IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,385,818
Granted Patent B2
US 12,385,818 · App. 18/109,598 · Granted Aug 12, 2025

Modeling gas desorption in a subsurface reservoir

Inventors: Moemen A. Abdelrahman (Dhahran, SA); Belaifa Elhadi (Dhahran, SA); Zhen Chen (Dhahran, SA)
Assignee: Saudi Arabian Oil Company
G01N7/14G01V11/00E21B43/006
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,385,818
App. No.
18/109,598
Granted
Aug 12, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

Systems and methods for modeling gas desorption in a subterranean reservoir include measuring a gas sorption parameter using a crushed core sample from the subterranean reservoir; computing a gas storage capacity of the subterranean reservoir at an initial reservoir pressure based on the gas sorption parameter; generating a three-dimensional (3D) distribution of total organic carbon (TOC) in the subterranean reservoir; estimating a 3D distribution of original adsorbed gas in place of the subterranean reservoir by correlating the gas storage capacity with the 3D distribution of TOC; and predicting the amount of gas desorbed from the subterranean reservoir as the reservoir is depleted.

Claims (40)

1. A method for modeling gas desorption in a subterranean reservoir, the method comprising:

measuring a gas sorption parameter using a crushed core sample from the subterranean reservoir;

computing a gas storage capacity of the subterranean reservoir at an initial reservoir pressure based on the gas sorption parameter;

generating a three-dimensional (3D) distribution of total organic carbon (TOC) in the subterranean reservoir;

estimating a 3D distribution of original adsorbed gas in place of the subterranean reservoir by correlating the gas storage capacity with the 3D distribution of TOC; and

predicting the amount of gas desorbed from the subterranean reservoir as the reservoir is depleted.

2. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

defining a desorption pressure at which gas in the subterranean reservoir begins to desorb.

3. The method of claim 2 , wherein, the desorption pressure is user-defined for each cell in the 3D distribution of original adsorbed gas in place.

4. The method of claim 2 , wherein the subterranean reservoir is under saturated.

5. The method of claim 2 , wherein the subterranean reservoir is saturated.

6. The method of claim 2 , wherein the desorption pressure is estimated based on the measuring.

7. The method of claim 1 , wherein the predicting comprises using an isotherm scaled by comparing a Langmuir isotherm with the 3D distribution of original adsorbed gas in place.

8. The method of claim 1 , further comprising producing hydrocarbons from the subterranean reservoir.

9. One or more non-transitory machine-readable storage devices storing instructions for modeling gas desorption in a subterranean reservoir, the instructions being executable by one or more processing devices to cause performance of operations comprising:

accessing, from a data store, values of a measured gas sorption parameter for the subterranean reservoir;

computing a gas storage capacity of the subterranean reservoir at an initial reservoir pressure based on the values of the measured gas sorption parameter;

generating a three-dimensional (3D) distribution of total organic carbon (TOC) in the subterranean reservoir;

estimating a 3D distribution of original adsorbed gas in place (OAGIP) of the subterranean reservoir by correlating the gas storage capacity with the 3D distribution of TOC; and

predicting the amount of gas desorbed from the subterranean reservoir as the reservoir is depleted.

10. The non-transitory machine-readable storage devices of claim 9 , wherein the operations further comprise:

defining a desorption pressure at which gas in the subterranean reservoir begins to desorb.

11. The non-transitory machine-readable storage devices of claim 10 , wherein, the desorption pressure is user defined for each cell in the 3D distribution of OAGIP.

12. The non-transitory machine-readable storage devices of claim 10 , wherein the subterranean reservoir is under saturated.

13. The non-transitory machine-readable storage devices of claim 10 , wherein the subterranean reservoir is saturated.

14. The non-transitory machine-readable storage devices of claim 10 , wherein the desorption pressure is estimated based on a measured gas sorption property.

15. The non-transitory machine-readable storage devices of claim 9 , wherein the predicting comprises using an isotherm scaled by comparing a Langmuir isotherm with the 3D distribution of original adsorbed gas in place.

16. A system for modeling gas desorption of a subterranean reservoir, the system comprising:

at least one processor; and

a memory storing instructions that, when executed by the at least one processor, cause the at least one processor to perform operations comprising:

accessing, from a data store, values of a measured gas sorption parameter for the subterranean reservoir;

computing a gas storage capacity of the subterranean reservoir at an initial reservoir pressure based on the values of the measured gas sorption parameter;

generating a three-dimensional (3D) distribution of total organic carbon (TOC) in the subterranean reservoir;

estimating a 3D distribution of original adsorbed gas in place (OAGIP) of the subterranean reservoir by correlating the gas storage capacity with the 3D distribution of TOC; and

predicting the amount of gas desorbed from the subterranean reservoir as the reservoir is depleted.

17. The system of claim 16 , wherein the operations further comprise:

defining a desorption pressure at which gas in the subterranean reservoir begins to desorb.

18. The system of claim 17 , wherein, the desorption pressure is user-defined for each cell in the 3D distribution of original adsorbed gas in place.

19. The system of claim 17 , wherein the subterranean reservoir is under saturated.

20. The system of claim 16 , wherein the predicting comprises using an isotherm scaled by comparing a Langmuir isotherm with the 3D distribution of original adsorbed gas in place.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jan 18, 2024
From: ABDELRAHMAN, MOEMEN A.; ELHADI, BELAIFA; CHEN, ZHEN
To: SAUDI ARABIAN OIL COMPANY
Reel/Frame 066166/0652 →
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20240272057A1 · Aug 15, 2024
References Cited (69)
US 10156507B2 · Davidson · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 11014829B2 · Parthasarathy · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11022486B2 · Tong et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11022618B2 · Sierks et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11027257B2 · Travolsi et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11031229B2 · Huang et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11041849B2 · Wang et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11046748B2 · Jin · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11049707B2 · Krechmer et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11052375B2 · Baumann et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11059017B2 · Buchner, Sr. et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11065602B2 · Alayande et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11066607B1 · Koseoglu · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11072686B2 · Veneman et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11078093B2 · Cwiertny et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11083990B2 · Shigaki et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11091647B2 · Hagimoto et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11097226B2 · Nair et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11099115B2 · Pejcinovic et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11101126B2 · Liu et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11106843B2 · Ma et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11123684B2 · Puxty et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11131615B2 · Savoy et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11133169B2 · Jones et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11133558B2 · Tokuno et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11136453B2 · Cwiertny et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11137394B2 · Chen et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11148119B2 · Fortner et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11156582B2 · Wang et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11161745B2 · Mu et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11174722B2 · Wang et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11179871B2 · Li · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11181501B2 · Vellaisamy et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11185842B2 · Okumura et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11186894B2 · Wang et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11202587B2 · Plaxco et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11203749B2 · Madison et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11207633B2 · Meirav et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11208453B2 · Weiss · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20100250215A1 · Kennon · 2010 [cited by examiner]
US 20130262069A1 · Leonard · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20220178252A1 · Hu et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20230340876A1 · Luo · 2023 [cited by examiner]
AU 2008265701 · 2008 [cited by applicant]
AU 2020103953 · 2021 [cited by applicant]
CA 2858319 · 2013 [cited by applicant]
CN 115618768A · 2023 [cited by examiner]
CN 117470708A · 2024 [cited by examiner]
CN 117494452A · 2024 [cited by examiner]
WO WO2018102732A1 · 2018 [cited by examiner]
WO WO2022173375A1 · 2022 [cited by examiner]
Pathi et al., “Limited storage and recovery of adsorbed gas in shale reservoirs—Insights from experiments and production modeling,” Fuel Communications, Mar. 2022, 10:100059, 12 pages. [cited by applicant]
Sharma et al., “Impact of Total Organic 1-20 Carbon on Adsorption Capacity, In-Place Hydrocarbons, and Ultimate Recovery: A Case Study of the Duvernay Formation in Alberta, Canada,” Proceedings of the 2018 Abu Dhabi Int… [cited by applicant]
International Search Report and Written Opinion in International Appln. No. PCT/US2024/015535, mailed on Jun. 3, 2024, 17 pages. [cited by applicant]
Akkutlu et al., “Multi-Scale Gas Transport in Shales with Local Kerogen Heterogeneities,” SPE Journal, Dec. 2012, 17(4):1002-1011, 10 pages. [cited by applicant]
Ambrose et al., “Shale Gas-in-place Calculations Part I—New Pore-Scale Considerations,” SPE Journal. Mar. 2012, 17(1):219-229, 11 pages. [cited by applicant]
Arumugam, “High-Pressure Adsorption of Pure Coalbed Gases on Dry Coals,” Thesis for the degree of Master of Science, Oklahoma State University, Dec. 2004, 127 pages. [cited by applicant]
Brunauer et al., “Adsorption of Gases in Multimolecular Layers,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, Feb. 1938, 60(2):309-319, 11 pages. [cited by applicant]
Dogru et al., “A Next-Generation Parallel Reservoir Simulator for Giant Reservoirs,” SPE Reservoir Simulation Symposium, Feb. 2009, 29 pages. [cited by applicant]
Langmuir, “The adsorption of gases on plane surfaces of glass, mica and platinum,” Journal of the American Chemical society 40.9, Sep. 1918, 1361-1403, 43 pages. [cited by applicant]
Mavor et al., “Measurement and evaluation of isotherm data,” Proceedings of 65th Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition of the Society of Petroleum Engineers, SPE 20728, Sep. 1990, 157-170, 14 pages. [cited by applicant]
Passey et al., “From oil-prone source rock to gas-producing shale reservoir-geologic and petrophysical characterization of unconventional shale-gas reservoirs,” International oil and gas conference and exhibition in Chi… [cited by applicant]
Reich et al., “Adsorption of Methane, Ethane, And Ethylene Gases And Their Binary And Ternary Mixtures And Carbon Dioxide On Activated Carbon At 212-301 K And Pressures To 35 Atmospheres,” Industrial and Engineering Che… [cited by applicant]
Santos et al., “Laboratory Measurement of Sorption Isotherm Under Confining Stress with Pore-Volume Effects,” SPE International, SPE 162595, Nov. 2012, 12 pages. [cited by applicant]
Seidle et al., “The Impact of Undersaturation on Coal Gas Economics,” SPE International, SPE 107731, Apr. 2007, 12 pages. [cited by applicant]
Silin et al., “Shale gas: Nanometer-scale observations and well modelling,” Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology 51.06, Nov. 2012, 464-475, 12 pages. [cited by applicant]
Sing et al., “Reporting Physisorption Data for Gas/Solid Systems with Special Reference to the Determination of Surface Area and Porosity (Recommendations 1984),” Pure and Applied Chemistry, Jan. 1985, 57(4):603-619, 17… [cited by applicant]
Vermesse et al., “Gas adsorption on zeolites at high pressure,” Langmuir, Aug. 1996, 12(17):4190-4196, 7 pages. [cited by applicant]
Yu et al., “Evaluation of Gas Adsorption in Marcellus Shale,” SPE International, SPE 170801-MS, Oct. 2014, 16 pages. [cited by applicant]
Cited By (1)
US 12,691,407