IP Library Granted Patent US 12,189,302
Granted Patent B2
US 12,189,302 · App. 17/738,093 · Granted Jan 7, 2025

Computational metrology

Inventors: Wim Tjibbo Tel (Helmond, NL); Bart Peter Bert Segers (Tessenderlo, BE); Everhardus Cornelis Mos (Best, NL); Emil Peter Schmitt-Weaver (Eindhoven, NL); Yichen Zhang (Eindhoven, NL); Petrus Gerardus Van Rhee (Nijmegen, NL); Xing Lan Liu (Ukkel, BE); Maria Kilitziraki (Veldhoven, NL); Reiner Maria Jungblut (Eindhoven, NL); Hyunwoo Yu (Hwaseong-si, KR)
Assignee: ASML NETHERLANDS B.V.
G03F7/70441G03F7/705G03F7/70508G03F7/70625G03F7/70633G03F7/70641G03F7/70683G06N3/02G06F30/20G06F2119/18G06F2119/22
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,189,302
App. No.
17/738,093
Granted
Jan 7, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method, involving determining a first distribution of a first parameter associated with an error or residual in performing a device manufacturing process; determining a second distribution of a second parameter associated with an error or residual in performing the device manufacturing process; and determining a distribution of a parameter of interest associated with the device manufacturing process using a function operating on the first and second distributions. The function may include a correlation.

Claims (26)

1. A method comprising:

obtaining an underlying contribution of a lithographic apparatus to overlay as part of a patterning process; and

combining, by a hardware computer, the underlying contribution with a further contribution to overlay of a substrate to obtain an estimate of overlay for the substrate.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the further contribution comprises a contribution of a substrate surface height of the substrate to overlay.

3. The method of claim 1 , wherein the further contribution comprises a contribution of a substrate servo error of the substrate to overlay.

4. The method of claim 1 , wherein the further contribution comprises a contribution of an alignment and/or projection system model residual.

5. The method of claim 1 , further comprising combining, with the underlying contribution and the contribution of the substrate surface height, a contribution of an etch process to overlay of the substrate.

6. The method of claim 5 , wherein the etch process contribution is specific to the patterning process but not specific to any particular substrate processed using the patterning process.

7. The method of claim 1 , wherein the underlying contribution is specific to a particular patterning process but not specific to any particular substrate processed using the patterning process.

8. The method of claim 1 , wherein the obtaining the underlying contribution further comprises obtaining measured overlay data and removing therefrom a contribution of a particular component of the lithographic apparatus to overlay.

9. The method of claim 8 , wherein the contribution of the particular component comprises one or more selected from: a contribution of a servo error, a contribution of alignment model residual, a contribution of a projection system aberration, a contribution of a projection system model residual, and/or a contribution of a substrate surface height.

10. The method of claim 1 , wherein the contribution comprises a spatial substrate fingerprint.

11. The method of claim 1 , further comprising using the estimate to perform any one or more selected from: predict a defect for the substrate, control the patterning process, monitor the patterning process, design an aspect of the patterning process, and/or calibrate a mathematical model.

12. A computer program product comprising a non-transitory computer readable medium having instructions therein, the instructions, when executed by a computer system, configured to cause the computer system to perform the method of claim 1 .

13. A method comprising:

obtaining an alignment data distribution across at least part of a substrate processed using a patterning process, based on measured alignment data; and

combining, by a hardware computer, the alignment data distribution with an alignment fingerprint attributable to a processing parameter other than measured alignment to obtain an estimate of alignment data for the substrate.

14. The method of claim 13 , wherein the alignment fingerprint comprises a contribution of a substrate height or unflatness of the substrate to alignment.

15. The method of claim 13 , wherein the alignment fingerprint comprises a contribution of a process effect, due to a part of the patterning process other than a lithography pattern transfer, of the substrate to alignment.

16. The method of claim 13 , wherein the alignment fingerprint comprises a contribution of heating of the substrate to alignment.

17. The method of claim 13 , wherein the alignment fingerprint is specific to the patterning process but not specific to any particular substrate processed using the patterning process.

18. The method of claim 13 , wherein the alignment fingerprint is specific to a particular substrate processed using the patterning process but not generic to other substrates processed using the patterning process.

19. The method of claim 13 , wherein the alignment fingerprint is derived from a measurement of the processing parameter.

20. The method of claim 13 , wherein the alignment fingerprint comprises a spatial substrate fingerprint.

21. The method of claim 13 , further comprising using the estimate to perform any one or more selected from: predict a defect for the substrate, control the patterning process, monitor the patterning process, design an aspect of the patterning process, and/or calibrate a mathematical model.

22. A computer program product comprising a non-transitory computer readable medium having instructions therein, the instructions, when executed by a computer system, configured to cause the computer system to perform the method of claim 13 .

Assignments (2)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded May 9, 2022
From: TEL, WIM TJIBBO; SEGERS, BART PETER BERT; MOS, EVERHARDUS CORNELIS; SCHMITT-WEAVER, EMIL PETER; ZHANG, YICHEN; VAN RHEE, PETRUS GERARDUS; LIU, XING LAN; KILITZIRAKI, MARIA; JUNGBLUT, REINER MARIA; YU, HYUNWOO
To: ASML NETHERLANDS B.V.
Reel/Frame 059870/0250 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded May 9, 2022
From: TEL, WIM TJIBBO; SEGERS, BART PETER BERT; MOS, EVERHARDUS CORNELIS; ZHANG, YICHEN; VAN RHEE, PETRUS GERARDUS; SCHMITT-WEAVER, EMIL PETER; LIU, XING LAN; JUNGBLUT, REINER MARIA; KILITZIRAKI, MARIA
To: ASML NETHERLANDS B.V.
Reel/Frame 059870/0278 →
Continuity (5)
Continuation 17197167 · Mar 10, 2021
Continuation 16481143
Provisional Application 62545578 · Aug 15, 2017
Provisional Application 62462201 · Feb 22, 2017
Related Publication 20220260925A1 · Aug 18, 2022
References Cited (108)
US 5007284A · Slone · 1991 [cited by applicant]
US 6331885B1 · Nishi · 2001 [cited by examiner]
US 6937914B1 · Bode · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 6961116B2 · Den Boef et al. · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 7265364B2 · Teunissen et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 7508976B1 · Yang et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 7561282B1 · Widmann · 2009 [cited by examiner]
US 8572518B2 · Tyminski et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8756028B2 · Chu · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 8804137B2 · Choi · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 8856694B2 · Ye et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 10394973B2 · Jin · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10990018B2 · Tel · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 11347150B2 · Tel · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20020158607A1 · Yang · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 20020165636A1 · Hasan · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 20050062949A1 · Irie · 2005 [cited by examiner]
US 20050219515A1 · Morohoshi · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 20060035159A1 · Best · 2006 [cited by examiner]
US 20060066855A1 · Boef et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20070021860A1 · Gertrudus Simons et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20080036984A1 · Mos · 2008 [cited by examiner]
US 20080094642A1 · Okita · 2008 [cited by examiner]
US 20080275586A1 · Ko et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20080275676A1 · Lin et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20090276075A1 · Good · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20100233600A1 · Den Boef et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20100243431A1 · Kuboi · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20110027704A1 · Cramer et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110043791A1 · Smilde et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110080567A1 · Hoekerd et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110153265A1 · Staals et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110205510A1 · Menchtchikov et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110213584A1 · Menchtchikov · 2011 [cited by examiner]
US 20120065920A1 · Nagumo · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20120146159A1 · Wang · 2012 [cited by examiner]
US 20120191236A1 · Ausschnitt · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20120198396A1 · Kajiwara · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20120242970A1 · Smilde et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20120262109A1 · Toya et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20130185042A1 · Taoka · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130230797A1 · Van Der Sanden et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130295698A1 · Pforr · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130331975A1 · Saulsbury · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20150120216A1 · Vukkadala · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150147918A1 · Matsuda et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150170904A1 · Tsen · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 20150235108A1 · Pandev · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20160006156A1 · Shimizu · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160047744A1 · Adel · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 20160072213A1 · Ichio et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160148850A1 · David · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160246185A1 · Ypma et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160274472A1 · Mathijssen · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 20160327871A1 · Nooitgedagt · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 20160349627A1 · Van Der Schaar et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160357115A1 · Kok · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160364513A1 · Foreman · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160370710A1 · Wardenier et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160370711A1 · Schmitt-Weaver et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20170045823A1 · Quintanilha · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170235230A1 · Ebert et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170336198A1 · Adel · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20180329307A1 · Brinkhof · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20190018326A1 · Van Der Schaar · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190361358A1 · Tel · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20210191278A1 · Tel · 2021 [cited by examiner]
CN 103034067 · 2013 [cited by applicant]
CN 102103330 · 2014 [cited by applicant]
CN 102033435 · 2014 [cited by applicant]
CN 106062634 · 2016 [cited by applicant]
EP 1744217 · 2007 [cited by applicant]
JP 2002064046 · 2002 [cited by applicant]
JP 2003059807 · 2003 [cited by applicant]
JP 2005302777 · 2005 [cited by applicant]
JP 2006053550 · 2006 [cited by applicant]
JP 2007242809 · 2007 [cited by applicant]
JP 3999775 · 2007 [cited by applicant]
JP 2008091721 · 2008 [cited by applicant]
JP 2012089896 · 2012 [cited by applicant]
JP 2012244015 · 2012 [cited by applicant]
JP 2015158594 · 2015 [cited by applicant]
JP 2017505460 · 2017 [cited by applicant]
TW 200710596 · 2007 [cited by applicant]
TW 200846389 · 2008 [cited by applicant]
TW 201516598 · 2015 [cited by applicant]
TW 1547685 · 2016 [cited by applicant]
TW 201835676 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
WO 2009078708 · 2009 [cited by applicant]
WO 2009106279 · 2009 [cited by applicant]
WO 2015124391 · 2015 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2015163307A1 · 2015 [cited by examiner]
WO 2016087069 · 2016 [cited by applicant]
WO 2016177568 · 2016 [cited by applicant]
WO 2017144379 · 2017 [cited by applicant]
Office Action issued in corresponding Chinese Patent Application No. 202111221202.5, dated Mar. 4, 2024. [cited by applicant]
Hg Lee et al. “Virtual overlay metrology for fault detection supported with integrated metrology and machine learning”; Proc. of SPIE, vol. 9424, pp. 1-6 (2015). [cited by applicant]
International Search Report and Written Opinion issued in corresponding PCT Patent Application No. PCT/EP2018/053412, dated Jul. 9, 2018. [cited by applicant]
Lee, Hong-Goo, et al.: “Virtual overlay metrology for fault detection supported with integrated metrology and machine learning”, Proc. of SPIE, vol. 9424, Mar. 19, 2015. [cited by applicant]
Tel, W.T., et al.: “Efficient hybrid metrology for focus, CD, and overlay”, Proc. of SPIE, vol. 10145, Mar. 28, 2017. [cited by applicant]
Schmitt-Weaver, Emil, et al.: “Computational overlay metrology with adaptive data analytics”, Proc. of SPIE, vol. 10145, Mar. 28, 2017. [cited by applicant]
Schmitt-Weaver, E., et al.: “Overlay improvements using a real time machine learning algorithm”, Proc. of SPIE, vol. 9050, Apr. 2014. [cited by applicant]
Taiwanese Office Action issued in corresponding Taiwanese Patent Application No. 107105689, dated Dec. 27, 2019. [cited by applicant]
Japanese Office Action issued in corresponding Japanese Patent Application No. 2019-565618, dated Oct. 13, 2020. [cited by applicant]
Korean Office Action issued in corresponding Korean Patent Application No. 10-2019-7027439, dated Dec. 23, 2020. [cited by applicant]
Chinese Office Action issued in corresponding Chinese Patent Application No. 201880013446.4, dated Dec. 12, 2020. [cited by applicant]
Taiwanese Office Action issued in corresponding Taiwanese Patent Application No. 109123142, dated Mar. 8, 2021. [cited by applicant]
Office Action issued in corresponding Japanese Patent Office Action No. 2023204691, dated Oct. 1, 2024. [cited by applicant]