IP Library Granted Patent US 12,197,136
Granted Patent B2
US 12,197,136 · App. 18/229,984 · Granted Jan 14, 2025

Method of determining control parameters of a device manufacturing process

Inventors: Wim Tjibbo Tel (Helmond, NL); Mark John Maslow (Eindhoven, NL); Koenraad Van Ingen Schenau (Veldhoven, NL); Patrick Warnaar (Tilburg, NL); Abraham Slachter (Waalre, NL); Roy Anunciado (Eindhoven, NL); Simon Hendrik Celine Van Gorp (Oud-Turnhout, BE); Frank Staals (Eindhoven, NL); Marinus Jochemsen (Veldhoven, NL)
Assignee: ASML NETHERLANDS B.V.
G03F7/70625G06F30/20G06T7/0004H01L22/20G03F1/00G06F30/33G06F30/398G06F2119/18G21K5/00H01L21/00
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,197,136
App. No.
18/229,984
Granted
Jan 14, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method including: obtaining an image of at least part of a substrate, wherein the image includes at least one feature manufactured on the substrate by a manufacturing process including a lithographic process and one or more further processes; determining one or more image-related metrics in dependence on a contour determined from the image, wherein one of the one or more image-related metrics is an edge placement error, EPE, of the at least one feature; and determining one or more control parameters of the lithographic process and/or the one or more further processes in dependence on the edge placement error, wherein at least one control parameter is determined so as to minimize the edge placement error of the at least one feature.

Claims (41)

1. A method comprising:

obtaining an image of at least part of a substrate, wherein the image comprises at least one feature manufactured on the substrate by a manufacturing process comprising a lithographic process and one or more further processes;

determining, by a hardware computer system, one or more image-related metrics in dependence on a contour determined from the image, wherein one of the one or more image-related metrics is an edge placement error, EPE, of the at least one feature; and

determining one or more control parameters of the lithographic process and/or the one or more further processes, in dependence on the edge placement error, wherein at least one control parameter of the one or more control parameters is determined so as to minimize the edge placement error of the at least one feature.

2. The method according to claim 1 , further comprising controlling a lithographic apparatus used in the lithographic process in dependence on the determined one or more control parameters.

3. The method according to claim 1 , further comprising controlling an etching apparatus used in the one or more further processes in dependence on the determined one or more control parameters.

4. The method according to claim 1 , wherein at least one of the one or more image-related metrics is determined in dependence on a comparison of the contour and a target contour.

5. The method according to claim 1 , further comprising:

determining a plurality of segments of the contour of a feature of the at least one feature;

determining a respective weight for each of the plurality of segments;

determining, for each of the segments, an image-related metric of the segment; and

determining an image-related metric of the feature of the at least one feature in dependence on the weight and image-related metric of each of the segments.

6. The method according to claim 5 , wherein the weight of each segment is dependent on a tolerance value of the image-related metric of the segment.

7. The method according to claim 5 , wherein the one or more control parameters are determined in dependence on a sensitivity of each of the segments.

8. The method according to claim 1 , wherein a plurality of control parameters is determined and at least two of the control parameters are co-determined.

9. The method according to claim 8 , wherein the co-determination of at least two of the control parameters is dependent on:

the combined effect of the at least two control parameters; and/or

the interdependence of the at the least two control parameters.

10. The method according to claim 8 , wherein the at least two co-determined control parameters are focus and dose.

11. The method according to claim 8 , wherein the co-determined control parameters are determined in dependence on CD variation on a small spatial scale or both CD variation on a small spatial scale and CD variation on a large spatial scale.

12. The method according to claim 1 , further comprising:

obtaining a plurality of images of the substrate; and

determining one or more image-related metrics of features in each image.

13. The method according to claim 12 , wherein the one or more image-related metrics include one or more selected from: sizes of block patterns in the images, differences in sizes of block patterns in the images, differences in pitches in gratings in the images, an overall shift of a block layer with respect to a grating layer, or a shift between two LELE layers.

14. The method according to claim 1 , wherein determining the one or more image-related metrics comprises:

determining a contour shape of a structure comprised by the at least one feature in the image;

comparing the determined contour shape with one or more reference contour shapes; and

generating a model of the comparison result.

15. The method according to claim 14 , where the model comprises parameters that represent translation, magnification and/or rotation differences between the determined contour shape and the one or more reference contour shapes.

16. A system for manufacturing devices on a substrate, wherein the system is configured to perform the method of claim 1 .

17. A computer program product comprising a non-transitory computer-readable medium having machine-readable instructions therein, the instructions, when executed by a computer system, configured to cause the computer system to at least:

obtain an image of at least part of a substrate, wherein the image comprises at least one feature manufactured on the substrate by a manufacturing process comprising a lithographic process and one or more further processes;

determine one or more image-related metrics in dependence on a contour determined from the image, wherein one of the one or more image-related metrics is an edge placement error, EPE, of the at least one feature; and

determine one or more control parameters of the lithographic process and/or the one or more further processes, in dependence on the edge placement error, wherein at least one control parameter of the one or more control parameters is determined so as to minimize the edge placement error of the at least one feature.

18. The computer program product of claim 17 , wherein the instructions are further configured to cause the computer system to control a lithographic apparatus used in the lithographic process in dependence on the determined one or more control parameters or control an etching apparatus used in the one or more further processes in dependence on the determined one or more control parameters.

19. The computer program product of claim 17 , wherein at least one of the one or more image-related metrics is determined in dependence on a comparison of the contour and a target contour.

20. The computer program product of claim 17 , wherein the instructions are further configured to cause the computer system to:

determine a plurality of segments of the contour of a feature of the at least one feature;

determine a respective weight for each of the plurality of segments;

determine, for each of the segments, an image-related metric of the segment; and

determine an image-related metric of the feature of the at least one feature in dependence on the weight and image-related metric of each of the segments.

Assignments (3)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Aug 24, 2023
From: TEL, WIM TJIBBO; MASLOW, MARK JOHN; VAN INGEN SCHENAU, KOENRAAD; WARNAAR, PATRICK; SLACHTER, ABRAHAM
To: ASML NETHERLANDS B.V.
Reel/Frame 064699/0615 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Aug 24, 2023
From: TEL, WIM TJIBBO; MASLOW, MARK JOHN; VAN INGEN SCHENAU, KOENRAAD; WARNAAR, PATRICK; SLACHTER, ABRAHAM
To: ASML NETHERLANDS B.V.
Reel/Frame 064699/0630 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Aug 24, 2023
From: TEL, WIM TJIBBO; MASLOW, MARK JOHN; SLACHTER, ABRAHAM; VAN INGEN SCHENAU, KOENRAAD; ANUNCIADO, ROY; VAN GORP, SIMON HENDRIK CELINE; WARNAAR, PATRICK; STAALS, FRANK; JOCHEMSEN, MARINUS
To: ASML NETHERLANDS B.V.
Reel/Frame 064699/0642 →
Priority Claims (3)
EP 17193430 · Sep 27, 2017 · regional
EP 17200255 · Nov 7, 2017 · regional
EP 18155070 · Feb 5, 2018 · regional
Continuity (3)
Continuation 17973221 · Oct 25, 2022
Continuation 16644206
Related Publication 20240012337A1 · Jan 11, 2024
References Cited (107)
US 5229872A · Mumola · 1993 [cited by applicant]
US 5296891A · Vogt et al. · 1994 [cited by applicant]
US 5493403A · Nishi · 1996 [cited by examiner]
US 5523193A · Nelson · 1996 [cited by applicant]
US 5969441A · Loopstra et al. · 1999 [cited by applicant]
US 6046792A · Van Der Werf et al. · 2000 [cited by applicant]
US 6978438B1 · Capodieci · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 7209216B2 · De Jager · 2007 [cited by examiner]
US 7568179B1 · Kroyan et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 7587704B2 · Ye et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 8490034B1 · Torunoglu · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8982324B2 · Hansen · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 10394131B2 · Hsu · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10545411B2 · Hansen · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 11513442B2 · Tel · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20040221255A1 · Pierrat et al. · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 20050076322A1 · Ye et al. · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 20050084766A1 · Sandstrom · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 20050138596A1 · Medvedeva · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 20060215142A1 · De Jager et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20070196747A1 · Granik et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20070198964A1 · Al-Imam · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20070201043A1 · Raymond · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20080309897A1 · Wong et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20090039263A1 · Matsuoka et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20090157360A1 · Ye et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20100005635A1 · Liverman et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20100010784A1 · Cao et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20100099033A1 · Cohen · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20100315614A1 · Hansen · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20110107280A1 · Liu · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110139027A1 · Hansen · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110184546A1 · Fan et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110202893A1 · Kusnadi et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110211748A1 · Xiao et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110230999A1 · Chen et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20120254813A1 · Chen et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20130174102A1 · Leu · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130179847A1 · Hansen · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20140109026A1 · Wang · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20150106771A1 · Chang · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20160282105A1 · Pandev · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160334715A1 · Smilde et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20170004242A1 · Chang et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170010538A1 · Hansen · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170082927A1 · Hsu et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170242333A1 · Li · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170314912A1 · Krishnan · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170315044A1 · Krishnan · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20180011407A1 · Hsu · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180252514A1 · Pandev · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180314148A1 · Tetiker · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180314163A1 · Liu · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180350699A1 · Gellineau · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180356734A1 · Conley et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20190137881A1 · Ausschnitt · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190369480A1 · Hansen · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20200189192A1 · Cao et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200193080A1 · Vellanki · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200356012A1 · Mos · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20210232748A1 · Hsu · 2021 [cited by applicant]
CN 1906478 · 2007 [cited by applicant]
CN 105992975 · 2016 [cited by applicant]
CN 106164775 · 2016 [cited by applicant]
JP 2002311562 · 2002 [cited by applicant]
JP 2006058452 · 2006 [cited by applicant]
JP 2008310333 · 2008 [cited by applicant]
JP 2009508161 · 2009 [cited by applicant]
JP 2012112974 · 2012 [cited by applicant]
JP 2012220955 · 2012 [cited by applicant]
JP 2013148840 · 2013 [cited by applicant]
JP 2014001927 · 2014 [cited by applicant]
JP 2014049573 · 2014 [cited by applicant]
JP 2014081220 · 2014 [cited by applicant]
JP 2014130077 · 2014 [cited by applicant]
JP 2017032733 · 2017 [cited by applicant]
JP 2017505462 · 2017 [cited by applicant]
KR 20160131110 · 2016 [cited by applicant]
TW 201207893 · 2012 [cited by applicant]
TW 201543172 · 2015 [cited by applicant]
TW 201708942 · 2017 [cited by applicant]
TW 201727521 · 2017 [cited by applicant]
TW 201732419 · 2017 [cited by applicant]
WO 2015121127 · 2015 [cited by applicant]
WO 2016128392 · 2016 [cited by applicant]
WO 2017144379 · 2017 [cited by applicant]
International Search Report and Written Opinion issued in corresponding PCT Patent Application No. PCT/EP2018/072605, dated Oct. 9, 2018. [cited by applicant]
Taiwanese Office Action issued in corresponding Taiwanese Patent Application No. 107133094, dated Oct. 31, 2019. [cited by applicant]
Shinoda ,S. et al.: “Focus measurement using SEM image analysis of circuit pattern”, Proc. of SPIE, vol. 9778, Mar. 24, 2016. [cited by applicant]
Toyoda, Y. et al.: “SEM-contour Shape Analysis Based on Circuit Structure for Advanced Systematic Defect Inspection”, Proc. of SPIE, vol. 9050, Apr. 2, 2014. [cited by applicant]
Lakcher, A. et al.: “Robust 2D patterns process variability assessment using CD-SEM contour extraction offline metrology”, Proc. of SPIE, vol. 10145, Mar. 28, 2017. [cited by applicant]
Halder, S. et al.: “Design-based metrology: Beyond CD/EPE metrics to evaluate printability performance”, Proc. of SPIE, vol. 9778, Mar. 24, 2016. [cited by applicant]
Spence, C. et al: “Full-Chip Lithography Simulation and Design Analysis”, Proc. of SPIE, vol. 5751, pp. 1-14 (2005). [cited by applicant]
Cao, Y, et al.: “Optimized Hardware and Software for Fast, Full Chip Simulation”, Proc. of SPIE, vol. 5754 (2005). [cited by applicant]
Granik, Yuri: “Source Optimization for Image Fidelity and Throughput”, Journal of Microlithography, Microfabrication, Microsystems 3(4), pp. 509-522 (2004). [cited by applicant]
Socha, R. et al.: “Simultaneous Source Mask Optimization (SMO)”, Proc. of SPIE, vol. 5853 (2005). [cited by applicant]
Rosenbluth, A.E. et al.: “Optimum Mask and Source Patterns to Print a Given Shape”, Proc. of SPIE, vol. 4346 (2001). [cited by applicant]
Korean Notice of Allowance issued in corresponding Korean Patent Application No. 10-2020-7009031, dated Aug. 30, 2022. [cited by applicant]
Chinese Office Action issued in corresponding Chinese Patent Application No. 201880062857.2, dated Sep. 15, 2021. [cited by applicant]
Japanese Office Action issued in corresponding Japanese Patent Application No. 2020-517950, dated May 11, 2021. [cited by applicant]
Korean Office Action issued in corresponding Korean Patent Application No. 10-2020-7009031, dated Sep. 22, 2021. [cited by applicant]
Fuhner, “Artificial Evolution for the Optimization of Lithographic Process Conditions”, Friedrich-Alexander-Universitat Erlangen-Nurnberg, 430 pages (Sep. 24, 2013). [cited by applicant]
Office Action issued in corresponding Japanese Patent Application No. 2022-109711, dated Jun. 13, 2023. [cited by applicant]
European Search Report issued in corresponding European Patent Application No. 23171216.7, dated Jul. 27, 2023. [cited by applicant]
G. Guo et al., “Efficient source mask optimization method for reduction of computational lithography cycles and enhancement of process-window predictability”, Journal of Micro/Nanolithography, MEMS, and MOEMS, vol. 14, … [cited by applicant]
S. Shinichi et al., “Focus measurement using SEM image analysis of circuit pattern”, Proc. of SPIE, vol. 9778, pp. 1-6 (2016). [cited by applicant]
Office Action issued in corresponding Taiwanese Patent Application No. 110127093, dated Jul. 14, 2023. [cited by applicant]
Cited By (1)
US 12,699,332