IP Library Granted Patent US 11,948,270
Granted Patent B2
US 11,948,270 · App. 18/240,910 · Granted Apr 2, 2024

Systems, devices, and methods for providing feedback on and improving the accuracy of super-resolution imaging

Inventors: Matthew C. Putman (Brooklyn, NY); John B. Putman (Celebration, FL); Vadim Pinskiy (Wayne, NJ); Joseph R. Succar (Brooklyn, NY)
Assignee: Nanotronics Imaging , Inc.
G06T3/4038G06F18/2411G06F18/2413G06T3/4053G06T5/50G06V10/764G06V10/993G06V20/693
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 11,948,270
App. No.
18/240,910
Granted
Apr 2, 2024
Kind
B2
Abstract

Systems, methods, and computer-readable media for feedback on and improving the accuracy of super-resolution imaging. In some embodiments, a low resolution image of a specimen can be obtained using a low resolution objective of a microscopy inspection system. A super-resolution image of at least a portion of the specimen can be generated from the low resolution image of the specimen using a super-resolution image simulation. Subsequently, an accuracy assessment of the super-resolution image can be identified based on one or more degrees of equivalence between the super-resolution image and one or more actually scanned high resolution images of at least a portion of one or more related specimens identified using a simulated image classifier. Based on the accuracy assessment of the super-resolution image, it can be determined whether to further process the super-resolution image. The super-resolution image can be further processed if it is determined to further process the super-resolution image.

Claims (61)

1. A method, comprising:

obtaining, by a computing system, a low resolution image of a specimen using a low resolution objective of a microscopy inspection system;

detecting, by the computing system, a plurality of artifacts in the low resolution image;

determining, by the computing system, that a first artifact of the plurality of artifacts is suitable for super-resolution imaging;

determining, by the computing system, that a second artifact of the plurality of artifacts is not suitable for super-resolution imaging; and

based on the determining,

generating, by the computing system, a super-resolution image of a first portion of the specimen that includes the first artifact,

generating, by the computing system, a high resolution image of a second portion of the specimen that includes the second artifact, and

generating, by the computing system, a single coherent image of the specimen by combining the super-resolution image and the high resolution image.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein determining, by the computing system, that the first artifact of the plurality of artifacts is suitable for super-resolution imaging comprises:

cross-correlating the first artifact to known artifacts that have been assessed as suitable for super-resolution imaging.

3. The method of claim 2 , wherein cross-correlating the first artifact to the known artifacts that have been assessed as suitable for super-resolution imaging comprises:

measuring a similarity of the first artifact to each known artifact as a function of a displacement of the first artifact relative to each known artifact.

4. The method of claim 2 , wherein the known artifacts that have been assessed as suitable for super-resolution imaging comprises artifacts where super-resolution images were generated and determined to be high-confidence super-resolution images.

5. The method of claim 1 , wherein determining, by the computing system, that the second artifact of the plurality of artifacts is not suitable for super-resolution imaging comprises:

cross-correlating the second artifact to known artifacts that have been assessed as not being suitable for super-resolution imaging.

6. The method of claim 5 , wherein cross-correlating the second artifact to the known artifacts that have been assessed as not being suitable for super-resolution imaging comprises:

measuring a similarity of the second artifact to each known artifact as a function of a displacement of the second artifact relative to each known artifact.

7. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

determining, by the computing system, a total number of artifacts on the specimen based on the single coherent image.

8. A non-transitory computer readable medium comprising one or more sequences of instructions, which, when executed by one or more processors, causes a computing system to perform operations comprising:

obtaining, by the computing system, a low resolution image of a specimen using a low resolution objective of a microscopy inspection system;

detecting, by the computing system, a plurality of artifacts in the low resolution image;

determining, by the computing system, that a first artifact of the plurality of artifacts is suitable for super-resolution imaging;

determining, by the computing system, that a second artifact of the plurality of artifacts is not suitable for super-resolution imaging; and

based on the determining,

generating, by the computing system, a super-resolution image of a first portion of the specimen that includes the first artifact,

generating, by the computing system, a high resolution image of a second portion of the specimen that includes the second artifact, and

generating, by the computing system, a single coherent image of the specimen by combining the super-resolution image and the high resolution image.

9. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 8 , wherein determining, by the computing system, that the first artifact of the plurality of artifacts is suitable for super-resolution imaging comprises:

cross-correlating the first artifact to known artifacts that have been assessed as suitable for super-resolution imaging.

10. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 9 , wherein cross-correlating the first artifact to the known artifacts that have been assessed as suitable for super-resolution imaging comprises:

measuring a similarity of the first artifact to each known artifact as a function of a displacement of the first artifact relative to each known artifact.

11. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 9 , wherein the known artifacts that have been assessed as suitable for super-resolution imaging comprises artifacts where super-resolution images were generated and determined to be high-confidence super-resolution images.

12. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 8 , wherein determining, by the computing system, that the second artifact of the plurality of artifacts is not suitable for super-resolution imaging comprises:

cross-correlating the second artifact to known artifacts that have been assessed as not being suitable for super-resolution imaging.

13. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 12 , wherein cross-correlating the second artifact to the known artifacts that have been assessed as not being suitable for super-resolution imaging comprises:

measuring a similarity of the second artifact to each known artifact as a function of a displacement of the second artifact relative to each known artifact.

14. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 8 , further comprising:

determining, by the computing system, a total number of artifacts on the specimen based on the single coherent image.

15. A system comprising:

a processor; and

a memory having programming instructions stored thereon, which when executed by the processor, causes the system to perform operations comprising:

obtaining a low resolution image of a specimen using a low resolution objective of a microscopy inspection system;

detecting a plurality of artifacts in the low resolution image;

determining that a first artifact of the plurality of artifacts is suitable for super-resolution imaging;

determining that a second artifact of the plurality of artifacts is not suitable for super-resolution imaging; and

based on the determining,

generating a super-resolution image of a first portion of the specimen that includes the first artifact,

generating a high resolution image of a second portion of the specimen that includes the second artifact, and

generating a single coherent image of the specimen by combining the super-resolution image and the high resolution image.

16. The system of claim 15 , wherein determining that the first artifact of the plurality of artifacts is suitable for super-resolution imaging comprises:

cross-correlating the first artifact to known artifacts that have been assessed as suitable for super-resolution imaging.

17. The system of claim 16 , wherein cross-correlating the first artifact to the known artifacts that have been assessed as suitable for super-resolution imaging comprises:

measuring a similarity of the first artifact to each known artifact as a function of a displacement of the first artifact relative to each known artifact.

18. The system of claim 15 , wherein determining that the second artifact of the plurality of artifacts is not suitable for super-resolution imaging comprises:

cross-correlating the second artifact to known artifacts that have been assessed as not being suitable for super-resolution imaging.

19. The system of claim 18 , wherein cross-correlating the second artifact to the known artifacts that have been assessed as not being suitable for super-resolution imaging comprises:

measuring a similarity of the second artifact to each known artifact as a function of a displacement of the second artifact relative to each known artifact.

20. The system of claim 15 , wherein the operations further comprise:

determining a total number of artifacts on the specimen based on the single coherent image.

Assignments (2)
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Nov 30, 2023
From: NANOTRONICS IMAGING, INC.; NANOTRONICS HEALTH LLC; CUBEFABS INC.
To: ORBIMED ROYALTY & CREDIT OPPORTUNITIES IV, LP
Reel/Frame 065726/0001 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Aug 31, 2023
From: PUTMAN, MATTHEW C.; PUTMAN, JOHN B.; PINSKIY, VADIM; SUCCAR, JOSEPH R.
To: NANOTRONICS IMAGING, INC.
Reel/Frame 064767/0038 →
Continuity (6)
Continuation 17222425 · Apr 5, 2021
Continuation 17029703 · Sep 23, 2020
Continuation 16576732 · Sep 19, 2019
Continuation 16233258 · Dec 27, 2018
Continuation 16027056 · Jul 3, 2018
Related Publication 20230419444A1 · Dec 28, 2023