IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,311,494
Granted Patent B2
US 12,311,494 · App. 17/677,893 · Granted May 27, 2025

Pressure signals during motor torque monitoring to provide spatial resolution

Inventors: Thomas Li (Santa Clara, CA); Benjamin Cherian (San Jose, CA)
Assignee: Applied Materials, Inc.
B24B37/013B24B37/042H01L22/26
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,311,494
App. No.
17/677,893
Granted
May 27, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method of polishing includes holding a substrate with a carrier head against a polishing surface of a polishing pad, generating relative motion between the substrate and polishing pad, applying a first pressure modulated by a first modulation function to a first region of the substrate, applying a second pressure modulated by a second modulation function that is orthogonal to the first modulation function to a second region of the substrate, during polishing of the substrate monitoring the substrate with an in-situ friction monitoring system to generate a sequence of measured values, and determining a relative contribution to the sequence of measured value from the first region and second region based on distinguishing the first frequency from the second frequency.

Claims (18)

1. A computer program product, comprising a non-transitory computer-readable medium having instructions to cause one or more computers to:

cause a carrier head of a polishing system to apply a first pressure modulated by a first modulation function to a first region of a substrate during polishing of the substrate;

cause the carrier head of the polishing system to apply a second pressure modulated by a second modulation function that is orthogonal to the first modulation function to a different second region of the substrate;

receive a sequence of measured values from an in-situ friction monitoring system;

determine a relative contribution to the sequence of measured value from the first region and second region based on distinguishing the first modulation function from the second modulation function;

determine which of the first region or the second region an overlying layer is clearing first to expose an underlying layer; and

adjust a polishing parameter based on which of the first region or the second region is clearing first.

2. The computer program product of claim 1 , wherein the first modulation function comprises a first cyclic waveform having a first frequency and the second modulation function comprises a second cyclic waveform having a different second frequency.

3. The computer program product of claim 1 , comprising storing one or more parameters indicating a relative coefficient of friction of the overlying layer and the underlying layer.

4. The computer program product of claim 3 , wherein storing the one or more parameters comprises storing a single parameter indicating which of the overlying layer and the underlying layer has a higher coefficient of friction.

5. The computer program product of claim 3 , wherein storing the one or more parameters comprises storing a first parameter indicating a coefficient of friction of the overlying layer and a second parameter indicating a coefficient of friction of the underlying layer.

6. The computer program product of claim 3 , comprising instructions to determine a scalar projection of the sequence of measured values onto each of the first modulation function and the second modulation function to generate a first value and a second value.

7. The computer program product of claim 6 , wherein the one or more parameters indicate that the underlying layer has a lower coefficient of friction, and comprising instructions to determine that the first region is clearing before the second region based on the first value decreasing relative to the second value.

8. The computer program product of claim 6 , wherein the one or more parameters indicate that the underlying layer has a higher coefficient of friction, and comprising instructions to determine that the first region is clearing before the second region based on the first value increasing relative to the second value.

9. The computer program product of claim 6 , wherein the one or more parameters indicate that the underlying layer has a lower coefficient of friction, and comprising instructions to determine that the second region is clearing before the first region based on the second value decreasing relative to the first value.

10. The computer program product of claim 6 , wherein the one or more parameters indicate that the underlying layer has a higher coefficient of friction, and comprising instructions to determine that the second region is clearing before the first region based on the second value increasing relative to the first value.

11. The computer program product of claim 1 , comprising instructions to receive a first nominal pressure and a second nominal pressure from a polishing recipe, and wherein an average of the first pressure modulated by the first modulation function equals the first nominal pressure and an average of the second pressure modulated by the second modulation function equals the second nominal pressure.

12. The computer program product of claim 11 , comprising instructions to compute a first upper pressure value and a first lower pressure value based on the first nominal pressure and a second upper pressure value and a second lower pressure value based on the second nominal pressure.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Apr 18, 2022
From: LI, THOMAS; CHERIAN, BENJAMIN
To: APPLIED MATERIALS, INC.
Reel/Frame 059626/0756 →
Continuity (2)
Provisional Application 63155917 · Mar 3, 2021
Related Publication 20220281059A1 · Sep 8, 2022
References Cited (60)
US 6129610A · Stephens · 2000 [cited by examiner]
US 6431953B1 · Carter · 2002 [cited by examiner]
US 6664557B1 · Amartur · 2003 [cited by examiner]
US 6991514B1 · Meloni · 2006 [cited by examiner]
US 7160178B2 · Gagliardi · 2007 [cited by examiner]
US 8554356B2 · Shimizu · 2013 [cited by examiner]
US 8563335B1 · Benvegnu · 2013 [cited by examiner]
US 8992286B2 · Cherian · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 9266214B2 · Kimba · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 10493590B2 · Zhang et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 11919121B2 · Cherian · 2024 [cited by examiner]
US 11969854B2 · Cherian · 2024 [cited by examiner]
US 11980995B2 · Li · 2024 [cited by examiner]
US 20020090889A1 · Crevasse · 2002 [cited by examiner]
US 20050260922A1 · Gan · 2005 [cited by examiner]
US 20070042675A1 · Benvegnu · 2007 [cited by examiner]
US 20070087662A1 · Benvegnu · 2007 [cited by examiner]
US 20070224915A1 · David · 2007 [cited by examiner]
US 20080099443A1 · Benvegnu · 2008 [cited by examiner]
US 20080274670A1 · Tada · 2008 [cited by examiner]
US 20110124269A1 · Tada · 2011 [cited by examiner]
US 20110281501A1 · Qian · 2011 [cited by examiner]
US 20130052916A1 · David et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130280827A1 · Benvegnu · 2013 [cited by examiner]
US 20130288572A1 · Benvegnu · 2013 [cited by examiner]
US 20160013085A1 · Chew et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20190168355A1 · Suzuki et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190275633A1 · Dhandapani · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190283208A1 · Dhandapani · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20210170542A1 · Sakashita · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20220161388A1 · Nakano · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20220281059A1 · Li · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20220281060A1 · Li · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20220281066A1 · Li · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20230390886A1 · Ummethala · 2023 [cited by examiner]
CN 102390036 · 2012 [cited by applicant]
CN 102490112 · 2012 [cited by applicant]
CN 108290269A · 2018 [cited by examiner]
CN 117083152A · 2023 [cited by examiner]
JP 2002103203A · 2002 [cited by examiner]
JP 2005501410 · 2005 [cited by applicant]
JP 2009028856A · 2009 [cited by applicant]
JP 2018508123A · 2018 [cited by applicant]
JP 2023127050A · 2023 [cited by examiner]
KR 1020170071609 · 2017 [cited by applicant]
KR 1020190066590 · 2019 [cited by applicant]
KR 1020190129307 · 2019 [cited by applicant]
TW 200520893 · 2005 [cited by applicant]
TW 200524709 · 2005 [cited by applicant]
TW 201236812 · 2012 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2019177840A1 · 2019 [cited by examiner]
WO WO2022186993A1 · 2022 [cited by examiner]
WO WO2022187025A1 · 2022 [cited by examiner]
WO WO2023166986A1 · 2023 [cited by examiner]
WO WO2023167001A1 · 2023 [cited by examiner]
International Search Report and Written Opinion in International Appln. No. PCT/US2022/017266, dated Jun. 2, 2022, 11 pages. [cited by applicant]
Office Action in Korean Appln. No. 10-2023-7033221, dated Aug. 29, 2024, 18 pages (with English summary). [cited by applicant]
Fukuroda et al., “In-Situ CMP Monitoring Technique for Multi-Layer Interconnection”, Presented at Proceedings of International Electron Devices Meeting, Washington, DC, USA, Dec. 10-13, 1995; IEEE, Aug. 6, 2002, 4 pages. [cited by applicant]
Hetherington et al., “Analysis of In-Situ Vibration Monitoring for End-Point Detection of CMP Planarization Processes,” Presented at Proceedings of the Conference: SPIE Symposium on Microelectronics Manufacturing Techno… [cited by applicant]
Office Action in Japanese Appln. No. 2023-553454, dated Nov. 5, 2024, 8 pages (with English translation). [cited by applicant]