IP Library Granted Patent US 12,378,634
Granted Patent B2
US 12,378,634 · App. 18/480,377 · Granted Aug 5, 2025

Systems and methods for improved raffinate injection

Inventors: Sarah Lyons (Vail, AZ); Joanna M. Robertson (Thatcher, AZ); Casey J. Clayton (Ariquipa, PE); Richard Melecio Sanchez (Central, AZ); Raquel Crossman (Mesa, AZ); Luciano Kiniti Issoe (Sao Palo, BR); Tianfang Ni (Boston, MA); Oleksandr Klesov (Lexington, MA); Luke Gerdes (Framingham, MA); Muneeb Alam (Alexandria, VA); Chase Zenner (Tucson, AZ); John Warren Dean, Jr. (Thatcher, AZ)
Assignee: FREEPORT MINERALS CORPORATION
C22B7/007C22B3/04C22B15/0065G01F1/363G01F1/42G01F15/003G01F15/005G01F15/066G05D16/20G08B21/182C22B3/02C22B3/22C22B3/44E21B43/28G01F1/34G01F1/74G01F15/006G05D16/101G05D16/2024Y02P10/20Y10T137/86574
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,378,634
App. No.
18/480,377
Granted
Aug 5, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

The present disclosure provides a method comprising determining an ore map for a heap to identify a location of a recoverable metal-bearing material in the heap, wherein the metal-bearing material comprises iron and at least one other metal value, delivering a leaching solution from a leaching solution source to a leaching solution regulating system, wherein the leaching solution comprises an effective amount of citric acid and hydrogen peroxide, regulating at least one of a pressure, a mass flow rate, or a volumetric flow rate of the leaching solution to achieve a target operational condition, wherein the target operational condition is selected to optimize a set of operational parameters to maximize recovery of the at least one other metal value, delivering the leaching solution at the target operational condition from the leaching solution regulating system to the subsurface leaching distribution system, and delivering the leaching solution at the target operational condition from the subsurface leaching distribution system to the location of the recoverable metal-bearing material under a surface of the heap to leach and recover the at least one other metal value.

Claims (28)

1. A method for recovering a metal from chalcopyrite, comprising:

delivering a leaching solution from a leaching solution source to a leaching solution regulating system, wherein the leaching solution comprises a combination of an effective amount of citric acid and hydrogen peroxide, wherein the citric acid keeps iron in the leaching solution and allows the hydrogen peroxide to interact with the chalcopyrite;

regulating a pressure, a mass flow rate and a volumetric flow rate of the leaching solution to achieve a target operational condition, wherein the target operational condition is selected to optimize a set of operational parameters to allow options of preventing plugging of a subsurface leaching distribution system, minimizing locking up of the leaching solution in the heap and maximizing recovery of the recoverable metal in the chalcopyrite;

delivering the leaching solution at the target operational condition from the leaching solution regulating system to the subsurface leaching distribution system; and

delivering the leaching solution at the target operational condition from the subsurface leaching distribution system to a location of the recoverable metal in the chalcopyrite under a surface of the heap to leach and recover the recoverable metal from the chalcopyrite.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the leaching solution regulating system comprises a plurality of leaching solution regulating modules.

3. The method of claim 2 , wherein each leaching solution regulating module comprises a meter configured to detect the pressure, the mass flow rate and the volumetric flow rate of the leaching solution.

4. The method of claim 2 , wherein each leaching solution regulating module comprises a regulator configured to set the pressure, the mass flow rate and the volumetric flow rate of the leaching solution to the target operational condition.

5. The method of claim 1 , further comprising determining an ore map for a heap to identify a location of the recoverable metal in the chalcopyrite in the heap.

6. The method of claim 1 , wherein the set of operational parameters comprises at least one of minerology, chemistry, permeability or the recoverable metal.

7. The method of claim 1 , further comprising transmitting the pressure, the mass flow rate and the volumetric flow rate of the leaching solution between the leaching solution regulating system and the subsurface leaching distribution system.

8. The method of claim 1 , further comprising determining x,y,z coordinates for the location of the recoverable metal in the chalcopyrite in the heap.

9. The method of claim 1 , wherein the effective amount of citric acid is about 1 g/L to about 10 g/L and wherein the effective amount of hydrogen peroxide is about 0.5% to about 10% by weight.

10. The method of claim 1 , further comprising treating the location of the recoverable metal in the chalcopyrite to render the recoverable metal in the chalcopyrite susceptible to further leaching, wherein the treating comprises delivering a treatment solution to the location of the recoverable metal in the chalcopyrite, and wherein the treatment solution comprises the citric acid.

11. A system, comprising:

recoverable metal in chalcopyrite in a heap;

a leaching solution regulating system configured to detect and regulate a pressure, a mass flow rate and a volumetric flow rate of a leaching solution to a target operational condition, wherein the target operational condition is selected to optimize a set of operational parameters to allow options of preventing plugging of a subsurface leaching distribution system, minimizing locking up of the leaching solution in the heap and maximizing recovery of the recoverable metal in the chalcopyrite, and

wherein the leaching solution comprises a combination of an effective amount of citric acid and hydrogen peroxide, wherein the citric acid keeps iron in the leaching solution and allows the hydrogen peroxide to interact with the chalcopyrite; and

a subsurface leaching solution distribution system fluidly coupled to the leaching solution regulating system, the subsurface leaching solution distribution system comprising a subsurface injector configured to deliver the leaching solution to the recoverable metal in the chalcopyrite under the surface of the heap to leach and recover the recoverable metal in the chalcopyrite.

12. The system of claim 11 , wherein the set of operational parameters comprises at least one of at least one of minerology, chemistry, permeability, and the recoverable metal.

13. The system of claim 11 , wherein the effective amount of citric acid is about 1 g/L to about 10 g/L and wherein the effective amount of hydrogen peroxide is about 0.5% to about 10% by weight.

14. The system of claim 11 , wherein the leaching solution regulating system transmits the pressure, the mass flow rate and the volumetric flow rate of the leaching solution between the leaching solution regulating system and the subsurface leaching distribution system.

15. The system of claim 11 , wherein the heap also includes at least one of copper, nickel, zinc, silver, gold, germanium, lead, arsenic, antimony, chromium, molybdenum, rhenium, tungsten, iron, ruthenium, osmium, cobalt, rhodium, iridium, palladium, platinum, uranium, or rare earth metals.

16. The system of claim 11 , wherein the subsurface injector is further configured to deliver a treatment solution to the at least one location of the recoverable metal in the chalcopyrite to render the at least one location susceptible to further leaching, wherein the treatment solution comprises citric acid.

17. The system of claim 11 , wherein the subsurface injector is inserted into a bore formed in the heap, the bore filled with at least one material configured to provide stability and sealing for the subsurface injector.

18. The system of claim 11 , further comprising a plurality of sensors distributed along a length of the subsurface injector.

19. The system of claim 11 , further comprising an ore map determined by adding flow data, irrigation data and a remaining mineral prediction from a machine learning model to obtain information by section and by data for the heap.

20. The system of claim 19 , wherein the at least one location of the recoverable metal in the chalcopyrite in the heap is in x,y,z coordinates of the heap.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded May 29, 2024
From: LYONS, SARAH; ROBERTSON, JOANNA M.; CLAYTON, CASEY J.; SANCHEZ, RICHARD MELECIO; CROSSMAN, RAQUEL; ISSOE, LUCIANO KINITI; NI, TIANFANG; KLESOV, OLEKSANDR; GERDES, LUKE; ALAM, MUNEEB; ZENNER, CHASE; DEAN, JOHN WARREN, JR.
To: FREEPORT MINERALS CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 067566/0484 →
Continuity (10)
Continuation In Part 17945451 · Sep 15, 2022
Continuation In Part 18124333 · Mar 21, 2023
Continuation 17733171 · Apr 29, 2022
Continuation 17223404 · Apr 6, 2021
Continuation 16223760 · Dec 18, 2018
Continuation 15989614 · May 25, 2018
Continuation 15539328
Provisional Application 63246046 · Sep 20, 2021
Provisional Application 62097458 · Dec 29, 2014
Related Publication 20240026493A1 · Jan 25, 2024
References Cited (99)
US 3587620A · Berthold · 1971 [cited by applicant]
US 3993293A · Mukae et al. · 1976 [cited by applicant]
US 4045084A · Hsueh et al. · 1977 [cited by applicant]
US 4093526A · Blanco et al. · 1978 [cited by applicant]
US 4168295A · Sawyer · 1979 [cited by applicant]
US 4175789A · Kube et al. · 1979 [cited by applicant]
US 4180088A · Mallett · 1979 [cited by applicant]
US 4369100A · Sawyer · 1983 [cited by applicant]
US 4739973A · Herndon · 1988 [cited by applicant]
US 4807854A · Mitchell · 1989 [cited by applicant]
US 4974816A · Emmett, Jr. et al. · 1990 [cited by applicant]
US 5313982A · Ohmi et al. · 1994 [cited by applicant]
US 5329463A · Sierk et al. · 1994 [cited by applicant]
US 5598838A · Servidio et al. · 1997 [cited by applicant]
US 6030048A · Hsu · 2000 [cited by applicant]
US 6395061B1 · Duyvesteyn et al. · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 6498031B1 · Carter · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 8388729B2 · Welham et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 9181603B2 · Boudreault et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9945009B2 · Boudreault et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 9982321B2 · Dean, Jr. et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10190190B2 · Dean, Jr. et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10344353B2 · Mujicic et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10975455B2 · Dean, Jr. et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11332808B2 · Dean, Jr. et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 11521138B1 · Geislinger · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 11639539B2 · Dean, Jr. et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20020179451A1 · Weldon et al. · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 20040113333A1 · Podznoev et al. · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 20040173057A1 · Fairbourn · 2004 [cited by examiner]
US 20050016593A1 · Ephrat et al. · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 20060054214A1 · Caamano et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20080102514A1 · Coallao Olivares et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20080210017A1 · Igarashi et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20080286180A1 · Jones · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20090087892A1 · Champion · 2009 [cited by examiner]
US 20090230207A1 · Guzman et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20090293679A1 · Singh et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20110178644A1 · Picton · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110286542A1 · Shelburne · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110303051A1 · Gonzalez et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20120161374A1 · Nakai et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20120297928A1 · Lang et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20130008856A1 · Megaw · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130032737A1 · Neilson et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20140369904A1 · Boudreault et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140369907A1 · Boudreault et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20150225808A1 · Boudreault et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20170356065A1 · Dean, Jr. · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20180274057A1 · Dean, Jr. et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20190119781A1 · Dean, Jr. et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190356065A1 · Watkins et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20200224290A1 · Oraby et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200340077A1 · Lizama · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20210238708A1 · Dean, Jr. et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20220259695A1 · Dean, Jr. et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20230090475A1 · Lyons · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20230227934A1 · Dean, Jr. et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20240026492A1 · Clayton et al. · 2024 [cited by applicant]
CA 1156049 · 1983 [cited by applicant]
CN 101871049 · 2010 [cited by applicant]
CN 111996373 · 2020 [cited by applicant]
GB 1404243 · 1975 [cited by applicant]
WO WO9808585 · 1998 [cited by applicant]
USPTO Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 17/945,451 dated Mar. 19, 2024. [cited by applicant]
International Preliminary Report on Patentablility from PCT/US2022/043625 dated Mar. 26, 2024. [cited by applicant]
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jan. 19, 2016 from corresponding International Application PCT/US2015/050015. [cited by applicant]
International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Feb. 3, 2017 from corresponding International Application PCT/US2015/050015. [cited by applicant]
Notice of Allowance and Examiner's Amendment from U.S. Appl. No. 15/539,328 dated Jan. 30, 2018. [cited by applicant]
Supplemental Notice of Allowability from U.S. Appl. No. 15/539,328 dated Apr. 26, 2018. [cited by applicant]
Notice of Allowance and Examiner's Amendment from U.S. Appl. No. 15/989,614 dated Sep. 27, 2018. [cited by applicant]
Examination Report dated Dec. 10, 2018 from corresponding Chilean Patent Application No. 2017-01732 with machine translation of same in English. [cited by applicant]
Non-Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 16/223,760 dated Jan. 16, 2020. [cited by applicant]
Non-Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 16/223,760 dated Aug. 7, 2020. [cited by applicant]
Notice of Allowance and Examiner's Interview Summary from U.S. Appl. No. 16/223,760 dated Dec. 23, 2020. [cited by applicant]
Notice of Allowance and Examiner's Interview Summary from U.S. Appl. No. 17/223,404 dated Jan. 25, 2022. [cited by applicant]
Non-Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 17/733,171 dated Nov. 9, 2022. [cited by applicant]
Notice of Allowance and Examiner's Interview Summary from U.S. Appl. No. 17/733,171 dated Dec. 21, 2022. [cited by applicant]
Stuurman, S., S. Ndlovu, and V. Sibanda. “Comparing the extent of the dissolution of copper-cobalt ores from the DRC Region.” Journal of the Southern African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy 114.4 (2014): 347-349. [cited by applicant]
Jadhav, Umesh, C. Su, and Hong Hocheng. “Leaching of metals from large pieces of printed circuit boards using citric acid and hydrogen peroxide.” Environmental Science and Pollution Research 23.23 (2016): 24384-24392. [cited by applicant]
Kokes, H., M. H. Morcali, and E. Acma. “Dissolution of copper and iron from malachite ore and precipitation of copper sulfate pentahydrate by chemical process.” Engineering Science and Technology, an International Journ… [cited by applicant]
Biswas, S., and A. F. Mulaba-Bafubiandi. “Extraction of Copper and Cobalt from Oxidized Ore using Organic Acids.” Hydrometallurgy Conference. 2016. [cited by applicant]
Yazici, Ersin Yener. “Improvement of stability of hydrogen peroxide using ethylene glycol.” Journal of Science and Engineering 19.57 (2017). [cited by applicant]
Mahajan, V., et al. “Enhanced leaching of copper from chalcopyrite in hydrogen peroxide-glycol system.” Minerals Engineering 20.7 (2007): 670-674. [cited by applicant]
Gargul, K., et al. “Leaching of lead and copper from flash smelting slag by citric acid.” Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering 19 (2019): 648-656. [cited by applicant]
Shabani, M. A., M. Irannajad, and A. R. Azadmehr. “Investigation on leaching of malachite by citric acid.” International Journal of Minerals, Metallurgy, and Materials 19.9 (2012): 782-786. [cited by applicant]
Haas, Larry A., and Terry L. Hebble. “Influence of Chelating Reagents on Leaching of Copper Ore” vol. 8965. US Department of the Interior, Bureau of Mines, 1985. [cited by applicant]
PCT Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration from PCT/US2022/043625 dated Jan. 6, 2023. [cited by applicant]
USPTO Non-Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 17/945,451 dated Jun. 23, 2023. [cited by applicant]
Salas-Martell et al., Leaching of pyrite-based ore containing copper using sulfuric acid and hydrogen peroxide, international Journal of Industrial Chemistry, 11:195-291, Jun. 2020 (Year: 2020). [cited by applicant]
CN-101871049-A English translation. [cited by applicant]
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority in PCT/US2024/049548 dated Dec. 10, 2024. [cited by applicant]
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority in PCT/US2024/049581 dated Dec. 18, 2024. [cited by applicant]
Reply to Written Opinion, PCT Demand and Letter Accompanying Article 19 Amendments in PCT/US2024/049548 dated Dec. 23, 2024. [cited by applicant]
Reply to Written Opinion, PCT Demand and Letter Accompanying Article 19 Amendments in PCT/US2024/049581 dated Feb. 14, 2025. [cited by applicant]
PCT International Preliminary Report on Patentability in PCT/US2024/049548 dated Feb. 27, 2025. [cited by applicant]
PCT Corrected International Preliminary Report on Patentability in PCT/US2024/049581 dated Mar. 20, 2025. [cited by applicant]
USPTO Non Final Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 18/480,354 dated Mar. 10, 2025. [cited by applicant]
Response to Non Final Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 18/480,354 dated Apr. 2, 2025. [cited by applicant]