IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,523,992
Granted Patent B2
US 12,523,992 · App. 17/608,468 · Granted Jan 13, 2026

Method for checking workpieces, checking facility and treatment facility

Inventors: Frank Herre (Oberriexingen, DE); Michael Zabel (Winnenden, DE); Dietmar Wieland (Waiblingen, DE); Sören Wehler (Ludwigsburg, DE)
Assignee: Dürr Systems AG
G05B19/41875B05B12/084B05B13/0452B05B14/43B05B16/20G05B2219/32368
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,523,992
App. No.
17/608,468
Granted
Jan 13, 2026
Kind
B2
Abstract

In order to provide a checking facility for checking workpieces and also a treatment facility for treating workpieces, which enable efficient and reliable quality optimisation, it is proposed that workpiece parameters are detected, for example by means of an automatic checking station, and a workpiece-specific data set is created on this basis and/or from facility parameters.

Claims (45)

1 . A method for checking workpieces, the method comprising:

determining one or more workpiece parameters of the workpieces to be checked by an automatic checking station; and

categorizing the workpieces depending on at least one of the workpiece parameters determined by the checking station,

wherein one or more workpieces, which have been categorized as defect-free by the checking station, are supplied to a quality inspection station downstream of the checking station, and

wherein results of the quality inspection station are utilized to adjust one or more facility parameters in one or more treatment stations for treating the workpieces.

2 . A method in accordance with claim 1 , wherein workpieces are post-treated, in which case one or more workpiece parameters are determined by the checking station which are to be classified as defective or which result in a defect on the workpiece.

3 . A method in accordance with claim 1 , wherein workpieces are not subjected to post-treatment if all workpiece parameters determined by the checking station are to be classified as free of defects and do not result in any defects on the workpiece.

4 . A method in accordance with claim 1 , wherein the workpieces supplied to the quality inspection station are a selection from all manufactured and/or treated workpieces, and wherein only these workpieces are subjected to a quality inspection.

5 . A method in accordance with claim 4 , wherein the selection of the workpieces to be supplied to the quality inspection station is made based on measured and/or calculated and/or simulated workpiece parameters and/or based on measured and/or calculated and/or simulated treatment result parameters, in particular based on one or more of the following parameters:

hue and/or brightness and/or color match and/or gradient and/or gloss level of a coating;

quality of a coating and/or a substrate surface, in particular evenness and/or roughness of a coating, in particular of each layer or individual layers;

uniformity of a layer thickness of a coating;

thickness of a coating;

hardness of a coating;

chemical composition of a coating, in particular degree of cross-linking and/or solvent content;

information about a nature and/or a type of at least one workpiece;

information about physical and/or production-related workpiece characteristics;

an individual workpiece identification number;

information about a manufacture and/or processing of at least one workpiece preceding the treatment;

information about a post-treatment and/or further processing of at least one workpiece following the treatment; or

information about measured, simulated and/or expected defects or other quality deficiencies on at least one workpiece, in particular position and/or extent of coating faults.

6 . A method in accordance with claim 1 , wherein one or more of the following parameters are measured during a quality inspection:

hue and/or brightness and/or color match and/or gradient and/or gloss level of a coating;

quality of a coating and/or a substrate surface, in particular evenness and/or roughness of a coating, in particular of each layer or individual layers;

uniformity of a layer thickness of a coating;

thickness of a coating;

hardness of a coating;

chemical composition of a coating, in particular degree of cross-linking and/or solvent content;

degree of contamination of a coating;

reflection properties of a workpiece surface;

absorption properties of a workpiece surface; or

emission properties of a workpiece surface.

7 . A method in accordance with claim 1 , wherein, during a quality inspection, quality measurements are performed only at those points of the workpieces which are free of defects according to a result of the check in the checking station.

8 . A method in accordance with claim 1 , wherein, based on results of quality measurements, an adjustment of one or more facility parameters, in particular in one or more treatment stations for treating the workpieces, is performed even if the one or more facility parameters lie within predefined limit values, wherein in particular drifts in a temporal development of the one or more facility parameters are already mitigated or compensated.

9 . A method in accordance with claim 1 , wherein the one or more workpieces are supplied to the quality inspection station based on the categorizing of the workpieces.

10 . A checking facility for checking workpieces, the checking facility comprising:

one or more checking stations for automatically determining one or more workpiece parameters of the workpieces to be checked; and

a control device which is set up and configured in such a way that the workpieces can be categorized by the control device depending on at least one of the workpiece parameters determined by the one or more checking stations, in particular by a method in accordance with claim 1 .

11 . A checking facility in accordance with claim 10 , wherein one or more checking stations each include one or more checking units which are formed as robots or include a robot.

12 . A checking facility in accordance with claim 10 , wherein one or more checking stations are formed as a gantry, through which the workpieces can be conveyed to be checked.

13 . A treatment facility for treating workpieces, the treatment facility comprising:

one or more treatment stations for treating the workpieces;

a checking facility for checking workpieces, in particular a checking facility in accordance with claim 11 ; and

a conveyor device by which workpieces can be conveyed to one or more checking stations of the checking facility, through the one or more checking stations and/or away from the one or more checking stations and/or by which workpieces can be conveyed to one or more treatment stations, through one or more treatment stations and/or away from the one or more treatment stations.

14 . A treatment facility in accordance with claim 13 , wherein one or more checking stations are integrated into a treatment station and/or into a post-treatment station of the treatment facility, and wherein a check of at least one workpiece can be performed by one or more treatment units of the treatment station and/or of the post-treatment station, which each have one or more checking units.

Priority Claims (2)
DE 10 2019 112 099.3 · May 9, 2019 · national
DE 10 2019 206 849.9 · May 10, 2019 · national
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20220214670A1 · Jul 7, 2022
References Cited (215)
US 4186793A · Teplinsky et al. · 1980 [cited by applicant]
US 5341304A · Sakamoto · 1994 [cited by examiner]
US 5844802A · Lepper · 1998 [cited by examiner]
US 6070128A · Descales et al. · 2000 [cited by applicant]
US 6141598A · Nam · 2000 [cited by examiner]
US 6516239B1 · Madden · 2003 [cited by examiner]
US 6528109B1 · Filev · 2003 [cited by examiner]
US 6627006B1 · Bartik-Himmler et al. · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 6801822B1 · Fujiwara · 2004 [cited by examiner]
US 6850874B1 · Higuerey et al. · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 7236846B1 · Koyama et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 7246156B2 · Ginter et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 7349746B2 · Emigholz · 2008 [cited by examiner]
US 10467502B2 · Ren · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 11353835B2 · Kobayashi · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20030061583A1 · Malhotra · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 20030069781A1 · Hancock et al. · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 20030139836A1 · Matthews et al. · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 20040025972A1 · Bartik-Himmler · 2004 [cited by examiner]
US 20040059553A1 · Heidemann et al. · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 20050002560A1 · Yamamoto · 2005 [cited by examiner]
US 20050010321A1 · Contos · 2005 [cited by examiner]
US 20060190110A1 · Holt · 2006 [cited by examiner]
US 20060257237A1 · McDonald et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20060259198A1 · Brcka · 2006 [cited by examiner]
US 20070220330A1 · Nauerz et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20070226540A1 · Konieczny · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20090143872A1 · Thiele et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20090216393A1 · Schimert · 2009 [cited by examiner]
US 20090250346A1 · Weschke · 2009 [cited by examiner]
US 20100083029A1 · Erickson · 2010 [cited by examiner]
US 20100161141A1 · Herre · 2010 [cited by examiner]
US 20110264424A1 · Miwa et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110270482A1 · Holzer · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110276828A1 · Tamaki et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20120218405A1 · Terreno · 2012 [cited by examiner]
US 20120254141A1 · Poland · 2012 [cited by examiner]
US 20130173332A1 · Ho · 2013 [cited by examiner]
US 20140351642A1 · Bates · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 20140358601A1 · Smiley et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20150277429A1 · Drath · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 20150279129A1 · Ishikawa · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 20160193620A1 · Schulze · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160299500A1 · Drasovean · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 20160343122A1 · Jing et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20170041452A1 · Amann · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170139382A1 · Sayyarrodsari · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20170185058A1 · Holverson et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170306986A1 · McLean, Jr. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170308049A1 · Fujii · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20180036845A1 · Thorwarth · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20180120028A1 · Robbin · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180157249A1 · Muto · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180189242A1 · Fukushima et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180293673A1 · Ortiz Obando · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20180326591A1 · Häusler · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20180340515A1 · Huyn et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180356154A1 · Iglauer et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20190019096A1 · Yoshida · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20190151924A1 · Nillies · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20190179282A1 · Götz et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190204815A1 · Ota · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20190243872A1 · Komatsu et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190383599A1 · Gregory · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20200012270A1 · Hollender · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20200055558A1 · Damoulis · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20200089209A1 · Amemiya · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200216130A1 · Von Krauland · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20200306780A1 · Maas · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20200401965A1 · Wu et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20210223167A1 · Jagiella · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210261374A1 · Celli · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20220197271A1 · Alt et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220214671A1 · Alt et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220214676A1 · Gienger et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220215305A1 · Wieland et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220237064A1 · Alt et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20230325271A1 · Nakamura et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
CN 109270907A · 2019 [cited by applicant]
DE 4113556A1 · 1991 [cited by applicant]
DE 102004048937A1 · 2005 [cited by applicant]
DE 102004019151A1 · 2005 [cited by applicant]
DE 102004024262A1 · 2005 [cited by applicant]
DE 102006022614A1 · 2006 [cited by applicant]
DE 102006045429A1 · 2007 [cited by applicant]
DE 102006055297A1 · 2008 [cited by applicant]
DE 102006056879A1 · 2008 [cited by applicant]
DE 102008062630A1 · 2010 [cited by applicant]
DE 102008060115B4 · 2010 [cited by applicant]
DE 102012213481A1 · 2014 [cited by applicant]
DE 102014201273A1 · 2015 [cited by applicant]
DE 102015119240B3 · 2017 [cited by applicant]
DE 102016012451A1 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
DE 102017101228A1 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
DE 102017208103A1 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
DE 102017113343A1 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
DE 102017217760A1 · 2019 [cited by applicant]
DE 102019112099B3 · 2020 [cited by applicant]
DE 102019206833A1 · 2020 [cited by applicant]
DE 102019206846A1 · 2020 [cited by applicant]
EP 1081569A2 · 2001 [cited by applicant]
EP 1176388A2 · 2002 [cited by applicant]
EP 2930578A2 · 2015 [cited by applicant]
EP 3699708A1 · 2017 [cited by applicant]
EP 3398698A1 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
EP 3294463B1 · 2019 [cited by applicant]
JP H04223826A · 1992 [cited by applicant]
JP H04358556A · 1992 [cited by applicant]
JP 1994034404A · 1994 [cited by applicant]
JP H06148090A · 1994 [cited by applicant]
JP H06155252A · 1994 [cited by applicant]
JP H06235094A · 1994 [cited by applicant]
JP 2000266570A · 2000 [cited by applicant]
JP 2004354250A · 2004 [cited by applicant]
JP 2005309616A · 2005 [cited by applicant]
JP 2006218426A · 2006 [cited by applicant]
JP 2010511232A · 2010 [cited by applicant]
JP 2010122847A · 2010 [cited by applicant]
JP 2012128583A · 2012 [cited by applicant]
JP 2013045281A · 2013 [cited by applicant]
JP 2013054626A · 2013 [cited by applicant]
JP 2015184942A · 2015 [cited by applicant]
JP 2016081482A · 2016 [cited by applicant]
JP 2016538645A · 2016 [cited by applicant]
JP 2017199074A · 2017 [cited by applicant]
JP 2018109876A · 2018 [cited by applicant]
JP 2018120343A · 2018 [cited by applicant]
JP 2018200043A · 2018 [cited by applicant]
JP 2019012473A · 2019 [cited by applicant]
JP 2019505754A · 2019 [cited by applicant]
JP 2019049391A · 2019 [cited by applicant]
JP 2019066957A · 2019 [cited by applicant]
WO 03042770A1 · 2003 [cited by applicant]
WO 2004079057A1 · 2004 [cited by applicant]
WO 2008078910A1 · 2008 [cited by applicant]
WO 2010082322A1 · 2010 [cited by applicant]
WO 2015077890A1 · 2015 [cited by applicant]
WO 2016195092A1 · 2016 [cited by applicant]
WO 2017086194A1 · 2017 [cited by applicant]
WO 2018047804A1 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
WO 2018220813A1 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
WO 2019077656A1 · 2019 [cited by applicant]
WO 2020062186A1 · 2020 [cited by applicant]
Andrew Kusiak et al., “The prediction and diagnosis of wind turbine faults,” dated Jun. 9, 2010, Elsevier, 9 pages. [cited by applicant]
Zhenyu Wu et al., “An Integrated Ensemble Learning Model for Imbalanced Fault Diagnostics and Prognostics,” dated Feb. 19, 2018, IEEE Access, 10 pages. [cited by applicant]
European Patent Office, International Search Report, issued in connection with Application No. PCT/DE2020/100358, dated Jul. 15, 2020, 6 pages. [cited by applicant]
European Patent Office, Written Opinion, issued in connection with Application No. PCT/DE2020/100358, dated Jul. 15, 2020, 8 pages. [cited by applicant]
European Patent Office, International Search Report, issued in connection with Application No. PCT/DE2020/100360, dated Jul. 15, 2020, 6 pages. [cited by applicant]
European Patent Office, Written Opinion, issued in connection with Application No. PCT/DE2020/100360, dated Jul. 15, 2020, 8 pages. [cited by applicant]
European Patent Office, International Search Report, issued in connection with Application No. PCT/DE2020/100357, dated Aug. 11, 2020, 6 pages. [cited by applicant]
European Patent Office, Written Opinion, issued in connection with Application No. PCT/DE2020/100357, dated Aug. 11, 2020, 6 pages. [cited by applicant]
European Patent Office, International Search Report, issued in connection with Application No. PCT/DE2020/100359, dated Oct. 13, 2020, 8 pages. [cited by applicant]
European Patent Office, Written Opinion, Issued in connection with Application No. PCT/DE2020/100359, dated Oct. 13, 2020, 15 pages. [cited by applicant]
European Patent Office, International Search Report, issued in connection with Application No. PCT/DE2020/100356, dated Oct. 13, 2020, 8 pages. [cited by applicant]
European Patent Office, Written Opinion, issued in connection with Application No. PCT/DE2020/100356, dated Oct. 13, 2020, 13 pages. [cited by applicant]
European Patent Office, International Search Report, issued in connection with Application No. PCT/DE2020/100355, dated Oct. 21, 2020, 8 pages. [cited by applicant]
European Patent Office, Written Opinion, issued in connection with Application No. PCT/DE2020/100355, dated Oct. 21, 2020, 13 pages. [cited by applicant]
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Non-Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 17/608,467, filed Jun. 22, 2023, 14 pages. [cited by applicant]
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 17/608,472, filed Jun. 29, 2023, 17 pages. [cited by applicant]
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Non-Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 17/608,472, filed Jan. 18, 2023, 14 pages. [cited by applicant]
Google, “Google Scholar/Patents search—text refined: Industrial plant fault cause historical database,” Google, retrieved Jan. 11, 2023, 3 pages. [cited by applicant]
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Non-Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 17/608,473, filed Mar. 31, 2023, 12 pages. [cited by applicant]
Karami et al., “Fault Detection and Diagnosis for Nonlinear Systems: A New Adaptive Gaussian Mixture Modeling Approach,” Elsevier, Energy & Buildings, vol. 166, 2018, 12 pages. [cited by applicant]
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Non-Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 17/608,469, filed Apr. 5, 2023, 22 pages. [cited by applicant]
Lange, “Machine Learning Based Error Prediction for Spray Painting Applications,” Chalmers University of Technology and University of Gothenburg, 2016, 59 pages. [cited by applicant]
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 17/608,472, filed Jun. 20, 2023, 16 pages. [cited by applicant]
Google, “Google Scholar/Patents search—text refined: Industrial plant fault database,” Google, retrieved Jun. 14, 2023, 2 pages. [cited by applicant]
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Advisory Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 17/608,472, filed Sep. 15, 2023, 16 pages. [cited by applicant]
European Patent Office, “Communication Under Article 94(3) EPC,” issued in connection with European Application No. 20 728 915.8, Sep. 18, 2023, 10 pages, with machine English translation. [cited by applicant]
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance and Fee(s) Due,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 17/608,467, filed Oct. 12, 2023, 7 pages. [cited by applicant]
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance and Fee(s) Due,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 17/608,469, filed Oct. 18, 2023, 12 pages. [cited by applicant]
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Non-Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 17/608,472, filed Oct. 19, 2023, 18 pages. [cited by applicant]
Google, “Google Scholar/Patents search—industrial plant fault database,” Google, retrieved Oct. 13, 2023, 2 pages. [cited by applicant]
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 17/608,473, filed Oct. 26, 2023, 12 pages. [cited by applicant]
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowability,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 17/608,469, filed Oct. 31, 2023, 10 pages. [cited by applicant]
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Non-Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 17/608,470, filed Jan. 19, 2024, 19 pages. [cited by applicant]
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Advisory Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 17/608,473, filed Feb. 6, 2024, 3 pages. [cited by applicant]
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 17/608,472, filed May 3, 2024, 15 pages. [cited by applicant]
Google, “Google Scholar/Patents search - industrial plant fault database,” Google, retrieved Apr. 12, 2024, 2 pages. [cited by applicant]
Japan Patent Office, “Notice of Reasons for Refusal,” issued in connection with Japanese Patent Application No. 2021-566047, Jan. 26, 2024, 8 pages, with English translation. [cited by applicant]
Japan Patent Office, “Notice of Reasons for Refusal,” issued in connection with Japanese Patent Application No. 2021-565988, Feb. 29, 2024, 10 pages, with English translation. [cited by applicant]
Japan Patent Office, “Notice of Reasons for Refusal,” issued in connection with Japanese Patent Application No. 2021-565995, Mar. 6, 2024, 10 pages, with English translation. [cited by applicant]
Japan Patent Office, “Notice of Reasons for Refusal,” issued in connection with Japanese Patent Application No. 2021-566002, Mar. 7, 2024, 8 pages, with English translation. [cited by applicant]
Japan Patent Office, “Notice of Reasons for Refusal,” issued in connection with Japanese Patent Application No. 2021-566091, Mar. 11, 2024, 10 pages, with English translation. [cited by applicant]
Japan Patent Office, “Notice of Reasons for Refusal,” issued in connection with Japanese Patent Application No. 2021-566108, dated Mar. 11, 2024, mailed Mar. 19, 2024, 10 pages, with English translation. [cited by applicant]
European Patent Office, “Extended European Search Report,” issued in connection with European Application No. 23 219 822.6, Apr. 17, 2024, 16 pages, with machine English translation. [cited by applicant]
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 17/608,472, dated Dec. 18, 2024, 19 pages. [cited by applicant]
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 17/608,470, filed Dec. 12, 2024, 29 pages. [cited by applicant]
Korean Intellectual Property Office, “Notice of Reasons for Refusal,” issued in connection with Korean Patent Application No. 10-2021-7040253, mailed on Dec. 12, 2024, 6 pages (English translation). [cited by applicant]
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Advisory Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 17/608,470, filed Feb. 26, 2025, 3 pages. [cited by applicant]
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Non-Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 17/608,470, filed Jul. 18, 2024, 26 pages. [cited by applicant]
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Non-Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 17/608,472, filed Aug. 23, 2024, 13 pages. [cited by applicant]
Google, “Google Scholar/Patents search—industrial plant fault database,” Google, retrieved Aug. 20, 2024, 2 pages. [cited by applicant]
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Non-Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 18/402,412, filed Aug. 26, 2024, 13 pages. [cited by applicant]
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Non-Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 17/608,473, filed Sep. 5, 2024, 18 pages. [cited by applicant]
Riascos, L. A M., Lucas Antonio Moscato, and Paulo Eigi Miyagi. “Detection and treatment of faults in manufacturing systems based on Petri Nets.” Journal of the Brazilian society of mechanical Sciences and Engineering 2… [cited by applicant]
Wu, Zhenhua, and Sheng-Jen Hsieh. “A realtime fuzzy Petri net diagnoser for detecting progressive faults in PLC based discrete manufacturing system.” The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 61 (20… [cited by applicant]
Wu, Zhenhua, Sheng-Jen Hsieh, and Jianzhi Li. “Sensor deployment based on fuzzy graph considering heterogeneity and multiple-objectives to diagnose manufacturing system.” Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing 2… [cited by applicant]
Melani, Arthur HA, et al. “Fault diagnosis based on Petri Nets: the case study of a hydropower plant.” IFAC—PapersOnline 49.31 (2016): 1-6. (Year: 2016). [cited by applicant]
James, Ajith Tom, 0. P. Gandhi, and S. G. Deshmukh. “Fault diagnosis of automobile systems using fault tree based on digraph modeling.” International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management 9 (2018): 494-… [cited by applicant]
Korean Patent Office, “Notice of Reason(s) for Refusal”, issued in connection with KR Patent Application No. 10-2021-7040082 on Feb. 17, 2025, 9 pages. [cited by applicant]
Korean Intellectual Property Office, “Notification of Reasons for Refusal,” issued in connection with Korean Patent Application No. 10-2021-7040083, dated Feb. 17, 2025, 17 pages. [English Translation Included]. [cited by applicant]
Farruggia, Alfonso, “A probabilistic approach to anomaly detection for Wireless Sensor Networks.” (2012). (Year: 2012). [cited by applicant]
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 17/608,473, filed Mar. 5, 2025, 20 pages. [cited by applicant]
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 18/402,412, dated Mar. 18, 2025, 9 pages. [cited by applicant]
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Non-Final Office Action,” Issued In connection with U.S. Appl. No. 17/608,470, dated May 2, 2025, 16 pages. [cited by applicant]
Korean Patent Office, “Notice of Reasons for Refusal,” issued in connection with Korean Patent Application No. 10-2021-7039938, dated Aug. 1, 2025, 7 pages. [English translation included.]. [cited by applicant]
Korean Patent Office, “Notice of Reasons for Refusal,” issued in connection with Korean Patent Application No. 10-2021-7040253, dated Aug. 23, 2025, 12 pages. [English translation included.]. [cited by applicant]
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Advisory Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 18/402,412, dated Jun. 3, 2025, 23 pages. [cited by applicant]
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance and Fee(s) Due,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 17/608,473, dated Jun. 10, 2025, 15 pages. [cited by applicant]
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance and Fee(s) Due,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 17/608,473, dated Jun. 17, 2025, 8 pages. [cited by applicant]
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance and Fee(s) Due,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 18/402,412, dated Jul. 1, 2025, 8 pages. [cited by applicant]
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance and Fee(s) Due,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 17/608,470, dated Sep. 25, 2025, 10 pages. [cited by applicant]
Korean Ministry of Intellectual Property, “Notification of Final Rejection,” issued in connection with Korean Patent Application No. 10-2021-7040084, dated Nov. 21, 2025, 8 pages. [With English translation.]. [cited by applicant]
Korean Ministry of Intellectual Property, “Notification of Final Rejection,” issued in connection with Korean Patent Application No. 10-2021-7040083, dated Nov. 21, 2025, 8 pages. [With English translation.]. [cited by applicant]