IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,394,674
Granted Patent B2
US 12,394,674 · App. 17/097,063 · Granted Aug 19, 2025

Method and machine for examining wafers

Inventors: Chien-Hung Chou (San Jose, CA); Wen-Tin Tai (Fremont, CA)
Assignee: ASML Netherlands B.V.
H01L22/20G05B19/41875G01N2021/8861G01N2021/8867G01N21/9501G05B2219/32205G05B2219/37224Y02P90/02Y02P90/80
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,394,674
App. No.
17/097,063
Granted
Aug 19, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

Method and machine utilizes the real-time recipe to perform weak point inspection on a series of wafers during the fabrication of integrated circuits. Each real-time recipe essentially corresponds to a practical fabrication history of a wafer to be examined and/or the examination results of at least one examined wafer of same “lot”. Therefore, different wafers can be examined by using different recipes where each recipe corresponds to a specific condition of a wafer to be examined, even these wafers are received by a machine for examining at the same time.

Claims (60)

1. An inspection apparatus for inspecting a semiconductor wafer, the inspection apparatus comprising:

a high resolution imaging tool comprising a source configured to provide a beam for imaging a semiconductor pattern on the semiconductor wafer;

a memory storing a set of instructions; and

a processor configured to execute the set of instructions to cause the apparatus to:

determine a similarity between a map representing the semiconductor wafer and a reference;

determine a first inspecting plan for inspecting the semiconductor wafer according to a critical area to define an inspection area on the semiconductor wafer when a first condition is satisfied that is based on the similarity, wherein the first inspecting plan covers only a semiconductor fabrication defect inspection area defined by the map;

acquire at least one image of the semiconductor pattern on the semiconductor wafer with the high resolution imaging tool using the first inspecting plan;

identify semiconductor fabrication defects in the inspection area according to the at least one image;

in response to the similarity exceeding a threshold, set a semiconductor wafer map flag value to a first value, or in response to the similarity not exceeding the threshold, set the semiconductor wafer map flag value to a second value; and

construct the first inspecting plan when the semiconductor wafer map flag is the first value, or construct a second inspecting plan when the semiconductor wafer map flag is the second value.

2. The inspection apparatus of claim 1 , wherein the processor is configured to execute the set of instructions to cause the apparatus to:

construct an inspection plan based on the similarity, wherein the inspection plan includes:

the first inspecting plan when the similarity exceeds a threshold; and

a second inspecting plan when the similarity does not exceed the threshold, the second inspecting plan covering a larger area than the first inspecting plan.

3. The inspection apparatus of claim 1 , wherein the reference includes a semiconductor wafer map stored in the memory.

4. The inspection apparatus of claim 1 , wherein the reference includes a graphic database system (GDS) file.

5. The inspection apparatus of claim 1 , wherein the first inspecting plan is determined based on at least one of the following: product information identifying a feature based on a semiconductor fabrication process; and detecting parameters that instruct the high resolution imaging tool what to do in the inspection area.

6. The inspection apparatus of claim 1 , wherein the first inspecting plan comprises instructions configured to cause the high resolution imaging tool to examine the semiconductor wafer only in the critical area.

7. The inspection apparatus of claim 1 , wherein

the high resolution imaging tool is a scanning electron microscope.

8. The inspection apparatus of claim 1 , wherein

the at least one image comprises image pixel dimensions of not more than 0.01 μm per pixel.

9. The inspection apparatus of claim 1 , wherein

acquiring the at least one image is performed in a shorter time than would be required to acquire a full inspection image of the semiconductor wafer.

10. The inspection apparatus of claim 1 , wherein

the high resolution imaging tool is an optical inspection system.

11. A method of inspecting a semiconductor wafer, comprising:

determining a similarity between a map representing the semiconductor wafer and a reference;

determining a first inspecting plan according to a critical area to define an inspection area on the semiconductor wafer when a first condition is satisfied that is based on the similarity, wherein the first inspecting plan covers only a semiconductor fabrication defect inspection area defined by the map;

examining the semiconductor wafer with a high resolution imaging tool using the first inspecting plan;

identifying semiconductor fabrication defects in the inspection area according to at least one image taken by the high resolution imaging tool; and

in response to the similarity exceeding a threshold, setting a semiconductor wafer map flag value to a first value; and

constructing the first inspecting plan when the semiconductor wafer map flag is the first value.

12. The method of claim 11 , wherein the map representing the semiconductor wafer includes process information.

13. The method of claim 11 , wherein the map representing the semiconductor wafer includes coordinates of semiconductor fabrication defects.

14. The method of claim 11 , further comprising:

constructing an inspection plan based on the determination of the similarity, wherein the inspection plan includes:

the first inspecting plan when the similarity exceeds a threshold; and

a second inspecting plan when the similarity does not exceed the threshold, the second inspecting plan covering a larger area than the first inspecting plan.

15. The method of claim 11 , wherein the map comprises at least one of the following: a possible semiconductor fabrication defect location within a die or a device provided by a prediction of a numerical simulation; a verified result of a previous inspection output of other semiconductor fabrication defect scanning tool; and a historical semiconductor wafer map result collected from a previous semiconductor wafer that experienced all fabrication processes.

16. The method of claim 15 , wherein the possible semiconductor fabrication defect location comprises a forerunner to semiconductor fabrication defects.

17. The method of claim 11 , further comprising

determining a second inspecting plan according to full semiconductor wafer inspection when the first condition is not satisfied.

18. The method of claim 11 , wherein the reference includes a semiconductor wafer map stored in a database.

19. The method of claim 11 , further comprising:

in response to the similarity not exceeding the threshold, setting the semiconductor wafer map flag value to a second value; and

constructing a second inspecting plan when the semiconductor wafer map flag is the second value.

20. The method of claim 11 , wherein

the high resolution imaging tool is a scanning electron microscope.

21. A non-transitory computer readable medium that stores a set of instructions that is executable by at least one processor of an inspection apparatus to cause the inspection apparatus to perform a method for inspecting a semiconductor wafer, the method comprising:

determining a similarity between a map representing the semiconductor wafer and a reference;

determining a first inspecting plan according to a critical area to define an inspection area on the semiconductor wafer when a first condition is satisfied that is based on the similarity, wherein the first inspecting plan covers only a semiconductor fabrication defect inspection area defined by the map;

examining the semiconductor wafer with a high resolution imaging tool using the first inspecting plan;

identifying semiconductor fabrication defects in the inspection area according to at least one image taken by the high resolution imaging tool;

in response to the similarity exceeding a threshold, setting a semiconductor wafer map flag value to a first value, or in response to the similarity not exceeding the threshold, setting the semiconductor wafer map flag value to a second value; and

constructing the first inspecting plan when the semiconductor wafer map flag is the first value, or constructing a second inspecting plan when the semiconductor wafer map flag is the second value, the second inspecting plan covering a larger area than the first inspecting plan.

22. The medium of claim 21 , wherein the instructions are executable by the at least one processor of the apparatus to cause the apparatus to further perform:

determining a second inspecting plan according to full semiconductor wafer inspection when the first condition is not satisfied.

23. The medium of claim 21 , wherein

the high resolution imaging tool is a scanning electron microscope.

Assignments (3)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Nov 19, 2020
From: HERMES MICROVISION INCORPORATED B.V.
To: ASML NETHERLANDS B.V.
Reel/Frame 054421/0263 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Nov 16, 2020
From: HERMES MICROVISION, INC.
To: HERMES MICROVISION INCORPORATED B.V.
Reel/Frame 054373/0131 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Nov 13, 2020
From: CHOU, CHIEN-HUNG; TAI, WEN-TIN
To: HERMES MICROVISION, INC.
Reel/Frame 054356/0735 →
Continuity (4)
Continuation 15708060 · Sep 18, 2017
Continuation 13589378 · Aug 20, 2012
Continuation In Part 12370913 · Feb 13, 2009
Related Publication 20210193537A1 · Jun 24, 2021
References Cited (110)
US 5654632A · Ohno · 1997 [cited by applicant]
US 5784484A · Umezawa · 1998 [cited by examiner]
US 5893095A · Jain et al. · 1999 [cited by applicant]
US 5917588A · Addiego · 1999 [cited by applicant]
US 6091249A · Talbot et al. · 2000 [cited by applicant]
US 6246787B1 · Hennessey et al. · 2001 [cited by applicant]
US 6259960B1 · Inokuchi · 2001 [cited by examiner]
US 6303394B1 · Steffan et al. · 2001 [cited by applicant]
US 6324298B1 · O'Dell · 2001 [cited by examiner]
US 6336086B1 · Perez et al. · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 6363382B1 · Kotani et al. · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 6449524B1 · Miller et al. · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 6509750B1 · Talbot et al. · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 6535774B1 · Bode et al. · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 6724929B1 · Matsuoka · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 6738682B1 · Pasadyn · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 6826316B2 · Luo et al. · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 6830941B1 · Lee et al. · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 6869807B2 · Yoshitake et al. · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 6917849B1 · Pasadyn et al. · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 6957120B1 · Bode et al. · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 6980687B2 · Ikegaya et al. · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 7142992B1 · Huet et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 7248939B1 · Chamness et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 7310585B2 · Brodsky et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 7313450B1 · Fu et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 7327444B2 · Naka et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 7327475B1 · Chu et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 7369236B1 · Sali et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 7619731B2 · Lally et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 7636649B2 · Li et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 7676077B2 · Kulkarni et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 7697130B2 · Ko et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 7747062B2 · Chen et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 7813539B2 · Shibuya et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 7853920B2 · Preil et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 7863552B2 · Cartlidge · 2011 [cited by examiner]
US 7877722B2 · Duffy et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 7881520B2 · Ueno et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 7906758B2 · Stults et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 7960697B2 · Chen et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 8000922B2 · Chen et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 8041103B2 · Kulkarni et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 8135204B1 · Chen et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8510687B1 · Liu · 2013 [cited by examiner]
US 8577153B2 · Duan et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8611639B2 · Kulkarni et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20020018756A1 · Shibuya et al. · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 20030072481A1 · Wooten et al. · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 20030121022A1 · Yoshitake et al. · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 20030149506A1 · Haanstra et al. · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 20030220706A1 · Abenes et al. · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 20040001619A1 · Tai et al. · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 20040046125A1 · Chen · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 20040141640A1 · Lee et al. · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 20040185583A1 · Tomoyasu et al. · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 20040223639A1 · Sato · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 20040262290A1 · Haanstra et al. · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 20040267399A1 · Funk · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 20050033528A1 · Toth et al. · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 20060015206A1 · Funk et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20060078189A1 · Hosoya et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20060195218A1 · Yamashita et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20060265145A1 · Huet et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20070019856A1 · Furman et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20070019858A1 · Shimura · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20070041631A1 · Fushida et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20070045536A1 · Nakasuji et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20070067134A1 · Borowicz et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20070156379A1 · Kulkarni et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20070255513A1 · Takahashi · 2007 [cited by examiner]
US 20070269101A1 · Hiroi et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20070274609A1 · Hirai et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20070288219A1 · Zafar et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20070293968A1 · Fu et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20080015802A1 · Urano et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20080058977A1 · Honda · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20080063255A1 · Usui et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20080163140A1 · Fouquet et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20080204739A1 · Huet et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20080240544A1 · Sato · 2008 [cited by examiner]
US 20080250384A1 · Duffy et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20080298670A1 · Nakagaki et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20090058444A1 · McIntyre · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20090070644A1 · Markle et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20090080759A1 · Bhaskar et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20090093904A1 · Baseman et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20090212213A1 · Nakasuji et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20090219520A1 · Ko et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20090290782A1 · Regensburger · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20090297019A1 · Zafar et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20090299681A1 · Chen et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20100119144A1 · Kulkarni et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20100150429A1 · Jau et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20100158345A1 · Kitamura et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20100158346A1 · Fang et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20100189339A1 · Amanullah et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20110013824A1 · Yamada · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110013825A1 · Shibuya et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110286656A1 · Kulkarni et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110320149A1 · Lee et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20120019279A1 · Huang et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20120245861A1 · Greene · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20120314054A1 · Chou et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20130202187A1 · Goren et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
TW 543081 · 2003 [cited by applicant]
TW 200416504 · 2004 [cited by applicant]
TW 200842341 · 2008 [cited by applicant]
Michael Baadke, These Stamps are the Legends of the Hobby, Linn's Stamp News (2000), https://www.linns.com/insights/stamp-collecting-basics/2000/september/these-stamps-are-the-legends-of-the-hobby.html. [cited by examiner]
Taiwan Intellectual Property Office, “Office Action” issued Dec. 10, 2015 (6 pages). [cited by applicant]
Cited By (1)
US 12,635,457