IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,287,343
Granted Patent B2
US 12,287,343 · App. 17/046,122 · Granted Apr 29, 2025

Quantification of neurofilament light chain in physiological samples

Inventors: Edward Kevin Hrusovsky (Hopkinton, MA); David Wilson (Boxborough, MA); Dandan Shan (Acton, MA); Lei Chang (Winchester, MA); Linan Song (Waltham, MA); Andreas Jeromin (Alachua, FL); Carmen Ioana Tobos (Farmington Hills, MI); Purvish Prahlad Patel (Medford, MA)
Assignee: QUANTERIX CORPORATION
G01N33/6896A61B5/0071A61B5/0075A61B5/0082A61B5/4064G01N1/38G01N33/582G01N2001/386G01N2800/28G01N2800/2821G01N2800/285
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,287,343
App. No.
17/046,122
Granted
Apr 29, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

The present disclosure relates to immunoassays for NF-L performed on liquid samples derived from physiological fluids such as venous blood to detect the presence or absence of a physiological condition by quantifying one or a combination of NF-L determinations at concentrations indicative of the condition.

Claims (23)

1. A method of testing for a neurological condition in a human subject, comprising:

i) forming a liquid sample by diluting a blood or plasma sample taken from the subject in a diluent, wherein the diluent comprises one or more immunoglobulins, a detergent, urea, and one or more blocking agents;

ii) obtaining a concentration of neurofilament light chain (NF-L) in the liquid sample via a singleplex immunoassay or a single molecule array;

iii) comparing the NF-L concentration from the human subject with a NF-L concentration from a healthy control sample; and

iv) assigning a risk of the neurological condition based on the comparison of step iii), wherein an increase in the NF-L concentration from the human subject compared to the NF-L concentration from the healthy control is indicative of the neurological condition.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the neurological condition is a neurodegenerative disease.

3. The method of claim 1 , wherein the neurological condition is an Alzheimer's disease.

4. The method of claim 1 , wherein the neurological condition is a multiple sclerosis.

5. The method of claim 1 , wherein the singleplex immunoassay or the single molecule array are digital assays.

6. The method of claim 1 , wherein the method further comprises: determining whether a CT scan of the subject is positive or negative for the neurological condition prior to performing the immunoassay.

7. The method of claim 1 , wherein the method is used in place of a CT scan and/or an MRI scan in a diagnostic protocol.

8. The method of claim 1 , wherein the assigning comprises determining a ratio of the NF-L concentration from the human subject compared to the NF-L concentration from the healthy control.

9. The method of claim 1 , wherein the comparing of step iii) further comprises calculating at least one classification value based on a classification model using the obtained concentration of NF-L as an input to the classification model; and wherein the assigning of step iv) further comprises comparing the at least one classification value to at least one threshold value.

10. The method of claim 9 , wherein the calculating at least one classification value comprises determining a ratio of the NF-L concentration from the human subject compared to the NF-L concentration from the healthy control.

11. The method of claim 1 , wherein the one or more immunoglobulins comprises human IgG, bovine gamma globulin (BgG), or a combination thereof.

12. The method of claim 1 , wherein the one or more blocking agents comprises mouse IgG.

13. The method of claim 11 , wherein the human IgG is at a concentration of between 1 mg/mL and 10 mg/mL.

14. The method of claim 9 , wherein the classification model predicts a traumatic brain injury with a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve having an area under the curve (AUC) of at least 0.85.

15. The method of claim 9 , wherein the classification model predicts a traumatic brain injury with a true positive rate of at least 75% at a false positive rate of less than 25%.

16. The method of claim 11 , wherein the one or more immunoglobulins comprises the combination of human IgG and bovine gamma globulin (BgG).

17. The method of claim 12 , wherein the one or more immunoglobulins comprises human IgG, bovine gamma globulin (BgG), or a combination thereof.

18. The method of claim 17 , wherein the one or more immunoglobulins comprises the combination of human IgG and bovine gamma globulin (BgG).

19. The method of claim 18 , wherein the human IgG is at a concentration of between 1 mg/mL and 10 mg/mL.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Oct 8, 2020
From: HRUSOVSKY, EDWARD KEVIN; WILSON, DAVID; SHAN, DANDAN; CHANG, LEI; SONG, LINAN; JEROMIN, ANDREAS; TOBOS, CARMEN IOANA; PATEL, PURVISH PRAHLAD
To: QUANTERIX CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 054012/0430 →
Continuity (3)
Provisional Application 62655738 · Apr 10, 2018
Provisional Application 62789067 · Jan 7, 2019
Related Publication 20220229073A1 · Jul 21, 2022
References Cited (45)
US 12111324B2 · Hrusovsky · 2024 [cited by examiner]
US 12130294B2 · Hrusovsky · 2024 [cited by examiner]
US 20070003564A1 · Hurley · 2007 [cited by examiner]
US 20100124552A1 · Klein et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20110039278A1 · Pieribone · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20120070379A1 · Black et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20130165342A1 · Rissin et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20140086836A1 · Burnham et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20150038355A1 · Tan et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150185232A1 · Keane · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 20150355182A1 · Rissin et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20170044264A1 · Fricke et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170160292A1 · Wilson et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20180080945A1 · Goetzl · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20180195124A1 · Gonzalez et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20210096140A1 · Hrusovsky et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210102959A1 · Hrusovsky et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
EP 2324360B1 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
PT 95669A · 1991 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2013103475A2 · 2013 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2014027899A1 · 2014 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2015066211A1 · 2015 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2016207253A1 · 2016 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2019199865A1 · 2019 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2019199869A1 · 2019 [cited by applicant]
Nimer et al., PLOS One 10(7): e0132177 (Year: 2015). [cited by examiner]
UmanDiagnostic NF-light (Year: 2017). [cited by examiner]
Shahim et al., Scientific Reports 6: 36791-9 (Year: 2016). [cited by examiner]
Kuhle et al., Clin Chem Lab Med 54(10): 1655-1661 (Year: 2016). [cited by examiner]
Arrambide et al., Neurology 87: 1076-1084 (Year: 2016). [cited by examiner]
Kuhle et al., Neurology 88: 826-831 (Year: 2017). [cited by examiner]
Lloyd et al. Protein Engineering, Design & Selection 22:159-168 (Year: 2009). [cited by examiner]
Edwards et al., J Mol Biol. 334(1): 103-118 (Year: 2003). [cited by examiner]
Andersen et al., Cytometry Part A 89(11): 1001-1009 (Year: 2016). [cited by examiner]
Chang et al., J Immunol Methods. 378(1-2): 102-115 (Year: 2012). [cited by examiner]
Flokowski et al., Clin Biochem Rev. 29(1): S83-S87 (Year: 2008). [cited by examiner]
Norgren et al., Hybridoma and Hybridomics 21(1): 53-59 (Year: 2002). [cited by examiner]
Korley et al., 2018, “Performance Evaluation of a Multiplex Assay for Simultaneous Detection of Four Clinically Relevant Traumatic Brain Injury Biomarkers,” J Neurotrauma, 36(1):182-187. [cited by applicant]
Wilson et al., 2016, “The Simoa HD-1 Analyzer: A Novel Fully Automated Digital Immunoassay Analyzer with Single-Molecule Sensitivity and Multiplexing,” J Lab Autom, 21(4):533-547 (Epub 2015). [cited by applicant]
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2019/026636 (Pub No. WO 2019199865) mailed Aug. 27, 2019 (12 pages). [cited by applicant]
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2019/026640 (Pub No. WO 2019199869) mailed Jun. 18, 2019 (12 pages). [cited by applicant]
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2019/026642 (Pub No. WO 2019199871) mailed Jun. 18, 2019 (12 pages). [cited by applicant]
Hampel et al., 2004, “Total and phosphorylated tau proteins: evaluation as core biomarker candidates in frontotemporal dementia,” Dement. Geriatr. Cogn. Disord., 17(4):350-354. [cited by applicant]
Thomann et al., 2009, “Association of total tau and phosphorylated tau 181 protein levels in cerebrospinal fluid with cerebral atrophy in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer disease,” J. Psychiatry Neurosci., 34(2):… [cited by applicant]
Shahim et al., 2016, “Serum neurofilament light protein predicts clinical outcome in traumatic brain injury,” Sci. Rep., 6:36791 and Supplementary Material (15 pages). [cited by applicant]