IP Library Granted Patent US 12,561,791
Granted Patent B2
US 12,561,791 · App. 18/894,638 · Granted Feb 24, 2026

Method to calibrate, predict, and control stochastic defects in EUV lithography

Inventors: Pradeep Vukkadala (Santa Clara, CA); Cao Zhang (Ann Arbor, MI); Anatoly Burov (Austin, TX); Guy Parsey (Ann Arbor, MI); Kyeongeun Ko (Gyeonggi-do, KR); Sergei G. Bakarian (Mountain View, CA); Janez Krek (Milan, MI); Kunlun Bai (Campbell, CA); Craig Higgins (Cedar Park, CA); John S. Graves (Austin, TX); Mark D. Smith (San Jose, CA); John J. Biafore (North Scituate, RI)
Assignee: KLA Corporation
G06T7/0004G06T7/0006G06T2207/20081G06T2207/30148G06T2207/30164G06T2207/30242
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,561,791
App. No.
18/894,638
Granted
Feb 24, 2026
Kind
B2
Abstract

Based on an initial probability of occurrence of a stochastic defect over a layout of a workpiece, a subset of locations on the workpiece are selected where the initial probability is above a threshold. The subset of locations are grouped by pattern shapes. An expected defect count is determined for each of the pattern shapes. A subset of the pattern shapes is then selected for repair.

Claims (36)

1 . A method comprising:

receiving, at a processor, an initial probability of occurrence of a stochastic defect over a layout of a workpiece, wherein the initial probability of occurrence of a stochastic defect is generated using a model;

selecting, using a processor, a subset of locations on the workpiece where the initial probability is above a threshold;

grouping, using the processor, the subset of locations by pattern shapes on the workpiece;

determining, using the processor, an expected defect count for each of the pattern shapes;

selecting, using the processor, a subset of the pattern shapes for repair, wherein selecting the subset of pattern shapes for repair includes determining a fraction expected defect count versus fractional location count curve for each of the layouts or determining an expected defect count versus fractional location count curve for each of the layouts;

repairing, using the processor, at least one of each of the subset of the pattern shapes thereby generating at least one repaired pattern shape; and

inserting, using the processor, the repaired pattern shape into corresponding locations of the layout.

2 . The method of claim 1 , wherein selecting the subset of pattern shapes for repair includes determining the fraction expected defect count versus the fractional location count curve for each of the layouts.

3 . The method of claim 2 , wherein the pattern shapes for repair are selected from the fraction expected defect count versus fractional location count curve.

4 . The method of claim 1 , wherein selecting the subset of pattern shapes for repair includes determining the expected defect count versus the fractional location count curve for each of the layouts.

5 . The method of claim 4 , wherein the pattern shapes for repair are selected from the expected defect count versus fractional location count curve.

6 . A system comprising:

an inspection tool configured to image a workpiece; and

a processor in electronic communication with the inspection tool, wherein the processor is configured to:

receive an initial probability of occurrence of a stochastic defect over a layout of a workpiece, wherein the initial probability of occurrence of a stochastic defect is generated using a model;

select a subset of locations on the workpiece where the initial probability is above a threshold;

group the subset of locations by pattern shapes on the workpiece;

determine an expected defect count for each of the pattern shapes;

select a subset of the pattern shapes for repair by determining a fraction expected defect count versus fractional location count curve for each of the layouts or determining an expected defect count versus fractional location count curve for each of the layouts;

repair at least one of each of the subset of the pattern shapes thereby generating at least one repaired pattern shape; and

insert the repaired pattern shape into corresponding locations of the layout.

7 . The system of claim 6 , wherein selecting the subset of pattern shapes for repair includes determining the fraction expected defect count versus the fractional location count curve for each of the layouts.

8 . The system of claim 7 , wherein the pattern shapes for repair are selected from the fraction expected defect count versus fractional location count curve.

9 . The system of claim 6 , wherein selecting the subset of pattern shapes for repair includes determining the expected defect count versus the fractional location count curve for each of the layouts.

10 . The system of claim 9 , wherein the pattern shapes for repair are selected from the expected defect count versus fractional location count curve.

11 . A non-transitory computer-readable storage medium, comprising one or more programs for executing the following steps on one or more computing devices:

receive an initial probability of occurrence of a stochastic defect over a layout of a workpiece, wherein the initial probability of occurrence of a stochastic defect is generated using a model;

select a subset of locations on the workpiece where the initial probability is above a threshold;

group the subset of locations by pattern shapes on the workpiece;

determine an expected defect count for each of the pattern shapes;

select a subset of the pattern shapes for repair by determining a fraction expected defect count versus fractional location count curve for each of the layouts or determining an expected defect count versus fractional location count curve for each of the layouts;

repair at least one of each of the subset of the pattern shapes thereby generating at least one repaired pattern shape; and

insert the repaired pattern shape into corresponding locations of the layout.

12 . The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium of claim 11 , wherein selecting the subset of pattern shapes for repair includes determining the fraction expected defect count versus the fractional location count curve for each of the layouts, and wherein the pattern shapes for repair are selected from the fraction expected defect count versus fractional location count curve.

13 . The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium of claim 11 , wherein selecting the subset of pattern shapes for repair includes determining the expected defect count versus the fractional location count curve for each of the layouts, and wherein the pattern shapes for repair are selected from the expected defect count versus fractional location count curve.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jan 8, 2025
From: VUKKADALA, PRADEEP; ZHANG, CAO; BUROV, ANATOLY; PARSEY, GUY; KO, KYEONGEUN; BAKARIAN, SERGEI G.; KREK, JANEZ; BAI, KUNLUN; HIGGINS, CRAIG; GRAVES, JOHN S.; SMITH, MARK D.; BIAFORE, JOHN J.
To: KLA CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 069779/0696 →
Continuity (2)
Provisional Application 63540605 · Sep 26, 2023
Related Publication 20250104216A1 · Mar 27, 2025
References Cited (53)
US 6560766B2 · Pierrat · 2003 [cited by examiner]
US 7221788B2 · Schulze · 2007 [cited by examiner]
US 7570796B2 · Zafar · 2009 [cited by examiner]
US 7769225B2 · Kekare · 2010 [cited by examiner]
US 8437534B2 · Shibuya · 2013 [cited by examiner]
US 8826209B2 · Kramer · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 9002497B2 · Volk · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 10223615B2 · Ma · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 10262408B2 · Park · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 10354405B2 · Lee · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 10474042B2 · Biafore · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 10672588B1 · Pathangi · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 10818001B2 · Leung et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10867382B2 · Moertelmaier · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 10871451B2 · Shabtay · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 10901325B2 · Gurevich et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 10957035B2 · Konecky · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 11119060B2 · Saraswatula · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 11126089B2 · Fang · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 11310467B2 · Allen · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 11747291B2 · Fukuda · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 11966156B2 · Vukkadala et al. · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 12205270B2 · Winfree · 2025 [cited by examiner]
US 20040151992A1 · Nagamura · 2004 [cited by examiner]
US 20050004774A1 · Volk · 2005 [cited by examiner]
US 20070288219A1 · Zafar · 2007 [cited by examiner]
US 20090304262A1 · Harabe · 2009 [cited by examiner]
US 20120198404A1 · Hasebe · 2012 [cited by examiner]
US 20120308112A1 · Hu · 2012 [cited by examiner]
US 20180275523A1 · Biafore et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180300870A1 · Park · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20190391482A1 · Oster · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20210225609A1 · Mack · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210263405A1 · Stanton et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20220129775A1 · Burov et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220196580A1 · Yin · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20220285226A1 · Huang · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20220292669A1 · Cho et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20230055365A1 · Kim et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20230326710A1 · Eyring · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20240337604A1 · Sakai · 2024 [cited by examiner]
US 20250095133A1 · Kuiper · 2025 [cited by examiner]
CN 111044525A · 2020 [cited by examiner]
CN 114372980A · 2022 [cited by examiner]
JP 2001274209A · 2001 [cited by examiner]
KR 20230028647A · 2023 [cited by examiner]
Latypov et al., Calibration of Gaussian random field stochastic EUV models, Proceedings of SPIE vol. 12051, Optical and EUV Nanolithography XXXV, 2022, 1205105. [cited by applicant]
Wang et al., Stochastic defect criticality prediction enabled by physical stochastic modeling and massive metrology, Proceedings of SPIE 11609, Extreme Ultraviolet (EUV) Lithography XII, 2021, 1160916. [cited by applicant]
De Bisschop, Stochastic printing failures in extreme ultraviolet lithography, Journal of Micro/Nanolithography, MEMS, and MOEMS, 2018, vol. 17, Issue 4, 041011. [cited by applicant]
De Bisschop et al., Empirical correlator for stochastic local CD uniformity in extreme ultraviolet lithography, Journal of Micro/Nanopatterning, Materials, and Metrology, 2022, vol. 21, Issue 3, 033201. [cited by applicant]
Levinson et al., Predicting very rare stochastic defects in EUVL processes for full-chip correction and verification, Proceedings of SPIE 11609, Extreme Ultraviolet (EUV) Lithography XII, 2021, 1160915, abstract. [cited by applicant]
Halder et al., Process window discovery methodology for extreme ultraviolet (EUV) lithography, Proceedings of SPIE 10959, Metrology, Inspection, and Process Control for Microlithography XXXIII, 2019, 109591V. [cited by applicant]
WIPO, International Search Report and Written Opinion issued for PCT/US2024/048252, Jan. 2, 2025. [cited by applicant]