IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,248,742
Granted Patent B2
US 12,248,742 · App. 17/424,164 · Granted Mar 11, 2025

Support method for metal material, prediction model generation method, metal material production method, and design support apparatus

Inventors: Kazuhiro Nakatsuji (Tokyo, JP); Osamu Yamaguchi (Tokyo, JP); Hiroyuki Takagi (Tokyo, JP)
Assignee: JFE STEEL CORPORATION
G06F30/27B22D11/16C22F1/00G06F18/214G06V10/443
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,248,742
App. No.
17/424,164
Granted
Mar 11, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

A design support method capable of accurately obtaining predicted values, while also considering production conditions of a metal material, and of reducing the time required for design is provided. The design support method uses a calculator to support design of metal material with desired characteristics and includes searching for design conditions yielding the desired characteristics using a prediction model for predicting a characteristic value of the metal material from the design conditions, the prediction model being constructed based on past performance data associating the design conditions, including chemical composition and production conditions of the metal material, with the characteristic value. The design support method also includes presenting at least the chemical composition and production conditions among the design conditions that are searched for and correspond to the desired characteristics. The design conditions are searched for so that deviation among predicted values based on different training data sets is reduced.

Claims (31)

1. A design support method carried out by a design support apparatus comprising a processor, an acquisition interface, and a display for supporting design, of a metal material that has desired characteristics, the design support method comprising:

acquiring, by the processor via the acquisition interface, constraint conditions as input information, the constraint conditions including a range of a chemical composition of the metal material and a range of production conditions of the metal material;

searching, by the processor, for design conditions that satisfy the constraint conditions and yield the desired characteristics using a prediction model for predicting a characteristic value of the metal material from the design conditions, the prediction model being constructed based on past performance data associating the design conditions, which include the chemical composition and production conditions of the metal material, with the characteristic value; and

displaying, by the processor via the display, at least the chemical composition and the production conditions among the design conditions that are searched for by the processor and correspond to the desired characteristics, wherein

the design conditions are searched for so that deviation among a plurality of predicted values based on a plurality of different training data sets is reduced, the deviation among the plurality of predicted values indicating a degree of difference of the predicted value from an average value of the plurality of predicted values, and

the metal material is produced based on at least the chemical composition and the production conditions.

2. The design support method of claim 1 , wherein

the design conditions that are searched for and correspond to the desired characteristics satisfy the constraint conditions.

3. The design support method of claim 1 , wherein the design conditions are also searched for in a new area differing from the past performance data so that a difference between the design conditions that are searched for and the design conditions in the past performance data increases.

4. The design support method of claim 1 , wherein

the design conditions include a feature vector based on image data of a metallic structure of the metal material, and

the design conditions that are searched for include the feature vector.

5. A prediction model generation method for generating the prediction model used in the design support method of claim 1 , the prediction model generation method comprising:

acquiring the past performance data associating the design conditions with the characteristic value; and

constructing the prediction model, for predicting the characteristic value from the design conditions, based on the acquired past performance data.

6. A design support apparatus for supporting design of a metal material that has desired characteristics, the design support apparatus comprising:

an acquisition interface configured to acquire constraint conditions as input information, the constraint conditions including a range of a chemical composition of the metal material and a range of production conditions of the metal material;

a processor configured to search for design conditions that satisfy the constraint conditions and yield the desired characteristics using a prediction model for predicting a characteristic value of the metal material from the design conditions, the prediction model being constructed based on past performance data associating the design conditions, which include the chemical composition and production conditions of the metal material, with the characteristic value; and

a display configured to display at least the chemical composition and the production conditions among the design conditions, searched for by the processor, that correspond to the desired characteristics, wherein

the processor searches for the design conditions so that deviation among a plurality of predicted values based on a plurality of different training data sets is reduced, the deviation among the plurality of predicted values indicating a degree of difference of the predicted value from an average value of the plurality of predicted values, and

the metal material is produced based on at least the chemical composition and the production conditions.

7. The design support method of claim 2 , wherein the design conditions are also searched for in a new area differing from the past performance data so that a difference between the design conditions that are searched for and the design conditions in the past performance data increases.

8. The design support method of claim 2 , wherein

the design conditions include a feature vector based on image data of a metallic structure of the metal material, and

the design conditions that are searched for include the feature vector.

9. The design support method of claim 3 , wherein

the design conditions include a feature vector based on image data of a metallic structure of the metal material, and

the design conditions that are searched for include the feature vector.

10. A prediction model generation method for generating the prediction model used in the design support method of claim 4 , the prediction model generation method comprising:

acquiring the past performance data associating the design conditions with the characteristic value; and

constructing the prediction model, for predicting the characteristic value from the design conditions, based on the acquired past performance data.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Sep 10, 2021
From: NAKATSUJI, KAZUHIRO; YAMAGUCHI, OSAMU; TAKAGI, HIROYUKI
To: JFE STEEL CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 057444/0370 →
Priority Claims (1)
WO PCT/JP2019/001675 · Jan 21, 2019 · international
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20220100932A1 · Mar 31, 2022
References Cited (62)
US 6411945B1 · Nakajima · 2002 [cited by examiner]
US 8374981B2 · Shigemori · 2013 [cited by examiner]
US 8756092B1 · Marsten · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 10345252B2 · Vecchio · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 10379448B2 · Mathijssen · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 10872682B2 · Reed · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 11216938B2 · Pu · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 11347910B1 · Martiny · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 11391677B2 · Witte · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 12066417B2 · Eto · 2024 [cited by examiner]
US 20080089591A1 · Zhou et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20090291013A1 · Fedchun · 2009 [cited by examiner]
US 20120283861A1 · Zwickl · 2012 [cited by examiner]
US 20140236548A1 · Conduit · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 20150106035A1 · Vecchio · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 20150170022A1 · Malik · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 20160034614A1 · Wang · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 20160282282A1 · Quintanilha · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 20170002440A1 · Sprock · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20170045823A1 · Quintanilha · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20170297072A1 · Kuyama · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20180018408A1 · Matsumura · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20180113967A1 · Agrawal · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20180348145A1 · Witte · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20190228327A1 · Horesh · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20190271966A1 · Coffman · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20200020415A1 · Sarmiento et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200024712A1 · Iwamura · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20200089826A1 · Liu · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20200257933A1 · Steingrimsson · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20210334440A1 · Yamashina · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20210397769A1 · Okuno · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20210406433A1 · Okuno · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20220072593A1 · Fujita · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20220076161A1 · Takada · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20220207218A1 · Lu · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20220276619A1 · Moriguchi · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20220292229A1 · Aonuma · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20240136026A1 · Takemoto · 2024 [cited by examiner]
US 20240144056A1 · Huang · 2024 [cited by examiner]
JP 2008097607A · 2008 [cited by applicant]
JP 2010106314A · 2010 [cited by applicant]
JP 2010172962A · 2010 [cited by applicant]
JP 2011103036A · 2011 [cited by applicant]
JP 2012146054A · 2012 [cited by applicant]
KR 101011546B1 · 2011 [cited by applicant]
RU 2016116261A · 2017 [cited by applicant]
WO 2018062398A1 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2020152993A1 · 2020 [cited by examiner]
Dey et al. (An Informatics Based Approach to Reduce the Grain Size of Cast Hadfield Steel, J. Inst. Eng. India Ser. D (Jan.-Jun. 2016) 97(1):1-9). (Year: 2016). [cited by examiner]
Reddy et al. (Design of medium carbon steels by computational intelligence Techniques, Computational Materials Science 101 (2015) 120-126). (Year: 2015). [cited by examiner]
Mar. 10, 2022, the Extended European Search Report issued by the European Patent Office in the corresponding European Patent Application No. 19911629.4. [cited by applicant]
N.S. Reddy et al., Design of medium carbon steels by computational intelligence techniques, Computational Materials Science, 2015, pp. 120-126, vol. 101. [cited by applicant]
Santanu Pattanayak et al., Computational intelligence based designing of microalloyed pipeline steel, Computational Materials Science, 2015, pp. 60-68, vol. 104. [cited by applicant]
Swati Dey et al., An Informatics Based Approach to Reduce the Grain Size of Cast Hadfield Steel, Journal of The Institution of Engineers (India): Series D, Jul. 19, 2015, pp. 1-9, vol. 97. [cited by applicant]
Apr. 22, 2022, Office Action issued by the Federal Service for Intellectual Property, Patents and Trademarks of the Russian Federation in the corresponding Russian Patent Application No. 2021124646 with English language… [cited by applicant]
Sep. 20, 2023, Office Action issued by the Korean Intellectual Property Office in the corresponding Korean Patent Application No. 10-2021-7025687 with English language concise statement of relevance. [cited by applicant]
Hiroshi Hasegawa, From Demands and Wishes to the Optimal Design Using the Systems Approach, Proceedings of the 28th Japan simulation conference, Jun. 11, 2009, pp. 113-116, with a partial English translation. [cited by applicant]
Jun. 15, 2021, Notification of Reasons for Refusal issued by the Japan Patent Office in the corresponding Japanese Patent Application No. 2020-516503 with English language Concise Statement of Relevance. [cited by applicant]
Mar. 3, 2020, International Search Report issued in the International Patent Application No. PCT/JP2019/047091. [cited by applicant]
Seiji Takeda et al., Material discovery by AI, The 32nd Annual Conference of the Japanese Society for Artificial Intelligence, 2018, with a partial English translation. [cited by applicant]
Yoshitaka Adachi et al., Material Information General System for Machine Learning Support, Systems, Control and Information, 2017, pp. 188-193, vol. 61, Issue 5, with a partial English translation. [cited by applicant]