IP Library Granted Patent US 12,655,734
Granted Patent B2
US 12,655,734 · App. 18/340,250 · Granted Jun 16, 2026

Methods for shut-in pressure escalation analysis

Inventor: Nicolas P. Roussel (Houston, TX)
Assignee: ConocoPhillips Company
E21B43/26E21B41/00E21B47/06G06F30/28G06F40/117G06F40/143G06F40/205H04L9/3247E21B43/267G01V20/00H04L2209/60
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,655,734
App. No.
18/340,250
Granted
Jun 16, 2026
Kind
B2
Abstract

Methods for using shut-in pressures to determine uncertainties in a hydraulic fracturing process in a shale reservoir are described. Data commonly collected during multistage fracturing is used to calculate propped fracture height and induced stresses, as well as other variables, in the presence of horizontal stress anisotropy. These variables can then be incorporated into reservoir simulations to improve the fracturing monitoring, forecast hydrocarbon recoveries, or modify fracturing plans.

Claims (54)

1 . A method of producing oil, comprising:

a) fracturing a well in a reservoir in n fracturing stages and measuring instantaneous shut-in pressure (ISIP) data at an end of each of said n fracturing stages;

b) inputting said ISIP data into a software program stored in a non-transitory memory of a computer,

c) said software program matching said ISIP data by varying stress plateau and escalation using Eq. 1:

Δ

σ

shadow

(

n

)

=

Δ

σ

plateau

(

1

-

ε

1

-

n

Escalation

)

Eq

.

1

wherein;

n is a stage number, Δσ plateau is a total value of stress interference for n fracturing stages, Δσ shadow is a stress interference contribution for each of n fracturing stages, and Escalation is how quickly stress interference approaches a stress plateau;

d) estimating fracture height and estimating horizontal-stress anisotropy by comparing said ISIP data for each of said n fracturing stages against stress plateau type curves and escalation type curves;

e) inputting said estimated horizontal-stress anisotropy and said estimated hydraulic-fracture height into a reservoir model software and optimizing a reservoir fracturing plan;

f) fracturing a next stage of said well or fracturing a similar well in said reservoir with said optimized reservoir fracturing plan; and

g) producing oil from said well or said similar well.

2 . The method of claim 1 , wherein ISIP is a pressure value past an early rapid fall off as determined by extrapolating a slope at an end of a pressure pulse caused by shut-in.

3 . The method of claim 2 , wherein in step d) fracture height, fracture length, and fracture area are also estimated.

4 . The method of claim 2 , wherein ISIP is measured at the surface, downhole, or both.

5 . The method of claim 2 , wherein if a stress load is less than half a net-pressure in said well at shut-in, fracture reorientation is limited, and said method may proceed, but if not, said method is discontinued, wherein said stress load is net pressure in a fracture stage just prior to the start of a subsequent fracture stage.

6 . The method of claim 2 , wherein said optimized fracturing plan uses one or more modified parameter(s) selected from the group consisting of: cluster number per stage, cluster spacing, stage spacing, fracturing pressure, fracturing fluid type, fracturing fluid volume, fracturing fluid viscosity, proppant type, proppant mass, proppant concentration, pumping rate, pumping schedule or combinations thereof.

7 . The method of claim 1 , wherein ISIP is determined after each of n stages of a diagnostic fracture injection test (DFIT), wherein said ISIP is a pressure value past an early rapid falloff as determined by extrapolating a slope at an end of a pressure pulse caused by shut-in, and wherein said DFIT comprises injecting a volume of fluid at a low rate through perforations in a cemented casing to create a small-scale hydraulic fracture, thereby obtaining ISIP data for each of said n stages of said DFIT.

8 . The method of claim 7 , wherein in step d) fracture height, fracture length, and fracture area are also estimated.

9 . The method of claim 7 , wherein ISIP is measured at the surface, downhole, or both.

10 . The method of claim 7 , wherein if a stress load is less than half a net-pressure in said well at shut-in, fracture reorientation is limited, and said method may proceed, but if not, said method is discontinued, wherein said stress load is net pressure in a fracture stage just prior to the start of a subsequent fracture stage.

11 . The method of claim 7 , wherein said optimized fracturing plan uses one or more modified parameter(s) selected from the group consisting of: cluster number per stage, cluster spacing, stage spacing, fracturing pressure, fracturing fluid type, fracturing fluid volume, fracturing fluid viscosity, proppant type, proppant mass, proppant concentration, pumping rate, pumping schedule or combinations thereof.

12 . The method of claim 1 , wherein in step d) fracture height, fracture length, and fracture area are also estimated.

13 . The method of claim 1 , wherein said ISIP is measured at the surface, downhole, or both.

14 . The method of claim 1 , wherein if a stress load is less than half a net-pressure in said well at shut-in, fracture reorientation is limited, and said method may proceed, but if not, said method is discontinued, wherein said stress load is net pressure in a fracture stage just prior to the start of a subsequent fracture stage.

15 . The method of claim 1 , wherein said optimized fracturing plan uses one or more modified parameter(s) selected from the group consisting of: cluster number per stage, cluster spacing, stage spacing, fracturing pressure, fracturing fluid type, fracturing fluid volume, fracturing fluid viscosity, proppant type, proppant mass, proppant concentration, pumping rate, pumping schedule or combinations thereof.

16 . A method for producing oil, comprising:

a) fracturing a well in a reservoir in n stages and measuring instantaneous shut-in pressure (ISIP) data at an end of each of said n fracturing stages;

b) estimating fracture height and horizontal-stress anisotropy based on said ISIP data and comparison to type curves for stress interference and type curves for escalation;

c) optimizing a reservoir fracturing plan using said estimated horizontal-stress anisotropy and said estimated hydraulic-fracture height to obtain an optimized reservoir fracturing plan;

d) fracturing a next stage said well or fracturing a second well in said reservoir with said optimized reservoir fracturing plan; and

e) producing oil from said well or said second well.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jun 23, 2023
From: ROUSSEL, NICOLAS P.
To: CONOCOPHILLIPS COMPANY
Reel/Frame 064042/0378 →
Continuity (5)
Continuation 17672269 · Feb 15, 2022
Continuation 16986779 · Aug 6, 2020
Continuation 15823762 · Nov 28, 2017
Provisional Application 62427262 · Nov 29, 2016
Related Publication 20230334204A1 · Oct 19, 2023
References Cited (62)
US 3933205A · Kiel · 1976 [cited by applicant]
US 4858130A · Widrow · 1989 [cited by applicant]
US 5005643A · Soliman et al. · 1991 [cited by applicant]
US 7114561B2 · Vinegar et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 7272973B2 · Craig · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 7543635B2 · East et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 7788037B2 · Soliman et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 7933718B2 · Mcdaniel et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 8204727B2 · Dean et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8210257B2 · Dusterhoft et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8521494B2 · Narr et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8733444B2 · East, Jr. et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 8839873B2 · Johnson et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 8938363B2 · Beasley et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9023770B2 · Todd et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9262713B2 · Shelley et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9394774B2 · Soliman et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9575206B2 · Guo et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9835017B2 · Taylor · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9926776B2 · Zha et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 9988895B2 · Roussel et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10120343B2 · Chiu et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10724359B2 · Anno et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10801307B2 · Roussel et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10846443B2 · Petukhov · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 11209558B2 · Roussel · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11500114B2 · Roussel et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20120152550A1 · East, Jr. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20120325462A1 · Roussel et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20130186688A1 · Rasmus et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130211807A1 · Templeton-Barrett et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20140067353A1 · Shelley · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 20160003020A1 · Sharma · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 20170114613A1 · Lecerf et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170211371A1 · Brady et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
EP 2163724A2 · 2010 [cited by applicant]
WO 2011022012A1 · 2011 [cited by applicant]
WO 2012173608A1 · 2012 [cited by applicant]
WO 2013008195A2 · 2013 [cited by applicant]
WO 2014126484A1 · 2014 [cited by applicant]
WO 2015124395A2 · 2015 [cited by applicant]
WO 2016175844A1 · 2016 [cited by applicant]
WO 2016193733A1 · 2016 [cited by applicant]
Manchanda, R.; Sharma, M. M.; Holzhauser, S. “Time dependent fracture-interference effects in pad wells.” SPE Prod & Oper., 29 (04), 274-287; SPE-164534 (2014). [cited by applicant]
Daneshy, A.; Au-Yeung, J.; Thompson, T.; Tymko, D. “Fracture shadowing: A direct method for determination of the reach and propagation pattern of hydraulic fractures in horizontal wells.” Paper presented at the SPE Hydr… [cited by applicant]
Escobar, F. H.; Castro, J. R.; Mosquera, J. S. “Rate-transient analysis for hydraulically fractured vertical oil and gas wells.” ARPN Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, vol. 9 (5), 739-749 (2014). [cited by applicant]
McClure, M. W.; Zoback, M. D. “Computational investigation of trends in initial shut-in pressure during multi-stage hydraulic stimulation in the Barnett Shale.” Paper presented at the 47th U.S. Rock Mechanics/Geomechani… [cited by applicant]
Manchanda, R.; Roussel, N. P.; Sharma, M. M. “Factors influencing fracture trajectories and fracturing pressure data in a horizontal completion.” Paper presented at the 46th U.S. Rock Mechanics/Geomechanics Symposium, C… [cited by applicant]
Roussel, N. P.; Manchanda, R.; Sharma, M. M. “Implications of fracturing pressure data recorded during a horizontal completion on stage spacing design.” Paper presented at the SPE Hydraulic Fracturing Technology Confere… [cited by applicant]
Roussel, N. P.; Sharma, M. M. “Strategies to minimize frac spacing and stimulate natural fractures in horizontal completions.” Paper presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Denver, CO SPE-146104… [cited by applicant]
Vermylen, J. P.; Zoback, M. D. “Hydraulic fracturing, microseismic magnitudes, and stress evolution in the Barnett Shale, Texas, USA.” Paper presented at the SPE Hydraulic Fracturing Technology Conference, The Woodlands… [cited by applicant]
Soliman, M. Y.; East, L.; Adams, D. “Geomechanics aspects of multiple fracturing of horizontal and vertical wells.” SPE Drill & Colp., 23(3), 217-228. SPE-86992-PA (2008). [cited by applicant]
Far, M. e.; Hardage, B. “Interpretation of fractures and stress anisotropy in Marcellus Shale using multicomponent seismic data.” Interpretation, vol. 2 (2), SE105-SE115 (2014). [cited by applicant]
Hayashi, K.; Sakurai, I. “Interpretation of hydraulic fracturing shut-in curves for tectonic stress measurements.” Intnl J. of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sci & Geomechanics Abstracts, vol. 26(6), 477-482 (1989). [cited by applicant]
Paderin, G. V.; Galybin, A. N.; Izvekov, O. Y. “Multi-stage hydro-fracture trajectories: modelling by the SIE method.” Procedia Materials Sci. 1798-1803 (2014). [cited by applicant]
Roussel, N. P.; Sharma, M. M. “Optimizing Fracture Spacing and Sequencing in Horizontal-Well Fracturing.” SPE Prod & Oper 26 (2), 173-184 (SPE-127986) (2011). [cited by applicant]
Gronseth, J. M. “Determination of the instantaneous shut in pressure from hydraulic fracturing data and its reliability as a measure of the minimum principal stress.” Paper presented at the 23rd U.S. Symposium on Rock M… [cited by applicant]
Mclennan, J. D.; Roegiers, J-C. “How instantaneous are instantaneous shut-in pressures?” Paper presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, New Orleans, Louisiana SPE-11064-MS (1982). [cited by applicant]
East, L.; Soliman, M. Y.; Augustine, J. “Methods for enhancing far-field complexity in fracturing operations.” SPE Prod & Oper, 26(3), 291-303, SPE-133380-PA (2011). [cited by applicant]
Song, J. H.; Rojas, J. C. “Preventing mud losses by wellbore strengthening.” paper presented at the SPE Russian Oil and Gas Technical Conference and Exhibition, Moscow, Russia SPE-101593-MS (2006). [cited by applicant]
Rafiee, M.; Solima, M. Y.; Pirayesh, E. “Hydraulic fracturing design and optimization: a modification to Zipper Frac.” Paper presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, San Antonio, TX SPE-159786 (2… [cited by applicant]
Waters, G.; Dean, B.; Downie, R.; Kerrihard, K.; Austbo, L.; McPherson, B. “Simultaneous hydraulic fracturing of adjacent horizontal wells in the Woodford Shale.” Paper presented at the SPE Hydraulic Fracturing Technolo… [cited by applicant]