IP Library Granted Patent US 8,126,624
Granted Patent B2
US 8,126,624 · App. 12/236,422 · Granted Feb 28, 2012

Method for selection of optimal mode and gear and input speed for preselect or tap up/down operation

View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 8,126,624
App. No.
12/236,422
Granted
Feb 28, 2012
Kind
B2
Abstract

A powertrain system includes an engine mechanically coupled to an electro-mechanical transmission at an input thereto selectively operative in one of a plurality of transmission operating range states and one of a plurality of engine states. A method for controlling the powertrain system includes combining sets of preferability factors inputted from engine sensors in a microprocessor or computer with other preferability factors generated during engine and vehicle operation to provide an output for a transmission control module, which may execute an operating range or engine state change.

Claims (31)

1. Method for controlling a powertrain system including an engine coupled to an input member of an electro-mechanical transmission selectively operative in one of a plurality of transmission operating range states and one of a plurality of engine states, comprising:

determining a current transmission operating range state and engine state;

determining at least one potential transmission operating range state and engine state;

optionally providing an operator torque request;

defining a minimum value for an input speed to said transmission for each potential transmission operating range state;

providing a plurality of proposed values for the input speed to said transmission for each potential transmission operating range state, each of said proposed values for the input speed also having associated with it a power input for said transmission, and a power loss;

ascribing a biasing cost to each of those proposed values for the transmission input speeds which are lower than said minimum value defined for each potential transmission operating range state, wherein said biasing cost ascribed to each of those proposed values has a magnitude which is proportional to the difference between its rpm and the rpm of said minimum value for each potential transmission operating range state;

selecting a single transmission input speed from said plurality of proposed values for each potential transmission operating range state;

determining preferability factors associated with the current transmission operating range state and engine state, and potential transmission operating range states and engine states;

preferentially weighting the preferability factors for the current transmission operating range state and engine state; and

selectively commanding changing the current transmission operating range state and engine state based upon said preferability factors and said single transmission input speed.

2. A method according to claim 1 wherein the transmission operating range states for which minimum values for the input speed to said transmission is defined are transmission pre-select ranges.

3. A method according to claim 1 wherein a mathematical function is used for ascribing a biasing cost to each of those proposed values for the transmission input speeds which are lower than said minimum value.

4. A method according to claim 3 wherein said function comprises a function selected from the group consisting of: linear functions, non-linear functions, and functions which comprise both linear and non-linear features.

5. A method according to claim 1 wherein said minimum values for the input speed to said transmission for each of the potential pre-select range states are defined as a function of transmission output speed.

6. Method for controlling a powertrain system including an engine coupled to an electro-mechanical transmission selectively operative in one of a plurality of transmission operating range states and one of a plurality of engine states, comprising:

providing a biasing costs function for each of a plurality of potential transmission operating range states, said biasing costs function applying biasing costs to transmission input speeds associated with potential operating points for said transmission within each potential transmission operating range state;

calculating power loss costs associated with each of a plurality of potential engine operating points;

selecting a transmission operating range state based on a comparison of said power loss costs; and

selectively commanding a change in said transmission operating range state.

7. A method according to claim 6 wherein said biasing costs are applied to potential engine operating points having transmission input speeds which are lower than a pre-determined minimum transmission input speed value.

8. A method according to claim 7 wherein said pre-determined minimum transmission input speed value is determined using subjective criteria.

9. A method according to claim 6 wherein said biasing costs function is a function of transmission output speed.

10. A system for controlling a powertrain system including an engine coupled to an electro-mechanical transmission selectively operative in one of a plurality of transmission operating range states and one of a plurality of engine states, comprising:

at least one microprocessor configured to receive data and provide an output, said data including

a first set of preferability factors,

a second set of preferability factors relating to a desired operating range state of said transmission,

a third set of preferability factors relating to a current operating range state of said transmission, and

a plurality of proposed values for the input speed to said transmission for each of its potential operating range states;

a control module configured to control shifting events in said transmission, said control module having inputs and outputs, wherein output from said at least one microprocessor is provided as input to said control module, said control module being configured to provide said third set of preferability factors to said at least one microprocessor as an input thereto; and

an electro-mechanical transmission operatively connected to the output from said control module.

Assignments (18)
MASTER TRANSACTION AGREEMENT Recorded Mar 8, 2016
From: CHRYSLER LLC
To: NEW CARCO ACQUISITION LLC
Reel/Frame 038031/0127 →
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Mar 8, 2016
From: NEW CARCO ACQUISITION LLC
To: CHRYSLER GROUP LLC
Reel/Frame 038032/0799 →
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Mar 8, 2016
From: CHRYSLER GROUP LLC
To: FCA US LLC
Reel/Frame 038033/0025 →
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Apr 30, 2015
From: CHRYSLER GROUP LLC
To: FCA US LLC
Reel/Frame 035553/0356 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Nov 7, 2014
From: WILMINGTON TRUST COMPANY
To: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS LLC
Reel/Frame 034189/0065 →
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Feb 10, 2011
From: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.
To: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS LLC
Reel/Frame 025781/0211 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Nov 8, 2010
From: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.
To: WILMINGTON TRUST COMPANY
Reel/Frame 025324/0515 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Nov 5, 2010
From: UAW RETIREE MEDICAL BENEFITS TRUST
To: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.
Reel/Frame 025315/0046 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Nov 4, 2010
From: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
To: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.
Reel/Frame 025245/0909 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Aug 28, 2009
From: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.
To: UAW RETIREE MEDICAL BENEFITS TRUST
Reel/Frame 023162/0237 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Aug 27, 2009
From: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.
To: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Reel/Frame 023156/0313 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Aug 21, 2009
From: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
To: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.
Reel/Frame 023126/0914 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Aug 21, 2009
From: CITICORP USA, INC. AS AGENT FOR BANK PRIORITY SECURED PARTIES; CITICORP USA, INC. AS AGENT FOR HEDGE PRIORITY SECURED PARTIES
To: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.
Reel/Frame 023155/0769 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Apr 16, 2009
From: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.
To: CITICORP USA, INC. AS AGENT FOR BANK PRIORITY SECURED PARTIES; CITICORP USA, INC. AS AGENT FOR HEDGE PRIORITY SECURED PARTIES
Reel/Frame 022554/0538 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Feb 4, 2009
From: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.
To: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Reel/Frame 022201/0405 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jan 27, 2009
From: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.
To: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.; DAIMLER AG; CHRYSLER LLC; BAYERISCHE MOTOREN WERKE AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT
Reel/Frame 022163/0249 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jan 8, 2009
From: KIM, KEE YONG
To: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.
Reel/Frame 022079/0976 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Sep 23, 2008
From: HEAP, ANTHONY H.
To: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.
Reel/Frame 021574/0497 →