IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,529,707
Granted Patent B2
US 12,529,707 · App. 17/382,968 · Granted Jan 20, 2026

Lateral flow assay machine testing quality verification

Inventors: Clas Sivertsen (Lilburn, GA); Sturla Sivertsen (Møre og Romsdal, NO); Roy Larsen (Kristiansund, NO); Tom Sivertsen (Kristiansund, NO)
Assignee: Assaya LLC
G01N35/00722G01N33/54388G01N2035/00019G01N2035/0091
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,529,707
App. No.
17/382,968
Granted
Jan 20, 2026
Kind
B2
Abstract

A system including a processor and memory coupled to the processor. The memory stores a local testing database having a test configuration profile for a cassette having a lateral flow assay (“LFA”) strip having a test line and intensity threshold value. An operator input device is coupled to the processor for receiving operator provided results from an operator that is provided to the processor. An LFA test result display for displaying an LFA test result, and an LFA strip reader coupled to the processor for reading the LFA strip is in the system. The processor determines the LFA test result based on comparing a measured intensity value of a portion of the test line in the LFA strip image to the intensity threshold value for the test line, receives the operator provided result from the operator input device, and provides to the LFA test result display the LFA test result.

Claims (68)

1 . A system comprising:

a memory having stored thereon a local testing database having a test configuration profile for a cassette having a lateral flow assay (“LFA”) strip having a test line, the test configuration profile including an intensity threshold value for the test line that represents an intensity value which indicates a positive test result;

an LFA strip reader for reading the test line of the LFA strip;

a programmable data processing apparatus, in communication with the LFA strip reader and the local testing database in the memory, configured to determine an LFA test result based on comparing a measured intensity value of the LFA strip from the LFA strip reader to the intensity threshold value from the local testing database in the memory;

the programmable data processing apparatus further configured to implement an operator interface on a display connected to the programmable data processing apparatus for receiving an operator-provided result, the operator-provided result indicating whether the LFA strip has one of a positive test result or a negative test result,

the programmable data processing apparatus further configured to receive the operator-provided result from the operator interface without first displaying the LFA test result on the operator interface;

the programmable data processing apparatus further configured to analyze the LFA test result and the operator-provided result to yield a result of a comparison between the LFA test result and the operator-provided result; and

the programmable data processing apparatus further configured to store the result of the comparison in a result database stored in the memory connected to the programmable data processing apparatus.

2 . The system of claim 1 , further comprising:

the programmable data processing apparatus further configured to implement the display to show the LFA test result to an operator on the operator interface; and

the programmable data processing apparatus further configured to enable the operator to alter the operator-provided result after the LFA test result is displayed on the operator interface.

3 . The system of claim 1 , further comprising:

the programmable data processing apparatus further configured to implement a display to show the LFA test result to an operator on the operator interface, prior to receiving the operator-provided result;

the programmable data processing apparatus further configured to use the operator-provided result is used as a visual confirmation of the LFA test result, providing a Machine Reading with Visual Confirmation (“MRV”) mode.

4 . The system of claim 1 , wherein the programmable data processing apparatus further configured to perform an analysis of discrepancies to tune the programmable data processing apparatus's determination of the LFA test result, wherein the discrepancies are a difference in the operator-provided results and the LFA test results.

5 . The system of claim 1 , wherein the programmable data processing apparatus further configured to receive the operator-provided result received without providing the LFA test result to an operator, and the programmable data processing apparatus further configured to use the operator-provided result is used for a visual confirmation of the LFA test result providing a Visual Reading with Machine Confirmation (“VRM”) mode.

6 . The system of claim 1 , further comprising:

the programmable data processing apparatus further configured to show the LFA test result to an operator on the operator interface; and

the programmable data processing apparatus further configured to request the operator interface to confirm the operator-provided result, after seeing the LFA test result.

7 . The system of claim 1 , further comprising:

the programmable data processing apparatus further configured to upload test results to a central database connected to the programmable data processing apparatus, the test results including the LFA test result, and the operator-provided result.

8 . The system of claim 1 , wherein the programmable data processing apparatus further configured to determine that the LFA strip is invalid when the operator-provided result does not match the LFA test result.

9 . The system of claim 1 , further comprising:

the programmable data processing apparatus further configured to implement on the a display a magnified image of a portion of the LFA strip, the portion comprising a control line, the programmable data processing apparatus further configured to show on the display a control line histogram of an intensity of the control line over time, the portion of the LFA strip further comprising the test line, and a test line histogram over time.

10 . The system of claim 9 , wherein for the test line and the control line a minimum value, maximum value, average, and median are displayed.

11 . The system of claim 1 , wherein:

the programmable data processing apparatus further configured to display the LFA test result on the operator interface after receiving the operator-provided result from the operator interface.

12 . A method comprising:

maintaining a local testing database in a memory having stored thereon a test configuration profile for a cassette having a lateral flow assay (“LFA”) strip having a test line, the test configuration profile including an intensity threshold value for the test line that represents an intensity value which indicates a positive test result;

reading the test line of the LFA strip using an LFA strip reader;

determining an LFA test result based on comparing a measured intensity value of a portion of the test line from the LFA strip reader to the intensity threshold value of the test line from the memory, subsequent to a sample being added to the LFA test strip;

receiving an operator-provided result at an operator interface on a display, the operator-provided result indicating whether the sample on the LFA strip results in one of a positive test result or a negative test result, wherein receiving the operator-provided result from the operator interface occurs without first displaying the LFA test result on the operator interface;

analyzing the LFA test result and the operator-provided result to yield a comparison between the LFA test result and the operator-provided result; and

storing a result of the comparison in the memory.

13 . The method of claim 12 , further comprising, at a time after the receiving an operator-provided result:

displaying the LFA test result to an operator; and

enabling the operator to alter the operator-provided result.

14 . The method of claim 12 , further comprising:

validating accuracy of the determining using the operator-provided result, wherein validation is determined by whether the LFA test result agrees with the operator-provided result.

15 . The method of claim 12 , wherein the operator-provided result is received without providing the LFA test result to an operator, and the operator-provided result is used for a visual confirmation of the LFA test result providing a Visual Reading with Machine Confirmation (“VRM”) mode.

16 . The method of claim 12 , further comprising:

receiving the operator-provided result prior to displaying the LFA test result;

showing the LFA test result to an operator; and

requesting the operator to confirm the operator-provided result, after seeing the LFA test result.

17 . The method of claim 12 , further comprising:

displaying, on the operator interface, a magnified image of a portion of the LFA strip to aid an operator in producing the operator-provided result, the portion comprising a control line, the display further to show a control line histogram of an intensity of the control line over time, the portion further comprising of the test line, and a test line histogram over time.

18 . The method of claim 17 , wherein for the test line and the control line a minimum value, maximum value, average, and median are displayed on the operator interface.

19 . The method of claim 12 , further comprising:

displaying the LFA test result on the operator interface after receiving the operator-provided result from the operator interface.

20 . A system comprising:

a local testing database having stored thereon a test configuration profile for a cassette having a lateral flow assay (“LFA”) strip having a test line, the test configuration profile including an intensity threshold value for the test line that represents an intensity value which indicates a positive test result;

an LFA strip reader for reading the test line of the LFA strip;

a programmable data processing apparatus, in communication with the LFA strip reader and the local testing database, configured to determine an LFA test result based on comparing a measured intensity value of a portion of the test line from the LFA strip reader to the intensity threshold value from the test configuration profile;

the programmable data processing apparatus further configured to display an operator interface on a display connected to the programmable data processing apparatus for receiving an operator-provided result, the operator-provided result indicating whether the LFA strip has one of a positive test result or a negative test result, wherein receiving the operator-provided result from the operator interface occurs without first displaying the LFA test result on the operator interface; and

the programmable data processing apparatus further configured to store the LFA test result and the operator-provided result in a result database connected to the programmable data processing apparatus.

21 . A system comprising:

a memory having stored therein a local testing database having a test configuration profile for a cassette having a lateral flow assay (LFA) strip with a test line, the test configuration profile including an intensity threshold value for the test line representing an intensity value which indicates a positive test result;

an LFA strip reader configured to read the test line of the LFA strip;

a programmable data processing apparatus configured by executable instructions stored in the memory to:

receive image data from the LFA strip reader,

compare a measured intensity value of the test line to the intensity threshold value,

determine an LFA test result based on the comparison of the measured intensity value of the test line to the intensity threshold value,

receive, from an operator interface on a display connected to the programmable data processing apparatus, an operator-provided result indicating a positive or negative test result, the operator-provided result being received without first displaying the LFA test result to an operator on the operator interface, and

compare the LFA test result and the operator-provided result to generate a comparison outcome;

a result database in the memory connected to the programmable data processing apparatus; and

the programmable data processing apparatus further configured to store the comparison outcome in a the result database.

22 . The system of claim 20 , wherein:

the programmable data processing apparatus further configured to display the LFA test result on the operator interface after receiving the operator-provided result from the operator interface.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jul 23, 2021
From: SIVERTSEN, CLAS; SIVERTSEN, TOM; LARSEN, ROY; SIVERTSEN, STURLA, MR
To: ASSAYA LLC
Reel/Frame 056960/0354 →
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20240410910A1 · Dec 12, 2024
References Cited (167)
US 5075078A · Osikowicz · 1991 [cited by examiner]
US 5308775A · Donovan · 1994 [cited by examiner]
US 5717778A · Chu · 1998 [cited by examiner]
US 5875258A · Ortyn · 1999 [cited by examiner]
US 5968839A · Blatt · 1999 [cited by examiner]
US 6061128A · Zweig · 2000 [cited by examiner]
US 6267722B1 · Anderson · 2001 [cited by examiner]
US 6394952B1 · Anderson · 2002 [cited by examiner]
US 6664071B1 · Windhab · 2003 [cited by examiner]
US 7177235B2 · Rund · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 7236428B1 · Morse · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 7267799B1 · Borich · 2007 [cited by examiner]
US 9702872B1 · Wang · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 9857372B1 · Pulitzer · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 9857373B1 · Pulitzer · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 10197558B1 · Saaski et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10823746B1 · Busa · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 11740203B2 · Galen et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 11802868B2 · Pulitzer et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 12094603B2 · Sivertsen · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 20010053336A1 · Hammer et al. · 2001 [cited by applicant]
US 20030021726A1 · Wu · 2003 [cited by examiner]
US 20030040128A1 · Meador · 2003 [cited by examiner]
US 20030120633A1 · Torre-Bueno · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 20030139903A1 · Zweig · 2003 [cited by examiner]
US 20030143530A1 · Klepp · 2003 [cited by examiner]
US 20040122790A1 · Walker · 2004 [cited by examiner]
US 20050008538A1 · Anderson · 2005 [cited by examiner]
US 20050203353A1 · Ma · 2005 [cited by examiner]
US 20050255001A1 · Padmanabhan · 2005 [cited by examiner]
US 20050255600A1 · Padmanabhan · 2005 [cited by examiner]
US 20060216832A1 · Nishikawa · 2006 [cited by examiner]
US 20060223192A1 · Smith · 2006 [cited by examiner]
US 20060246599A1 · Rosenstein · 2006 [cited by examiner]
US 20060274145A1 · Reiner · 2006 [cited by examiner]
US 20060292040A1 · Wickstead · 2006 [cited by examiner]
US 20070122914A1 · Curry · 2007 [cited by examiner]
US 20080186499A1 · Krauth · 2008 [cited by examiner]
US 20090061450A1 · Hunter · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20090074282A1 · Pinard · 2009 [cited by examiner]
US 20090087926A1 · Hasegawa · 2009 [cited by examiner]
US 20090155811A1 · Natan · 2009 [cited by examiner]
US 20090312663A1 · John · 2009 [cited by examiner]
US 20100045789A1 · Fleming · 2010 [cited by examiner]
US 20100105024A1 · Xu et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20100135857A1 · Hunter · 2010 [cited by examiner]
US 20100267049A1 · Rutter et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20100331651A1 · Groll · 2010 [cited by examiner]
US 20110213564A1 · Henke · 2011 [cited by examiner]
US 20110213579A1 · Henke · 2011 [cited by examiner]
US 20120071342A1 · Lochhead · 2012 [cited by examiner]
US 20120115214A1 · Battrell · 2012 [cited by examiner]
US 20120122236A1 · Tarpey · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20120123686A1 · Xiang et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20120282154A1 · Slowey · 2012 [cited by examiner]
US 20130203043A1 · Ozcan · 2013 [cited by examiner]
US 20130273645A1 · Waga · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130288254A1 · Pollack et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130338243A1 · Kentsis et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20140017812A1 · Smith · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 20140018779A1 · Worrell et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140154792A1 · Moynihan · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 20140227681A1 · Fleming · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 20140278832A1 · Glavina · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 20140324373A1 · Xiang · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 20140339100A1 · Malecha · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20150010992A1 · Fleming · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 20150099306A1 · Ku · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 20150244852A1 · Erickson et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20160030613A1 · Paul et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160157598A1 · Anelevitz · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160178607A1 · Husheer · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 20160188937A1 · Tyrrell · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 20160265032A1 · Sethi et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160356800A1 · Glavina · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 20160356801A1 · Glavina · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 20160370366A1 · Fleming · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 20170049915A1 · Brais et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170160258A1 · Hengstler · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20170184586A1 · Hopper · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20180031551A1 · Karlovac · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20180106789A1 · Pulitzer · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20180107790A1 · Pulitzer · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20180149600A1 · Farrell · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20180164222A1 · Pulitzer et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180246038A1 · Hunter · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180259449A1 · Poulsen et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180293350A1 · Dimov · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20180348198A1 · Broadwell · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20180372734A1 · Pfenninger · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20190070324A1 · Hardin et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190096516A1 · Pulitzer et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190122768A1 · Pulitzer et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190224685A1 · Benenati · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190229907A1 · Nicolson et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190267822A1 · Waffner et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190317115A1 · Maclean et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190339264A1 · Gary et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190369094A1 · Ishikawa et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20200330979A1 · Cyr · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20200386753A1 · Somes et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200408715A1 · Galen et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20210086177A1 · Lin · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210132035A1 · Adelman · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20210172945A1 · Armbruster et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210263018A1 · Taran · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210293688A1 · Chang · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20210319911A1 · Hall et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210327056A1 · Needham · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20220091114A1 · Levin · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20220178920A1 · Howard · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220254027A1 · Lin · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20220254133A1 · Adsul · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20220258155A1 · Ren et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220296755A1 · Wurmfeld et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220304560A1 · Jackson et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220399109A1 · Sivertsen · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20220404354A1 · Robinson et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220405551A1 · Jain · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20220412961A1 · Jolly et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20230213452A1 · Minobe · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 20230274538A1 · Sia · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 20230351754A1 · Satish · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 20240363206A1 · Mayer · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 20240387010A1 · Sivertsen · 2024 [cited by examiner]
US 20240402198A1 · Sivertsen · 2024 [cited by examiner]
US 20240404658A1 · Sivertsen · 2024 [cited by examiner]
US 20240412829A1 · Sivertsen · 2024 [cited by examiner]
US 20240424160A1 · Sivertsen · 2024 [cited by examiner]
US 20240428905A1 · Sivertsen · 2024 [cited by examiner]
CN 102482702A · 2012 [cited by applicant]
CN 102539735A · 2012 [cited by applicant]
CN 106680496A · 2017 [cited by examiner]
EP 2839264A1 · 2015 [cited by applicant]
TW 201833554A · 2018 [cited by applicant]
TW M588797U · 2020 [cited by applicant]
WO 2013119266A1 · 2013 [cited by applicant]
WO 2013158504A1 · 2013 [cited by applicant]
WO 2020174895A1 · 2020 [cited by applicant]
WO 2020251460A1 · 2020 [cited by applicant]
Waters, L. C. et al, Journal of Hazardous Materials 1995, 43, 1-12. (Year: 1995). [cited by examiner]
Lin, C.-S. et al, Optik 2004, 115, 363-369. (Year: 2004). [cited by examiner]
Waugh, J. J. S. et al, BJOG: an International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 2005, 112, 412-417. (Year: 2005). [cited by examiner]
Filippini, D. et al, Analyst 2006, 131, 111-117. (Year: 2006). [cited by examiner]
O'Farrell, B., in Lateral Flow Immunoassay 2009, Wong, R. C. et al. (eds.), Humana Press, New York, 1-33. (Year: 2009). [cited by examiner]
De Silva, D. A. et al, Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada 2014, 36, 605-612. (Year: 2014). [cited by examiner]
Hou, Y. et al, Nanoscale Research Letters 2017, 12, paper 291, 13 pages. (Year: 2017). [cited by examiner]
Correa, M. E. et al, Pregnancy Hypertension: An International Journal of Women's Cardiovascular Health 2017, 750-53. (Year: 2017). [cited by examiner]
Tucker, K. et al, Pregnancy Hypertension 2018, 12, 161-168. (Year: 2018). [cited by examiner]
Xu, Y. et al, Analytical Chemistry 2018, 90, 708-715 with 13 pages of supporting information. (Year: 2018). [cited by examiner]
Magiati, M. et al, Microchimica Acta 2018, 185, paper 314, 9 pages. (Year: 2018). [cited by examiner]
Panic, G. et al, Parasites & Vectors 2019, 12, paper 298, 7 pages. (Year: 2019). [cited by examiner]
Anfossi et al., Multiplex Lateral Flow Immunoassay: An Overview of Strategies towards High-throughput Point-of-Need Testing, Biosensors (Basel). Mar. 2019; 9(1): 2. (Year: 2018). [cited by applicant]
Assaygenie, Rapid covid19 antibody detection test principles and methods, published: 2020, https://www.assaygenie.com/rapid-covid 19-antibody-detection-tests-principles-and-methods (Year: 2020). [cited by applicant]
Azzi et al, Rapid Salivary Test suitable for a mass screening program to detect SARS-CoV-2: A diagnostic accuracy study, Journal of Infection, vol. 81, Issue 3, Sep. 2020, pp. e75-e78 (Year: 2020). [cited by applicant]
Badi et al., The Effect of Gold Salt Concentration in the Production of Gold Nanospheres, Jan. 2020, Journal of Applied Mathematics and Physics (Year: 2020). [cited by applicant]
Baker et al., The SARS-COV-2 Spike Protein Binds Sialic Acids and Enables Rapid Detection in a Lateral Flow Point of Care Diagnostic Device, 2020, vol. 6, 2046-2052 (Year: 2020). [cited by applicant]
Contreras-Aguilar, Changes in Saliva Analytes in Dairy Cows during Peripartum: A Pilot Study, Mar. 9, 2021, Animals, vol. 11, issues 3 (Year: 2021). [cited by applicant]
Independent Forensics, Developmental Validation of RSID-Urine, Mar. 2021, Independent Forensics, https://www.ifi-test.com/rsid-urine/ (Year: 2021). [cited by applicant]
Larsen et al., Fluorometric determination of uric acid in bovine milk, 2010, Journal of Dairy Research, vol. 77, 438-444 (Year: 2010). [cited by applicant]
Old et al., Developmental Validation of RSIDTM-Saliva: A Lateral Flow Immunochromatographic Strip Test for the Forensic Detection of Saliva, J Forensic Sci, Jul. 2009, vol. 54, No. 4 (Year: 2009). [cited by applicant]
Richardson et al., Amylase in Cow's Milk, 1936, Journal of Dairy Science, vol. 19, Issue 12, 761-772 (Year: 1936). [cited by applicant]
Stattechnologies, Adulteration Test Strips, 2017, StatTechnologies, https://stat-technologies.com/product/adulteration-test-strips/ (Year: 2017). [cited by applicant]
Stuart Patton, Some Practical Implications of the Milk Mucins, 1999, Journal of Dairy Science, vol. 82, Issue 6, 1115-1117 (Year:1999). [cited by applicant]
Thao et al., Analytical Chemistry 2017, 89, 6781-6786. [cited by applicant]
Zhu et al. Paper electrode integrated lateral flow immunosensor for quantitative analysis of oxidative stress induced DNA damage, 2014, Analyst, 139(11), 2850-2857 (Year: 2014). [cited by applicant]
Urusov AE et al. (2019) Towards Lateral Flow Quantitative Assays: Detection Approaches. Biosensors, 9(3), 16 pgs; https://doi.org/10.3390/bios9030089 (Year: 2019). [cited by applicant]