IP Library Granted Patent US 9,100,417
Granted Patent B2
US 9,100,417 · App. 12/115,199 · Granted Aug 4, 2015

Multi-node and multi-call state machine profiling for detecting SPIT

View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 9,100,417
App. No.
12/115,199
Granted
Aug 4, 2015
Kind
B2
Abstract

An apparatus and method for detecting potentially-improper call behavior (e.g., SPIT, etc.) are disclosed. The illustrative embodiment of the present invention is based on finite-state machines (FSMs) that represent the legal states and state transitions of communications protocols at nodes during Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) calls. In accordance with the illustrative embodiment, a library of FSM execution profiles associated with improper call behavior and a set of rules (or rule base) associated with improper FSM behavior over one or more calls are maintained. When the behavior of one or more finite-state machines during one or more calls matches either an execution profile in the library or a rule in the rule base, an alert is generated.

Claims (31)

1. A method comprising:

determining, by a data-processing system, whether the execution of an instance of a first finite-state machine and an instance of a second finite-state machine during a call matches one or more execution profiles that are associated with improper call behavior,

wherein said instance of said first finite-state machine corresponds to the state of a communications protocol at a first node, and

wherein said instance of said second finite-state machine corresponds to the state of the communications protocol at a second node that is different than the first node, and

wherein at least one of said execution profiles characterizes the execution of a plurality of finite-state machines, corresponding to the respective state of the communications protocol at the respective node, during a call; and

when a match exists, generating, by a data-processing system, a signal that indicates a possible occurrence of improper call behavior,

wherein the execution of a plurality of finite-state machines during a first call matches a first execution profile, and that the execution of said plurality of finite-state machines during a second call matches a second execution profile.

2. The method of claim 1 wherein said improper call behavior is engendered by a third node.

3. The method of claim 1 wherein at least one of said execution profiles comprises a sequence of visited states of a finite-state machine.

4. The method of claim 1 wherein at least one of said execution profiles comprises a metric that is based on how often one or more particular states of a finite-state machine are visited.

5. The method of claim 1 wherein at least one of said execution profiles comprises a metric that is based on how long a finite-state machine spends in one or more particular states.

6. A method comprising:

determining, by a data-processing system, whether the execution of an instance of a first finite-state machine and of an instance of a second finite state machine during a call matches one or more rules that are associated with improper call behavior,

wherein said instance of said first finite-state machine corresponds to the state of a communications protocol at a first node, and

wherein said instance of said second finite-state machine corresponds to the state of the communications protocol at a second node that is different than the first node, and

wherein at least one of said rules comprises a condition pertaining to the execution of a plurality of finite-state machines, corresponding to the respective state of the communications protocol at the respective node, during a call; and

when a match exists, generating, by a data-processing system, a signal that indicates a possible occurrence of improper call behavior,

wherein said condition specifies a relationship between how often said first finite-state machine visits a first non-empty set of states and how often said second finite-state machine visits a second non-empty set of states.

7. The method of claim 6 wherein said improper call behavior is engendered by a third node.

8. The method of claim 6 wherein said first finite-state machine corresponds to the state of a communications protocol at a calling terminal, and wherein said second finite state machine corresponds to the state of said communications protocol at a called terminal.

9. The method of claim 6 wherein said condition specifies a relationship between how long said first finite-state machine spends in a first non-empty set of states and how long said second finite-state machine spends in a second non-empty set of states.

10. A method comprising:

determining, by a data-processing system, whether the execution of an instance of a first finite-state machine and of an instance of a second finite-state machine during a first call and during a second call matches one or more rules that are associated with improper call behavior,

wherein said instance of said first finite-state machine corresponds to the state of a communications protocol at a first node, and

wherein said instance of said second finite-state machine corresponds to the state of the communications protocol at a second node that is different than the first node, and

wherein at least one of said rules comprises a condition pertaining to the execution of a plurality of finite-state machines, corresponding to the respective state of the communications protocol at the respective node, during a plurality of calls; and

when a match exists, generating, by a data-processing system, a signal that indicates a possible occurrence of improper call behavior,

wherein said condition specifies that the execution of a plurality of finite-state machines during a first call matches a first execution profile, and that the execution of said plurality of finite-state machines during a second call matches a second execution profile.

11. The method of claim 10 wherein said condition specifies that the execution of a plurality of finite-state machines during a first call is similar to the execution of said plurality of finite-state machines during a second call.

12. The method of claim 10 wherein said condition specifies that the execution of a plurality of finite-state machines during a first call is different than the execution of said plurality of finite-state machines during a second call.

13. The method of claim 10 wherein said condition specifies that the execution of a plurality of finite-state machines during a first call and during a second call both match a particular execution profile.

Assignments (25)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Apr 4, 2024
From: AVAYA LLC
To: ARLINGTON TECHNOLOGIES, LLC
Reel/Frame 067022/0780 →
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RELEASE AND REASSIGNMENT Recorded Mar 25, 2024
From: CITIBANK, N.A.
To: AVAYA LLC; AVAYA MANAGEMENT L.P.
Reel/Frame 066894/0117 →
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RELEASE AND REASSIGNMENT Recorded Mar 25, 2024
From: WILMINGTON SAVINGS FUND SOCIETY, FSB
To: AVAYA LLC; AVAYA MANAGEMENT L.P.
Reel/Frame 066894/0227 →
(SECURITY INTEREST) GRANTOR'S NAME CHANGE Recorded Sep 21, 2023
From: AVAYA INC.
To: AVAYA LLC
Reel/Frame 065019/0231 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS (REEL/FRAME 045034/0001) Recorded May 18, 2023
From: GOLDMAN SACHS BANK USA., AS COLLATERAL AGENT
To: AVAYA INC.; INTELLISIST, INC.; AVAYA INTEGRATED CABINET SOLUTIONS LLC; OCTEL COMMUNICATIONS LLC; VPNET TECHNOLOGIES, INC.; ZANG, INC. (FORMER NAME OF AVAYA CLOUD INC.); HYPERQUALITY, INC.; HYPERQUALITY II, LLC; CAAS TECHNOLOGIES, LLC; AVAYA MANAGEMENT L.P.
Reel/Frame 063779/0622 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS (REEL/FRAME 53955/0436) Recorded May 18, 2023
From: WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS NOTES COLLATERAL AGENT
To: AVAYA MANAGEMENT L.P.; AVAYA INC.; INTELLISIST, INC.; AVAYA INTEGRATED CABINET SOLUTIONS LLC
Reel/Frame 063705/0023 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS (REEL/FRAME 61087/0386) Recorded May 18, 2023
From: WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS NOTES COLLATERAL AGENT
To: AVAYA MANAGEMENT L.P.; AVAYA INC.; INTELLISIST, INC.; AVAYA INTEGRATED CABINET SOLUTIONS LLC
Reel/Frame 063690/0359 →
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded May 4, 2023
From: AVAYA INC.; AVAYA MANAGEMENT L.P.; INTELLISIST, INC.
To: CITIBANK, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 063542/0662 →
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded May 3, 2023
From: AVAYA MANAGEMENT L.P.; AVAYA INC.; INTELLISIST, INC.; KNOAHSOFT INC.
To: WILMINGTON SAVINGS FUND SOCIETY, FSB [COLLATERAL AGENT]
Reel/Frame 063742/0001 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS AT REEL 45124/FRAME 0026 Recorded Apr 26, 2023
From: CITIBANK, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT
To: AVAYA HOLDINGS CORP.; AVAYA INC.; AVAYA MANAGEMENT L.P.; AVAYA INTEGRATED CABINET SOLUTIONS LLC
Reel/Frame 063457/0001 →
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Aug 5, 2022
From: AVAYA INC.; INTELLISIST, INC.; AVAYA MANAGEMENT L.P.; AVAYA CABINET SOLUTIONS LLC
To: WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 061087/0386 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Sep 25, 2020
From: AVAYA INC.; AVAYA MANAGEMENT L.P.; INTELLISIST, INC.; AVAYA INTEGRATED CABINET SOLUTIONS LLC
To: WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
Reel/Frame 053955/0436 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Jan 23, 2018
From: AVAYA INC.; AVAYA INTEGRATED CABINET SOLUTIONS LLC; OCTEL COMMUNICATIONS LLC; VPNET TECHNOLOGIES, INC.; ZANG, INC.
To: CITIBANK, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 045124/0026 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Jan 10, 2018
From: AVAYA INC.; AVAYA INTEGRATED CABINET SOLUTIONS LLC; OCTEL COMMUNICATIONS LLC; VPNET TECHNOLOGIES, INC.; ZANG, INC.
To: GOLDMAN SACHS BANK USA, AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 045034/0001 →
BANKRUPTCY COURT ORDER RELEASING ALL LIENS INCLUDING THE SECURITY INTEREST RECORDED AT REEL/FRAME 025863/0535 Recorded Dec 15, 2017
From: THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON TRUST, NA
To: AVAYA INC.
Reel/Frame 044892/0001 →
BANKRUPTCY COURT ORDER RELEASING ALL LIENS INCLUDING THE SECURITY INTEREST RECORDED AT REEL/FRAME 041576/0001 Recorded Dec 15, 2017
From: CITIBANK, N.A.
To: AVAYA INC.; AVAYA INTEGRATED CABINET SOLUTIONS INC.; OCTEL COMMUNICATIONS LLC (FORMERLY KNOWN AS OCTEL COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION); VPNET TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Reel/Frame 044893/0531 →
BANKRUPTCY COURT ORDER RELEASING ALL LIENS INCLUDING THE SECURITY INTEREST RECORDED AT REEL/FRAME 030083/0639 Recorded Dec 15, 2017
From: THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON TRUST COMPANY, N.A.
To: AVAYA INC.
Reel/Frame 045012/0666 →
BANKRUPTCY COURT ORDER RELEASING ALL LIENS INCLUDING THE SECURITY INTEREST RECORDED AT REEL/FRAME 029608/0256 Recorded Dec 15, 2017
From: THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON TRUST COMPANY, N.A.
To: AVAYA INC.
Reel/Frame 044891/0801 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Jan 27, 2017
From: AVAYA INC.; AVAYA INTEGRATED CABINET SOLUTIONS INC.; OCTEL COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION; VPNET TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
To: CITIBANK, N.A., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT
Reel/Frame 041576/0001 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jun 3, 2015
From: WU, YU-SUNG
To: AVAYA INC.
Reel/Frame 035780/0528 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Mar 13, 2013
From: AVAYA, INC.
To: BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON TRUST COMPANY, N.A., THE
Reel/Frame 030083/0639 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Jan 10, 2013
From: AVAYA, INC.
To: THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON TRUST COMPANY, N.A.
Reel/Frame 029608/0256 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Feb 22, 2011
From: AVAYA INC., A DELAWARE CORPORATION
To: BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON TRUST, NA, AS NOTES COLLATERAL AGENT, THE
Reel/Frame 025863/0535 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Oct 12, 2010
From: GARG, SACHIN; SINGH, NAVJOT; ADHIKARI, AKSHAY
To: AVAYA, INC.
Reel/Frame 025121/0974 →
REASSIGNMENT Recorded Jun 26, 2008
From: AVAYA TECHNOLOGY LLC
To: AVAYA INC
Reel/Frame 021156/0734 →