IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,443,177
Granted Patent B2
US 12,443,177 · App. 17/608,473 · Granted Oct 14, 2025

Analysis method and devices for same

Inventors: Andreas Gienger (Kirchheim unter Teck, DE); Oliver Sawodny (Stuttgart, DE); Simon Alt (Ditzingen, DE); Martin Weickgenannt (Bietigheim-Bissingen, DE); Markus Hummel (Urbach, DE); Tobias Schlotterer (Hechingen, DE); Jens Berner (Möglingen, DE); Hauke Bensch (Lübeck, DE)
Assignee: Dürr Systems AG
G05B23/0254G05B2223/02
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,443,177
App. No.
17/608,473
Granted
Oct 14, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

In order to provide a method for anomaly and/or fault recognition in an industrial-method plant, for example a painting plant, wherein anomalies and/or fault situations are recognisable simply and reliably by means of the method, it is proposed according to the invention that the method should comprise the following: automatic generation of an anomaly and/or fault model of the industrial-method plant that comprises information on the occurrence probability of process values; automatic input of process values of the industrial-method plant during operation thereof; automatic recognition of an anomaly and/or fault situation by determining an occurrence probability by means of the anomaly and/or fault model on the basis of the process values of the industrial-method plant that have been input and by checking the occurrence probability for a limit value,

Claims (80)

1. A method for anomaly and/or fault recognition in an industrial process, the method comprising:

identifying a process structure of the industrial process comprising determining a structure graph mapping relationships of components, in the industrial process;

wherein the components comprise sensors and/or actuators;

wherein the structure graph comprises a plurality of cliques describing physical relationships between the components, and wherein relationships between nodes of each are described by a probability density function of a plurality of probability density functions;

generating an anomaly and/or fault model of the industrial process, wherein the anomaly and/or fault model comprises the structure graph;

the anomaly and/or fault model comprising information on an occurrence probability of process values of the industrial process;

inputting the process values of the industrial process into the anomaly and/or fault model during operation of the industrial process,

using the probability density functions to recognize an anomaly and/or fault situation by determining the occurrence probability of the inputted process values of the industrial process and by checking the occurrence probability against a limit value; and

applying at least one corrective measure based on the recognized anomaly and/or fault situation and/or continuing operation of the industrial process.

2. The method according to claim 1 , wherein

the anomaly and/or fault model includes structural data containing information of the process structure of the industrial process, and/or

the anomaly and/or fault model includes parameterization data containing information on relationships between process values of the industrial process.

3. The method according to claim 1 , wherein, for generating the anomaly and/or fault model, one or more of the following steps is carried out:

determination of causalities in the identified process structure of the industrial process; or

structure parameterization of the relationships in the identified process structure of the industrial process.

4. The method according to claim 1 , wherein determination of the structure graph is performed using one or more of the following:

a machine learning method;

expert knowledge;

known circuit diagrams and/or procedure diagrams; or

designations in a numbering system of the industrial process.

5. The method according to claim 3 , wherein the industrial process is activated by test signals for structure identification for determining the structure graph.

6. The method according to claim 3 , wherein the determining of causalities in the identified process structure of the industrial process is performed using one or more of the following:

system input signals and system output signals that are generated on activation of the industrial process by test signals;

expert knowledge;

known circuit diagrams and/or procedure diagrams; or

designations in a numbering system of the industrial process.

7. The method according to claim 3 , wherein, for structure parameterization of the relationships in the identified process structure of the industrial process, one or more of the following is used:

models for determining probability density functions, wherein the models comprise Gaussian mixture models;

known physical relationships between process values; or

physical characteristic diagrams of functional elements of the industrial process.

8. The method according to claim 7 , wherein data from regular operation of the industrial process and/or data obtained by activation of the industrial process by test signals are used for structure parameterization using models for determining probability density functions, wherein the models comprise Gaussian mixture models.

9. The method according to claim 8 , wherein the data that are used for structure parameterization using models for determining probability density functions, wherein the models comprise Gaussian mixture models.

10. The method according to claim 1 , wherein during generation of the anomaly and/or fault model the limit value for the occurrence probability of the process value is established, and wherein an anomaly is recognized if the occurrence probability falls below the limit value.

11. The method according to claim 1 , wherein a fault cause of the recognized anomaly and/or a recognized fault situation is identified.

12. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the industrial process comprises one or more of the following treatment stations of a painting plant:

pre-treatment station;

station for cathodic dip coating;

drying stations;

industrial supply air plant; or

painting robot.

13. An anomaly and/or fault recognition system for recognizing an anomaly and/or fault, which is configured to perform the method for anomaly and/or fault recognition in an industrial process according to claim 1 , wherein the industrial process comprises a painting plant.

14. An industrial control system comprising:

a treatment station; and

an anomaly and/or fault recognition system according to claim 13 .

15. The method according to claim 1 , wherein, as a result of allocating a fault cause for a recognized anomaly and/or fault situation, affected ones of the cliques are expanded by adding at least one node and a probability density function of the recognized anomaly and/or fault situation is integrated into a relationship of the added at least one node.

16. A method for anomaly and/or fault recognition in an industrial process, the method comprising:

generating a structure graph by determining relationships between components of the industrial process;

wherein the components comprise sensors and/or actuators;

wherein the structure graph comprises a plurality of cliques describing physical relationships between the components, and wherein relationships between nodes of each are described by a probability density function of a plurality of probability density functions;

parametrizing the structure graph using a Gaussian mixture model (GMM) to determine the probability density function,

generating, an anomaly and/or fault model of the industrial process that includes information on an occurrence probability of process values of the industrial process;

wherein the anomaly and/or fault model comprises the parameterized structure graph;

inputting the process values of the industrial process into the anomaly and/or fault model during operation of the industrial process;

using the probability density functions to recognize an anomaly and/or fault situation by determining the occurrence probability of the inputted process values of the industrial process and by checking the occurrence probability against a limit value; and

applying at least one corrective measure based on the recognized anomaly and/or fault situation and/or continuing operation of the industrial process.

17. The method according to claim 16 , wherein

the anomaly and/or fault model includes structural data containing information on a process structure in the industrial process; and/or

the anomaly and/or fault model includes data containing information on relationships between process values of the industrial process.

18. The method according to claim 16 , wherein, for generating the anomaly and/or fault model, one or more of the following steps is carried out: structure identification for determining a process structure of the industrial process; determination of causalities in the determined process structure of the industrial process; or structure parameterization of the relationships in the determined process structure of the industrial process.

19. The method according to claim 18 , wherein, in a context of structure identification for determining a process structure of the industrial process, the structure graph maps relationships in the industrial process.

20. The method according to claim 19 , wherein determination of the process structure is performed using one or more of the following:

a machine learning method;

expert knowledge;

known circuit diagrams and/or procedure diagrams; or designations in a numbering system of the industrial process.

21. The method according to claim 18 , wherein the industrial process is activated by test signals for structure identification for determining the structure graph.

22. The method according to claim 18 , wherein the determining of causalities in the determined process structure of the industrial process is performed using one or more of the following:

system input signals and system output signals that are generated on activation of the industrial process by test signals;

expert knowledge;

known circuit diagrams and/or procedure diagrams; or designations in a numbering system of the industrial process.

23. The method according to claim 18 , wherein, for structure parameterization of the relationships in the determined process structure of the industrial process, one or more of the following is used: models for determining probability density functions, wherein the models comprise: Gaussian mixture models; known physical relationships between process values; or physical characteristic diagrams of functional elements of the industrial process.

24. The method according to claim 23 , wherein data from regular operation of the industrial process and/or data obtained by activation of the industrial process by test signals are used for structure parameterization using models for determining probability density functions, wherein the models comprise Gaussian mixture models.

25. The method according to claim 24 , wherein the data that are used for structure parameterization using models for determining probability density functions, wherein the models comprise Gaussian mixture models, are pre-processed before the structure parameterization.

26. The method according to claim 16 , wherein during generation of the anomaly and/or fault model the limit value is established, and wherein an anomaly is recognized if the occurrence probability falls below the limit value.

27. The method according to claim 16 , wherein a fault cause of a recognized anomaly and/or a recognized fault situation is identified.

28. The method according to claim 16 , wherein the industrial process includes or is formed by one or more of the following treatment stations of a painting plant:

pre-treatment station;

station for cathodic dip coating;

drying stations;

industrial supply air plant; or

a painting robot.

Priority Claims (2)
DE 10 2019 112 099.3 · May 9, 2019 · national
DE 10 2019 206 837.5 · May 10, 2019 · national
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20220214676A1 · Jul 7, 2022
References Cited (210)
US 4186793A · Teplinsky et al. · 1980 [cited by applicant]
US 5341304A · Sakamoto et al. · 1994 [cited by applicant]
US 5844802A · Lepper et al. · 1998 [cited by applicant]
US 6070128A · Descales et al. · 2000 [cited by applicant]
US 6141598A · Nam · 2000 [cited by applicant]
US 6516239B1 · Madden et al. · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 6528109B1 · Filev · 2003 [cited by examiner]
US 6627006B1 · Bartik-Himmler et al. · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 6801822B1 · Fujiwara et al. · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 6850874B1 · Higuerey et al. · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 7236846B1 · Koyama et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 7246156B2 · Ginter et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 7349746B2 · Emigholz · 2008 [cited by examiner]
US 10467502B2 · Ren · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 11353835B2 · Kobayashi et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20030061583A1 · Malhotra · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 20030069781A1 · Hancock et al. · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 20030139836A1 · Matthews et al. · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 20040025972A1 · Bartik-Himmler et al. · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 20040059553A1 · Heidemann et al. · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 20050002560A1 · Yamamoto et al. · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 20050010321A1 · Contos et al. · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 20060190110A1 · Holt et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20060257237A1 · McDonald et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20060259198A1 · Brcka et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20070220330A1 · Nauerz et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20070226540A1 · Konieczny · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20090143872A1 · Thiele et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20090216393A1 · Schimert · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20090250346A1 · Weschke et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20100083029A1 · Erickson et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20100161141A1 · Herre et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20110264424A1 · Miwa et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110270482A1 · Holzer · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110276828A1 · Tamaki et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20120218405A1 · Terreno · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20120254141A1 · Poland et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20130173332A1 · Ho et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20140351642A1 · Bates et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140358601A1 · Smiley et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20150277429A1 · Drath et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150279129A1 · Ishikawa · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20160193620A1 · Schulze · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160299500A1 · Drasovean · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160343122A1 · Jing et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20170041452A1 · Amann · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170139382A1 · Sayyarrodsari et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170185058A1 · Holverson et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170306986A1 · McLean, Jr. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170308049A1 · Fujii et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20180036845A1 · Thorwarth · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180120028A1 · Robbin · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180157249A1 · Muto · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180189242A1 · Fukushima et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180293673A1 · Ortiz Obando · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180326591A1 · Hausler · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180340515A1 · Huyn et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180356154A1 · Iglauer et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20190019096A1 · Yoshida et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190151924A1 · Nillies · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190179282A1 · Götz et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190204815A1 · Ota et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190243872A1 · Komatsu et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190383599A1 · Gregory et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20200012270A1 · Hollender et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200055558A1 · Damoulis et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200089209A1 · Amemiya · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200216130A1 · Von Krauland · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200306780A1 · Maas et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200401965A1 · Wu et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20210223167A1 · Jagiella · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210261374A1 · Celli · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20220197271A1 · Alt et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220214670A1 · Herre et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220214671A1 · Alt et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220215305A1 · Wieland et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220237064A1 · Alt et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20230325271A1 · Nakamura et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
CN 109270907A · 2019 [cited by applicant]
DE 4113556A1 · 1991 [cited by applicant]
DE 102004048937A1 · 2005 [cited by applicant]
DE 102004019151A1 · 2005 [cited by applicant]
DE 102004024262A1 · 2005 [cited by applicant]
DE 102006022614A1 · 2006 [cited by applicant]
DE 102006045429A1 · 2007 [cited by applicant]
DE 102006055297A1 · 2008 [cited by applicant]
DE 102006056879A1 · 2008 [cited by applicant]
DE 102008062630A1 · 2010 [cited by applicant]
DE 102008060115B4 · 2010 [cited by applicant]
DE 102012213481A1 · 2014 [cited by applicant]
DE 102014201273A1 · 2015 [cited by applicant]
DE 102015119240B3 · 2017 [cited by applicant]
DE 102016012451A1 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
DE 102017101228A1 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
DE 102017208103A1 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
DE 102017113343A1 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
DE 102017217760A1 · 2019 [cited by applicant]
DE 102019112099B3 · 2020 [cited by applicant]
DE 102019206833A1 · 2020 [cited by applicant]
DE 102019206846A1 · 2020 [cited by applicant]
EP 1081569A2 · 2001 [cited by applicant]
EP 1176388A2 · 2002 [cited by applicant]
EP 2930578A2 · 2015 [cited by applicant]
EP 3699708A1 · 2017 [cited by applicant]
EP 3398698A1 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
EP 3294463B1 · 2019 [cited by applicant]
JP H04223826A · 1992 [cited by applicant]
JP H04358556A · 1992 [cited by applicant]
JP 1994034404A · 1994 [cited by applicant]
JP H06148090A · 1994 [cited by applicant]
JP H06155252A · 1994 [cited by applicant]
JP H06235094A · 1994 [cited by applicant]
JP 2000266570A · 2000 [cited by applicant]
JP 2004354250A · 2004 [cited by applicant]
JP 2005309616A · 2005 [cited by applicant]
JP 2006218426A · 2006 [cited by applicant]
JP 2010511232A · 2010 [cited by applicant]
JP 2010122847A · 2010 [cited by applicant]
JP 2012128583A · 2012 [cited by applicant]
JP 2013045281A · 2013 [cited by applicant]
JP 2013054626A · 2013 [cited by applicant]
JP 2015184942A · 2015 [cited by applicant]
JP 2016081482A · 2016 [cited by applicant]
JP 2016538645A · 2016 [cited by applicant]
JP 2017199074A · 2017 [cited by applicant]
JP 2018109876A · 2018 [cited by applicant]
JP 2018120343A · 2018 [cited by applicant]
JP 2018200043A · 2018 [cited by applicant]
JP 2019012473A · 2019 [cited by applicant]
JP 2019505754A · 2019 [cited by applicant]
JP 2019049391A · 2019 [cited by applicant]
JP 2019066957A · 2019 [cited by applicant]
WO 03042770A1 · 2003 [cited by applicant]
WO 2004079057A1 · 2004 [cited by applicant]
WO 2008078910A1 · 2008 [cited by applicant]
WO 2010082322A1 · 2010 [cited by applicant]
WO 2015077890A1 · 2015 [cited by applicant]
WO 2016195092A1 · 2016 [cited by applicant]
WO 2017086194A1 · 2017 [cited by applicant]
WO 2018047804A1 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
WO 2018220813A1 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
WO 2019077656A1 · 2019 [cited by applicant]
WO 2020062186A1 · 2020 [cited by applicant]
Karami et al., “Fault detection and diagnosis for nonlinear systems: A new adaptive Gaussian mixture modeling approach”, Elsevier 2018 (Year: 2018). [cited by examiner]
Riascos, L. A. M., Lucas Antonio Moscato, and Paulo Eigi Miyagi. “Detection and treatment of faults in manufacturing systems based on Petri Nets.” Journal of the Brazilian society of mechanical Sciences and Engineering … [cited by examiner]
Wu, Zhenhua, and Sheng-Jen Hsieh. “A realtime fuzzy Petri net diagnoser for detecting progressive faults in PLC based discrete manufacturing system.” The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 61 (20… [cited by examiner]
Wu, Zhenhua, Sheng-Jen Hsieh, and Jianzhi Li. “Sensor deployment based on fuzzy graph considering heterogeneity and multiple-objectives to diagnose manufacturing system.” Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing 2… [cited by examiner]
Melani, Arthur HA, et al. “Fault diagnosis based on Petri Nets: the case study of a hydropower plant.” IFAC—PapersOnLine 49.31 (2016): 1-6. (Year: 2016). [cited by examiner]
James, Ajith Tom, O. P. Gandhi, and S. G. Deshmukh. “Fault diagnosis of automobile systems using fault tree based on digraph modeling.” International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management 9 (2018): 494-… [cited by examiner]
Farruggia, Alfonso. “A probabilistic approach to anomaly detection for Wireless Sensor Networks.” (2012). (Year: 2012). [cited by examiner]
Andrew Kusiak et al.,“The prediction and diagnosis of wind turbine faults,” dated Jun. 9, 2010, Elsevier, 9 pages. [cited by applicant]
Zhenyu Wu et al., “An Integrated Ensemble Learning Model for Imbalanced Fault Diagnostics and Prognostics,” dated Feb. 19, 2018, IEEE Access, 10 pages. [cited by applicant]
European Patent Office, International Search Report, issued in connection with Application No. PCT/DE2020/100358, dated Jul. 15, 2020, 6 pages. [cited by applicant]
European Patent Office, Written Opinion, issued in connection with Application No. PCT/DE2020/100358, dated Jul. 15, 2020, 8 pages. [cited by applicant]
European Patent Office, International Search Report, issued in connection with Application No. PCT/DE2020/100360, dated Jul. 15, 2020, 6 pages. [cited by applicant]
European Patent Office, Written Opinion, issued in connection with Application No. PCT/DE2020/100360, dated Jul. 15, 2020, 8 pages. [cited by applicant]
European Patent Office, International Search Report, issued in connection with Application No. PCT/DE2020/100357, dated Aug. 11, 2020, 6 pages. [cited by applicant]
European Patent Office, Written Opinion, issued in connection with Application No. PCT/DE2020/100357, dated Aug. 11, 2020, 6 pages. [cited by applicant]
European Patent Office, International Search Report, issued in connection with Application No. PCT/DE2020/100359, dated Oct. 13, 2020, 8 pages. [cited by applicant]
European Patent Office, Written Opinion, Issued in connection with Application No. PCT/DE2020/100359, dated Oct. 13, 2020, 15 pages. [cited by applicant]
European Patent Office, International Search Report, issued in connection with Application No. PCT/DE2020/100356, dated Oct. 13, 2020, 8 pages. [cited by applicant]
European Patent Office, Written Opinion, issued in connection with Application No. PCT/DE2020/100356, dated Oct. 13, 2020, 13 pages. [cited by applicant]
European Patent Office, International Search Report, issued in connection with Application No. PCT/DE2020/100355, dated Oct. 21, 2020, 8 pages. [cited by applicant]
European Patent Office, Written Opinion, issued in connection with Application No. PCT/DE2020/100355, dated Oct. 21, 2020, 13 pages. [cited by applicant]
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Non-Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 17/608,467, Jun. 22, 2023, 14 pages. [cited by applicant]
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 17/608,472, Jun. 29, 2023, 17 pages. [cited by applicant]
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Non-Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 17/608,469, Apr. 5, 2023, 22 pages. [cited by applicant]
Lange, “Machine Learning Based Error Prediction for Spray Painting Applications,” Chalmers University of Technology and University of Gothenburg, 2016, 59 pages. [cited by applicant]
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 17/608,472, Jun. 20, 2023, 16 pages. [cited by applicant]
Google, “Google Scholar/Patents search—text refined: Industrial plant fault database,” Google, retrieved Jun. 14, 2023, 2 pages. [cited by applicant]
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Non-Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 17/608,472, Jan. 18, 2023, 14 pages. [cited by applicant]
Google, “Google Scholar/Patents search—text refined: Industrial plant fault cause historical database,” Google, retrieved Jan. 11, 2023, 3 pages. [cited by applicant]
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Advisory Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 17/608,472, Sep. 15, 2023, 16 pages. [cited by applicant]
European Patent Office, “Communication Under Article 94(3) EPC,” issued in connection with European Application No. 20 728 915.8, Sep. 18, 2023, 10 pages, with machine English translation. [cited by applicant]
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance and Fee(s) Due,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 17/608,467, Oct. 12, 2023, 7 pages. [cited by applicant]
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance and Fee(s) Due,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 17/608,469, Oct. 18, 2023, 12 pages. [cited by applicant]
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Non-Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 17/608,472, Oct. 19, 2023, 18 pages. [cited by applicant]
Google, “Google Scholar/Patents search—industrial plant fault database,” Google, retrieved Oct. 13, 2023, 2 pages. [cited by applicant]
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowability,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 17/608,469, Oct. 31, 2023, 10 pages. [cited by applicant]
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Non-Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 17/608,470, Jan. 19, 2024, 19 pages. [cited by applicant]
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Non-Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 17/608,468, Dec. 22, 2023, 20 pages. [cited by applicant]
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 17/608,472, May 3, 2024, 15 pages. [cited by applicant]
Google, “Google Scholar/Patents search—industrial plant fault database,” Google, retrieved Apr. 12, 2024, 2 pages. [cited by applicant]
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 17/608,468, Apr. 11, 2024, 17 pages. [cited by applicant]
Japan Patent Office, “Notice of Reasons for Refusal,” issued in connection with Japanese Patent Application No. 2021-566047, Jan. 26, 2024, 8 pages, with English translation. [cited by applicant]
Japan Patent Office, “Notice of Reasons for Refusal,” issued in connection with Japanese Patent Application No. 2021-565988, Feb. 29, 2024, 10 pages, with English translation. [cited by applicant]
Japan Patent Office, “Notice of Reasons for Refusal,” issued in connection with Japanese Patent Application No. 2021-565985, Mar. 6, 2024, 10 pages, with English translation. [cited by applicant]
Japan Patent Office, “Notice of Reasons for Refusal,” issued in connection with Japanese Patent Application No. 2021-566108, dated Mar. 11, 2024, mailed Mar. 19, 2024, 10 pages, with English translation. [cited by applicant]
Japan Patent Office, “Notice of Reasons for Refusal,” issued in connection with Japanese Patent Application No. 2021-566002, Mar. 7, 2024, 8 pages, with English translation. [cited by applicant]
European Patent Office, “Extended European Search Report,” issued in connection with European Application No. 23 219 822.6, Apr. 17, 2024, 16 pages, with machine English translation. [cited by applicant]
Japan Patent Office, “Notice of Reasons for Refusal,” issued in connection with Japanese Patent Application No. 2021-566091, Mar. 11, 2024, 10 pages, with English translation. [cited by applicant]
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Non-Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 17/608,470, Jul. 18, 2024, 26 pages. [cited by applicant]
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Non-Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 17/608,472, Aug. 23, 2024, 13 pages. [cited by applicant]
Google, “Google Scholar/Patents search—industrial plant fault database,” Google, retrieved Aug. 20, 2024, 2 pages. [cited by applicant]
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Non-Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 18/402,412, Aug. 26, 2024, 13 pages. [cited by applicant]
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Non-Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 17/608,468, Oct. 2, 2024, 19 pages. [cited by applicant]
Korean Intellectual Property Office, “Notification of Reasons for Refusal,” issued in connection with Korean Patent Application No. 10-2021-7040083, dated Feb. 17, 2025, 17 pages. [English Translation Included]. [cited by applicant]
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Non-Final Office Action,” Issued In connection with U.S. Appl. No. 17/608,470, dated May 2, 2025, 16 pages. [cited by applicant]
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 17/608,472, dated Dec. 18, 2024, 19 pages. [cited by applicant]
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 17/608,470, Dec. 12, 2024, 29 pages. [cited by applicant]
Korean Intellectual Property Office, “Notice of Reasons for Refusal,” issued in connection with Korean Patent Application No. 10-2021-7040253, mailed on Dec. 12, 2024, 6 pages (English translation). [cited by applicant]
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Advisory Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 17/608,470, Feb. 26, 2025, 3 pages. [cited by applicant]
Korean Patent Office, “Notice of Reason(s) for Refusal”, issued in connection with KR Patent Application No. 10-2021-7040082 on Feb. 17, 2025, 9 pages. [cited by applicant]
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Non-Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 17/608,468, dated Mar. 6, 2025, 14 pages. [cited by applicant]
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 18/402,412, dated Mar. 18, 2025, 9 pages. [cited by applicant]
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Advisory Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 18/402,412, dated Jun. 3, 2025, 23 pages. [cited by applicant]
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 17/608,468, dated Jun. 18, 2025, 14 pages. [cited by applicant]
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance and Fee(s) Due,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 18/402,412, dated Jul. 1, 2025, 8 pages. [cited by applicant]
Korean Patent Office, “Notice of Reasons for Refusal,” issued in connection with Korean Patent Application No. 10-2021-7039938, dated Aug. 1, 2025, 7 pages. [English translation included.]. [cited by applicant]
Korean Patent Office, “Notice of Reasons for Refusal,” issued in connection with Korean Patent Application No. 10-2021-7040253, dated Aug. 23, 2025, 12 pages. [English translation included.]. [cited by applicant]