IP Library Granted Patent US 12,442,697
Granted Patent B2
US 12,442,697 · App. 18/161,638 · Granted Oct 14, 2025

Sensors with deformable conductors and selective deformation

Inventor: Mark Ronay (Portland, OR)
Assignee: Liquid Wire Inc.
G01L1/2212H01B1/02H01B1/16H01Q1/36H01Q1/364H01Q5/378H01Q9/065H01Q9/14H01Q9/26G01L1/2262H01Q1/38
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,442,697
App. No.
18/161,638
Granted
Oct 14, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

A sensor may include a bladder, and a deformable conductor disposed on the bladder such that deformation of the bladder causes deformation of the deformable conductor, wherein the bladder is constrained so as to enhance the deformation of the conductor in response to the deformation of the bladder. A method may include applying a stimulus to a bladder having a deformable conductor attached thereto, detecting a change in an electrical characteristic associated with the deformable conductor in response to the stimulus, and selectively constraining the bladder to amplify the change in electrical characteristic in response to the stimulus.

Claims (40)

1. A sensor, comprising:

an elastic bladder; and

a trace comprising a stretchable conductor comprising a fluid-phase material, the stretchable conductor disposed in a geometry on the elastic bladder such that deformation of the elastic bladder causes deformation of the stretchable conductor, wherein the deformation of the stretchable conductor causes a change in an electrical characteristic of the stretchable conductor; and

wherein the elastic bladder is constrained in a first dimension such that it is able to flex in a second dimension to a degree greater than in the first dimension.

2. The sensor of claim 1 , wherein the electrical characteristic comprises at least one of a resistance, a reactance, or a resonant frequency, or combinations thereof.

3. The sensor of claim 2 , wherein the stretchable conductor is configured to generate a signal indicative of the electrical characteristic of the stretchable conductor.

4. The sensor of claim 3 , wherein the trace is communicably coupled to a processor configured to receive the signal, and wherein the processor is configured to determine a strain on the elastic bladder based, at least in part, on the signal.

5. The sensor of claim 1 , wherein the geometry is configured to provide a different change in the electrical characteristic of the stretchable conductor based on a shear force or a compression force placed on the stretchable conductor.

6. The sensor of claim 1 , wherein the elastic bladder contains a medium that biases the elastic bladder to return to a predetermined three-dimensional configuration.

7. The sensor of claim 1 , wherein:

the stretchable conductor is configured to elongate in the second dimension.

8. The sensor of claim 1 , wherein the stretchable conductor comprises a metal gel printed on a surface of the elastic bladder.

9. The sensor of claim 1 , wherein the fluid-phase material comprises a liquid metal disposed in a fluidic channel attached to the elastic bladder.

10. A system, comprising:

a sensor comprising:

an elastic bladder; and

a trace comprising a stretchable conductor comprising a fluid-phase material, the stretchable conductor disposed in a geometry on the elastic bladder such that deformation of the elastic bladder causes deformation of the stretchable conductor, wherein the deformation of the stretchable conductor causes a change in an electrical characteristic of the stretchable conductor, wherein the elastic bladder is constrained in a first dimension such that it is able to flex in a second dimension to a degree greater than in the first dimension, and wherein the stretchable conductor is configured to generate a signal indicative of the electrical characteristic of the stretchable conductor; and

a processor configured to receive the signal, and wherein the processor is configured to determine a strain on the elastic bladder based, at least in part, on the signal.

11. The system of claim 10 , wherein the electrical characteristic comprises at least one of a resistance, a reactance, or a resonant frequency, or combinations thereof.

12. The system of claim 10 , wherein the geometry is configured to provide a different change in the electrical characteristic of the stretchable conductor based on a shear force or a compression force placed on the stretchable conductor.

13. The system of claim 10 , wherein the elastic bladder contains a medium that biases the elastic bladder to return to a predetermined three-dimensional configuration.

14. The system of claim 10 , wherein:

the stretchable conductor is configured to elongate in the second dimension.

15. The system of claim 10 , wherein the stretchable conductor comprises a metal gel printed on a surface of the elastic bladder.

16. The system of claim 10 , wherein the fluid-phase material comprises a liquid metal disposed in a fluidic channel attached to the elastic bladder.

17. A method of using an elastic bladder comprising a trace formed of a stretchable conductor comprising a fluid-phase material, the stretchable conductor disposed in a geometry on the elastic bladder, wherein the trace is communicably coupled to a processor, and wherein the elastic bladder is constrained in a first dimension such that it is able to flex in a second dimension to a degree greater than in the first dimension the method comprising:

determining a first electrical characteristic of the stretchable conductor;

applying a stimulus to the elastic bladder, wherein the stimulus deforms the elastic bladder, and wherein deformation of the elastic bladder causes an elongation of the trace that causes the stretchable conductor to have a second electrical characteristic;

calculating, via the processor, a difference between the first electrical characteristic and the second electrical characteristic; and

determining, via the processor, a strain applied to the elastic bladder based on the calculated difference between the first electrical characteristic and the second electrical characteristic.

18. The method of claim 17 , further comprising:

biasing, via a medium contained within the elastic bladder, the elastic bladder such that the elastic bladder returns to a predetermined three-dimensional configuration, and wherein the elastic bladder has the first electrical characteristic in the predetermined three-dimensional configuration.

19. The method of claim 17 , wherein the electrical characteristic comprises at least one of a resistance, a reactance, or a resonant frequency, or combinations thereof.

20. The method of claim 17 , wherein the stretchable conductor comprises a metal gel printed on a surface of the elastic bladder.

21. The sensor of claim 1 , further comprising a first electrical contact and a second electrical contact disposed on the elastic bladder, wherein the trace conductively connects the first electrical contact and the second electrical contact.

22. The sensor of claim 1 , wherein the geometry comprises a plurality of turns wound around the elastic bladder.

23. The system of claim 10 , wherein the sensor further comprises a first electrical contact and a second electrical contact disposed on the elastic bladder, and wherein the trace conductively connects the first electrical contact and the second electrical contact.

24. The system of claim 10 , wherein the geometry comprises a plurality of turns wound around the elastic bladder.

25. The method of claim 17 , wherein the elastic bladder further comprises a first electrical contact and a second electrical contact disposed on the elastic bladder, wherein the trace conductively connects the first electrical contact and the second electrical contact.

26. The method of claim 17 , wherein the geometry comprises a plurality of turns wound around the elastic bladder.

Assignments (2)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded May 9, 2025
From: RONAY, MARK
To: LIQUID WIRE INC.
Reel/Frame 071073/0333 →
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Jun 23, 2024
From: LIQUID WIRE LLC
To: LIQUID WIRE INC.
Reel/Frame 067808/0307 →
Continuity (9)
Continuation 17509144 · Oct 25, 2021
Continuation 16157102 · Oct 11, 2018
Continuation In Part 15947744 · Apr 6, 2018
Continuation In Part PCTUS2017019762 · Feb 27, 2017
Provisional Application 62483307 · Apr 7, 2017
Provisional Application 62483309 · Apr 7, 2017
Provisional Application 62571753 · Oct 12, 2017
Provisional Application 62301622 · Feb 29, 2016
Related Publication 20230228634A1 · Jul 20, 2023
References Cited (122)
US 5056706A · Dolbear · 1991 [cited by examiner]
US 5198189A · Booth · 1993 [cited by examiner]
US 5391846A · Taylor · 1995 [cited by examiner]
US 5478978A · Taylor · 1995 [cited by examiner]
US 5792236A · Taylor · 1998 [cited by examiner]
US 5961144A · Desmarais · 1999 [cited by examiner]
US 6205861B1 · Lee · 2001 [cited by examiner]
US 6447448B1 · Ishikawa · 2002 [cited by examiner]
US 6781284B1 · Pelrine · 2004 [cited by examiner]
US 6812624B1 · Pei · 2004 [cited by examiner]
US 7509835B2 · Beck · 2009 [cited by examiner]
US 7703333B2 · Hayakawa · 2010 [cited by examiner]
US 7854173B2 · Cheng · 2010 [cited by examiner]
US 7896069B2 · Dria · 2011 [cited by examiner]
US 8069735B1 · Egorov · 2011 [cited by examiner]
US 8149211B2 · Hayakawa · 2012 [cited by examiner]
US 8553334B2 · Lambert et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8680876B2 · Kadono · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 8886334B2 · Ghaffari · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 8931351B2 · Muramatsu · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 9063627B2 · Yairi · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 9281153B1 · Wedding · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 9422150B2 · Okamoto · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 9581629B2 · Zhu · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 9622680B2 · Ghaffari · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 9671297B2 · Sibbett · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 9710060B2 · McMillen · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 9753568B2 · McMillen · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 9757050B2 · Ghaffari · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 9816799B2 · Keller · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 9820055B2 · Babayoff · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 9841331B2 · Wood · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 9863796B2 · Sheverev · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 9901268B2 · Hughes · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 10151649B2 · Lewis · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 10215600B2 · Sheverev · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 10275069B2 · Smith · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 10282011B2 · McMillen · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 10461166B2 · Nijhuis et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10527507B2 · Wood · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 10555609B2 · Park · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 10617809B2 · Weaver · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 10641666B2 · Kim · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 10672530B2 · Ronay · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 10716884B2 · Weaver · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 11156509B2 · Ronay · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 11222735B2 · Ronay · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 11467669B2 · Liu · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 11585705B2 · Ronay · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 11619554B2 · Ronay · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 20070238282A1 · Furman · 2007 [cited by examiner]
US 20080066564A1 · Hayakawa · 2008 [cited by examiner]
US 20090120696A1 · Hayakawa · 2009 [cited by examiner]
US 20100132476A1 · Cheng · 2010 [cited by examiner]
US 20110006787A1 · Kadono · 2011 [cited by examiner]
US 20140012160A1 · Ghaffari · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 20140012242A1 · Lee · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 20140048749A1 · Lockett · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 20140238153A1 · Wood · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 20150000418A1 · Bach · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 20150270089A1 · Ghanea-Hercock · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 20160037625A1 · Huitema · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 20160049227A1 · Bottiglio · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 20160317992A1 · Thuo · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 20170038881A1 · McMillen · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20170176167A1 · Keller · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20170188942A1 · Ghaffari · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20180103899A1 · Cahan · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20180247727A1 · Ronay · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180315518A1 · Ronay · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20190056277A1 · Ronay · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20190092955A1 · Tabor · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20190255240A1 · Weaver · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20190307504A1 · Shen · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20190336666A1 · Weaver · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20190368952A1 · Li · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20200365293A1 · Ronay · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20220155162A1 · Ronay · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20220285043A1 · Ronay · 2022 [cited by applicant]
DE 2652506A1 · 1978 [cited by applicant]
DE 19916322A1 · 2000 [cited by applicant]
EP 0532215A2 · 1993 [cited by applicant]
EP 2058081A2 · 2009 [cited by applicant]
EP 2594987A2 · 2013 [cited by applicant]
EP 3424053A1 · 2019 [cited by applicant]
EP 3424053B1 · 2021 [cited by applicant]
JP S4841911A · 1973 [cited by applicant]
JP S63225103A · 1988 [cited by applicant]
JP 2011034708A · 2011 [cited by applicant]
JP 2014528079A · 2014 [cited by applicant]
JP 2019516208A · 2019 [cited by applicant]
WO 2015076751A1 · 2015 [cited by applicant]
WO 2017019762A1 · 2017 [cited by applicant]
WO 2017151523A1 · 2017 [cited by applicant]
WO 2020247697A1 · 2020 [cited by applicant]
Borin et al., Viscosity of liquid metal suspensions—experimental approaches and open issues, European Physical Journal Special Topics (Mar. 16, 2013), 220: 101-110. [cited by applicant]
Liu et al., Characterization of Nontoxic Liquid-Metal Alloy Galinstan for Applications in Microdevices, Journal of Microelectromechanical Systems (Apr. 2012), 21(2):443-450. [cited by applicant]
Dickey et al., Eutectic Gallium-Indium (EGaln): A Liquid Metal Alloy for the Formation of Stable Structures in Microchannels at Room Temperature, Advanced Functional Materials (Apr. 11, 2018), 18(7): 1097-1104. [cited by applicant]
Dickey, Emerging Applications of Liquid Metals Featuring Surface Oxides, ACS Applied Materials and Interfaces (Oct. 6, 2014), 6(21):18369-18379. [cited by applicant]
Gao et al., Direct Writing of Flexible Electronics through Room Temperature Liquid Metal Ink, PLoS ONE (Sep. 19, 2012), 7(9):1-10. [cited by applicant]
Kramer et al., Effect of Microtextured Surface Topography on the Wetting Behavior of Eutectic Gallium-Indium Alloys, Langmuir (2014), 30(2):533-539. [cited by applicant]
Khondoker et al., Fabrication methods and applications of microstructured gallium based liquid metal alloys, Smart Materials and Structures (Aug. 8, 2016), 25:1-24. [cited by applicant]
Entesari et al., Fluidics in Microwave Components, IEEE Microwave Magazine (Jun. 2016), 17(6):50-75. [cited by applicant]
Gao et al., Gallium-based thermal interface material with high compliance and wettability, Applied Physics A (2012), 107:701-708. [cited by applicant]
Hemmati et al., Rheological behavior of silver nanowire conductive inks during screen printing, Journal of Nanoparticle Research (Aug. 10, 2016), 18(429):1-11. [cited by applicant]
He et al., Inorganic Materials and Assembly Techniques for Flexible and Stretchable Electronics, Proceedings of the IEEE (Apr. 2015), 103(4): 619-632. [cited by applicant]
Jeyakumar et al., Rheology of liquid metals and alloys, Journal of Non-Newtonian Fluid Mechanics (Apr. 28, 2011), 166:831-838. [cited by applicant]
Koke et al., Flow behaviour of semi-solid metal alloys, Journal of Non-Newtonian Fluid Mechanics (Apr. 1, 2003), 112:141-160. [cited by applicant]
Tabatabai et al., Liquid-Phase Gallium—Indium Alloy Electronics with Microcontact Printing, American Chemical Society, Langmuir (2013), 29:6194-6200. [cited by applicant]
Pastoriza-Gallego et al., Rheological non-Newtonian behaviour of ethylene glycol-bases Fe2O3 nanofluids, Nanoscale Research Letters (2011), 6(560):1-7. [cited by applicant]
Zheng et al., Personal electronics printing via tapping mode composite liquid metal ink delivery and adhesion mechanism, Scientific Reports (Apr. 4, 2014), 4(4588):1-8. [cited by applicant]
Favini et al., Sensing performance of electrically conductive fabrics and suspension lines for parachute systems, Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures (2012), 23(17) 1969-1986. [cited by applicant]
Mengüc et al., Soft Wearable Motion Sensing Suit for Lower Limb Biomechanics Measurements, IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) (2013), p. 5289-5296. [cited by applicant]
Tekscan Force Sensors for Design, Machine Design Custom Media, p. 1-9. [cited by applicant]
International Search Report and Written Opinion received for International PCT Application No. PCT/US2020/036215, dated Sep. 8, 2020. [cited by applicant]
Extended European Search Report for European Application No. 17760557.3, dated Jul. 19, 2019. [cited by applicant]
Extended European Search Report for European Application No. 21196700.5, dated Feb. 2, 2022. [cited by applicant]
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International PCT Application No. PCT/US2017/019762, dated Sep. 13, 2018. [cited by applicant]
International Search Report and Written Opinion received for International PCT Application No. PCT/US2017/019762, dated May 29, 2017. [cited by applicant]
“Mechanical Moduli of Viscoelastic Materials”, Polymer Properties Database, 2021. [cited by applicant]
“Practical Strain Gage Measurements”, Agilent Technologies, Agilent Technologies Inc., 1999, E-94-E130. [cited by applicant]
Hoshyargar et al., “Generation of Catalytically Active Materials frorn a Liquid Metal Precursor”, Chem Commun., Jul. 29, 2015, 51:14026-14029. [cited by applicant]