IP Library Granted Patent US 12,649,136
Granted Patent B2
US 12,649,136 · App. 19/299,173 · Granted Jun 9, 2026

System and method for operating a electrified reactor

Inventors: Branko Zugic (Cambridge, MA); Joseph Rodden (Cambridge, MA)
Assignee: Lydian Labs, Inc.
B01J19/0013B01J19/24B01J27/224C01B32/40B01J2219/00058B01J2219/00135B01J2219/00195B01J2219/0022B01J2219/00234B01J2219/00268
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,649,136
App. No.
19/299,173
Granted
Jun 9, 2026
Kind
B2
Abstract

The method can include receiving a baseline signal curve, operating an electrified reactor, measuring a signal, optionally determining a state (e.g., state of health) of the electrified reactor, and controlling the electrified reactor based on the signal. The method can include receiving (e.g., determining, measuring, etc.) a resistance-temperature and/or resistance-time curve; operating an electrified reactor comprising resistively heating a porous catalytic element; measuring an electrical signal (e.g., resistance, current, voltage, etc.) of the electrified reactor; optionally inferring a temperature of the electrified reactor based on the electrical signal and the resistance-temperature, and controlling the electrified reactor based on the electrical signal. The system can include one or more of a reaction module (e.g., an electrical coupler or electrode and catalytic element, etc.), inlet and outlet valves, power source, electrical feedthroughs (e.g., leads, supports, etc.), sensors, and computing system (e.g. controller).

Claims (19)

1 . A method for controlling an electrified reactor comprising:

receiving a baseline resistance relationship associated with a catalytic element of the electrified reactor, wherein the catalytic element comprises porous silicon carbide;

operating the electrified reactor, comprising controlling a power source of the electrified reactor to resistively heat the catalytic element using a predetermined current density and introducing gaseous CO 2 and water to the catalytic element, wherein the CO 2 and water are converted to CO and H 2 ;

while operating the electrified reactor, measuring at least one of voltage or power of the electrified reactor;

computing an instantaneous resistance of the catalytic element from the current density and the at least one of voltage or power; and

controlling the power source based on a difference between a target resistance and the instantaneous resistance, wherein the target resistance is determined based on a baseline resistance relationship, wherein the baseline resistance relationship comprises a resistance-time relationship, wherein the target resistance comprises a steady-state resistance value based on the resistance-time relationship, wherein the resistance-time relationship comprises a resistance versus time curve measured for a test catalytic element under a set of conditions that correspond with a set of reactor operation conditions;

wherein, while operating the electrified reactor, a temperature of the catalytic element is not directly measured using a temperature sensor.

2 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising detecting degradation of the catalytic element, wherein the degradation is detected when the resistance is different from the target resistance by a percent error of at least 10%.

3 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the baseline resistance relationship further comprises a resistance-temperature relationship; wherein controlling the power source is further based on a resistance value associated with an expected reaction temperature based on the baseline resistance-temperature relationship.

4 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising measuring the baseline resistance relationship, wherein measuring the baseline resistance comprises:

heating a set of catalytic elements, each analogous to the catalytic element in a furnace;

introducing steam, carbon dioxide, carbon monoxide, and hydrogen to the furnace to mimic reaction conditions of the electrified reactor; and

measuring a resistance at different temperatures for each catalytic element of the set of catalytic elements.

5 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising determining an operation setpoint based on the resistance and the target resistance; wherein the operation setpoint is determined using a set of predetermined heuristics.

6 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising determining an operation setpoint based on the resistance and the target resistance; wherein the operation setpoint is determined using a machine learning model.

7 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the baseline resistance relationship is received from a set of baseline resistance relationships, wherein the baseline resistance relationship is received based on a reaction environment of the electrified reactor or an age of the electrified reactor.

8 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the electrified reactor comprises a second catalytic element arranged fluidically in series with the catalytic element, wherein the second catalytic element is resistively heated with a second power source, wherein the method further comprises computing an instantaneous resistance of the second catalytic element and controlling the second power source, independently from the power source, based on the instantaneous resistance of the second catalytic element and a second target resistance.

9 . The method of claim 1 , wherein measuring the at least one of voltage or power comprises measuring a voltage drop across the catalytic element during the conversion of the CO 2 and water to CO and H 2 .

10 . The method of claim 1 , wherein controlling the power source is further based on a flow rate of at least one of the CO 2 or the water, wherein the power source is controlled such that a local temperature of the catalytic element is maintained.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Apr 16, 2026
From: ZUGIC, BRANKO; RODDEN, JOSEPH
To: LYDIAN LABS, INC.
Reel/Frame 074392/0246 →
Continuity (2)
Provisional Application 63682474 · Aug 13, 2024
Related Publication 20260048377A1 · Feb 19, 2026
References Cited (58)
US 3477827A · Mott · 1969 [cited by applicant]
US 3541729A · Dantowitz · 1970 [cited by applicant]
US 5428955A · Yuuki et al. · 1995 [cited by applicant]
US 7172735B1 · Lowe et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 7297324B2 · TeGrotenhuis · 2007 [cited by examiner]
US 7611579B2 · Lashmore et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 8926721B2 · Bingue et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 11173545B2 · Qi et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11866328B1 · Sheludko et al. · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 12157104B2 · Zugic · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 20060014056A1 · Park et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20060124445A1 · Labrecque et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20150129805A1 · Karpenko · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 20170283259A1 · Yu · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20190118264A1 · Qi et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20200354216A1 · Mortensen · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20210113983A1 · Mortensen et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210238035A1 · Mortensen et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210262662A1 · Maeshima et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210318177A1 · Culbertson et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20220081291A1 · Mortensen · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20220306559A1 · Mortensen et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220410109A1 · Mortensen · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20230002690A1 · Klaassen et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20230118083A1 · Jo et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20230159326A1 · Surma et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20240059562A1 · Mortensen · 2024 [cited by examiner]
US 20250001381A1 · Zugic et al. · 2025 [cited by applicant]
US 20250243071A1 · Zugic et al. · 2025 [cited by applicant]
CN 1514508A · 2004 [cited by applicant]
CN 105183039A · 2015 [cited by applicant]
CN 115888618A · 2023 [cited by applicant]
EP 3574991A1 · 2019 [cited by applicant]
GB 1547810A · 1979 [cited by applicant]
JP 2005087803A · 2005 [cited by applicant]
JP 2006012790A · 2006 [cited by applicant]
JP 2009513327A · 2009 [cited by applicant]
WO 2004091773A1 · 2004 [cited by applicant]
WO 2019228797A1 · 2019 [cited by applicant]
WO 2020185744A1 · 2020 [cited by applicant]
WO 2021110809A1 · 2021 [cited by applicant]
WO 2022221740A1 · 2022 [cited by applicant]
WO 2022241260A1 · 2022 [cited by applicant]
WO 2024086300A1 · 2024 [cited by applicant]
Mooraj, et al., “3D printing of metal-based materials for renewable energy applications”, Nano Research, Tsinghua University Press, CN, vol. 14, No. 7, Dec. 4, 2020 (Dec. 4, 2020), pp. 2105-2132, XP037499819, ISSN: 1998… [cited by applicant]
Abbas, et al., “Experimental assessment of reverse water gas shift integrated with chemical looping for low-carbon fuels”, Journal of CO2 Utilization 83 (2024) 102775. [cited by applicant]
Cao, et al., “CO2 conversion to syngas via electrification of endothermal reactors: process design and environmental impact analysis”, Energy Conversion and Management, vol. 265, Aug. 1, 2022, 115763. [cited by applicant]
Chen, et al., “Recent Advances in Supported Metal Catalysts and Oxide Catalysts for the Reverse Water-Gas Shift Reaction”, Frontiers in Chemistry, Aug. 2020, vol. 8, Article 709. [cited by applicant]
González-Castaño, et al., “The reverse water gas shift reaction: a process systems engineering perspective”, The Royal Society of Chemistry 2021, React. Chem. Eng., DOI: 10.1039/d0re00478b. [cited by applicant]
Idamakanti, et al., “Electrified Catalysts for Endothermic Chemical Processes: Materials Needs, Advances, and Challenges”, ACS Eng. Au 2024, 4, 71-90. [cited by applicant]
Ishida, et al., “CO2 Recovery in a Power Plant With Chemical Looping Combustion”, Energy Convers. Mgmt., vol. 38, Suppl., pp. S187 SI92, 1997. [cited by applicant]
Maporti, et al., “Towards sustainable hydrogen production: Integrating electrified and convective steam reformer with carbon capture and storage”, Chemical Engineering Journal 499 (2024) 156357. [cited by applicant]
Subramanian, et al., “Geometric Catalyst Utilization in Zero-Gap CO2 Electrolyzers”, ACS Energy Letters. vol 8. No. 1. Article. Jan. 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acsenergylett.2c02194. [cited by applicant]
Theofanidis, et al., “On the Electrification of CO2-Based Methanol Synthesis via a Reverse Water-Gas Shift: A Comparative Techno-Economic Assessment of Thermo-Catalytic and Plasma-Assisted Routes”, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. … [cited by applicant]
Trivino, et al., “Transforming CO2 to valuable feedstocks: Emerging catalytic and 2 technological advances for the reverse water gas shift reaction”, Chemical Engineering Journal, vol. 487, May 1, 2024, 150369. [cited by applicant]
Wismann, et al., “Electrified methane reforming: A compact approach to greener industrial hydrogen production”, Science 364, 756-759 (2019) May 24, 2019. [cited by applicant]
Zhang, Xiao, “A stable low-temperature H2-production catalyst by crowding Pt on α-MoC”, Nature, Article, vol. 589—Jan. 21, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-03130-6. [cited by applicant]
Zugic, et al., “Reactor Systems for Endothermic Reactions”, U.S. Appl. No. 19/038,495, filed Jan. 27, 2025. [cited by applicant]