IP Library › Granted Patent US 9,411,523
Granted Patent B2
US 9,411,523 · App. 13/934,830 · Granted Aug 9, 2016

Redundant array of independent disks (RAID) system backup management

Inventors: Gary D. Cudak (Creedmoor, NC); Lydia M. Do (Raleigh, NC); Christopher J. Hardee (Raleigh, NC); Adam Roberts (Moncure, NC)
Assignee: GLOBALFOUNDRIES INC.
G06F3/0619G06F3/0665G06F3/0689G06F11/1458G06F11/2046
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 9,411,523
App. No.
13/934,830
Granted
Aug 9, 2016
Kind
B2
Abstract

Disclosed herein are RAID backup management systems and methods. According to an aspect, a method may include identifying portions of data in each of multiple storage units of a RAID system. The method may also include backing up data in the identified portions to a hot spare. Further, the method may include allocating storage space in the hot spare for the backup based on detection of errors among the storage units.

Claims (40)

1. A system comprising:

a plurality of storage units of a redundant array of independent disks (RAID) system; and

a RAID controller configured to:

identify portions of data in each of the storage units;

back up data in the identified portions to a hot spare;

compare at least one characteristic of the storage units to each other;

determine allocation of storage space for the hot spare based on the comparison;

compare a likelihood of failure of the storage units to each other; and

allocate storage space in the hot spare for the backup based on the comparison of the likelihood of failure of the storage units to each other.

2. The system of claim 1 , wherein the RAID system is one of a RAID 5 system and a RAID 6 system.

3. The system of claim 1 , wherein the RAID controller is configured to:

determine the at least one characteristic of one of the storage units; and

determine the allocation of storage space in the hot spare based on the characteristic.

4. The system of claim 3 , wherein the RAID controller is configured to compare the likelihood of a failure of the storage units by determining a likelihood of failure of the one of the storage units.

5. The system of claim 1 , wherein the RAID controller is configured to determine the storage unit having the highest likelihood of failure among the storage units, wherein the size of the identified allocation of the storage space of the storage unit having the highest likelihood of failure is greater than the sizes of the memory of the other storage units.

6. The method of claim 1 , wherein the RAID controller is configured to determine a portion of one of the storage units associated with one or more errors, wherein the identified portion of the one of the storage units corresponds to the portion associated with one or more errors.

7. The system of claim 1 , wherein the RAID controller is configured to:

determine failure of one of the storage units; and

switch over to use of the hot spare as a partially rebuilt replacement in place of the failed storage unit in response to determining the failure.

8. The system of claim 1 , wherein the RAID controller is configured to use data in the hot spare to populate a storage unit for replacement of a failed storage unit.

9. A computer program product for redundant array of independent disks (RAID) management, said computer program product comprising:

a non-transitory computer readable storage medium having computer readable program code embodied therewith;

a processor configured to execute the computer readable program code, the computer readable program code comprising:

computer readable program code configured to identify portions of data in each of the storage units;

computer readable program code configured to back up data in the identified portions to a hot spare;

computer readable program code configured to compare at least one characteristic of the storage units to each other;

computer readable program code configured to determine allocation of storage space for the hot spare based on the comparison;

computer readable program code configured to compare a likelihood of failure of the storage units to each other; and

computer readable program code configured to allocate storage space in the hot spare for the backup based on the comparison of the likelihood of failure of the storage units to each other.

10. The computer program product of claim 9 , wherein the RAID system is one of a RAID 5 system and a RAID 6 system.

11. The computer program product of claim 9 , further comprising computer readable program code configured to:

determine a characteristic of one of the storage units; and

determine an allocation of storage space in the hot spare based on the characteristic.

12. The computer program product of claim 11 , further comprising computer readable program code configured to determine a likelihood of failure of the one of the storage units.

13. The computer program product of claim 9 , wherein comparing at least one characteristic comprises determining the storage unit having the highest likelihood of failure among the storage units, wherein the size of the identified allocation of the storage space of the storage unit having the highest likelihood of failure is greater than the sizes of the memory of the other storage units.

14. The computer program product of claim 9 , further comprising computer readable program code configured to determine a portion of one of the storage units associated with one or more errors, wherein the identified portion of the one of the storage units corresponds to the portion associated with one or more errors.

15. The computer program product of claim 9 , further comprising computer readable program code configured to:

determine failure of one of the storage units; and

switch over to use of the hot spare as a partially rebuilt replacement in place of the failed storage unit in response to determining the failure.

16. The computer program product of claim 9 , further comprising using data in the hot spare to populate a storage unit for replacement of a failed storage unit.

Assignments (7)
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded May 12, 2021
From: WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
To: GLOBALFOUNDRIES U.S. INC.
Reel/Frame 056987/0001 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Nov 20, 2020
From: WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
To: GLOBALFOUNDRIES INC.
Reel/Frame 054636/0001 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Nov 2, 2020
From: GLOBALFOUNDRIES INC.
To: GLOBALFOUNDRIES U.S. INC.
Reel/Frame 054633/0001 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Nov 29, 2018
From: GLOBALFOUNDRIES INC.
To: WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
Reel/Frame 049490/0001 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Oct 5, 2015
From: GLOBALFOUNDRIES U.S. 2 LLC; GLOBALFOUNDRIES U.S. INC.
To: GLOBALFOUNDRIES INC.
Reel/Frame 036779/0001 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Sep 3, 2015
From: INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION
To: GLOBALFOUNDRIES U.S. 2 LLC
Reel/Frame 036550/0001 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jul 3, 2013
From: CUDAK, GARY D.; DO, LYDIA M.; HARDEE, CHRISTOPHER JAMES; ROBERTS, ADAM
To: INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 030736/0583 →
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20150012701A1 · Jan 8, 2015