electrolyzers for low-cost hydrogen production in a renewable energy future” Joule 1.4, Dec. 2017, 651-658, 8 pages. [cited by applicant]
Zhang et al., “Techno-economic comparison of green ammonia production processes” Applied Energy 259, Feb. 2020, 12 pages. [cited by applicant]
Huang et al., “Hydrogen generation by ammonia decomposition over Co/Ce02 catalyst: Influence of support morphologies,” Applied Surface Science, 2020, 532: 147335, 16 pages. [cited by applicant]
Huo et al., “Spatial confinement and electron transfer moderating MoN bond strength for superior ammonia decomposition catalysis,” Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 2021, 294:120254, 12 pages. [cited by applicant]
Jafarbegloo et al., “One-pot synthesis of NiO—MgO nanocatalysts for CO2 reforming of methane: The influence of active metal content on catalytic performance,” Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 2015, 27:116… [cited by applicant]
Kawi et al., “Progress in synthesis of highly active and stable nickel-based catalysts for carbon dioxide reforming methane,” Chemsuschem, 2015, 8(21):3556-3575, 20 pages. [cited by applicant]
Krishnan et al., “COx-free hydrogen generation via decomposition of ammonia over al, Ti and Zr—Laponite supported MoS2 catalysts,” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2020, 45(15):8568-8583, 16 pages. [cited by applicant]
Li et al., “Highly efficient Co/NC catalyst derived from ZIF-67 for hydrogen generation through ammonia decomposition,” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, Mar. 2022, 47(26):12882-12892, 11 pages. [cited by applicant]
Li et al., “Production of hydrogen by ammonia decomposition over supported Co3O4 catalysts,” Catalysis Today, Sep. 2022, 402:45-51, 7 pages. [cited by applicant]
Lucentini et al., “Ammonia decomposition over 3D-printed CeO2 structures loaded with Ni,” Applied Catalysis A: General, 2020, 591: 117382, 31 pages. [cited by applicant]
Maleki et al., “Co—Ce—Al—O mesoporous catalysts for hydrogen generation via ammonia decomposition,” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2024, 51:267-275, 9 pages. [cited by applicant]
Pakhare et al., “A review of dry CO2 reforming of methane over noble metal catalysts,” Chem Soc Rev, 2014, 43(22):7813-7837, 25 pages. [cited by applicant]
Parker et al., “Ammonia Decomposition Enhancement by Cs-Promoted Fe/A12O3 Catalysts,” Catalysis Letters, 2020, 150(12):3369-3376, 8 pages. [cited by applicant]
Pinzón et al., “COx-free hydrogen production from ammonia at low temperature using Co/SiC catalyst: Effect of promoter,” Catalysis Today, May 2022, 390-391:34-47, 14 pages. [cited by applicant]
Song et al., “Dry reforming of methane by stable Ni—Mo nanocatalysts on single crystalline MgO,” Catalysis, Science, Feb. 2020, 367:777-781, 6 pages. [cited by applicant]
Su et al., “Fe-based catalyst derived from MgFe-LDH: Very efficient yet simply obtainable for hydrogen production via ammonia decomposition,” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2021, 46(61):31122-31132, 11 pages. [cited by applicant]
Wolfbeisser et al., “Methane dry reforming over ceria-zirconia supported Ni catalysts,” Catal Today, 2016, 277:234-245, 12 pages. [cited by applicant]
Xie et al., “Immobilizing Ni nanoparticles to mesoporous silica with size and location control via a polyol-assisted route for coking and sintering resistant dry reforming of methane,” Chem Commun, 2014, 50(55):7250-725… [cited by applicant]
Zhang et al., “Coke-resistant Ni@SiO2 catalyst for dry reforming of methane,” Applied Catalysis B-Environmental, 2015, 176:513-521, 9 pages. [cited by applicant]