IP Library Granted Patent US 9,552,397
Granted Patent B2
US 9,552,397 · App. 14/305,636 · Granted Jan 24, 2017

Mechanism for computing and using contextualized social media scores

Inventors: Reinhard P. Klemm (Basking Ridge, NJ); David Skiba (Golden, CO)
Assignee: Avaya Inc.
G06F17/3053H04L51/32
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 9,552,397
App. No.
14/305,636
Granted
Jan 24, 2017
Kind
B2
Abstract

A social media network is monitored for postings of a control group. The control group is a group of one or more individuals that posts on a particular topic. The postings of the control group may cover all the postings of each member of the control group for a period of time. A first relative social media score is calculated for the postings of the control group on the social media network. A social media score is calculated for a social media posting of a user or entity on the social media network. The relative social media score for the control group is compared to the social media score for the user or entity to see if there is a significant difference. If there is a significant difference, an agent in a contact center to is identified respond to the social media posting of the user or entity.

Claims (48)

1. A method for managing a contact center comprising:

calculating, by a processor, a first relative social media score for one or more postings of a first control group on a first social media network;

calculating, by the processor, a first social media score for a first social media posting of a user or entity on the first social media network;

comparing, by the processor, the first relative social media score for the one or more postings of the first control group with the first social media score for the first social media posting of the user or entity for a first difference; and

in response to the first difference meeting or exceeding a predetermined difference threshold, identifying, by the processor, an agent in the contact center to respond to the first social media posting of the user or entity.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the one or more postings of the first control group is a group of previous social media posts by the user or entity on the social media network.

3. The method of claim 1 , wherein the one or more postings of the first control group is a group of previous social media posts by other users or entities.

4. The method of claim 1 , wherein the first control group is defined based on at least one of a time period, the first social media network, a customer profile, customers with similar profiles, customers that have posted on the same product or service, customers that have posted on the same social media network, and customers that have posted on the same account.

5. The method of claim 1 , wherein the first social media network comprises a plurality of social media networks and wherein calculating the relative social media score for the one or more postings of the first control group on the first social media network is also calculated based on the plurality of social media networks.

6. The method of claim 5 , further comprising:

calculating a second relative social media score for one or more postings of the first control group on a second social media network;

calculating a second social media score for a second social media posting of the user or entity on the second social media network;

comparing the second relative social media score for the one or more postings of the first control group with the second social media score for the second social media posting of the user or entity for a second difference; and

in response to either the first difference or the second difference being significant, identifying the agent in the contact center to respond to either the first social media posting or the second social media posting of the user that has the significant difference.

7. The method of claim 6 , wherein both the first difference and the second difference are significant and wherein the agent in the contact center is identified based on both the first difference and the second difference.

8. The method of claim 1 , wherein the first social media posting of the user or entity is on a first account of the first social media network and further comprising:

calculating a second relative social media score for one or more postings of the first control group on a second account of the first social media network;

calculating a second social media score for a second social media posting of the user or entity on the second account of the first social media network;

comparing the second relative social media score for the one or more postings of the first control group with the second social media score for the second social media posting of the user or entity for a second difference; and

in response to either the first difference or the second difference being significant, identifying the agent in the contact center to respond to either the first social media posting or the second social media posting of the user that has the significant difference.

9. The method of claim 8 , wherein both the first difference and the second difference are significant and wherein at least one of the following is true:

the first difference is positive and the second difference is negative;

the first difference is positive and the second difference is positive; and

the first difference is negative and the second difference is negative.

10. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

selecting a response template for the agent based a magnitude of the first difference; and

filing out at least a portion of the response template based on a topic of the first social media posting of the user or entity.

11. The method of claim 1 , wherein the control group is dynamically created based on a characteristic or subject of the first social media posting of the user or entity.

12. A system for managing a contact center comprising:

a processor programmed to execute:

a comparison module configured to calculate a first relative social media score for one or more postings of a first control group on a first social media network, calculate a first social media score for a first social media posting of a user or entity on the first social media network, and compare the first relative social media score for the one or more postings of the first control group with the first social media score for the first social media posting of the user or entity for a first difference; and

a routing module configured to identify an agent in the contact center to respond to the first social media posting of the user or entity in response to the first difference meeting or exceeding a predetermined difference threshold.

13. The system of claim 12 , wherein the one or more postings of the first control group is a group of previous social media posts by the user or entity on the social media network.

14. The system of claim 12 , wherein the one or more postings of the first control group is a group of previous social media posts by other users or entities.

15. The system of claim 12 , wherein the first social media network comprises a plurality of social media networks and wherein calculating the relative social media score for the one or more postings of the first control group on the first social media network is also calculated based on the plurality of social media networks.

16. The system of claim 15 , wherein:

the comparison module is further configured to calculate a second relative social media score for one or more postings of the first control group on a second social media network, calculate a second social media score for a second social media posting of the user or entity on a the second social media network, and compare the second relative social media score for the one or more postings of the first control group with the second social media score for the second social media posting of the user or entity for a second difference; and

the routing module is further configured to identifying the agent in the contact center to respond to either the first social media posting or the second social media posting of the user that has the significant difference.

17. The system of claim 12 , wherein the first social media posting of the user or entity is on a first account of the first social media network and wherein:

the comparison module is further configured to calculate a second relative social media score for one or more postings of the first control group on a second account of the first social media network, calculate a second social media score for a second social media posting of the user or entity on the second account of the first social media network, and compare the second relative social media score for the one or more postings of the first control group with the second social media score for the second social media posting of the user or entity for a second difference; and

the routing module is further configured to identifying the agent in the contact center to respond to either the first social media posting or the second social media posting of the user that has the significant difference.

18. The system of claim 12 , wherein the routing module is further configured to select a response template for the agent based a magnitude of the first difference and fill out at least a portion of the response template based on a topic of the first social media posting of the user or entity.

19. The system of claim 12 , wherein the agent is identified based on a topic of the first social media posting of the user or entity and a magnitude of the first difference.

20. A method for managing a contact center comprising:

calculating, by a processor, a first relative social media score for one or more postings of a first control group on a first social media network;

calculating, by the processor, a first social media score for a first social media posting of a user or entity on a second social media network;

comparing, by the processor, the first relative social media score for the one or more postings of the first control group with the first social media score for the first social media posting of the user or entity for a first difference; and

in response to the first difference meeting or exceeding a predetermined difference threshold, identifying, by the processor, an agent in the contact center to respond to the first social media posting of the user or entity.

Assignments (14)
(SECURITY INTEREST) GRANTOR'S NAME CHANGE Recorded Sep 21, 2023
From: AVAYA INC.
To: AVAYA LLC
Reel/Frame 065019/0231 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS (REEL/FRAME 045034/0001) Recorded May 18, 2023
From: GOLDMAN SACHS BANK USA., AS COLLATERAL AGENT
To: AVAYA INC.; INTELLISIST, INC.; AVAYA INTEGRATED CABINET SOLUTIONS LLC; OCTEL COMMUNICATIONS LLC; VPNET TECHNOLOGIES, INC.; ZANG, INC. (FORMER NAME OF AVAYA CLOUD INC.); HYPERQUALITY, INC.; HYPERQUALITY II, LLC; CAAS TECHNOLOGIES, LLC; AVAYA MANAGEMENT L.P.
Reel/Frame 063779/0622 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS (REEL/FRAME 53955/0436) Recorded May 18, 2023
From: WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS NOTES COLLATERAL AGENT
To: AVAYA MANAGEMENT L.P.; AVAYA INC.; INTELLISIST, INC.; AVAYA INTEGRATED CABINET SOLUTIONS LLC
Reel/Frame 063705/0023 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS (REEL/FRAME 61087/0386) Recorded May 18, 2023
From: WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS NOTES COLLATERAL AGENT
To: AVAYA MANAGEMENT L.P.; AVAYA INC.; INTELLISIST, INC.; AVAYA INTEGRATED CABINET SOLUTIONS LLC
Reel/Frame 063690/0359 →
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded May 4, 2023
From: AVAYA INC.; AVAYA MANAGEMENT L.P.; INTELLISIST, INC.
To: CITIBANK, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 063542/0662 →
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded May 3, 2023
From: AVAYA MANAGEMENT L.P.; AVAYA INC.; INTELLISIST, INC.; KNOAHSOFT INC.
To: WILMINGTON SAVINGS FUND SOCIETY, FSB [COLLATERAL AGENT]
Reel/Frame 063742/0001 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS AT REEL 45124/FRAME 0026 Recorded Apr 26, 2023
From: CITIBANK, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT
To: AVAYA HOLDINGS CORP.; AVAYA INC.; AVAYA MANAGEMENT L.P.; AVAYA INTEGRATED CABINET SOLUTIONS LLC
Reel/Frame 063457/0001 →
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Aug 5, 2022
From: AVAYA INC.; INTELLISIST, INC.; AVAYA MANAGEMENT L.P.; AVAYA CABINET SOLUTIONS LLC
To: WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 061087/0386 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Sep 25, 2020
From: AVAYA INC.; AVAYA MANAGEMENT L.P.; INTELLISIST, INC.; AVAYA INTEGRATED CABINET SOLUTIONS LLC
To: WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
Reel/Frame 053955/0436 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Jan 23, 2018
From: AVAYA INC.; AVAYA INTEGRATED CABINET SOLUTIONS LLC; OCTEL COMMUNICATIONS LLC; VPNET TECHNOLOGIES, INC.; ZANG, INC.
To: CITIBANK, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 045124/0026 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Jan 10, 2018
From: AVAYA INC.; AVAYA INTEGRATED CABINET SOLUTIONS LLC; OCTEL COMMUNICATIONS LLC; VPNET TECHNOLOGIES, INC.; ZANG, INC.
To: GOLDMAN SACHS BANK USA, AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 045034/0001 →
BANKRUPTCY COURT ORDER RELEASING ALL LIENS INCLUDING THE SECURITY INTEREST RECORDED AT REEL/FRAME 041576/0001 Recorded Dec 15, 2017
From: CITIBANK, N.A.
To: AVAYA INC.; AVAYA INTEGRATED CABINET SOLUTIONS INC.; OCTEL COMMUNICATIONS LLC (FORMERLY KNOWN AS OCTEL COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION); VPNET TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Reel/Frame 044893/0531 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Jan 27, 2017
From: AVAYA INC.; AVAYA INTEGRATED CABINET SOLUTIONS INC.; OCTEL COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION; VPNET TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
To: CITIBANK, N.A., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT
Reel/Frame 041576/0001 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jun 26, 2014
From: KLEMM, REINHARD P.; SKIBA, DAVID
To: AVAYA INC.
Reel/Frame 033187/0885 →
Continuity (2)
Provisional Application 61952631 · Mar 13, 2014
Related Publication 20150261756A1 · Sep 17, 2015