IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,595,729
Granted Patent B2
US 12,595,729 · App. 17/700,929 · Granted Apr 7, 2026

Method to assess risk of fluid flow and associated long term damage of annular cement

Inventors: Siva Rama Krishna Jandhyala (Houston, TX); Walmy Cuello Jimenez (Houston, TX)
Assignee: Halliburton Energy Services, Inc.
E21B47/005C04B40/0032E21B2200/20
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,595,729
App. No.
17/700,929
Granted
Apr 7, 2026
Kind
B2
Abstract

Methods of the present disclosure relate to assessing and mitigating the risk of pore pressure buildup as part of designing a cement formulation. A method comprises: performing wellbore integrity analysis to provide a stress state of a cement sheath, wherein the cement sheath is a model; modifying the stress state of the cement sheath due to fluid influx through the cement sheath; comparing the modified stress state to failure properties for the cement sheath; and formulating a cement composition based on at least the modified stress state.

Claims (34)

1 . A method comprising:

performing wellbore integrity analysis to provide a stress state of a cement sheath, wherein the cement sheath is a model;

modifying the stress state of the cement sheath due to a fluid influx through the cement sheath;

comparing the modified stress state to failure properties for the cement sheath; and

formulating a cement composition based on at least the modified stress state such that the cement composition has a shear strength greater than the modified stress state;

preparing the cement composition;

pumping the cement composition into a wellbore; and

setting the cement composition in the wellbore to form a set cement composition, wherein the set cement composition has the property of having shear strength greater than the modified stress state.

2 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising constructing a stress map of the cement sheath.

3 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising applying boundary conditions to replace rock and casing that are adjacent to the cement sheath.

4 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising adjusting permeability of the cement sheath as a function of deformation of the cement sheath.

5 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the cement sheath has a constant permeability.

6 . The method of claim 3 , wherein the boundary conditions comprise a stiffness of rock and a constant pore pressure, for the cement sheath and a rock edge.

7 . The method of claim 6 , wherein the rock has a stiffness lower than the cement sheath.

8 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the cement composition is further formulated such that the fluid influx through the cement sheath is less than a setpoint fluid influx.

9 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the wellbore integrity analysis is performed utilizing a two-dimensional plane strain framework governed by Hooke's law and a transient thermal process of conduction.

10 . The method of claim 1 , wherein performing the wellbore integrity analysis comprises creating a mesh model representing a cross-section of a wellbore based on rock, cement sheath, and casing dimensions, and applying temperature and pressure loads corresponding to the construction, pressure test, and production stages of a well life.

11 . A method comprising:

performing wellbore integrity analysis to provide a stress state of a cement sheath, wherein the cement sheath is a model;

modifying the stress state of the cement sheath due to a fluid influx through the cement sheath;

comparing the modified stress state to failure properties for the cement sheath; and

formulating a cement composition such that the fluid influx into a set cement composition formed from the cement composition is less than a setpoint fluid influx;

preparing the cement composition;

pumping the cement composition into a wellbore; and

setting the cement composition in the wellbore to form the set cement composition, wherein the set cement composition has the property of having fluid influx into the set cement composition of less than the setpoint fluid influx.

12 . The method of claim 11 , further comprising constructing a stress map of the cement sheath.

13 . The method of claim 11 , further comprising applying boundary conditions to replace rock and casing that are adjacent to the cement sheath.

14 . The method of claim 11 , further comprising adjusting permeability of the cement sheath as a function of deformation of the cement sheath.

15 . The method of claim 11 , wherein the cement sheath has a constant permeability.

16 . The method of claim 13 , wherein the boundary conditions comprise a stiffness of rock and a constant pore pressure, for the cement sheath and a rock edge.

17 . The method of claim 16 , wherein the rock has a stiffness lower than the cement sheath.

18 . The method of claim 11 , wherein the wellbore integrity analysis is performed utilizing a two-dimensional plane strain framework governed by Hooke's law and a transient thermal process of conduction.

19 . The method of claim 11 , wherein performing the wellbore integrity analysis comprises creating a mesh model representing a cross-section of a wellbore based on rock, cement sheath, and casing dimensions, and applying temperature and pressure loads corresponding to the construction, pressure test, and production stages of a well life.

20 . The method of claim 11 , wherein the setpoint fluid influx is determined based on a regulatory requirement for maximum allowable sustained casing pressure (SCP).

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Mar 31, 2022
From: JANDHYALA, SIVA RAMA KRISHNA; JIMENEZ, WALMY CUELLO
To: HALLIBURTON ENERGY SERVICES, INC.
Reel/Frame 059557/0864 →
Continuity (2)
Provisional Application 63309101 · Feb 11, 2022
Related Publication 20230258068A1 · Aug 17, 2023
References Cited (44)
US 6230804B1 · Mueller · 2001 [cited by examiner]
US 6697738B2 · Ravi · 2004 [cited by examiner]
US 7133778B2 · Ravi · 2006 [cited by examiner]
US 7530396B1 · Reddy · 2009 [cited by examiner]
US 8105433B2 · Kishi · 2012 [cited by examiner]
US 9624419B2 · Khammar · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 10415371B2 · Draper · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 10450494B2 · Pernites · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 10620065B2 · Polsky · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 10655414B1 · Wang · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 11441415B2 · Pisklak · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 11577997B2 · Jandhyala · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 20120205103A1 · Ravi · 2012 [cited by examiner]
US 20130082191A1 · Raghavan · 2013 [cited by examiner]
US 20150033862A1 · Bois · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 20150330179A1 · James · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 20160264840A1 · Nelson · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 20170009122A1 · Funkhouser · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20170096874A1 · Parsons · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20170130115A1 · Ballard · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20170183964A1 · Jandhyala · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20170205388A1 · Thomas · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20170268325A1 · Draper · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20180156677A1 · Polsky · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20180328128A1 · Ravi · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20190218445A1 · Pernites · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20190367797A1 · Morgan · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20210082543A1 · Yin · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20210207470A1 · Pisklak · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20210324704A1 · Jandhyala · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20220009835A1 · Jandhyala · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20220228484A1 · Cramer · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20220381110A1 · Kunz · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20230055082A1 · Jandhyala · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 20230112008A1 · Jandhyala · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 20230185979A1 · Benkley · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 20230258068A1 · Jandhyala · 2023 [cited by examiner]
WO 2020027834 · 2020 [cited by applicant]
Xu et al. (Influences of Fracturing Fluid Injection on Mechanical Integrity of Cement Sheath under Four Failure Modes, MDPI, 2018, pp. 1-18) (Year: 2018). [cited by examiner]
Backe et al. (Characterizing Curing-Cement Slurries by Permeability, Tensile Strength, and Shrinkage, SPE Drill. & Completion, Sep. 1999, pp. 162-167) (Year: 1999). [cited by examiner]
Andrade et al. (Cement Sheath Failure Mechanisms: Numerical Estimates to Design for Long-Term Well Integrity, 2016, Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering (2016) 682-698) (Year: 2016). [cited by examiner]
Ramos et al. (Borehole Cement Sheath Integrity—Numerical Simulation Under Reservoir Conditions, Mecánica Computacional, 2017, pp. 193-225) (Year: 2017). [cited by examiner]
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2022/022730, dated Nov. 2, 2022. [cited by applicant]
Soil-Pore Fluid Analysis, Available at https://dianafea.com/manuals/d944/Analys/node460.html, Accessed Mar. 1, 2022. [cited by applicant]