IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,274,520
Granted Patent B2
US 12,274,520 · App. 18/659,045 · Granted Apr 15, 2025

System and method for manipulating an anatomy

Inventors: David Gene Bowling (Los Ranchos De Albuquerque, NM); John Michael Stuart (Rio Rancho, NM); Jerry A. Culp (Kalamazoo, MI); Donald W. Malackowski (Schoolcraft, MI); José Luis Moctezuma de la Barrera (Freiburg, DE); Patrick Roessler (Merzhausen, DE); Joel N. Beer (Albuquerque, NM)
Assignee: MAKO Surgical Corp.
A61B34/30A61B17/1675A61B34/10A61B34/20A61B34/32A61B34/37A61B34/76A61B90/39A61B2018/00565A61B2018/00601A61B2034/105A61B2034/107A61B2034/2055A61B2034/2059A61B2034/2068A61B2090/3937A61B2090/3975
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,274,520
App. No.
18/659,045
Granted
Apr 15, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

Surgical systems and methods for manipulating an anatomy includes a surgical tool, a robotic manipulator configured to support and move the surgical tool, and controller(s) that generate a virtual boundaries delineating a portions of the anatomy allowed to be removed by the surgical tool. The controller(s) control the robotic manipulator to autonomously move the surgical tool in relation to a first virtual boundary and according to a first feed rate or first frequency of path oscillations to remove a first portion. The controller(s) control the robotic manipulator to autonomously move the surgical tool in relation to a second virtual boundary that is spaced from the first virtual boundary, and according to a different feed rate or different frequency of path oscillations, to remove a second portion.

Claims (62)

1. A surgical system configured to manipulate an anatomy, the surgical system comprising:

a surgical tool configured to interact with the anatomy;

a robotic manipulator configured to support and move the surgical tool; and

one or more controllers configured to:

generate a first virtual boundary delineating a first portion of the anatomy allowed to be removed by the surgical tool;

control the robotic manipulator to autonomously move the surgical tool in relation to the first virtual boundary and according to a first feed rate to remove the first portion;

generate a second virtual boundary being spaced apart from the first virtual boundary and delineating a second portion of the anatomy allowed to be removed by the surgical tool; and

control the robotic manipulator to autonomously move the surgical tool in relation to the second virtual boundary and according to a second feed rate to remove the second portion, wherein the first feed rate is different than the second feed rate.

2. The surgical system of claim 1 , wherein the first virtual boundary further delineates the first portion of the anatomy from the second portion of the anatomy such that the first virtual boundary protects the second portion from removal by the surgical tool.

3. The surgical system of claim 1 , wherein the second portion of the anatomy is located between the first virtual boundary and the second virtual boundary.

4. The surgical system of claim 1 , wherein the one or more controllers are configured to generate the first virtual boundary and the second virtual boundary relative to a target surface of the anatomy, wherein the target surface defines a planned surface of the anatomy onto which an implant is to be positioned.

5. The surgical system of claim 4 , wherein the one or more controllers are configured to

generate the first virtual boundary to be spaced apart from the target surface by a first distance; and

generate the second virtual boundary to be:

aligned with the target surface; or

spaced apart from the target surface by a second distance that is less than the first distance.

6. The surgical system of claim 1 , wherein, during removal of the first portion of the anatomy, the one or more controllers are configured to activate the second virtual boundary.

7. The surgical system of claim 1 , wherein, after removal of the first portion of the anatomy, the one or more controllers are configured to:

deactivate the first virtual boundary; and

activate the second virtual boundary.

8. The surgical system of claim 1 , wherein the one or more controllers are configured to:

control the robotic manipulator to autonomously move the surgical tool in relation to the first virtual boundary and according to the first feed rate to bulk cut the first portion; and

control the robotic manipulator to autonomously move the surgical tool in relation to the second virtual boundary and according to the second feed rate to fine cut the second portion, wherein the first feed rate is faster than the second feed rate.

9. The surgical system of claim 8 , wherein the one or more controllers are configured to:

generate a first tool path for the surgical tool to bulk cut the first portion, the first tool path defining a first frequency of path oscillations; and

generate a second tool path for the surgical tool to fine cut the second portion, the second tool path defining a second frequency of path oscillations, wherein the second frequency of path oscillations is greater than the first frequency of path oscillations.

10. The surgical system of claim 1 , wherein the one or more controllers are configured to:

control the robotic manipulator to autonomously move the surgical tool in relation to the first virtual boundary and according to the first feed rate to fine cut the first portion; and

control the robotic manipulator to autonomously move the surgical tool in relation to the second virtual boundary and according to the second feed rate to bulk cut the second portion, wherein the first feed rate is slower than the second feed rate.

11. A method of operating a surgical system for manipulating an anatomy, the surgical system including a surgical tool configured to interact with the anatomy, a robotic manipulator configured to support and move the surgical tool, and one or more controllers, the method comprising the one or more controllers performing the following:

generating a first virtual boundary delineating a first portion of the anatomy allowed to be removed by the surgical tool;

controlling the robotic manipulator for autonomously moving the surgical tool in relation to the first virtual boundary and according to a first feed rate for removing the first portion;

generating a second virtual boundary being spaced apart from the first virtual boundary and delineating a second portion of the anatomy allowed to be removed by the surgical tool; and

controlling the robotic manipulator for autonomously moving the surgical tool in relation to the second virtual boundary and according to a second feed rate for removing the second portion, wherein the first feed rate is different than the second feed rate.

12. A surgical system configured to manipulate an anatomy, the surgical system comprising:

a surgical tool configured to interact with the anatomy;

a robotic manipulator configured to support and move the surgical tool; and

one or more controllers configured to:

generate a first virtual boundary delineating a first portion of the anatomy allowed to be removed by the surgical tool;

control the robotic manipulator to autonomously move the surgical tool in relation to the first virtual boundary and according to a first tool path defining a first frequency of path oscillations to remove the first portion;

generate a second virtual boundary being spaced apart from the first virtual boundary and delineating a second portion of the anatomy allowed to be removed by the surgical tool; and

control the robotic manipulator to autonomously move the surgical tool in relation to the second virtual boundary and according to a second tool path defining a second frequency of path oscillations to remove the second portion, wherein the first frequency of path oscillations is different than the second frequency of path oscillations.

13. The surgical system of claim 12 , wherein the first virtual boundary further delineates the first portion of the anatomy from the second portion of the anatomy such that the first virtual boundary protects the second portion from removal by the surgical tool.

14. The surgical system of claim 12 , wherein the second portion of the anatomy is located between the first virtual boundary and the second virtual boundary.

15. The surgical system of claim 12 , wherein the one or more controllers are configured to concurrently activate the first virtual boundary and the second virtual boundary during removal of the first portion of the anatomy.

16. The surgical system of claim 12 , wherein the one or more controllers are configured to generate the first virtual boundary and the second virtual boundary relative to a target surface of the anatomy, wherein the target surface defines a planned surface of the anatomy onto which an implant is to be positioned.

17. The surgical system of claim 16 , wherein the one or more controllers are configured to

generate the first virtual boundary to be spaced apart from the target surface by a first distance; and

generate the second virtual boundary to be:

aligned with the target surface; or

spaced apart from the target surface by a second distance that is less than the first distance.

18. The surgical system of claim 17 , wherein the one or more controllers are configured to:

control the robotic manipulator to autonomously move the surgical tool in relation to the first virtual boundary and according to the first tool path defining the first frequency of path oscillations to bulk cut the first portion; and

control the robotic manipulator to autonomously move the surgical tool in relation to the second virtual boundary and according to the second tool path defining the second frequency of path oscillations to fine cut the second portion, wherein the first frequency of path oscillations is less than the second frequency of path oscillations.

19. The surgical system of claim 17 , wherein the one or more controllers are configured to:

control the robotic manipulator to autonomously move the surgical tool in relation to the first virtual boundary and according to the first tool path defining the first frequency of path oscillations to fine cut the first portion; and

control the robotic manipulator to autonomously move the surgical tool in relation to the second virtual boundary and according to the second tool path defining the second frequency of path oscillations to bulk cut the second portion, wherein the first frequency of path oscillations is greater than the second frequency of path oscillations.

20. A method of operating a surgical system for manipulating an anatomy, the surgical system including a surgical tool configured to interact with the anatomy, a robotic manipulator configured to support and move the surgical tool, and one or more controllers, the method comprising the one or more controllers performing the following:

generating a first virtual boundary delineating a first portion of the anatomy allowed to be removed by the surgical tool;

controlling the robotic manipulator for autonomously moving the surgical tool in relation to the first virtual boundary and according to a first tool path defining a first frequency of path oscillations for removing the first portion;

generating a second virtual boundary being spaced apart from the first virtual boundary and delineating a second portion of the anatomy allowed to be removed by the surgical tool; and

controlling the robotic manipulator for autonomously moving the surgical tool in relation to the second virtual boundary and according to a second tool path defining a second frequency of path oscillations for removing the second portion, wherein the first frequency of path oscillations is different than the second frequency of path oscillations.

Assignments (3)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Nov 13, 2024
From: STRYKER LEIBINGER GMBH & CO. KG
To: MAKO SURGICAL CORP.
Reel/Frame 069246/0176 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Nov 13, 2024
From: BOWLING, DAVID GENE; STUART, JOHN MICHAEL; CULP, JERRY A.; MALACKOWSKI, DONALD W.; BEER, JOEL N.
To: MAKO SURGICAL CORP.
Reel/Frame 069351/0626 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Nov 13, 2024
From: MOCTEZUMA DE LA BARRERA, JOSÉ LUIS; ROESSLER, PATRICK
To: STRYKER LEIBINGER GMBH & CO. KG
Reel/Frame 069246/0213 →
Continuity (7)
Continuation 18213293 · Jun 23, 2023
Continuation 17365280 · Jul 1, 2021
Continuation 16902360 · Jun 16, 2020
Continuation 16130089 · Sep 13, 2018
Continuation 15157833 · May 18, 2016
Provisional Application 62163672 · May 19, 2015
Related Publication 20240285359A1 · Aug 29, 2024
References Cited (72)
US 4907164A · Guyder · 1990 [cited by applicant]
US 5776136A · Sahay et al. · 1998 [cited by applicant]
US 6128547A · Tomoeda et al. · 2000 [cited by applicant]
US 6267594B1 · Hugo · 2001 [cited by examiner]
US 7742804B2 · Faul · 2010 [cited by examiner]
US 7747311B2 · Quaid, III · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 7774044B2 · Sauer · 2010 [cited by examiner]
US 7815644B2 · Masini · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 8010180B2 · Quaid et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 8021368B2 · Haines · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 8287522B2 · Moses et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 9008757B2 · Wu · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9119655B2 · Bowling et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9339346B2 · Malackowski · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9381085B2 · Axelson, Jr. et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9427334B2 · Axelson, Jr. et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9585725B2 · Bonutti · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9603665B2 · Bowling et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 10098704B2 · Bowling et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10743952B2 · Bowling et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10856876B2 · Forsell · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 11083531B2 · Bowling et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11116574B2 · Haider et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11723732B2 · Bowling et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20030109780A1 · Coste-Maniere et al. · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 20040128026A1 · Harris et al. · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 20050228440A1 · Brock et al. · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 20070055269A1 · Iannarone et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20080077158A1 · Haider et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20080281343A1 · Dewey et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20100056905A1 · Anderson · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20100063514A1 · Maschke · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20100305711A1 · McKinnon et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20110130762A1 · Metzger et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110208256A1 · Zuhars · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110277775A1 · Holop et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20120078254A1 · Ashby et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20120165652A1 · Dempsey · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20120176306A1 · Lightcap et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20120330429A1 · Axelson, Jr. et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20130006267A1 · Odermatt et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130038707A1 · Cunningham et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130060278A1 · Bozung et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130096574A1 · Kang et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130169423A1 · Iorgulescu et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130317344A1 · Borus et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20140039681A1 · Bowling et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140180290A1 · Otto et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140257293A1 · Axelson, Jr. et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140276943A1 · Bowling et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140276949A1 · Staunton et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20160030115A1 · Shen et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160038243A1 · Miller et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160045268A1 · Keppler et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160175091A1 · Van Heugten · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 20160242858A1 · Moctezuma de la Barrera et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20190008596A1 · Bowling et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20200305993A1 · Bowling et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20210322114A1 · Bowling et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20230329811A1 · Bowling et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
CN 101160104A · 2008 [cited by applicant]
CN 104519822A · 2015 [cited by applicant]
JP H10166242A · 1998 [cited by applicant]
WO 2006091494A1 · 2006 [cited by applicant]
WO 2013101753A1 · 2013 [cited by applicant]
WO 2014100460A1 · 2014 [cited by applicant]
Burghart, C.R. et al., “Robot Controlled Osteotomy in Craniofacial Surgery”, First International Workshop on Haptic Devices in Medical Applications Proceedings, Jun. 23, 1999, Paris, FR, 11 pages. [cited by applicant]
English language abstract for CN 101160104 A extracted from espacenet.com database on May 10, 2024, 2 pages. [cited by applicant]
English language abstract for CN 104519822 A extracted from espacenet.com database on Jan. 28, 2021, 2 pages. [cited by applicant]
English language abstract for JPH 10-166242 extracted from espacenet.com database on Mar. 11, 2020, 2 pages. [cited by applicant]
Hassfeld, S. et al., “Intraoperative Navigation Techniques Accuracy Tests and Clinical Report”, Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery (CARS), Tokyo, Jun. 1998, pp. 670-675. [cited by applicant]
International Search Report for PCT/US2016/033062; Dated Aug. 16, 2016; 13 pages. [cited by applicant]