IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,541,194
Granted Patent B2
US 12,541,194 · App. 17/608,470 · Granted Feb 3, 2026

Method for analysing quality deficiencies

Inventors: Simon Alt (Ditzingen, DE); Jan-Philipp Schuh (Lauffen a.N., DE); Ralf Schurer (Marbach am Neckar, DE); Markus Hummel (Urbach, DE); Jens Berner (Möglingen, DE); Jens Häcker (Markgröningen, DE); Thomas Hezel (Asperg, DE); Frank Herre (Oberriexingen, DE); Michael Zabel (Winnenden, DE); Dietmar Wieland (Waiblingen, DE); Philipp Oetinger (Sachsenheim, DE); Robin Heim (Güglingen, DE)
Assignee: Dürr Systems AG
G05B19/41875G05B2219/32368
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,541,194
App. No.
17/608,470
Granted
Feb 3, 2026
Kind
B2
Abstract

In order to provide a method for analysing quality deficiencies of workpieces, preferably vehicle bodies and/or vehicle attachment parts, in particular after and/or whilst passing through a production process in industrial-method plants, preferably after and/or whilst passing through a painting process in painting plants, by means of which method quality deficiencies can be avoided and/or by means of which method quality deficiency causes in the production process can be determined, avoided and/or remedied, it is proposed in accordance with the invention that the method comprises the following steps: creating a workpiece-specific data set, uniquely assigned to a workpiece, at the start of a production process, in particular at the start of a painting process and/or creating a workpiece-carrier-specific data set, uniquely assigned to a workpiece carrier, at the start of a production process, in particular at the start of a painting process; supplementing the workpiece-specific data set while a workpiece is passing through the production process, in particular the painting process, with in particular quality-relevant process data and/or supplementing the workpiece-carrier-specific data set while a workpiece carrier is passing through the production process, in particular the painting process, with in particular quality-relevant process data; storing the workpiece-specific data set in a database and/or storing the workpiece-carrier-specific data set in a database.

Claims (33)

1 . A method for analyzing surface imperfections of workpieces, preferably of vehicle bodies and/or vehicle attachment parts, in particular after and/or whilst passing through a production process in industrial-method plants, preferably after and/or whilst passing through a painting process in painting plants, the method comprising:

creating a workpiece-specific data set, uniquely assigned to a workpiece, at a start of a production process, in particular at the start of a painting process, and/or creating a workpiece-carrier-specific data set, uniquely assigned to a workpiece carrier, at the start of a production process, in particular at the start of a painting process;

supplementing the workpiece-specific data set while a workpiece is passing through the production process, in particular the painting process, with in particular quality-relevant process data and/or supplementing the workpiece-carrier-specific data set while a workpiece carrier is passing through the production process, in particular the painting process, with in particular quality-relevant process data; and

storing the workpiece-specific data set in a database and/or storing the workpiece-carrier-specific data set in a database,

wherein the workpiece-specific data set and/or the workpiece-carrier-specific data set is supplemented with quality data that contains information about surface imperfections of the particular workpiece, preferably at an end of the production process, in particular at the end of the painting process,

wherein quality data from a plurality of workpiece-specific data sets and/or from a plurality of workpiece-carrier-specific data sets are automatically classified into different quality deficiency clusters by a cluster method for the detection of systematic surface imperfections, and

wherein workpieces are ejected from the production process based on the quality deficiency clusters detected by the cluster method.

2 . The method in accordance with claim 1 , wherein, by an analysis procedure, quality deficiency causes for the systematic surface imperfections detected by the cluster method and classified into different quality deficiency clusters are automatically determined, preferably by analysis of the in particular quality-relevant process data of the workpiece-specific data sets of the workpieces with systematic surface imperfections of a particular quality deficiency cluster and/or by analysis of the in particular quality-relevant process data of the workpiece-carrier-specific data sets of the workpiece carriers for which the workpieces have systematic surface imperfections of a particular quality deficiency cluster.

3 . The method in accordance with claim 2 , wherein the determined quality deficiency causes include anomalies and/or deviations in the production process, in particular in the painting process.

4 . The method in accordance with claim 2 , wherein correlations between the determined quality deficiency causes and the systematic surface imperfections classified into different quality deficiency clusters are determined by the analysis procedure.

5 . The method in accordance with claim 4 , wherein imminent systematic surface imperfections are automatically determined by the determined correlations, preferably by automatically inferring future surface imperfections of a workpiece from one or more anomalies and/or deviations determined in the ongoing production process by the correlations determined by the analysis procedure, while a workpiece is passing through the production process.

6 . The method in accordance with claim 1 , wherein the workpiece-specific data set and/or the workpiece-carrier-specific data set is supplemented in each individual process step with, in particular, quality-relevant process data.

7 . The method in accordance with claim 1 , wherein one or more of the following process parameters are used as in particular quality-relevant process data, by which a workpiece-specific data set and/or a workpiece-carrier-specific data set is supplemented:

target-time overruns in process steps of the production process;

events occurring during a run-through of a process step of the production process;

body-in-white quality data of a particular workpiece;

anomalies and/or deviations in the production process;

weather data; and

personal data for persons who were involved in a process step of the production process when it was run through.

8 . The method in accordance with claim 1 , wherein the workpiece-specific data set and/or the workpiece-specific data set is supplemented with process fault data containing information about an anomaly and/or deviation in a process step of the production process whilst a workpiece and/or a workpiece carrier passes through the process step of the production process.

9 . The method in accordance with claim 1 , wherein the method is performed in an industrial-method plant, in particular in a painting plant, which includes a plurality of treatment stations which are different from one another and in each of which one or more process steps of the production process, in particular of the painting process, can be performed.

10 . The method in accordance with claim 1 , wherein the workpiece-specific data set and/or the workpiece-carrier-specific data set is supplemented continuously or discontinuously with the in particular quality-relevant process data.

11 . The method in accordance with claim 1 , wherein the workpiece-specific data set and/or the workpiece-carrier-specific data set is supplemented in each case with in particular quality-relevant process data which in each case include a time stamp by which the particular process data can be uniquely assigned to a time and/or a process step of the production process.

12 . The method in accordance with claim 1 , wherein the supplemented workpiece-specific data set of a workpiece and/or the supplemented workpiece-carrier-specific data set of a workpiece carrier is stored in a database during and/or after the passing of a workpiece and/or a workpiece carrier through the production process.

13 . A quality analysis system for analyzing surface imperfections of workpieces, preferably of vehicle bodies, in particular after and/or whilst passing through a production process in industrial-method plants, preferably after and/or whilst passing through a painting process in painting plants, comprising

an interface for communication with a control system of an industrial-method plant, in particular a painting plant; and

a control device which is set up and configured in such a way that the method in accordance with claim 1 can be carried out by the control device.

14 . An industrial-method plant, in particular a painting plant, comprising:

one or more treatment stations;

a control system by which a production process, in particular a painting process, in the one or more treatment stations can be controlled; and

a quality analysis system in accordance with claim 13 .

15 . The method in accordance with claim 1 , wherein the systemic surface imperfections detected by the cluster method are displayed to a user via a visualization.

16 . The method in accordance with claim 1 , wherein a process control system of the production process is adapted on a basis of quality deficiency clusters detected by the cluster method.

Priority Claims (2)
DE 10 2019 112 099.3 · May 9, 2019 · national
DE 10 2019 206 833.2 · May 10, 2019 · national
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20220214671A1 · Jul 7, 2022
References Cited (215)
US 4186793A · Teplinsky et al. · 1980 [cited by applicant]
US 5341304A · Sakamoto et al. · 1994 [cited by applicant]
US 5844802A · Lepper et al. · 1998 [cited by applicant]
US 6070128A · Descales et al. · 2000 [cited by applicant]
US 6141598A · Nam · 2000 [cited by examiner]
US 6516239B1 · Madden · 2003 [cited by examiner]
US 6528109B1 · Filev et al. · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 6627006B1 · Bartik-Himmler et al. · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 6801822B1 · Fujiwara et al. · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 6850874B1 · Higuerey et al. · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 7236846B1 · Koyama et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 7246156B2 · Ginter et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 7349746B2 · Emigholz et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 10467502B2 · Ren · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 11353835B2 · Kobayashi et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20030061583A1 · Malhotra · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 20030069781A1 · Hancock et al. · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 20030139836A1 · Matthews et al. · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 20040025972A1 · Bartik-Himmler et al. · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 20040059553A1 · Heidemann et al. · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 20050002560A1 · Yamamoto et al. · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 20050010321A1 · Contos et al. · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 20060190110A1 · Holt · 2006 [cited by examiner]
US 20060257237A1 · McDonald et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20060259198A1 · Brcka et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20070220330A1 · Nauerz et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20070226540A1 · Konieczny · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20090143872A1 · Thiele et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20090216393A1 · Schimert · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20090250346A1 · Weschke et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20100083029A1 · Erickson et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20100161141A1 · Herre et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20110264424A1 · Miwa et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110270482A1 · Holzer · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110276828A1 · Tamaki et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20120218405A1 · Terreno · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20120254141A1 · Poland · 2012 [cited by examiner]
US 20130173332A1 · Ho et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20140351642A1 · Bates et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140358601A1 · Smiley et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20150277429A1 · Drath et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150279129A1 · Ishikawa · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20160193620A1 · Schulze · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160299500A1 · Drasovean · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160343122A1 · Jing et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20170041452A1 · Amann · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170139382A1 · Sayyarrodsari et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170185058A1 · Holverson et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170306986A1 · McLean, Jr. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170308049A1 · Fujii et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20180036845A1 · Thorwarth · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20180120028A1 · Robbin · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180157249A1 · Muto · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180189242A1 · Fukushima et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180293673A1 · Ortiz Obando · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20180326591A1 · Hausler · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180340515A1 · Huyn et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180356154A1 · Iglauer et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20190019096A1 · Yoshida et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190151924A1 · Nillies · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190179282A1 · Götz et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190204815A1 · Ota et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190243872A1 · Komatsu et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190383599A1 · Gregory et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20200012270A1 · Hollender et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200055558A1 · Damoulis · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20200089209A1 · Amemiya · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200216130A1 · Von Krauland · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200306780A1 · Maas · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20200401965A1 · Wu et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20210223167A1 · Jagiella · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210261374A1 · Celli · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20220197271A1 · Alt et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220214670A1 · Herre et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220214676A1 · Gienger et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220215305A1 · Wieland et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220237064A1 · Alt et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20230325271A1 · Nakamura et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
CN 109270907A · 2019 [cited by applicant]
DE 4113556A1 · 1991 [cited by applicant]
DE 102004048937A1 · 2005 [cited by applicant]
DE 102004019151A1 · 2005 [cited by applicant]
DE 102004024262A1 · 2005 [cited by applicant]
DE 102006022614A1 · 2006 [cited by applicant]
DE 102006045429A1 · 2007 [cited by applicant]
DE 102006055297A1 · 2008 [cited by applicant]
DE 102006056879A1 · 2008 [cited by applicant]
DE 102008062630A1 · 2010 [cited by applicant]
DE 102008060115B4 · 2010 [cited by applicant]
DE 102012213481A1 · 2014 [cited by applicant]
DE 102014201273A1 · 2015 [cited by applicant]
DE 102015119240B3 · 2017 [cited by applicant]
DE 102016012451A1 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
DE 102017101228A1 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
DE 102017208103A1 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
DE 102017113343A1 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
DE 102017217760A1 · 2019 [cited by applicant]
DE 102019112099B3 · 2020 [cited by applicant]
DE 102019206833A1 · 2020 [cited by applicant]
DE 102019206846A1 · 2020 [cited by applicant]
EP 1081569A2 · 2001 [cited by applicant]
EP 1176388A2 · 2002 [cited by applicant]
EP 2930578A2 · 2015 [cited by applicant]
EP 3699708A1 · 2017 [cited by applicant]
EP 3398698A1 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
EP 3294463B1 · 2019 [cited by applicant]
JP H04223826A · 1992 [cited by applicant]
JP H04358556A · 1992 [cited by applicant]
JP 1994034404A · 1994 [cited by applicant]
JP H06148090A · 1994 [cited by applicant]
JP H06155252A · 1994 [cited by applicant]
JP H06235094A · 1994 [cited by applicant]
JP 2000266570A · 2000 [cited by applicant]
JP 2004354250A · 2004 [cited by applicant]
JP 2005309616A · 2005 [cited by applicant]
JP 2006218426A · 2006 [cited by applicant]
JP 2010511232A · 2010 [cited by applicant]
JP 2010122847A · 2010 [cited by applicant]
JP 2012128583A · 2012 [cited by applicant]
JP 2013045281A · 2013 [cited by applicant]
JP 2013054626A · 2013 [cited by applicant]
JP 2015184942A · 2015 [cited by applicant]
JP 2016081482A · 2016 [cited by applicant]
JP 2016538645A · 2016 [cited by applicant]
JP 2017199074A · 2017 [cited by applicant]
JP 2018109876A · 2018 [cited by applicant]
JP 2018120343A · 2018 [cited by applicant]
JP 2018200043A · 2018 [cited by applicant]
JP 2019012473A · 2019 [cited by applicant]
JP 2019505754A · 2019 [cited by applicant]
JP 2019049391A · 2019 [cited by applicant]
JP 2019066957A · 2019 [cited by applicant]
WO 03042770A1 · 2003 [cited by applicant]
WO 2004079057A1 · 2004 [cited by applicant]
WO 2008078910A1 · 2008 [cited by applicant]
WO 2010082322A1 · 2010 [cited by applicant]
WO 2015077890A1 · 2015 [cited by applicant]
WO 2016195092A1 · 2016 [cited by applicant]
WO 2017086194A1 · 2017 [cited by applicant]
WO 2018047804A1 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
WO 2018220813A1 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
WO 2019077656A1 · 2019 [cited by applicant]
WO 2020062186A1 · 2020 [cited by applicant]
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Non-Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 17/608,472, Jan. 18, 2023, 14 pages. [cited by applicant]
Google, “Google Scholar/Patents search—text refined: Industrial plant fault cause historical database,” Google, retrieved Jan. 11, 2023, 3 pages. [cited by applicant]
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Non-Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 17/608,473, Mar. 31, 2023, 12 pages. [cited by applicant]
Karami et al., “Fault Detection and Diagnosis for Nonlinear Systems: A New Adaptive Gaussian Mixture Modeling Approach,” Elsevier, Energy & Buildings, vol. 166, 2018, 12 pages. [cited by applicant]
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Non-Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 17/608,469, Apr. 5, 2023, 22 pages. [cited by applicant]
Lange, “Machine Learning Based Error Prediction for Spray Painting Applications,” Chalmers University of Technology and University of Gothenburg, 2016, 59 pages. [cited by applicant]
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 17/608,472, Jun. 20, 2023, 16 pages. [cited by applicant]
Google, “Google Scholar/Patents search—text refined: Industrial plant fault database,” Google, retrieved Jun. 14, 2023, 2 pages. [cited by applicant]
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Non-Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 17/608,467, Jun. 22, 2023, 14 pages. [cited by applicant]
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 17/608,472, Jun. 29, 2023, 17 pages. [cited by applicant]
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Advisory Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 17/608,472, Sep. 15, 2023, 16 pages. [cited by applicant]
European Patent Office, “Communication Under Article 94(3) EPC,” issued in connection with European Application No. 20 728 915.8, Sep. 18, 2023, 10 pages, with machine English translation. [cited by applicant]
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance and Fee(s) Due,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 17/608,467, Oct. 12, 2023, 7 pages. [cited by applicant]
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance and Fee(s) Due,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 17/608,469, Oct. 18, 2023, 12 pages. [cited by applicant]
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Non-Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 17/608,472, Oct. 19, 2023, 18 pages. [cited by applicant]
Google, “Google Scholar/Patents search—industrial plant fault database,” Google, retrieved Oct. 13, 2023, 2 pages. [cited by applicant]
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 17/608,473, Oct. 26, 2023, 12 pages. [cited by applicant]
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowability,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 17/608,469, Oct. 31, 2023, 10 pages. [cited by applicant]
Andrew Kusiak et al., “The prediction and diagnosis of wind turbine faults,” dated Jun. 9, 2010, Elsevier, 9 pages. [cited by applicant]
Zhenyu Wu et al., “An Integrated Ensemble Learning Model for Imbalanced Fault Diagnostics and Prognostics,” dated Feb. 19, 2018, IEEE Access, 10 pages. [cited by applicant]
European Patent Office, International Search Report, issued in connection with Application No. PCT/DE2020/100358, dated Jul. 15, 2020, 6 pages. [cited by applicant]
European Patent Office, Written Opinion, issued in connection with Application No. PCT/DE2020/100358, dated Jul. 15, 2020, 8 pages. [cited by applicant]
European Patent Office, International Search Report, issued in connection with Application No. PCT/DE2020/100360, dated Jul. 15, 2020, 6 pages. [cited by applicant]
European Patent Office, Written Opinion, issued in connection with Application No. PCT/DE2020/100360, dated Jul. 15, 2020, 8 pages. [cited by applicant]
European Patent Office, International Search Report, issued in connection with Application No. PCT/DE2020/100357, dated Aug. 11, 2020, 6 pages. [cited by applicant]
European Patent Office, Written Opinion, issued in connection with Application No. PCT/DE2020/100357, dated Aug. 11, 2020, 6 pages. [cited by applicant]
European Patent Office, International Search Report, issued in connection with Application No. PCT/DE2020/100359, dated Oct. 13, 2020, 8 pages. [cited by applicant]
European Patent Office, Written Opinion, Issued in connection with Application No. PCT/DE2020/100359, dated Oct. 13, 2020, 15 pages. [cited by applicant]
European Patent Office, International Search Report, issued in connection with Application No. PCT/DE2020/100356, dated Oct. 13, 2020, 8 pages. [cited by applicant]
European Patent Office, Written Opinion, issued in connection with Application No. PCT/DE2020/100356, dated Oct. 13, 2020, 13 pages. [cited by applicant]
European Patent Office, International Search Report, issued in connection with Application No. PCT/DE2020/100355, dated Oct. 21, 2020, 8 pages. [cited by applicant]
European Patent Office, Written Opinion, issued in connection with Application No. PCT/DE2020/100355, dated Oct. 21, 2020, 13 pages. [cited by applicant]
Japan Patent Office, “Notice of Reasons for Refusal,” issued in connection with Japanese Patent Application No. 2021-566091, Mar. 11, 2024, 10 pages, with English translation. [cited by applicant]
Japan Patent Office, “Notice of Reasons for Refusal,” issued in connection with Japanese Patent Application No. 2021-566108, dated Mar. 11, 2024, mailed Mar. 19, 2024, 10 pages, with English translation. [cited by applicant]
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Non-Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 17/608,468, Dec. 22, 2023, 20 pages. [cited by applicant]
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Advisory Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 17/608,473, Feb. 6, 2024, 3 pages. [cited by applicant]
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 17/608,472, May 3, 2024, 15 pages. [cited by applicant]
Google, “Google Scholar/Patents search—industrial plant fault database,” Google, retrieved Apr. 12, 2024, 2 pages. [cited by applicant]
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 17/608,468, Apr. 11, 2024, 17 pages. [cited by applicant]
Japan Patent Office, “Notice of Reasons for Refusal,” issued in connection with Japanese Patent Application No. 2021-566047, Jan. 26, 2024, 8 pages, with English translation. [cited by applicant]
Japan Patent Office, “Notice of Reasons for Refusal,” issued in connection with Japanese Patent Application No. 2021-565988, Feb. 29, 2024, 10 pages, with English translation. [cited by applicant]
Japan Patent Office, “Notice of Reasons for Refusal,” issued in connection with Japanese Patent Application No. 2021-565985, Mar. 6, 2024, 10 pages, with English translation. [cited by applicant]
Japan Patent Office, “Notice of Reasons for Refusal,” issued in connection with Japanese Patent Application No. 2021-566002, Mar. 7, 2024, 8 pages, with English translation. [cited by applicant]
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Non-Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 17/608,472, Aug. 23, 2024, 13 pages. [cited by applicant]
Google, “Google Scholar/Patents search—industrial plant fault database,” Google, retrieved Aug. 20, 2024, 2 pages. [cited by applicant]
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Non-Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 18/402,412, Aug. 26, 2024, 13 pages. [cited by applicant]
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Non-Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 17/608,473, Sep. 5, 2024, 18 pages. [cited by applicant]
Riascos, L. A M., Lucas Antonio Moscato, and Paulo Eigi Miyagi. “Detection and treatment of faults in manufacturing systems based on Petri Nets.” Journal of the Brazilian society of mechanical Sciences and Engineering 2… [cited by applicant]
Wu, Zhenhua, and Sheng-Jen Hsieh. “A realtime fuzzy Petri net diagnoser for detecting progressive faults in PLC based discrete manufacturing system.” The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 61 (20… [cited by applicant]
Wu, Zhenhua, Sheng-Jen Hsieh, and Jianzhi Li. “Sensor deployment based on fuzzy graph considering heterogeneity and multiple-objectives to diagnose manufacturing system.” Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing 2… [cited by applicant]
Melani, Arthur HA, et al. “Fault diagnosis based on Petri Nets: the case study of a hydropower plant.” IFAC—PapersOnline 49.31 (2016): 1-6. (Year: 2016). [cited by applicant]
James, Ajith Tom, 0. P. Gandhi, and S. G. Deshmukh. “Fault diagnosis of automobile systems using fault tree based on digraph modeling.” International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management 9 (2018): 494-… [cited by applicant]
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Non-Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 17/608,468, Oct. 2, 2024, 19 pages. [cited by applicant]
European Patent Office, “Extended European Search Report,” issued in connection with European Application No. 23 219 822.6, Apr. 17, 2024, 16 pages, with machine English translation. [cited by applicant]
Farruggia, Alfonso, “A probabilistic approach to anomaly detection for Wireless Sensor Networks.” (2012). (Year: 2012). [cited by applicant]
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Non-Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 17/608,468, dated Mar. 6, 2025, 14 pages. [cited by applicant]
Korean Intellectual Property Office, “Notice of Reasons for Refusal,” issued in connection with Korean Patent Application No. 10-2021-7040253, mailed on Dec. 12, 2024, 6 pages (English translation). [cited by applicant]
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 17/608,472, dated Dec. 18, 2024, 19 pages. [cited by applicant]
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 17/608,473, Mar. 5, 2025, 20 pages. [cited by applicant]
Korean Patent Office, “Notice of Reason(s) for Refusal”, issued in connection with KR Patent Application No. 10-2021-7040082 on Feb. 17, 2025, 9 pages. [cited by applicant]
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 18/402,412, dated Mar. 18, 2025, 9 pages. [cited by applicant]
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Advisory Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 18/402,412, dated Jun. 3, 2025, 23 pages. [cited by applicant]
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance and Fee(s) Due,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 17/608,473, dated Jun. 10, 2025, 15 pages. [cited by applicant]
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Corrected Notice of Allowability,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 17/608,473, dated Jun. 17, 2025, 8 pages. [cited by applicant]
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 17/608,468, dated Jun. 18, 2025, 14 pages. [cited by applicant]
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance and Fee(s) Due,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 18/402,412, dated Jul. 1, 2025, 8 pages. [cited by applicant]
Korean Patent Office, “Notice of Reasons for Refusal,” issued in connection with Korean Patent Application No. 10-2021-7039938, dated Aug. 1, 2025, 7 pages. [English translation included.]. [cited by applicant]
Korean Patent Office, “Notice of Reasons for Refusal,” issued in connection with Korean Patent Application No. 10-2021-7040253, dated Aug. 23, 2025, 12 pages. [English translation included.]. [cited by applicant]
Korean Intellectual Property Office, “Notification of Reasons for Refusal,” issued in connection with Korean Patent Application No. 10-2021-7040083, dated Feb. 17, 2025, 17 pages. [English Translation Included]. [cited by applicant]
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance and Fee(s) Due,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 17/608,468, dated Sep. 10, 2025, 5 pages. [cited by applicant]
Korean Ministry of Intellectual Property, “Notification of Final Rejection,” issued in connection with Korean Patent Application No. 10-2021-7040084, dated Nov. 21, 2025, 8 pages. [With English translation.]. [cited by applicant]
Korean Ministry of Intellectual Property, “Notification of Final Rejection,” issued in connection with Korean Patent Application No. 10-2021-7040083, dated Nov. 21, 2025, 8 pages. [With English translation.]. [cited by applicant]