IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,252,960
Granted Patent B2
US 12,252,960 · App. 18/086,322 · Granted Mar 18, 2025

Oil recovery method integrated with the capture, utilization and storage of CO2 through a cavern in saline rock

Inventor: Edgard Poiate Junior (Rio de Janeiro, BR)
Assignee: Petróleo Brasileiro S.A.—Petrobras
E21B41/0064E21B43/28E21B49/00E21B43/166
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,252,960
App. No.
18/086,322
Granted
Mar 18, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

The present invention finds its field of application among the advanced oil recovery methods, which must occur simultaneously and integrated with the capture, utilization, and storage of CO2 through a cavern built in offshore saline rock. More particularly the invention refers to offshore oil wells where there is an evaporitic rock layer next to it and, suitable for constructing a cavern in the saline rock, for its use as a CO2 and brine control volume in the water-gas alternating injection process in the reservoir.

Claims (32)

1. An oil recovery method integrated with capture, utilization, and storage of CO 2 through a cavern in saline rock, the oil recovery method comprising:

constructing an access well to generate the cavern in saline rock;

installing two concentric tubular columns in the access well;

circulating water or brine through the two concentric tubular columns to dissolve salt to form the cavern in saline rock using equipment used in a Water Alternating Gas (WAG)-type oil recovery method, the equipment comprising:

pumps,

filters;

separators; and

pipelines;

vertically moving the two concentric tubular columns of injection;

evaluating a geometry of the cavern in saline rock:

performing a cavern hydrostatic integrity test;

installing a first pipe in a position next to a top of the cavern in saline rock for a CO 2 inlet and outlet;

installing a second pipe in a position next to a bottom of the cavern in saline rock for a brine inlet and outlet;

carrying out cycles of replacement of brine by CO 2 until the cavern is filled with CO 2 ,

storing the CO 2 within the cavern for a duration of time; and

abandoning the access well.

2. The method, according to claim 1 , wherein the cavern in saline rock is formed during a period in which CO 2 is injected into the cavern during the WAG-type oil recovery method.

3. The method, according to claim 2 , wherein a period of circulating water to form the cavern in saline rock is from 2 to 24 months.

4. The method, according to claim 1 , wherein forming the cavern in saline rock occurs simultaneously with the WAG-type oil recovery method.

5. The method, according to claim 1 , wherein circulating water to dissolve the salt is carried out by an autonomous subsea pumping system or by a Stationary Production Unit (SPU).

6. The method, according to claim 5 , wherein the autonomous subsea pumping system or the SPU directs circulation or reverse circulation of water or brine inside the cavern in saline rock.

7. The method, according to claim 1 , wherein evaluating the geometry of the cavern in saline rock is carried out by sonar inside and/or outside the cavern in saline rock.

8. The method, according to claim 1 further comprising, after evaluating the geometry of the cavern in saline rock, determining whether to abandon the access well or reinstall the two concentric tubular columns based on evaluating the geometry.

9. The method, according to claim 1 , wherein the first pipe and the second pipe, at the top of the cavern in saline rock and at the bottom of the cavern in saline rock, respectively, are configured to direct fluids and gases entry and exit in the cavern in saline rock.

10. The method, according to claim 9 , wherein the first pipe and the second pipe comprise rigid or flexible tubes, wherein one of the first pipe or the second pipe is positioned between 1 and 10 m from the top of the cavern in saline rock, for entry and exit of CO 2 , and the other of the first pipe or the second pipe is between 1 and 10 m from the bottom of the saline rock cavern, for brine entry and exit.

11. The method according to claim 10 , wherein the first pipe and the second pipe each have a smaller diameter in relation to the access well in a range of 10% to 50% smaller.

12. The method, according to claim 11 , wherein the first pipe and the second pipe are operated alternately or simultaneously substituting brine in the saline rock cavern for CO 2 discontinuously or in steps.

13. The method, according to claim 12 , wherein the substituting the brine in the saline rock cavern by CO 2 occurs simultaneously with the WAG-type oil recovery method.

14. The method, according to claim 1 , wherein the WAG-type oil recovery method occurs simultaneously with a capture, utilization, and storage of CO 2 in the cavern in saline rock.

15. The method, according to claim 1 , wherein substituting the brine or CO 2 filling periods in the cavern in saline rock range from 2 to 24 months.

16. The method, according to claim 1 , wherein the well is abandoned with cement plugs after carrying out cycles of replacement of brine by CO 2 until the saline rock cavern is filled with CO 2 .

17. The method, according to claim 1 , wherein the brine and CO 2 are circulated from a stationary production unit.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Aug 13, 2024
From: POIATE JUNIOR, EDGARD
To: PETRÓLEO BRASILEIRO S.A. - PETROBRAS
Reel/Frame 068260/0373 →
Priority Claims (1)
BR 10 2021 026298 2 · Dec 23, 2021 · national
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20230203918A1 · Jun 29, 2023
References Cited (28)
US 2623596A · Whorton et al. · 1952 [cited by applicant]
US 3525395A · Chew · 1970 [cited by applicant]
US 20110206459A1 · Tunget · 2011 [cited by examiner]
US 20130064604A1 · Han · 2013 [cited by examiner]
US 20140354031A1 · Haugen · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 20160053594A1 · Nazarian · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 20190284918A1 · Tritt · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20190368348A1 · Tiwari · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20200115283A1 · Kvassnes · 2020 [cited by examiner]
United States Department of Energy Carsbad Field Office, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Apr. 28, 2006, 2 pages. [cited by applicant]
Beltrao et al. (2009) “Challenges and New Technologies for the Development of the Pre-Salt Cluster, Santos Basin, Brazil”, Offshore Technology Conference, 11 pages. [cited by applicant]
Crotogino et al. (Apr. 2001) “Huntorf CAES: More than 20 Years of Successful Operation”, Solution Mining Research Institute, 7 pages. [cited by applicant]
Grigg et al. (2008) “Injectivity Changes and CO2 Retention for EOR and Sequestration Projects”, SPE International (SPE 110760), 13 pages. [cited by applicant]
Janeiro, Der. (2020) “Estudo sobre o aproveitamento do gas natural do Pro-sal,”, http://www.anp.gov.br/arquivos/estudos/aproveitamento-gn-presal. [cited by applicant]
Lima et al. (2020) “Assessment of Continuous and Alternating CO2 Injection Under Brazilian-pre-salt-like Conditions”, Journal of Petroleum Exploration and Production Technology, 10:2947-2956. [cited by applicant]
Lord et al. (Sep. 23, 2014) “Geologic Storage of Hydrogen: Scaling Up to Meet City Transportation Demands”, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 39:15570-15582. [cited by applicant]
Munson et al. (1989) “Approach to First Principles Model Prediction Of Measured WIPP in Situ Room Closure in Salt”, Tunneling and Underground Space Technology, 16 pages. [cited by applicant]
Poiate, Edgard Jr. (Dec. 20, 2012) “Mecanica das Rochas e Mecanica Computacional para Projeto de Pocos de Petroleo em Zonas de Sal.”, Pontificia Universidade Catalica do Rio de Janeiro, 40 pages. [cited by applicant]
Pizarro et al. (Apr. 16, 2012) “Challenges in Implementing an EOR Project in the Pre-Salt Province in Deep Offshore Brasil”, SPE International (SPE-155665), 13 pages. [cited by applicant]
Qadir et al. (Mar. 15, 2012) “Comparative Study of FAWAG and SWAG as an Effective EOR Technique for a Malaysian Field”, Research Journal of Applied Sciences, Engineering and Technology, 4(6):645-648. [cited by applicant]
Schaefer et al. (2017) “Technical-Economic Evaluation of Continuous CO2 Reinjection, Continuous Water Injection and Water Alternating Gas (Wag) Injection in Reservoirs Containing CO2”, Cilamce, 16 pages. [cited by applicant]
Schainker, Robert B. (2011) “Advanced Compressed Air Energy Storage (CAES) Demonstration Projects”, Electronic Power Research Institute, 8 pages. [cited by applicant]
Touma et al. (Oct. 2019) “Innovative Gas Treatment Solutions for Offshore Systems”, OTC-29913-MS, 9 pages. [cited by applicant]
Veil et al. (1998) “Disposal of NORM-Contaminated Oil Field Wastes in Salt Caverns”, Solution Mining Research Institute Spring, 17 pages. [cited by applicant]
Venkataramani et al. (Sep. 2016) “A Review on Compressed Air Energy Storage—A Pathway for Smart Grid And Polygeneration”, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 62:895-907. [cited by applicant]
Xie et al. (2009) “Research Advance of CO2 Storage in Rock Salt Caverns”, Yantu Lixue/Rock and Soil Mechanics, 3324-3330. [cited by applicant]
Evans et al. (2009) “Underground Gas Storage: Worldwide Experiences and Future Development in the UK and Europe”, The Geological Society, 313:93-128. [cited by applicant]
Lord, Anna S. (2009) “Overview of Geologic Storage of Natural Gas with an Emphasis on Assessing the Feasibility of Storing Hydrogen”, Sandia National Laboratories, 28 pages. [cited by applicant]