IP Library Granted Patent US 7,873,156
Granted Patent B1
US 7,873,156 · App. 11/540,306 · Granted Jan 18, 2011

Systems and methods for analyzing contact center interactions

View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 7,873,156
App. No.
11/540,306
Granted
Jan 18, 2011
Kind
B1
Abstract

Systems and methods for analyzing contact center interactions are provided. In this regard, a representative method includes: receiving information corresponding to an interaction between a contact center agent and a customer; and assessing quality of the interaction based, at least in part, on information corresponding to at least one of: a history of the customer; and an event corresponding to the customer and occurring subsequent to the interaction.

Claims (37)

1. A method for analyzing contact center interactions comprising:

determining review-candidate criteria used for designating which interaction among multiple interactions is to be reviewed;

determining review-execution criteria used for determining when an interaction, which is designated for review, can be reviewed;

responsive to identifying an interaction of interest satisfying both the review-candidate criteria and the review-execution criteria, providing access to information corresponding to the interaction of interest and information corresponding to a related interaction such that the interaction of interest can be reviewed in context; and

delaying review for a predetermined time period responsive to determining that a customer associated with the interaction of interest has attempted another interaction subsequent to the interaction of interest.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the review-candidate criteria includes a predetermined number of interactions for completing a transaction such that, responsive to determining that a customer has had at least the predetermined number of interactions for completing a transaction, at least one of those interactions is designated for review.

3. The method of claim 1 , wherein the review-candidate criteria includes a customer identification such that, responsive to determining that a particular customer is a party to an interaction, that interaction is designated for review.

4. The method of claim 1 , wherein the review-execution criteria includes a specified event such that, responsive to determining that the specified event has occurred, the interaction designated for review can be reviewed.

5. The method of claim 1 , wherein the review-execution criteria includes a waiting period such that, responsive to determining that the waiting period has expired, the interaction designated for review can be reviewed.

6. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

recording the interactions.

7. The method of claim 6 , wherein, in recording the interactions, audio and screen information is recorded.

8. The method of claim 1 , further comprising performing automated evaluation of the interaction of interest.

9. The method of claim 8 , wherein performing automated evaluation comprises performing script adherence analysis.

10. The method of claim 8 , wherein performing automated evaluation comprises evaluating the interaction of interest for fraud.

11. The method of claim 1 , wherein at least some of the interactions are facilitated using Internet Protocol packets.

12. The method of claim 11 , monitoring the Internet Protocol packets to identify interactions satisfying the review-candidate criteria and the review-execution criteria.

13. A method for analyzing contact center interactions comprising:

receiving information corresponding to an interaction between a contact center agent and a customer;

assessing quality of the interaction based, at least in part, on information corresponding to at least one of: a history of the customer; and an event corresponding to the customer and occurring subsequent to the interaction; and

delaying assessing for a predetermined time period responsive to determining that a customer associated with the interaction has attempted another interaction subsequent to the interaction that is to be assessed for quality.

14. The method of claim 13 , wherein the information corresponding to a history of the customer includes information corresponding to a previous interaction of that customer.

15. The method of claim 13 , wherein the event is completion of a transaction associated with the interaction.

16. A system for analyzing contact center interactions comprising:

an interaction analyzer operative to:

receive information corresponding to review-candidate criteria used for designating which interaction among multiple interactions is to be reviewed;

receive information corresponding to review-execution criteria used for determining when an interaction, which is designated for review, can be reviewed;

identify an interaction of interest satisfying both the review-candidate criteria and the review-execution criteria;

provide access to information corresponding to the interaction of interest and information corresponding to a related interaction such that the interaction of interest can be reviewed in context; and

delay review for a predetermined time period responsive to determining that a customer associated with the interaction of interest has attempted another interaction subsequent to the interaction of interest.

17. The system of claim 16 , wherein the information corresponding to a related interaction includes at least one of: a history of the customer; and an event, corresponding to the customer, occurring subsequent to the interaction.

18. The system of claim 16 , wherein the review-candidate criteria includes a predetermined number of interactions for completing a transaction such that, responsive to determining that a customer has had at least the predetermined number of interactions for completing a transaction, at least one of those interactions is designated for review.

19. The system of claim 16 , wherein the review-execution criteria includes a waiting period such that, responsive to determining that the waiting period has expired, the interaction designated for review can be reviewed.

20. The system of claim 16 , wherein the interaction analyzer is further operative to monitor Internet Protocol packets associated with the multiple interactions to identify those interactions satisfying the review-candidate criteria and the review-execution criteria.

21. The system of claim 16 , further comprising a computer, and wherein the interaction analyzer is embodied as software executing on the computer.

22. The system of claim 16 , further comprising a recorder operative to record the interaction of interest.

23. The system of claim 16 , further comprising means for recording the interaction of interest.

Assignments (9)
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Dec 23, 2025
From: VERINT AMERICAS INC.
To: ALTER DOMUS (US) LLC, AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 074034/0292 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS PREVIOUSLY RECORDED AT REEL/FRAME (043293/0567) Recorded Nov 26, 2025
From: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT
To: VERINT AMERICAS INC.
Reel/Frame 073796/0639 →
GRANT OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENT RIGHTS Recorded Jul 21, 2017
From: VERINT AMERICAS INC.
To: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 043293/0567 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Jun 30, 2017
From: CREDIT SUISSE AG, CAYMAN ISLANDS BRANCH
To: VERINT AMERICAS INC.
Reel/Frame 043066/0473 →
GRANT OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENT RIGHTS Recorded Oct 21, 2013
From: VERINT AMERICAS INC.
To: CREDIT SUISSE AG, CAYMAN ISLANDS BRANCH, AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 031465/0450 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENT RIGHTS Recorded Oct 21, 2013
From: CREDIT SUISSE AG, CAYMAN ISLANDS BRANCH, AS COLLATERAL AGENT
To: VERINT AMERICAS INC.; VERINT SYSTEMS INC.; VERINT VIDEO SOLUTIONS INC.
Reel/Frame 031448/0373 →
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Mar 29, 2013
From: WITNESS SYSTEMS, INC.
To: VERINT AMERICAS INC.
Reel/Frame 030112/0585 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded May 2, 2011
From: VERINT AMERICAS INC.
To: CREDIT SUISSE AG
Reel/Frame 026207/0203 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Dec 8, 2006
From: BLAIR, CHRISTOPHER D.
To: WITNESS SYSTEMS, INC.
Reel/Frame 018599/0618 →