Alternative methodology in assessing network availability
View Patent ↗The present invention provides methods, devices, and systems for determining the availability of at least a part of a communications network in the context of alternate routing. Moreover, the present invention is adapted to consider network flow variations based on device outages all while accounting for the actual probability associated with various re-routing scenarios.
1. A method for analyzing an availability of at least part of a communications network, the network including a set of network components, the method comprising:
processor executing an availability assessment tool stored as a set of instructions stored on a tangible, non-transitory computer-readable medium;
the assessment tool identifying at least a first and second scenario for the network, wherein the first scenario comprises the set of network components arranged in a first communication configuration to support a first path through the network and wherein the second scenario comprises the set of network components arranged in a second communication configuration to support a second path through the network, the second path being an alternate path to the first path;
the assessment tool determining an availability of the network in the first scenario;
the assessment tool determining an availability of the network in the second scenario;
the assessment tool determining a probability with which the first scenario will occur;
the assessment tool determining a probability with which the second scenario will occur;
the assessment tool determining an availability probability for the first scenario based on the probability of the first scenario and the availability of the network in the first scenario;
the assessment tool determining an availability probability for the second scenario based on the probability of the second scenario and the availability of the network in the second scenario;
the assessment tool summing the availability probability for the first scenario with the availability probability for the second scenario to determine an indication of an overall network availability; and
the assessment tool providing the indication of the overall network availability.
2. The method of claim 1 , further comprising determining one or more scenario-generating components which are active in the first communication configuration and inactive in the second communication configuration.
3. The method of claim 2 , further comprising:
determining an availability associated with each component in the set of network components;
accounting for the availability associated with each component active in the first scenario when determining an availability of the network in the first scenario;
accounting for the availability associated with each component active in the second scenario when determining an availability of the network in the second scenario; and
combining the first scenario availability with the second scenario availability to determine the overall network availability.
4. The method of claim 3 , wherein at least one of MTBF, MTTR, MTTF, FIT, MTBO, failure rate, reportable outage(s), outage downtime measure(s), and downtime measure for partial outage are used as an indication of the availability associated with each component in the set of network components.
5. The method of claim 1 , wherein less than all possible combinations of components subject to failure are included in a scenario used to determine the overall network availability, the method further comprising:
normalizing the probability of the first scenario and the probability of the second scenario prior to determining an overall network availability.
6. The method of claim 1 , wherein communications traffic is flowed from a first endpoint in the network to a second endpoint in the network via a first traffic route in the first scenario and wherein communications traffic is flowed from the first endpoint in the network to the second endpoint in the network via a second traffic route in the second scenario, and wherein the second traffic route comprises at least one component therein that is not in the first traffic route.
7. The method of claim 1 , wherein traffic is flowed across the network in both the first and second scenarios to determine the network availability in the first and second scenarios respectively.
8. The method of claim 1 , wherein each component in the set of network components comprise at least one of a Wide Area Network (WAN), Local Area Network (LAN), router, gateway resource, server, switch, digital signal processor, time division multiplexed slot, time division multiplexed bus, trunk, port, transport network, control network, port network, Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) card, analog-to-digital converter, digital-to-analog converter, modem, circuit board, circuit element, data bus, and wire.
9. The method of claim 1 , wherein at least two components in the set of components comprise different availabilities.
10. A system for analyzing an availability of at least part of a communication network, the network including a set of network components, wherein each component in the set of network components comprises an availability associated therewith, and wherein at least two components in the set of network components comprise different availabilities, the system comprising:
storage memory including instructions for executing an availability assessment tool, the availability assessment tool operable to:
identify at least a first and second scenario for the network, wherein the first scenario comprises the set of network components arranged in a first communication configuration to support a first path through the network and wherein the second scenario comprises the set of network components arranged in a second communication configuration to support a second path through the network, the second path being an alternate path to the first path;
determine an availability of the network in the first and second scenario;
determine a probability with which the first scenario will occur;
determine a probability with which the second scenario will occur;
determine an availability probability for the first scenario based on the probability of the first scenario and the availability of the network in the first scenario;
determine an availability probability for the second scenario based on the probability of the second scenario and the availability of the network in the second scenario;
sum the availability probability for the first scenario with the availability probability for the second scenario to determine an indication of an overall network availability;
provide the indication of the overall network availability; and
a processor configured to execute the instructions stored on the storage memory.
11. The system of claim 10 , wherein the availability assessment tool is further operable to compare the overall network availability to an availability expectation, determine that the overall network availability does not satisfy the availability expectation, and provide, as part of the indication, that the availability expectation is not met by a current configuration of the network components.
12. The system of claim 11 , wherein the availability assessment tool is further operable to identify at least one restricting component in the set of components and provide, as part of the indication, a suggestion to replace at least one restricting component with a second component comprising a better availability and provide a backup component to at least one restricting component.
13. The system of claim 10 , wherein the availability assessment tool is further operable to determine at least one network component that is subject to failure during operation, and wherein at least one network component is active in the first communication configuration and inactive in the second communication configuration.
14. The system of claim 13 , wherein the availability assessment tool is further operable to determine an availability associated with each component in the set of network components, account for the availability associated with each component active in the first scenario when determining an availability of the network in the first scenario, account for the availability associated with each component active in the second scenario when determining an availability of the network in the second scenario, and combine the first scenario availability with the second scenario availability to determine the overall network availability.
15. The system of claim 14 , wherein at least one of MTBF, MTTR, MTTF, FIT, MTBO, failure rate, reportable outage(s), outage downtime measure(s), and downtime measure for partial outage are used as an indication of the availability associated with each component in the set of network components.
16. The system of claim 10 , wherein less than all possible combinations of components subject to failure are included in a scenario used to determine the overall network availability, and wherein the availability assessment tool is further operable to normalize the probability of the first scenario and the probability of the second scenario prior to determining an overall network availability.
17. The system of claim 16 , wherein communications traffic is flowed from a first endpoint in the network to a second endpoint in the network via a first traffic route in the first scenario and wherein communications traffic is flowed from the first endpoint in the network to the second endpoint in the network via a second traffic route in the second scenario, and wherein the second traffic route comprises at least one component therein that is not in the first traffic route.
18. The system of claim 10 , wherein traffic is flowed across the network in both the first and second scenarios to determine the network availability in the first and second scenarios respectively.
19. The system of claim 10 , wherein each component in the set of network components comprise at least one of a Wide Area Network (WAN), Local Area Network (LAN), router, gateway resource, server, switch, digital signal processor, time division multiplexed slot, time division multiplexed bus, trunk, port, transport network, control network, port network, Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) card, analog-to-digital converter, digital-to-analog converter, modem, circuit board, circuit element, data bus, and wire.
20. The system of claim 10 , wherein at least two components in the set of components comprise different availabilities.
21. A tangible, non-transitory computer readable medium having stored thereon computer-executable instructions that, when executed by a processor, perform a method for analyzing an availability of at least part of a communications network, the instructions comprising:
instructions to identify at least a first and second scenario for the network, wherein the first scenario comprises the set of network components arranged in a first communication configuration to support a first path through the network and wherein the second scenario comprises the set of network components arranged in a second communication configuration to support a second path through the network, the second path being an alternate path to the first path;
instructions to determine an availability and a probability of the network in the first scenario;
instructions to determine an availability probability for the first scenario based on the probability of the first scenario and the availability of the network in the first scenario;
instructions to determine an availability and a probability of the network in the second scenario;
instructions to determine an availability probability for the second scenario based on the probability of the second scenario and the availability of the network in the second scenario;
instructions to sum the availability probability for the first scenario with the availability probability for the second scenario to provide an indication of an overall network availability; and
instructions to provide the indication of the overall network availability.
22. The computer readable medium of claim 21 , wherein less than all possible combinations of components subject to failure are included in a scenario used to determine the overall network availability, the instructions further comprising instructions to normalize the probability of the first scenario and the probability of the second scenario prior to determining an overall network availability.