IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,491,506
Granted Patent B2
US 12,491,506 · App. 17/885,197 · Granted Dec 9, 2025

Catalysts for dry reforming and methods of producing the same

Inventors: Cafer Tayyar Yavuz (Thuwal, SA); Seokjin Kim (Jinju, KR); Aadesh Harale (Dhahran, SA); Bandar Al Solami (Dhahran, SA); Aqil Jamal (Dhahran, SA)
Assignees: Saudi Arabian Oil Company; King Abdullah University of Science and Technology
B01J37/031B01J21/10B01J23/28B01J23/755C01B3/40C01B2203/0238C01B2203/1058C01B2203/1241
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,491,506
App. No.
17/885,197
Granted
Dec 9, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

The disclosure relates to catalysts for dry reforming, methods of producing the catalysts, and methods of using the catalysts in dry reforming. The catalysts contain nickel, molybdenum and a metal oxide. The methods of producing the catalysts include adding a solvent to precipitate the catalyst, followed by removing the solvent. The solvent addition and removal steps can be repeated as desired.

Claims (23)

1 . A method, comprising:

a) combining a nickel precursor, a molybdenum precursor and a metal oxide in a first solvent to provide a mixture;

b) adding a second solvent to the mixture to precipitate a catalyst from the mixture, wherein the precipitated catalyst forms a first layer and the first solvent and the second solvent form a second layer; and

c) removing the second layer,

wherein the catalyst comprises nickel, molybdenum and the metal oxide; and

wherein the second solvent comprises a member selected from the group consisting of acetone, toluene, ethanol, ethyl acetate, propanol, butanol, methanol, dichloromethane, and acetonitrile.

2 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising repeating b) and c) at least three times.

3 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the second solvent comprises ethanol.

4 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising, after c), isolating the catalyst from the first solvent; and drying the isolated catalyst.

5 . The method of claim 1 , wherein:

the nickel precursor comprises a member selected from the group consisting of NiCl 2 , NiCl 2 ·6H 2 O, Ni(NO 3 ) 2 , NiSO 4 , Ni(NH 4 ) 2 , Ni(SO 4 ) 2 ·6H 2 O, Ni(OCOCH 3 ) 2 ·4H 2 O, NiBr 2 , NiCO 3 , NiF 2 , NiI 2 , NiC 2 O 4 ·2H 2 O and Ni(ClO 4 ) 2 ·6H 2 O; and

the molybdenum precursor comprises a member selected from the group consisting of Mo(CO) 6 , MoO 3 , Na 2 MoO 4 , CaMoO 4 , ZnMoO 4 and (NH 4 ) 6 Mo 7 O 2 ·4H 2 O.

6 . The method of claim 5 , wherein the metal oxide comprises a member selected from the group consisting of ZrO 2 , MgO, TiO 2 , Al 2 O 3 , SiO 2 , CrO 2 , Fe 2 O 3 , Fe 3 O 4 , CuO, ZnO, CaO, Sb 2 O 4 , Co 3 O 4 , Fe 3 O 4 , Pb 3 O 4 , Mn 3 O 4 , Ag 2 O 2 , U 3 O 8 , Cu 2 O, Li 2 O, Rb 2 O, Ag 2 O, Tl 2 O, BeO, CdO, TiO, GeO 2 , HfO 2 , PbO 2 , MnO 2 , TeO 2 , SnO 2 , La 2 O 3 , Fe 2 O 3 , CeO 2 , WO 2 , UO 2 , ThO 2 , TeO2, MoO 2 , and MoO 3 .

7 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the metal oxide comprises MgO.

8 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the first solvent comprises water and ethylene glycol.

9 . The method of claim 1 , wherein a) further comprises including a reducing agent in the mixture.

10 . The method of claim 1 , wherein a) further comprises including a surfactant to the mixture.

11 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the nickel precursor comprises NiCl 2 6H 2 O, the molybdenum precursor comprises (NH 4 ) 6 Mo 7 O 2 4H 2 O, and the metal oxide comprises MgO.

12 . The method of claim 1 , wherein a weight ratio of nickel from the nickel precursor to metal oxide in the mixture is 0.01 wt. % to 40 wt. %.

13 . The method of claim 1 , wherein a weight ratio of molybdenum from the molybdenum precursor to the metal oxide in the mixture is from 0.01 wt. % to 39.9 wt. %.

14 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising, after c), using the catalyst in a dry reforming reaction.

15 . The method of claim 14 , wherein the dry reforming reaction comprises reacting carbon dioxide and a C 1 -C 4 hydrocarbon to make carbon monoxide and hydrogen.

16 . The method of claim 14 , further comprising, after using the catalyst in a dry reforming reaction, removing coke from the catalyst.

Assignments (2)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Aug 18, 2022
From: YAVUZ, CAFER TAYYAR; KIM, SEOKJIN
To: KING ABDULLAH UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
Reel/Frame 060841/0814 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Aug 18, 2022
From: HARALE, AADESH; AL-SOLAMI, BANDAR; JAMAL, AQIL
To: SAUDI ARABIAN OIL COMPANY
Reel/Frame 060841/0834 →
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20240050933A1 · Feb 15, 2024
References Cited (58)
US 5714132A · Kapoor et al. · 1998 [cited by applicant]
US 7772450B2 · Iaccino et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 8586500B2 · Kuperman et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8628744B2 · Flytzani-Stephanopoulos et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 11110434B2 · Jiang et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11478784B2 · Gascon et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20010006615A1 · Badano · 2001 [cited by applicant]
US 20120100062A1 · Nakamura et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20130108538A1 · Ostuni et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20160149244A1 · Abe et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20180215618A1 · Kang et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20190168206A1 · Yavuz et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190308183A1 · Agblevor et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20200016578A1 · Mikhajlov et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200172394A1 · Han et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20220119720A1 · Bielenberg et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220401915A1 · Koh et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20230041936A1 · Cho et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20230092115A1 · Han et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20230183083A1 · Khowaiter et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20230234841A1 · Chae et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
CN 103586030 · 2014 [cited by applicant]
CN 104258864 · 2015 [cited by applicant]
CN 105561998 · 2016 [cited by applicant]
CN 113562701A · 2021 [cited by applicant]
DE 202010012734U1 · 2012 [cited by applicant]
EP 3988205 · 2022 [cited by applicant]
GB 2573885A · 2019 [cited by applicant]
KR 1020180043936 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2016069385 · 2016 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2018026246 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2018026246A1 · 2018 [cited by examiner]
WO WO2019020376A1 · 2019 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2019043875A1 · 2019 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2021122584A1 · 2021 [cited by applicant]
U.S. Appl. No. 17/619,481, Dong et al., filed Dec. 15, 2021. [cited by applicant]
Jafarbegloo et al., “One-pot synthesis of NiO-MgO nanocatalysts for CO2 reforming of methane: The influence of active metal content on catalytic performance,” J Nat Gas Sci Eng., 2015, 27:1165-1173, 23 pages. [cited by applicant]
Kawi et al., “Progress in synthesis of highly active and stable nickel-based catalysts for carbon dioxide reforming methane,” Chemsuschem, 2015, 8(21):3556-3575, 20 pages. [cited by applicant]
Pakhare et al., “A review of dry CO2 reforming of methane over noble metal catalysts,” Chem Soc Rev, 2014, 43(22):7813-7837, 25 pages. [cited by applicant]
Song et al., “Dry reforming of methane by stable Ni-Mo nanocatalysts on single crystalline MgO,” Catalysis, Science, Feb. 2020, 367:777-781, 6 pages. [cited by applicant]
Wolfbeisser et al., “Methane dry reforming over ceria-zirconia supported Ni catalysts,” Catal Today, 2016, 277:234-245, 12 pages. [cited by applicant]
Xie et al., “Immobilizing Ni nanoparticles to mesoporous silica with size and location control via a polyol-assisted route for coking and sintering resistant dry reforming of methane,” Chem Commun, 2014, 50(55):7250-725… [cited by applicant]
Zhang et al., “Coke-resistant Ni@SiO2 catalyst for dry reforming of methane,” Appl Catal B-Environ, 2015, 176:513-521, 9 pages. [cited by applicant]
Berenschot, “Oxygen synergy for hydrogen production,” TESN118016—Waterstofversneller, Dec. 2019, 97 pages. [cited by applicant]
Esposito, “Membraneless electrolyzers for low-cost hydrogen production in a renewable energy future,” Joule, Dec. 2017, 1:651-658, 10 pages. [cited by applicant]
Huang et al., “Hydrogen generation by ammonia decomposition over Co/CeO2 catalyst: Influence of support morphologies,” Applied Surface Science, 2020, 532:147335, 16 pages. [cited by applicant]
Huo et al., “Spatial confinement and electron transfer moderating MoN bond strength for superior ammonia decomposition catalysis,” Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 2021, 294:120254, 12 pages. [cited by applicant]
International Search Report and Written Opinion in International Appln. No. PCT/US2022/052654, mailed on Jan. 22, 2024, 13 pages. [cited by applicant]
Krishnan et al., “COx-free hydrogen generation via decomposition of ammonia over al, Ti and Zr-Laponite supported MoS2 catalysts,” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2020, 45(15):8568-8583, 16 pages. [cited by applicant]
Li et al., “Highly efficient Co/NC catalyst derived from ZIF-67 for hydrogen generation through ammonia decomposition,” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, Mar. 2022, 47(26):12882-12892, 11 pages. [cited by applicant]
Li et al., “Production of hydrogen by ammonia decomposition over supported Co3O4 catalysts,” Catalysis Today, Sep. 2022, 402:45-51, 7 pages. [cited by applicant]
Lucentini et al., “Ammonia decomposition over 3D-printed CeO2 structures loaded with Ni,” Applied Catalysis A: General, 2020, 591:117382, 31 pages. [cited by applicant]
Maleki et al., “Co-Ce-Al-O mesoporous catalysts for hydrogen generation via ammonia decomposition,” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2024, 51:267-275, 9 pages. [cited by applicant]
Parker et al., “Ammonia Decomposition Enhancement by Cs-Promoted Fe/Al2O3 Catalysts,” Catalysis Letters, 2020, 150(12):3369-3376, 8 pages. [cited by applicant]
Pinzón et al., “COx-free hydrogen production from ammonia at low temperature using Co/SiC catalyst: Effect of promoter,” Catalysis Today, May 2022, 390-391:34-47, 14 pages. [cited by applicant]
Su et al., “Fe-based catalyst derived from MgFe-LDH: Very efficient yet simply obtainable for hydrogen production via ammonia decomposition,” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2021, 46(61):31122-31132, 11 pages. [cited by applicant]
Zhang et al., “Techno-economic comparison of green ammonia production processes” Applied Energy, Feb. 2020, 259:114135, 12 pages. [cited by applicant]
SAIP Examination Report in SAIP Appln. No. 123450142, mailed on Sep. 22, 2025, 9 pages, with English Translation. [cited by applicant]