IP Library Granted Patent US 12,644,043
Granted Patent B2
US 12,644,043 · App. 18/615,122 · Granted Jun 2, 2026

Compositions and methods for pressure protection

Inventors: Samiha Said Elsayed Morsy (Houston, TX); Nabijan Nizamidin (Houston, TX); Taimur Malik (Houston, TX); Mohsen S. Tagavifar (Houston, TX)
Assignee: CHEVRON U.S.A. INC.
C09K8/94C09K8/584C09K8/588C09K8/594C09K8/602C09K8/665C09K8/74E21B33/138E21B43/162E21B43/166E21B43/17E21B43/255E21B43/26E21B43/267E21B2200/20
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,644,043
App. No.
18/615,122
Granted
Jun 2, 2026
Kind
B2
Abstract

Disclosed are compositions and methods for the pressure protection of existing wells during infill drilling operations.

Claims (29)

1 . A method for pressure protection of a first wellbore in proximity to a second wellbore, the method comprising:

injecting an aqueous pressure protection composition into the first wellbore in fluid communication with an unconventional subterranean formation prior to, during, or prior to and during fracturing of the second wellbore in fluid communication with the unconventional subterranean formation;

wherein a region of an unconventional subterranean formation in proximity to the first wellbore is previously fractured; and

wherein the aqueous protection composition in the first wellbore biases fracture formation away from the previously fractured region in proximity to the first wellbore and towards virgin rock proximate to the second wellbore;

wherein the first wellbore has an existing reservoir pressure that is less than original reservoir pressure;

wherein the aqueous pressure protection solution is injected at a pressure and flowrate effective to increase the first wellbore pressure without fracturing the first wellbore; and

wherein the aqueous pressure protection solution comprises a surfactant package comprising a first surfactant.

2 . The method of claim 1 , wherein a region of an unconventional subterranean formation in fluid communication with the first wellbore is naturally fractured, has been previously fractured one or more times, or a combination thereof.

3 . The method of any of claim 1 , wherein the fracturing of the second wellbore comprises fracturing a region of an unconventional subterranean formation in fluid communication with the second wellbore or refracturing a region of an unconventional subterranean formation in fluid communication with the second wellbore.

4 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the aqueous pressure protection composition further comprises one or more secondary surfactants.

5 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the first wellbore was under production for at least three months prior to injection of the aqueous pressure protection composition.

6 . The method of claim 1 , wherein at least 10,000 barrels of hydrocarbon were produced from the first wellbore prior to injection of the aqueous pressure protection composition.

7 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the first wellbore pressure is from 20% to 70% of the original reservoir pressure.

8 . The method of claim 1 , wherein injecting the aqueous pressure protection composition comprises injecting the aqueous pressure protection composition at a pressure and flowrate effective to increase the first wellbore pressure by at least 30%, to increase the first wellbore pressure to from greater than the original reservoir pressure to 150% of the original reservoir pressure, to increase the first wellbore pressure to within 15% of original reservoir fracture pressure, or any combination thereof.

9 . The method of claim 1 , wherein injecting an aqueous pressure protection composition into the first wellbore comprises injecting the aqueous pressure protection composition at least 1 day before fracturing.

10 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the method further comprises injecting a fracturing fluid into the unconventional subterranean fomlation via the second wellbore at a sufficient pressure to create or extend at least one fracture in a rock matrix of the unconventional subterranean formation in a region proximate to the second wellbore.

11 . The method of claim 10 , wherein the method further comprises producing a hydrocarbon from the first wellbore during, after, or during and after the injection of the fracturing fluid into the unconventional subterranean formation via the second wellbore.

12 . The method of claim 1 , wherein injection of the aqueous pressure protection composition into the first wellbore results in increased hydrocarbon recovery from the first wellbore as compared to an expected level of hydrocarbon recovery projected from a decline curve fit to production history of the first wellbore.

13 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the injection of the aqueous pressure protection composition in the first wellbore impacts a direction, a geometry, or any combination thereof of the at least one fracture created or extended in the region during injection of the fracturing fluid into the unconventional subterranean formation via the second wellbore.

14 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the injection of the aqueous pressure protection composition in the first wellbore reduces entry of fluid, debris, or any combination thereof into the first wellbore during injection of the fracturing fluid into the unconventional subterranean formation via the second wellbore.

15 . The method of claim 1 , wherein injection of the aqueous pressure protection composition in the first wellbore increases a relative permeability in a region proximate to the first wellbore.

16 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the method further comprises modeling the first wellbore to determine a volume of the aqueous pressure protection composition into the unconventional subterranean formation via the first wellbore.

17 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the method further results in increased hydrocarbon recovery from the first wellbore, the second wellbore, or any combination thereof.

18 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the aqueous pressure protection composition comprises an aqueous solution comprising an acid, an alkali agent, a co-solvent, a chelating agent, a clay swelling inhibitor, a viscosity-modifying polymer, or any combination thereof.

19 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the primary surfactant comprises an anionic surfactant comprising a hydrophobic tail comprising from 6 to 60 carbon atoms.

20 . The method of claim 1 , wherein injection of the aqueous pressure protection composition into the first wellbore comprises:

injecting a first aqueous pressure protection composition into the first wellbore, then injecting a second aqueous pressure protection composition into the first wellbore; injecting an aqueous pressure protection composition into the first wellbore, then injecting a gas into the first wellbore,

injecting an aqueous pressure protection composition into the first wellbore, then injecting a hydrocarbon solvent such as LPG into the first wellbore; or

any combination thereof.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Sep 17, 2024
From: MORSY, SAMIHA SAID ELSAYED; NIZAMIDIN, NABIJAN; MALIK, TAIMUR; TAGAVIFAR, MOHSEN S.
To: CHEVRON U.S.A. INC.
Reel/Frame 068605/0559 →
Continuity (8)
Continuation 17891745 · Aug 19, 2022
Continuation 16922997 · Jul 7, 2020
Provisional Application 62873904 · Jul 13, 2019
Provisional Application 62873901 · Jul 13, 2019
Provisional Application 62873902 · Jul 13, 2019
Provisional Application 62871164 · Jul 7, 2019
Provisional Application 62871165 · Jul 7, 2019
Related Publication 20250122421A1 · Apr 17, 2025
References Cited (82)
US 3811504A · Haferkamp et al. · 1974 [cited by applicant]
US 3811505A · Flournoy et al. · 1974 [cited by applicant]
US 3811507A · Flournoy et al. · 1974 [cited by applicant]
US 3890239A · Dycus et al. · 1975 [cited by applicant]
US 4463806A · Hurd · 1984 [cited by applicant]
US 5488148A · Weerasooriya et al. · 1996 [cited by applicant]
US 6022843A · Shanks et al. · 2000 [cited by applicant]
US 6225267B1 · Eckard et al. · 2001 [cited by applicant]
US 7629299B2 · Berger et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 7677317B2 · Wilson · 2010 [cited by examiner]
US 7718582B2 · Le et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 7770641B2 · Dwarakanath et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 8211837B2 · Weerasooriya et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 9422469B2 · Dwarakanath et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9605198B2 · Shong et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9617464B2 · Dwarakanath et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9752071B2 · Dwarakanath et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9976072B2 · Shong et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10011757B2 · Dwarakanath et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10266750B2 · Oghena et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10337303B2 · Dwarakanath et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20050199395A1 · Berger et al. · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 20060185845A1 · Shpakoff et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20060189486A1 · Shpakoff et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20070191633A1 · Berger et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20080164021A1 · Dykstra · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20080274918A1 · Quintero et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20090112014A1 · Campbell et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20090270281A1 · Steinbrenner et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20100004843A1 · Yu et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20100292110A1 · Pope et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20100319920A1 · Pope et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20110046024A1 · Campbell et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110048721A1 · Pope et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110059872A1 · Weerasooriya et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110059873A1 · Weerasooriya et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110071057A1 · Weerasooriya et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110100402A1 · Soane et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110190174A1 · Weerasooriya et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110190175A1 · Steinbrenner et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110201531A1 · Sharma et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20120000708A1 · van Zanten et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20130277050A1 · Cherian et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20140096967A1 · Sharma et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140288909A1 · Prestwood et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20150211347A1 · Snider · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 20160090523A1 · Ravi et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160280983A1 · Zamora et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160281494A1 · Shirdel et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20170198202A1 · Shong et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170241251A1 · Rodrigues · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20190100689A1 · Zelenev et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190264552A1 · Martysevich et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20200024937A1 · Parkhonyuk et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20210002544A1 · Hahn et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210002991A1 · Morsy et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
WO 2008079855 · 2008 [cited by applicant]
WO 2011094442 · 2011 [cited by applicant]
WO 2012027757 · 2012 [cited by applicant]
WO 2019028083 · 2019 [cited by applicant]
WO 2019028085 · 2019 [cited by applicant]
WO 2019028086 · 2019 [cited by applicant]
CSUG/SPE 136757 Vincent, M.C., “Restimulation of Unconventional Reservoirs: When are Refracs Beneficial?” Paper presented at the Canadian Unconventional Resources and International Petroleum Conference, Calgary, Alberta… [cited by applicant]
SPE 184851, Bommer, Peter, et al., “Re-Designing from Scratch and Defending Offset Wells: Case Study of a Six-Well Bakken Zipper Project, McKenzie County, ND.” SPE Hydraulic Fracturing Technology Conference and Exhibiti… [cited by applicant]
SPE-189860, Bommer, Peter A., and Marcus A. Bayne., “Active Well Defense in the Bakken: Case Study of a Ten-Well Frac Defense Project, McKenzie County, ND.” Spe Hydraulic Fracturing Technology Conference and Exhibition.… [cited by applicant]
SPE-191712-MS. Whitfield, Tom, M. Hunter Watkins, and L. James Dickinson. “Pre-loads: successful mitigation of damaging frac hits in the Eagle Ford.” SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition. OnePetro, 2018. SPE-1… [cited by applicant]
URTeC: 2902707, Nieto, et al., “An Integrated Approach to Optimizing Completions and Protecting Parent Wells in the Montney Formation, N.E.B.C”, 2018, This paper was prepared for presentation at the Unconventional Resou… [cited by applicant]
URTeC: 2881265, Gala, et al., “Modeling of Fluid Injection in Depleted Parent Wells to Minimize Damage due to Frac-Hits”, This paper was prepared for presentation at the Unconventional Resources Technology Conference he… [cited by applicant]
SPE-1117-0035, Jacobs, Trent. “Frac hits reveal well spacing may be too tight, completion volumes too large.” Journal of Petroleum Technology 69.11 (2017): 35-38. [cited by applicant]
SPE-1218-0034, Jacobs, Trent. “Fighting Water With Water: How Engineers are Turning the Tides on Frac Hits.” Journal of Petroleum Technology 70.12 (2018): 34-38. [cited by applicant]
URTeC: 2662893 Sun, Hao, et al. “Understanding the‘Frac-Hits’ Impact on a Midland Basin Tight-Oil Well Production.” SPE/AAPG/SEG Unconventional Resources Technology Conference. Unconventional Resources Technology Confer… [cited by applicant]
URTeC: 2690466 Ajisafe, Foluke, et al. “Understanding Impact of Well Spacing and Interference on Production Performance in Unconventional Reservoirs, Permian Basin.” Unconventional Resources Technology Conference, Austi… [cited by applicant]
URTeC: 2691962, Cao, Richard, et al. “Well interference and optimum well spacing for Wolfcamp development at Permian Basin.” Unconventional Resources Technology Conference, Austin, Texas, Jul. 24-26, 2017. Society of Ex… [cited by applicant]
URTeC: 2695433 Rafiee, Mehdi, and Tarun Grover. “Well spacing optimization in Eagle Ford shale: an operator's experience.” Unconventional Resources Technology Conference, Austin, Texas, Jul. 24-26, 2017. Society of Expl… [cited by applicant]
Zhang, Jincai, and Shang-Xian Yin. “Fracture gradient prediction: an overview and an improved method.” Petroleum Science 14.4 (2017): 720-730. [cited by applicant]
Minifrac Tests, 2012, http://www.fekete.com/SAN/TheoryAndEquations/WellTestTheoryEquations/Minifrac.htm). [cited by applicant]
SPE 129766, Barnes, Julian Richard, et al. “Application of internal olefin sulfonates and other surfactants to EOR. Part 1: Structure-Performance relationships for selection at different reservoir conditions.” SPE impro… [cited by applicant]
URTeC: 2902400 Swanson, Cory, et al. “Post-Frac-Hit Mitigation and Well Remediation of Woodford Horizontal Wells With Solvent/Surfactant Chemistry Blend.” Unconventional Resources Technology Conference, Houston, Texas, … [cited by applicant]
SPE-197097-MS, Xu, Liang, James Ogle, and Todd Collier. “Fracture Hit Mitigation Through Surfactant-Based Treatment Fluids in Parent Wells.” SPE Liquids-Rich Basins Conference-North America. Society of Petroleum Enginee… [cited by applicant]
Morsy, Samiha. “Experimental and simulation study of improved oil recovery in shale formations.” Texas Tech University, May 2014. [cited by applicant]
Non-final Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 16/922,993 issued on Apr. 13, 2021. [cited by applicant]
Non-final Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 16/923,000 issued on Apr. 13, 2021. [cited by applicant]