IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,351,220
Granted Patent B2
US 12,351,220 · App. 18/611,165 · Granted Jul 8, 2025

Broken rail detector

Inventor: Paul D. Gies (Calgary, CA)
Assignee: Athena Industrial Technologies Inc.
B61L23/044B61L1/163B61L1/165B61L1/18B61L1/187B61L23/042G01R19/04G01R25/005G01R19/10
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,351,220
App. No.
18/611,165
Granted
Jul 8, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method and apparatus to detect breaks in tracks and/or detect the presence of a vehicle, such as a train, in a monitored section of the track or rail. Embodiments of the present invention measure the change in track inductance associated with a track or rail break. Electrical shunts are connected between the rails at spaced-apart intervals (for example a shunt can be placed every mile). At least two different frequencies of alternating current are generated and fed into the segments of rail (for example at or near a mid-point between the shunts). If a rail break occurs, the total inductance of the rail at that segment will change. Using two or more frequencies allows a rail break to be differentiated from environmental rail-to-rail and rail-to-earth leakage.

Claims (34)

1. A detector comprising:

a circuit configured to apply at least two frequencies of alternating electrical current to a shunted segment of a track;

said circuit configured to measure an amplitude change and a phase angle change of the at least two frequencies of alternating electrical current and identify a break in at least a portion of the track based on the measured amplitude change and the phase angle change for each of the at least two frequencies; and

said circuit configured to measure an amplitude and phase of each of the at least two frequencies of alternating electrical current to cancel out common parasitic resistance that is in parallel with rail inductance of the shunted segment of the track normalizing the amplitudes of the at least two frequencies if the amplitudes of the at least two frequencies are not equal.

2. The detector of claim 1 wherein the track comprises a rail track.

3. The detector of claim 1 wherein the shunted segment of the track comprises an electrical shunt disposed at opposing ends of the shunted segment of the track.

4. The detector of claim 3 wherein said electrical shunt comprises an electrical conductor electrically connected between two rails of the shunted segment of the track.

5. The detector of claim 1 wherein said circuit is electrically connected at or about a midpoint of the shunted segment of the track.

6. The detector of claim 1 wherein said circuit is configured to monitor current flow to the shunted segment of the track.

7. The detector of claim 1 further comprising a communications unit.

8. The detector of claim 7 wherein said communications unit is configured to provide data telemetry.

9. The detector of claim 8 wherein said communications unit comprises a radio frequency transmitter.

10. The detector of claim 1 configured to transmit data and to relay data received from another detector.

11. The detector of claim 1 further comprising a communication node configured to receive and transmit data.

12. The detector of claim 1 wherein said circuit does not determine a break in a portion of the track merely by identifying a drop in current flow through all or a portion of the shunted track segment.

13. A method for detecting a break in at least a portion of a track comprising:

forming a track segment by establishing or otherwise using an electrical shunt at each end of the track segment;

applying at least two frequencies of alternating electrical current to the track segment, such that each of the at least two frequencies of alternating electrical current flow through two loops within the track segment;

monitoring a phase angle of each of the at least two frequencies of alternating electrical current;

transmitting data indicative of a break in the track; and

canceling out parasitic resistance of a first loop of the two loops that is in parallel with rail inductance of the first loop and canceling out parasitic resistance of a second loop of the two loops that is in parallel with rail inductance of the second loop by:

normalizing amplitudes of the two frequencies if the amplitudes of the two frequencies are not equal; and

monitoring a voltage and a phase of the at least two frequencies of alternating electrical current and using data from the monitored voltage and phase to cancel out the parasitic resistance of at the first loop and the second loop.

14. The method of claim 13 wherein establishing or otherwise using an electrical shunt at each end of the track comprises selecting a portion of track which is bounded by at least one existing electrical shunt.

15. The method of claim 13 wherein the track comprises a rail track.

16. The method of claim 13 wherein indicia of a break is generated in response to an observed positive amplitude shift from a baseline reference point for a lower of the at least two frequencies of alternating electrical current in addition to a negative phase shift being observed in a higher of the at least two frequencies of alternating current.

17. The method of claim 13 wherein the method determines a break in a portion of the track based on an electrical parameter other than reduced current flow.

18. The method of claim 13 wherein transmitting data indicative of a break comprises transmitting an alert of a break.

19. The method of claim 13 wherein transmitting data indicative of a break comprises transmitting data of or relating to the phase angle between the at least two frequencies such that a determination of a break can be made.

20. The method of claim 13 wherein transmitting data indicative of a break comprises transmitting data via a radio frequency of less than 200 kilohertz.

21. The method of claim 13 further comprising relaying data received from an apparatus that is configured to monitor a different track segment.

22. The method of claim 13 further comprising providing a communication node which is configured to receive data from a plurality of monitoring devices.

23. The method of claim 13 further comprising transmitting data indicative of a presence of a rail vehicle on the track segment.

24. The method of claim 13 wherein the rail vehicle is a train or a portion thereof and the track is a rail track.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Mar 31, 2024
From: GIES, PAUL D.
To: ATHENA INDUSTRIAL TECHNOLOGIES INC.
Reel/Frame 067097/0868 →
Continuity (3)
Continuation 17070693 · Oct 14, 2020
Provisional Application 62914751 · Oct 14, 2019
Related Publication 20240278815A1 · Aug 22, 2024
References Cited (60)
US 3683176A · Crofts · 1972 [cited by applicant]
US 3970271A · Auer et al. · 1976 [cited by applicant]
US 4306694A · Kuhn · 1981 [cited by applicant]
US 4352475A · Smith et al. · 1982 [cited by applicant]
US 4442988A · Laurent et al. · 1984 [cited by applicant]
US 4932614A · Birkin · 1990 [cited by applicant]
US 5680054A · Gauthier · 1997 [cited by applicant]
US 6102340A · Peek et al. · 2000 [cited by applicant]
US 6216985B1 · Stephens · 2001 [cited by applicant]
US 6271754B1 · Durtler · 2001 [cited by applicant]
US 6459656B1 · Futsuhara et al. · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 6655639B2 · Grappone · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 6830224B2 · Lewin et al. · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 8157219B2 · Ashraf et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8985523B2 · Chadwick et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 8996208B2 · Shoppa et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9102341B2 · Malone et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9150228B2 · Grappone · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9162691B2 · Polivka et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9669851B2 · Cooper et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9802631B2 · Matthews et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9834237B2 · Plotnikov et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 10167005B2 · Noffsinger et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10351150B1 · Lederman · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 10689016B2 · Woo et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10822003B2 · Aisa · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 11975750B2 · Gies · 2024 [cited by examiner]
US 20030038216A1 · Holgate · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 20060202860A1 · Tsai et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20060205369A1 · Schaich et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20070132463A1 · Anderson · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20100025545A1 · Koval · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20100235123A1 · Bartonek · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20100283437A1 · Chung · 2010 [cited by examiner]
US 20130284859A1 · Polivka et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20140044146A1 · Harrison · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20150307117A1 · Noffsinger et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150367872A1 · Plotnikov et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20160244078A1 · Noffsinger et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20180065650A1 · Plotnikov · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20190061794A1 · Noffsinger et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190193762A1 · Machado et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190344814A1 · Plotnikov et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190370638A1 · Green · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20210107541A1 · Gies · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20220234632A1 · Gies · 2022 [cited by applicant]
CN 106167034A · 2016 [cited by applicant]
CN 104936849B · 2017 [cited by applicant]
DE 2121971A1 · 1971 [cited by applicant]
DE 2623967A1 · 1977 [cited by applicant]
EP 1603785B1 · 2008 [cited by applicant]
EP 2090491A1 · 2009 [cited by applicant]
FR 2303900A1 · 1976 [cited by applicant]
GB 2311190A · 1997 [cited by applicant]
WO 2016182994A1 · 2016 [cited by applicant]
Bowden, Richard P, “Broken Rail Detection in Non-Signaled Territory”, BNSF Railway Company, 2010. [cited by applicant]
Burger, Francois A, “A Practical Continuous Operating Rail Break Detection System Using Guided Waves”, Institute for Maritime Technology, 18th World Conference on Non-destructive Testing, Durban, South Africa, Apr. 20, … [cited by applicant]
Kindt, Joel , et al., “Next Generation Track Circuits”, U.S. Department of Transportation Report No. FRA/ORD-18/10, Apr. 2018. [cited by applicant]
Turner, Steven , “Feasibility of Locomotive-Mounted Broken Rail Detection”, Final Report for High-Speed Rail Innovations Deserving Exploratory Analysis Programs (IDEA) Project 38, Jun. 21, 2004. [cited by applicant]
Whalen, R. B, et al., “Lightweight Vehicle Track Shunting”, U.S. Department of Transportation Report No. FRA/ORD-81/56, Apr. 1981. [cited by applicant]