IP Library Granted Patent US 10,122,582
Granted Patent B2
US 10,122,582 · App. 15/163,472 · Granted Nov 6, 2018

System and method for efficient bandwidth allocation for forked communication sessions

Inventors: Puneet Kumar (Pune, IN); Tibor Lukac (Superior, CO)
Assignee: Avaya Inc.
H04L41/0896H04L65/1006H04L67/142
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 10,122,582
App. No.
15/163,472
Granted
Nov 6, 2018
Kind
B2
Abstract

A request for a communication session is received by a system. For example, a request to establish a voice communication session is received by the system. The system determines whether the request for the communication session is to be forked to a plurality of communication endpoints. If the communication session is to be forked, a highest bandwidth requirement for the forked communication session is determined. The determined highest bandwidth requirement for the forked communication session is based on a highest bandwidth requirement of one or more codecs that are defined in the received request for the communication session. The determined highest bandwidth requirement for the forked communication session is allocated so that the forked communication session can be established.

Claims (42)

1. A system comprising:

a microprocessor; and

a computer readable medium, coupled with the microprocessor and comprising microprocessor readable and executable instructions that program the microprocessor to:

receive a request to establish a communication session;

determine that the request to establish the communication session is to be forked to a plurality of communication endpoints;

in response to determining that the communication session is to be forked to the plurality of communication endpoints, determine a highest bandwidth requirement for the forked communication session, wherein the determined highest bandwidth requirement for the forked communication session is a highest bandwidth requirement of one or more codecs that are defined in the received request to establish the communication session; and

allocate the determined highest bandwidth requirement for the forked communication session.

2. The system of claim 1 , wherein the determined highest bandwidth requirement for the forked communication session is more than a currently available bandwidth for a network, wherein the one or more codecs defined in the received request to establish the communication session comprises a plurality of codecs, and wherein the microprocessor removes one or more of the plurality of codecs from the received request to establish the communication session.

3. The system of claim 2 , wherein the request to establish the communication session is a Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) INVITE message with a Session Description Protocol (SDP) offer, wherein the microprocessor removes the one or more of the plurality of codecs from the SDP offer.

4. The system of claim 1 , wherein the determined highest bandwidth requirement for the forked communication session is more than a currently available bandwidth for a network, wherein the one or more codecs defined in the received request to establish the communication session comprises a plurality of codecs, and wherein the microprocessor adds a maximum bandwidth field to the received request to establish the communication session.

5. The system of claim 4 , wherein the request to establish the communication session is a Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) INVITE message with a Session Description Protocol (SDP) offer and wherein the microprocessor adds the maximum bandwidth field in a SDP b=line field in the SDP offer.

6. The system of claim 5 , wherein the forked communication session is a video communication session, wherein the SDP b=line field is used to limit a frame rate in the forked video communication session.

7. The system of claim 1 , wherein the forked communication session is forked in a plurality of physical communication links and wherein the microprocessor:

identifies a highest bandwidth requirement for each of the plurality of physical communication links based on a highest bandwidth requirement for all the forks of the communication session in an individual physical communication link; and

allocates the highest bandwidth requirement for each of the individual physical communication links.

8. The system of claim 7 , wherein a highest bandwidth requirement for one of the plurality of physical communication links is more than a currently available bandwidth for the one of the plurality of physical communication links, wherein the one or more codecs comprises a plurality of codecs, and wherein the microprocessor removes one or more of the plurality of codecs from the request to establish the communication session for all the forks of the communication in the one of the plurality of physical communication links.

9. The system of claim 7 , wherein a highest bandwidth requirement for one of the plurality of physical communication links is more than a currently available bandwidth for the one of the plurality of physical communication links and wherein the microprocessor adds a maximum bandwidth field to the request to establish the communication session sent in the one of the plurality of physical communication links.

10. The system of claim 1 , wherein determining the highest bandwidth requirement for the forked communication session causes the microprocessor to:

(i) get a codec from the request to establish the communication session;

(ii) determine a bandwidth for the codec;

(iii) compare the bandwidth of the codec to the highest bandwidth requirement;

(iv) copy the bandwidth of the codec to the highest bandwidth requirement if the bandwidth of the codec is higher; and

repeat elements (i), (ii), (iii), and (iv) for the remaining codecs in the request to establish the communication session.

11. The system of claim 1 , wherein the determined highest bandwidth requirement for the forked communication session is determined based on a plurality of codecs that support different medias.

12. The system of claim 1 , wherein the microprocessor readable and executable instructions program the microprocessor to:

determine if a network or link has multiple forks;

in response to the network or link having multiple forks, determining if the highest bandwidth requirement for the forked communication session is more than a stored bandwidth requirement of the network or link; and

in response to determining that the highest bandwidth requirement is more than the stored bandwidth requirement of the network or link, determining a highest bandwidth requirement for the network or link.

13. A method comprising:

receiving, by a microprocessor, a request to establish a communication session;

determining, by the microprocessor, that the request to establish the communication session is to be forked to a plurality of communication endpoints;

in response to determining that the communication session is to be forked to the plurality of communication endpoints, determining, by the microprocessor, a highest bandwidth requirement for the forked communication session, wherein the determined highest bandwidth requirement for the forked communication session is a highest bandwidth requirement of one or more codecs that are defined in the received request to establish the communication session; and

allocating, by the microprocessor, the determined highest bandwidth requirement for the forked communication session.

14. The method of claim 13 , wherein the determined highest bandwidth requirement for the forked communication session is more than a currently available bandwidth for a network, wherein the one or more codecs defined in the received request to establish the communication session comprises a plurality of codecs, and wherein the microprocessor removes one or more of the plurality of codecs from the received request to establish the communication session.

15. The method of claim 13 , wherein the determined highest bandwidth requirement for the forked communication session is more than a currently available bandwidth for a network, wherein the one or more codecs defined in the received request to establish the communication session comprises a plurality of codecs, and wherein the microprocessor adds a maximum bandwidth field to the request to establish the communication session.

16. The method of claim 15 , wherein the request to establish the communication session is a Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) INVITE message with a Session Description Protocol (SDP) offer, wherein the microprocessor adds the maximum bandwidth field in a SDP b=line field in the SDP offer.

17. The method of claim 16 , wherein the forked communication session is a video communication session, wherein the SDP b=line field is used to limit a frame rate in the forked video communication session.

18. The method of claim 13 , wherein the forked communication session is forked in a plurality of physical communication links and wherein the microprocessor:

identifies a highest bandwidth requirement for each of the plurality of physical communication links based on a highest bandwidth requirement for all the forks of the communication session in an individual physical communication link; and

allocates the highest bandwidth requirement for each of the individual physical communication links.

19. The method of claim 18 , wherein a highest bandwidth requirement for one of the plurality of physical communication links is more than a currently available bandwidth for the one of the plurality of physical communication links, wherein the one or more codecs comprises a plurality of codecs, and wherein the microprocessor removes one or more of the plurality of codecs from the request to establish the communication session for all the forks of the communication in the one of the plurality of physical communication links.

20. The method of claim 18 , wherein a highest bandwidth requirement for one of the plurality of physical communication links is more than a currently available bandwidth for the one of the plurality of physical communication links and wherein the microprocessor adds a maximum bandwidth field to the request to establish the communication session sent in the one of the plurality of physical communication links.

Assignments (14)
(SECURITY INTEREST) GRANTOR'S NAME CHANGE Recorded Sep 21, 2023
From: AVAYA INC.
To: AVAYA LLC
Reel/Frame 065019/0231 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS (REEL/FRAME 53955/0436) Recorded May 18, 2023
From: WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS NOTES COLLATERAL AGENT
To: AVAYA MANAGEMENT L.P.; AVAYA INC.; INTELLISIST, INC.; AVAYA INTEGRATED CABINET SOLUTIONS LLC
Reel/Frame 063705/0023 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS (REEL/FRAME 61087/0386) Recorded May 18, 2023
From: WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS NOTES COLLATERAL AGENT
To: AVAYA MANAGEMENT L.P.; AVAYA INC.; INTELLISIST, INC.; AVAYA INTEGRATED CABINET SOLUTIONS LLC
Reel/Frame 063690/0359 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS (REEL/FRAME 045034/0001) Recorded May 18, 2023
From: GOLDMAN SACHS BANK USA., AS COLLATERAL AGENT
To: AVAYA INC.; INTELLISIST, INC.; AVAYA INTEGRATED CABINET SOLUTIONS LLC; OCTEL COMMUNICATIONS LLC; VPNET TECHNOLOGIES, INC.; ZANG, INC. (FORMER NAME OF AVAYA CLOUD INC.); HYPERQUALITY, INC.; HYPERQUALITY II, LLC; CAAS TECHNOLOGIES, LLC; AVAYA MANAGEMENT L.P.
Reel/Frame 063779/0622 →
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded May 4, 2023
From: AVAYA INC.; AVAYA MANAGEMENT L.P.; INTELLISIST, INC.
To: CITIBANK, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 063542/0662 →
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded May 3, 2023
From: AVAYA MANAGEMENT L.P.; AVAYA INC.; INTELLISIST, INC.; KNOAHSOFT INC.
To: WILMINGTON SAVINGS FUND SOCIETY, FSB [COLLATERAL AGENT]
Reel/Frame 063742/0001 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS AT REEL 45124/FRAME 0026 Recorded Apr 26, 2023
From: CITIBANK, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT
To: AVAYA HOLDINGS CORP.; AVAYA INC.; AVAYA MANAGEMENT L.P.; AVAYA INTEGRATED CABINET SOLUTIONS LLC
Reel/Frame 063457/0001 →
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Aug 5, 2022
From: AVAYA INC.; INTELLISIST, INC.; AVAYA MANAGEMENT L.P.; AVAYA CABINET SOLUTIONS LLC
To: WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 061087/0386 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Sep 25, 2020
From: AVAYA INC.; AVAYA MANAGEMENT L.P.; INTELLISIST, INC.; AVAYA INTEGRATED CABINET SOLUTIONS LLC
To: WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
Reel/Frame 053955/0436 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Jan 23, 2018
From: AVAYA INC.; AVAYA INTEGRATED CABINET SOLUTIONS LLC; OCTEL COMMUNICATIONS LLC; VPNET TECHNOLOGIES, INC.; ZANG, INC.
To: CITIBANK, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 045124/0026 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Jan 10, 2018
From: AVAYA INC.; AVAYA INTEGRATED CABINET SOLUTIONS LLC; OCTEL COMMUNICATIONS LLC; VPNET TECHNOLOGIES, INC.; ZANG, INC.
To: GOLDMAN SACHS BANK USA, AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 045034/0001 →
BANKRUPTCY COURT ORDER RELEASING ALL LIENS INCLUDING THE SECURITY INTEREST RECORDED AT REEL/FRAME 041576/0001 Recorded Dec 15, 2017
From: CITIBANK, N.A.
To: AVAYA INC.; AVAYA INTEGRATED CABINET SOLUTIONS INC.; OCTEL COMMUNICATIONS LLC (FORMERLY KNOWN AS OCTEL COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION); VPNET TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Reel/Frame 044893/0531 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Jan 27, 2017
From: AVAYA INC.; AVAYA INTEGRATED CABINET SOLUTIONS INC.; OCTEL COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION; VPNET TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
To: CITIBANK, N.A., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT
Reel/Frame 041576/0001 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded May 24, 2016
From: KUMAR, PUNEET; LUKAC, TIBOR
To: AVAYA INC.
Reel/Frame 038708/0016 →
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20170346697A1 · Nov 30, 2017