IP Library Granted Patent US 12,540,286
Granted Patent B2
US 12,540,286 · App. 18/073,968 · Granted Feb 3, 2026

Two stage catalytic process for pyrolysis oil upgrading to BTX

Inventors: Miao Sun (Dhahran, SA); Sohel K Shaikh (Dhahran, SA); Ibrahim A. Abba (Dhahran, SA); Noor Al-Mana (Dhahran, SA); Zhonglin Zhang (Dhahran, SA)
Assignee: Saudi Arabian Oil Company
C10G65/12C10G45/46C10G2300/1096C10G2300/4006C10G2300/4012C10G2400/30
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,540,286
App. No.
18/073,968
Granted
Feb 3, 2026
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method for upgrading pyrolysis oil includes contacting a pyrolysis oil feed with hydrogen in the presence of a mixed metal oxide catalyst in a first slurry reactor, where: the pyrolysis oil feed comprises multi-ring aromatic compounds comprising greater than or equal to sixteen carbon atoms, and contacting the pyrolysis oil feed with hydrogen in the presence of the mixed metal oxide catalyst in the first slurry reactor to convert at least a portion of the multi-ring aromatic compounds in the pyrolysis oil feed to light aromatic compounds comprising di-aromatic compounds, tri-aromatic compounds, or both, passing an intermediate stream comprising the light aromatic compounds to a second slurry reactor downstream of the first slurry reactor; and contacting the intermediate stream with hydrogen in the presence of a mesoporous zeolite supported metal catalyst in a second slurry reactor.

Claims (28)

1 . A system for upgrading pyrolysis oil, the system comprising:

a mixed metal oxide catalyst comprising a plurality of catalyst particles, where each of the plurality of catalyst particles comprises a plurality of different metal oxides;

a first slurry reactor configured to contact a pyrolysis oil feed with hydrogen in the presence of the mixed metal oxide catalyst to produce a first reactor effluent comprising light aromatic compounds that include di-aromatic compounds, tri-aromatic compounds, or both;

a first separator disposed downstream of the first slurry reactor and configured to separate the first reactor effluent to produce a used mixed metal oxide catalyst and an intermediate stream comprising the light aromatic compounds;

a mesoporous zeolite supported metal catalyst;

a second slurry reactor downstream of the first separator and configured to contact the intermediate stream with hydrogen in the presence of the mesoporous zeolite supported metal catalyst to produce a second reactor effluent comprising aromatic compounds having six to eight carbon atoms; and

a second separator disposed downstream of the second slurry reactor and configured to separate the second reactor effluent to produce a used mesoporous zeolite supported metal catalyst and at least one product effluent comprising aromatic compounds having six to eight carbon atoms.

2 . The system of claim 1 , in which the first separator is directly downstream of the first slurry reactor.

3 . The system of claim 1 , in which the second slurry reactor is directly downstream of the first separator.

4 . The system of claim 1 , in which the used mixed metal oxide catalyst is recycled back to the first slurry reactor.

5 . The system of claim 1 , in which the used mesoporous zeolite supported metal catalyst is recycled back to the second slurry reactor.

6 . The system of claim 1 , wherein plurality of metal oxides of the mixed metal oxide catalyst comprise oxides of metals in groups 3-13 of the International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry (IUPAC) periodic table.

7 . The system of claim 1 , wherein the plurality of metal oxides in the mixed metal oxide catalyst are selected from the group consisting of iron oxide (Fe 2 O 3 ), zirconium oxide (ZrO 2 ), cerium oxide (CeO 2 ), aluminum oxide (alumina) (Al 2 O 3 ), silica (SiO 2 ), tungsten oxide (WO 3 ), molybdenum oxide (MoO 3 ), titanium oxide (TiO 2 ), and combinations of these.

8 . The system of claim 1 , wherein the mixed metal oxide catalyst comprises from 60 wt. % to 95 wt. % iron oxide, based on the total weight of the mixed metal oxide catalyst.

9 . The system of claim 1 , wherein the mixed metal oxide catalyst comprises from 1 wt. % to 20 wt. % zirconium oxide, based on the total weight of the mixed metal oxide catalyst.

10 . The system of claim 1 , wherein the mixed metal oxide catalyst comprises from 0.1 wt. % to 10 wt. % cerium oxide, based on the total weight of the mixed metal oxide catalyst.

11 . The system of claim 1 , wherein the mixed metal oxide catalyst comprises from 1 wt. % to 20 wt. % aluminum oxide (Al 2 O 3 ), based on the total weight of the mixed metal oxide catalyst.

12 . The system of claim 1 , wherein the mixed metal oxide catalyst comprises from 60 wt. % to 95 wt. % iron oxide, from 1 wt. % to 20 wt. % zirconium oxide, from 0.1 wt. % to 10 wt. % cerium oxide, and from 1 wt. % to 20 wt. % aluminum oxide (Al 2 O 3 ), based on the total weight of the mixed metal oxide catalyst.

13 . The system of claim 1 , wherein the mixed metal oxide catalyst comprises 83 wt. % iron oxide, 7.5 wt. % zirconium oxide, 2.5 wt. % cerium oxide, and 7.0 wt. % aluminum oxide (Al 2 O 3 ).

14 . The system of claim 1 , wherein the first slurry reactor is configured to contact the pyrolysis oil feed with hydrogen in the presence of the mixed metal oxide catalyst at a temperature of from 300° C. to 500° C. and a pressure of from 1 MPa to 20 MPa.

15 . The system of claim 1 , wherein the mesoporous zeolite supported metal catalyst comprises a first metal catalyst and a second metal catalyst supported on a mesoporous zeolite support.

16 . The system of claim 15 , wherein the first metal catalyst, the second metal catalyst, or both comprises a heteropolyacid.

17 . The system of claim 16 , wherein the heteropolyacid comprises:

at least one metal selected from cobalt, molybdenum, vanadium, or combinations of these; and

at least one heteroatom selected from phosphorous, silicon, arsenic, germanium, or combinations of these.

18 . The system of claim 16 , wherein the heteropolyacid comprises phosphormolybdic heteropolyacid having formula H 3 PMo 12 O 40 , decamolybdodicobaltate heteropolyacid having chemical formula H 6 [Co 2 Mo 10 O 38 H 4 ], or silicomolybdic heterpolyacid having chemical formula H 4 [SiMo 12 O 40 ].

19 . The system of claim 15 , wherein the first metal catalyst comprises a first heteropolyacid and the second metal catalyst comprises a second heteropolyacid that is different from the first heteropolyacid.

20 . The system of claim 1 , wherein the second slurry reactor is configured to contact the light aromatic compounds with hydrogen in the presence of the mesoporous zeolite supported metal catalyst at a temperature of from 300° C. to 500° C. and a pressure of from 1 MPa to 20 MPa.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Apr 7, 2023
From: SUN, MIAO; SHAIKH, SOHEL K.; ABBA, IBRAHIM A.; AL-MANA, NOOR; ZHANG, ZHONGLIN
To: SAUDI ARABIAN OIL COMPANY
Reel/Frame 063253/0687 →
Continuity (2)
Division 17365008 · Jul 1, 2021
Related Publication 20230093135A1 · Mar 23, 2023
References Cited (41)
US 7431831B2 · Farshid · 2008 [cited by examiner]
US 7935243B2 · Chabot · 2011 [cited by examiner]
US 9605217B2 · Sundararaman · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 10597590B2 · Van Wees · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 10751709B1 · Sun et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10751710B1 · Sun · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20090005052A1 · Abusch-Magder et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20090173666A1 · Zhou · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20110210045A1 · Kou · 2011 [cited by examiner]
US 20150014217A1 · Smiley · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 20150267130A1 · Butley · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 20160257889A1 · Abdullah et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160362618A1 · Oprins et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20170009157A1 · Oprins · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170050177A1 · Greeley et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170058210A1 · Pelaez et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20180361372A1 · Tammana et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20190016975A1 · Coleman et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190078027A1 · Deimund et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190078029A1 · Johnson et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190203130A1 · Mukherjee · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20210001321A1 · Sun · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210009907A1 · Frecon et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210130715A1 · Xu · 2021 [cited by applicant]
WO 2013151986A1 · 2013 [cited by applicant]
WO 2017093056A1 · 2017 [cited by applicant]
Guerzoni et al. “Catalytic Cracking of a Hydrocarbon Mixture on Combinations of HY and HZSM-5 Zeolites” Chemistry Department, Journal of Catalysis 139, 289-303 (1993), 15 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Jimenez-Cruz et al. “Molecular size evaluation of linear and branched paraffins from the gasoline pool by DFT quantum chemical calculations” Science Direct, Fuel 83 (2004) 2183-2188, 7 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Kim et al. “Novel Ni2P/zeolite catalysts for naphthalene hydrocracking to BTX” Catalysis Communications 45 (2014) 133-138, 6 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Kim et al. “Morphology effect of b-zeolite supports for Ni2P catalysts on the hydrocracking of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons to benzene, toluene, and xylene” Journal of Catalysis 351 (2017) 67-78, 12 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Kondoh et al., “Catalytic cracking of heavy oil over TiO2—ZrO2 catalysts under superheated steam conditions”, Fuel, vol. 167, pp. 288-294, 2016. [cited by applicant]
Kondoh et al., “Effects of H2O Addition on Oil Sand Bitumen Cracking Using a CeO2—ZrO2—Al2O3-FeOx Catalyst”, Energy & Fuels, vol. 30, pp. 10358-10364, 2016. [cited by applicant]
Kondoh et al., “Upgrading of oil sand bitumen over an iron oxide catalyst using sub- and super-critical water”, Fuel Processing Technology, vol. 145, pp. 96-101, 2016. [cited by applicant]
Lapinas et al. “Catalytic Hydrogenation and Hydrocracking of Fluorene: Reaction Pathways, Kinetics, and Mechanisms” Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 1991, 30, 42-50, 9 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Leite et al. “Hydrocracking of phenanthrene over bifunctional Pt catalysts” Catalysis Today 65 (2001) 241-247, 7 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Lemberton et al. “Catalytic hydroconversion of simulated coal tars” Applied Catalysis A: General, 79 (1991) 115-126, 12 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Matsui et al. “Explanation of Product Distribution of Hydrocracking Reaction of Aromatic Hydrocarbons with Nickel-Loaded Zeolites Based on CAMD Study on Interaction between Zeolites and Substrates” Energy & Fuels (1995)… [cited by applicant]
Park et al. “Hydro-conversion of 1-methyl naphthalene into (alkyl)benzenes over alumina-coated USY zeolite-supported NiMOS catalysts” Fuel 90 (2011) 182-189, 8 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Park et al. “Mild hydrocracking of 1-methyl naphthalene (1-MN) over alumina modified zeolite” Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry 19 (2013) 627-632, 6 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Tailleur et al. The effect of aromatics on paraffin mild hydrocracking reactions (WNiPd/CeY—Al2O3), Fuel Processing Technology 89 (2008) 808-818, 11 pgs. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Office Action dated Jan. 2, 2022 pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 17/364,990, filed Jul. 1, 2021 (14 pages). [cited by applicant]