IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,730,212
Granted Patent B2
US 12,730,212 · App. 18/762,435 · Granted Sep 8, 2026

Interference limiting for surveillance messages

Inventor: Ruy C. Brandao (Redmond, WA)
Assignee: Honeywell International Inc.
G01S13/765G01S7/023G01S13/762G01S13/91G08G5/20H04B1/0475H04B1/1027H04B1/3822H04B2001/0416
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,730,212
App. No.
18/762,435
Granted
Sep 8, 2026
Kind
B2
Abstract

In some examples, a system includes a transceiver configured to transmit a first surveillance message at a first power level at or below a first maximum power level. The system also includes processing circuitry coupled to the transceiver, the processing circuitry configured to determine that a threshold condition exists. The processing circuitry is also configured to determine a second maximum power level in response to determining that the threshold condition exists, where the second maximum power level is lower than the first maximum power level. The transceiver is configured to transmit, in response to the processing circuitry determining that the threshold condition exists, a second surveillance message at a second power level, wherein the second power level is at or below the second maximum power level.

Claims (20)

1 . A system configured to be mounted on an ownship vehicle, the system comprising:

a transceiver configured to transmit a first surveillance message at a first power level at or below a first maximum power level; and

processing circuitry coupled to the transceiver, the processing circuitry being configured to:

determine a first reduction in the first maximum power level for the ownship vehicle according to interference limiting standards;

determine a closure rate for the ownship vehicle based on a speed of the ownship vehicle;

determine a second reduction in the first maximum power level for the ownship vehicle based on the closure rate, wherein a magnitude of the second reduction is less than a magnitude of the first reduction; and

determine a second maximum power level based on the second reduction, and

wherein the transceiver is configured to transmit a second surveillance message at a second power level at or below the second maximum power level.

2 . The system of claim 1 , wherein the processing circuitry is configured to determine the closure rate based on the speed and an altitude of the ownship vehicle.

3 . The system of claim 1 , wherein the processing circuitry is configured to determine the first reduction based on a number of transmitting vehicles in an area around the ownship vehicle.

4 . The system of claim 3 , wherein the processing circuitry is configured to determine a maximum reduction based on the number of transmitting vehicles in the area, and wherein the magnitude of the first reduction is less than or equal to a magnitude of the maximum reduction.

5 . The system of claim 4 , wherein the processing circuitry is configured to determine a third maximum power level based on the maximum reduction, and wherein the second maximum power level is greater than or equal to the third maximum power level.

6 . The system of claim 1 , wherein the processing circuitry is configured to:

determine a surveillance range of the ownship vehicle based on the closure rate and a surveillance time; and

determine the second reduction based on the closure rate and the surveillance range.

7 . The system of claim 1 ,

wherein the transceiver includes a TCAS II transmitter, and

wherein the processing circuitry is further configured to:

determine that a power output of the TCAS II transmitter is less than a power output allowed by applicable requirements for a TCAS I system; and

suppress TCAS broadcast interrogations transmitted by the transceiver in response to determining that the power output of the TCAS II transmitter is less than the power output allowed by applicable requirements for the TCAS I system.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jul 2, 2024
From: BRANDAO, RUY C.
To: HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC.
Reel/Frame 067899/0795 →
Continuity (4)
Division 18148943 · Dec 30, 2022
Division 16892029 · Jun 3, 2020
Provisional Application 62858832 · Jun 7, 2019
Related Publication 20260056310A1 · Feb 26, 2026
References Cited (53)
US 5220329A · Verbeke, Jr. et al. · 1993 [cited by applicant]
US 6313783B1 · Kuntman et al. · 2001 [cited by applicant]
US 6483453B2 · Oey et al. · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 6657578B2 · Stayton et al. · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 7158073B2 · Ybarra · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 7436350B1 · Maloratsky et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 7619557B2 · Billaud et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 8233412B1 · Abbey et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8738064B2 · Hofmann et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 9100087B2 · Stayton · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 9791562B2 · Stayton · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 9869745B1 · Rowlan · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 9997826B2 · Oey · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10132923B2 · Robin · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10451725B2 · Kirk · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10785607B2 · Balasubramanian et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10795016B2 · Hauswald et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 11041950B2 · Troxel · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11152990B1 · Brandao · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11156708B2 · McCullen · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11171416B2 · Ferguson et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11555911B2 · Brandao · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 11869372B2 · Brandao et al. · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 20040242273A1 · Corbett et al. · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 20110215963A1 · Perl · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20170259942A1 · Ziarno · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20180137765A1 · Sindlinger et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180321370A1 · Robin · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20190045406A1 · Kalathil et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190061693A1 · Johnson · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20190098458A1 · Perdew et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190162841A1 · Peckham · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190334604A1 · Kusano et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20200351790A1 · Hsieh et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200389193A1 · Brandao · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20210124375A1 · Li · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20220148446A1 · Brandao · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20230141517A1 · Brandao · 2023 [cited by applicant]
CN 103682558 · 2014 [cited by applicant]
EP 0524099A1 · 1993 [cited by applicant]
WO 201935924A1 · 2019 [cited by applicant]
Communication enclosing extended European Search Report from counterpart European Application No. 20178624.1, dated Oct. 28, 2020, 8 pp. [cited by applicant]
Communication pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC from counterpart European Application No. 20178624.1 dated Nov. 4, 2022, 7 pp. [cited by applicant]
Harman et al., “TCAS II: Design and Validation of the High-Traffic-Density Surveillance Subsystem”, Lincoln Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Feb. 12, 1985, 158 pp. [cited by applicant]
Prosecution History from U.S. Appl. No. 16/892,029, dated Jun. 14, 2021 through Dec. 7, 2022, 70 pp. [cited by applicant]
Prosecution History from U.S. Appl. No. 18/148,943, dated Jul. 20, 2023 through Mar. 27, 2024, 29 pp. [cited by applicant]
Response to Communication pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC dated Nov. 4, 2022, from counterpart European Application No. 20178624.1 filed Feb. 28, 2023, 37 pp. [cited by applicant]
Response to European Search Report dated Oct. 28, 2020, from counterpart European Patent Application No. 20178624.1, filed on Mar. 31, 2021, 7 pp. [cited by applicant]
Sections 2.2.3.4 through 2.2.3.6.4 of Radio Technical Commission for Aeronautics DO-185B, Jun. 19, 2008, 7 pp. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Department of Transportation, “Introduction to TCAS II,” Version 7.1, HQ-111358, Feb. 28, 2011, 50 pp. [cited by applicant]
Williamson et al., “Development and Operation of the Traffic Alert and Collision Avoidance System (TCAS),” 8078 Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 77, No. 11, Nov. 1989, 10 pp. [cited by applicant]
Response to Communication pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC dated Apr. 11, 2025, from counterpart European Application No. 20178624.1 filed Jul. 14, 2025, 50 pp. [cited by applicant]
Communication pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC from counterpart European Application No. 20178624.1 dated Apr. 11, 2025, 5 pp. [cited by applicant]