IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,669,327
Granted Patent B2
US 12,669,327 · App. 18/099,798 · Granted Jun 30, 2026

System and method for suppression of tool induced shift in scanning overlay metrology

Inventors: Itay Gdor (Tel-Aviv, IL); Yuval Lubashevsky (Haifa, IL); Vladimir Levinski (Nazareth Ilit, IL); Daria Negri (Nesher, IL); Alon Yagil (Milpitas, CA); Nickolai Isakovich (Milpitas, CA)
Assignee: KLA Corporation
G01B11/272G01N21/4788G01N21/956G01B2210/56
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,669,327
App. No.
18/099,798
Filed
Jan 20, 2023
Granted
Jun 30, 2026
Kind
B2
Art Unit
2877
USPC
356/401
Abstract

An overlay metrology system and method are disclosed for generating an overlay measurement of an overlay target including cells with structures in reversed orders. The overlay metrology system may include an illumination sub-system and a collection sub-system. The collection sub-system may include one or more detectors to collect measurement light from a sample. The sample, according to a metrology recipe, may include an overlay target having a first cell of a first cell type and a second cell of a second cell type, where the second cell type includes structures in a reverse order relative to the first cell type. The metrology recipe may include receiving detection signals, generating an overlay measurement of each cell based on the detection signals, and generating an overlay measurement associated with the overlay target based on a value indicative of an average of the overlay measurements of each cell.

Claims (78)

1 . An overlay metrology system comprising:

a controller comprising one or more processors configured to execute program instructions causing the one or more processors to execute a metrology recipe by:

receiving first detection signals from one or more detectors from a first cell of two or more cells of an overlay target;

receiving second detection signals from the one or more detectors from a second cell of the two or more cells;

generating an overlay measurement of the first cell based on the first detection signals;

generating an overlay measurement of the second cell based on the second detection signals;

generating an overlay measurement associated with the overlay target based on a value indicative of an average of the overlay measurement of the first cell and the overlay measurement of the second cell,

wherein the first cell is defined as a first cell type characterized by an order of structures in layers, the order characterized by pitches of the structures in the layers, wherein the second cell is defined as a second cell type characterized by a second order of second structures in the layers, the second order characterized by second pitches of the second structures in the layers,

wherein the first cell includes a first layer of structures having a first pitch and a second layer having a second pitch, wherein the second cell includes a first layer of structures having the second pitch and a second layer having the first pitch such that the pitches of structures within layers of the second cell are reversed relative to the first cell, wherein the order of structures in layers of the first cell type and second cell type are configured to suppress tool induced shift (TIS) error by averaging overlay measurements of cells with reversed pitch orders,

wherein the receiving the first detection signals and the receiving the second detection signals comprises receiving time-varying interference signals as the overlay target is scanned while the overlay target is in motion;

extracting at least one of intensity or phase information associated with the received time-varying interference signals using a phase locking technique; and

determining an overlay error between the first and second layers of the overlay target based on at least one of intensity or phase information.

2 . The overlay metrology system of claim 1 , wherein the controller is configured to execute the program instructions causing the one or more processors to execute the metrology recipe by: determining a tool induced shift (TIS) error of the overlay target based on a difference between the overlay measurement of the first cell and the overlay measurement of the second cell.

3 . The overlay metrology system of claim 1 , wherein the one or more detectors comprise at least one detector located in a pupil plane.

4 . The overlay metrology system of claim 1 , wherein the one or more detectors comprise at least one detector located in a field plane.

5 . The overlay metrology system of claim 1 , wherein the one or more detectors comprise at least one diode array sensor.

6 . The overlay metrology system of claim 1 , wherein the one or more detectors comprise at least one charge-coupled device (CCD) sensor.

7 . The overlay metrology system of claim 1 , wherein an illumination pupil plane distribution of an illumination beam is circular.

8 . The overlay metrology system of claim 1 , wherein an illumination pupil plane distribution of an illumination beam is annular.

9 . The overlay metrology system of claim 1 , wherein the structures of the two or more cells of the overlay target are at 45 degree angles relative to a scan direction.

10 . The overlay metrology system of claim 9 , wherein the two or more cells of the overlay target comprise waffle cells with periodic structures in a same layer at plus 45 degrees and minus 45 degrees from the scan direction such that a waffle pattern is formed.

11 . The overlay metrology system of claim 9 , wherein the two or more cells comprise four cells in a row, wherein the four cells in the row comprise two first cell types adjacent to each other with the structures at a positive diagonal angle relative to the scan direction and two second cell types adjacent to each other with the structures at a negative diagonal angle relative to the scan direction.

12 . The overlay metrology system of claim 9 , wherein the two or more cells comprise at least three cells in a row and a fourth cell adjacent to a third cell of the at least three cells, wherein a first and second cell of the at least three cells are configured to be used with the scan direction, while the fourth cell and the third cell are configured to be used with a different scan direction orthogonal to the scan direction.

13 . The overlay metrology system of claim 1 , wherein the two or more cells comprise three or more layers of varying pitches.

14 . The overlay metrology system of claim 1 , wherein a first location comprising a first detector comprises a location of +1 Moiré order diffraction, wherein a second location comprising a second detector comprises a location of −1 Moiré order diffraction.

15 . An overlay metrology system comprising:

an illumination sub-system comprising:

an illumination source configured to generate an illumination beam;

a collection sub-system comprising:

one or more detectors; and

an objective lens configured to collect measurement light emanating from a sample in response to the illumination beam as the sample is scanned along a scan direction, wherein the sample comprises an overlay target according to a metrology recipe, wherein the overlay target comprises two or more cells comprising structures with periodicity along the scan direction; and

a controller communicatively coupled to the collection sub-system, the controller comprising one or more processors configured to execute program instructions causing the one or more processors to execute the metrology recipe by:

receiving first detection signals from the one or more detectors from a first cell of the two or more cells;

receiving second detection signals from the one or more detectors from a second cell of the two or more cells;

generating an overlay measurement of the first cell based on the first detection signals;

generating an overlay measurement of the second cell based on the second detection signals;

generating an overlay measurement associated with the overlay target based on a value indicative of an average of the overlay measurement of the first cell and the overlay measurement of the second cell,

wherein the first cell is defined as a first cell type characterized by an order of the structures in layers, the order characterized by pitches of the structures in the layers, wherein the second cell is defined as a second cell type characterized by a second order of second structures in the layers, the second order characterized by second pitches of the second structures in the layers,

wherein the first cell includes a first layer of structures having a first pitch and a second layer having a second pitch, wherein the second cell includes a first layer of structures having the second pitch and a second layer having the first pitch such that the pitches of structures within layers of the second cell are reversed relative to the first cell, wherein the order of structures in layers of the first cell type and second cell type are configured to suppress tool induced shift (TIS) error by averaging overlay measurements of cells with reversed pitch orders,

wherein the receiving the first detection signals and the receiving the second detection signals comprises receiving time-varying interference signals as the overlay target is scanned while the overlay target is in motion;

extracting at least one of intensity or phase information associated with the received time-varying interference signals using a phase locking technique; and

determining an overlay error between the first and second layers of the overlay target based on at least one of intensity or phase information.

16 . The overlay metrology system of claim 15 , wherein the controller is configured to execute the program instructions causing the one or more processors to execute the metrology recipe by: determining a tool induced shift (TIS) error of the overlay target based on a difference between the overlay measurement of the first cell and the overlay measurement of the second cell.

17 . The overlay metrology system of claim 15 , wherein the one or more detectors comprise at least one detector located in a pupil plane.

18 . The overlay metrology system of claim 15 , wherein the one or more detectors comprise at least one detector located in a field plane.

19 . The overlay metrology system of claim 15 , wherein the one or more detectors comprise at least one diode array sensor.

20 . The overlay metrology system of claim 15 , wherein the one or more detectors comprise at least one charge-coupled device (CCD) sensor.

21 . The overlay metrology system of claim 15 , wherein an illumination pupil plane distribution of the illumination beam is circular.

22 . The overlay metrology system of claim 15 , wherein an illumination pupil plane distribution of the illumination beam is annular.

23 . The overlay metrology system of claim 15 , wherein the structures of the two or more cells of the overlay target are at 45 degree angles relative to the scan direction.

24 . The overlay metrology system of claim 23 , wherein the two or more cells of the overlay target comprise waffle cells with periodic structures in a same layer at plus 45 degrees and minus 45 degrees from the scan direction such that a waffle pattern is formed.

25 . The overlay metrology system of claim 23 , wherein the two or more cells comprise at least four cells in a row, wherein the at least four cells in the row comprise at least two first cell types adjacent to each other with the structures at a positive diagonal angle relative to the scan direction and at least two second cell types adjacent to each other with the structures at a negative diagonal angle relative to the scan direction.

26 . The overlay metrology system of claim 23 , wherein the two or more cells comprise at least three cells in a row and a fourth cell adjacent to a third cell of the at least three cells, wherein the first cell and the second cell of the at least three cells are configured to be used with the scan direction, while the fourth cell and the third cell are configured to be used with a different scan direction orthogonal to the scan direction.

27 . The overlay metrology system of claim 15 , wherein the two or more cells comprise three or more layers of varying pitches.

28 . The overlay metrology system of claim 15 , wherein a first location comprising a first detector comprises a location of +1 Moiré order diffraction, wherein a second location comprising a second detector comprises a location of −1 Moiré order diffraction.

29 . An overlay target comprising:

four cells aligned in a row comprising:

a first cell and a third cell comprising periodic structures at plus 45 degrees from a scan direction; and

a second cell and a fourth cell comprising periodic structures at minus 45 degrees from the scan direction,

wherein the first cell and the second cell are of a first cell type, and the third cell and the fourth cell are of a second cell type,

wherein the first cell type is characterized by an order of structures in layers, the order characterized by pitches of the structures in the layers, wherein the second cell type is characterized by a second order of second structures, the second order characterized by second pitches of the second structures in the layers,

wherein the first cell includes a first layer of structures having a first pitch and a second layer having a second pitch, wherein the second cell includes a first layer of structures having the second pitch and a second layer having the first pitch such that the pitches of structures within layers of the second cell are reversed relative to the first cell, wherein the first cell type and second cell type are configured to suppress tool induced shift (TIS) error by averaging overlay measurements of cells with reversed pitch orders,

wherein time-varying interference signals of the overlay target are obtained when the overlay target is in motion;

wherein at least one of intensity or phase information associated with the received time-varying interference signals is extracted from the overlay target using a phase locking technique; and

wherein overlay error between layers of the overlay target is determined based on at least one of intensity or phase information.

30 . A method comprising:

receiving first detection signals from one or more detectors from a first cell of two or more cells of an overlay target of a sample comprising structures with periodicity along a scan direction;

receiving second detection signals from the one or more detectors from a second cell of the two or more cells;

generating an overlay measurement of the first cell based on the first detection signals;

generating an overlay measurement of the second cell based on the second detection signals;

generating an overlay measurement associated with the overlay target based on a value indicative of an average of the overlay measurement of the first cell and the overlay measurement of the second cell,

wherein the first cell is defined as a first cell type characterized by an order of the structures in layers, the order characterized by pitches of the structures in the layers, wherein the second cell is defined as a second cell type characterized by a second order of second structures in the layers, the second order characterized by second pitches of the second structures in the layers,

wherein the first cell includes a first layer of structures having a first pitch and a second layer having a second pitch, wherein the second cell includes a first layer of structures having the second pitch and a second layer having the first pitch such that the pitches of structures within layers of the second cell are reversed relative to the first cell, wherein the order of structures in layers of the first cell type and second cell type are configured to suppress tool induced shift (TIS) error by averaging overlay measurements of cells with reversed pitch orders,

wherein the receiving the first detection signals and the receiving the second detection signals comprises receiving time-varying interference signals as the overlay target is scanned while the overlay target is in motion;

extracting at least one of intensity or phase information associated with the received time-varying interference signals using a phase locking technique; and

determining an overlay error between the first and second layers of the overlay target based on at least one of intensity or phase information.

31 . The method of claim 30 further comprising:

determining a tool induced shift (TIS) error of the overlay target based on a difference between the overlay measurement of the first cell and the overlay measurement of the second cell.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Mar 14, 2023
From: GDOR, ITAY; LUBASHEVSKY, YUVAL; LEVINSKI, VLADIMIR; NEGRI, DARIA; YAGIL, ALON; ISAKOVICH, NICKOLAI
To: KLA CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 062976/0136 →
Continuity (2)
Provisional Application 63427538 · Nov 23, 2022
Related Publication 20240167813A1 · May 23, 2024
References Cited (186)
US 4947413A · Jewell et al. · 1990 [cited by applicant]
US 5216257A · Brueck et al. · 1993 [cited by applicant]
US 5414514A · Smith et al. · 1995 [cited by applicant]
US 5563702A · Emery · 1996 [cited by examiner]
US 5808731A · Kirk · 1998 [cited by applicant]
US 5822055A · Tsai · 1998 [cited by examiner]
US 5895735A · Yoon · 1999 [cited by applicant]
US 5914204A · Lee · 1999 [cited by applicant]
US 6958819B1 · Heaton et al. · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 6982793B1 · Yang et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 7046361B1 · Yang · 2006 [cited by examiner]
US 7247843B1 · Moon · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 7254792B1 · Rekhi · 2007 [cited by examiner]
US 7440105B2 · Adel et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 7528941B2 · Kandel · 2009 [cited by examiner]
US 7602491B2 · Kandel et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 7671990B1 · Adel et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 8520212B2 · Coene · 2013 [cited by examiner]
US 8786825B2 · Kerkhof et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 9123649B1 · Manassen et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9739702B2 · Bringoltz · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 9864209B2 · Levinski · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 9885961B1 · Amir · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 9929104B2 · Park et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10197389B2 · Levinski et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10268125B2 · Peng et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10437163B2 · Schaar et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10488768B2 · Auer et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10527952B2 · Grunzweig et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10551749B2 · Levinski et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10571811B2 · Amit et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10585357B2 · Schaar et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10606178B2 · Zwier · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10691030B2 · Staals et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10802409B2 · Fan et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10824079B2 · Lubashevsky et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10983005B2 · Wu et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11073768B2 · Hill et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11085754B2 · Amit et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11112369B2 · Gready · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11119417B2 · Manassen et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11164307B1 · Feler et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11248905B2 · Amit et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 11300405B2 · Manassen et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 11300524B1 · Hill et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 11353799B1 · Volkovich et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 11355375B2 · Volkovich et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 11378394B1 · Paskover et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 11428642B2 · Hill et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 11526086B2 · Hill et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 11531275B1 · Hill et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 11604149B2 · Feler · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 11640116B2 · Den Boef et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 11796925B2 · Lubashevsky et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 12105433B2 · Feler et al. · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 12216412B2 · Hsieh et al. · 2025 [cited by applicant]
US 12235588B2 · Manassen et al. · 2025 [cited by applicant]
US 20010021477A1 · Dirksen et al. · 2001 [cited by applicant]
US 20020033952A1 · Hill · 2002 [cited by examiner]
US 20020080364A1 · Monshouwer et al. · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 20040101983A1 · Jones et al. · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 20040133369A1 · Pack · 2004 [cited by examiner]
US 20040169861A1 · Mieher et al. · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 20050012928A1 · Sezginer et al. · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 20050195398A1 · Adel et al. · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 20060117293A1 · Smith et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20070077503A1 · Yoo · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20070234786A1 · Moon · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20070242272A1 · Suehira et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20070279630A1 · Kandel et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20090042108A1 · Yasuzato · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20090195768A1 · Bijnen · 2009 [cited by examiner]
US 20100123886A1 · Bijnen · 2010 [cited by examiner]
US 20100267682A1 · Johri et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20100277706A1 · Schaar et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20110122496A1 · Schaar et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20120033193A1 · Schaar et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20120069337A1 · Ishigo · 2012 [cited by examiner]
US 20120253325A1 · Sniffin et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20130032712A1 · Shih et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130193602A1 · Suzuki et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130252429A1 · Okamoto et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20140065736A1 · Amir et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140240704A1 · Komine et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20150138523A1 · Jak et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150177135A1 · Amit et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150204664A1 · Bringoltz et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150235880A1 · Inada et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150292877A1 · Marciano et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150293458A1 · Vanoppen et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150308817A1 · Li et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20160047744A1 · Adel · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 20160061589A1 · Bhattacharyya et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160071260A1 · Azordegan · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 20160093574A1 · Cai et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160123894A1 · Fu · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 20160146740A1 · Lu et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160223920A1 · Tinnemans et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160300767A1 · Ko et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160334716A1 · Mieher · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 20170146338A1 · Allen · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170307367A1 · Yaegashi et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170351184A1 · Peng et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20180024054A1 · Moon et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180090296A1 · Neil · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20180094978A1 · Neil · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20180188663A1 · Levinski et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180246420A1 · Pandey et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180373167A1 · Grunzweig · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20190004439A1 · Lubashevsky et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190033726A1 · Adam · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20190049373A1 · Levinski · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190101835A1 · Chen · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190219931A1 · Zwier · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190279841A1 · Xiao · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20190285996A1 · Shibayama et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190310080A1 · Hill · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20190317413A1 · Cheng · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20190354024A1 · Tsiatmas et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190378012A1 · Tripodi · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20200050114A1 · Bozkurt et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200132446A1 · Shalibo et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200233317A1 · Ausschnitt et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200241429A1 · Yang et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200409271A1 · Hill · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20210072650A1 · Feler · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20210233821A1 · Feler et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210364279A1 · Manassen et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210364935A1 · Gdor et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20220034652A1 · Manassen et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220252990A1 · Javaheri et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220328365A1 · Manassen et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20230064193A1 · Tinnemans et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20230133640A1 · Hill et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20230213875A1 · Lubashevsky et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20230314319A1 · Manassen et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20230314344A1 · Paskover et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20240004310A1 · Blanton et al. · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 20240142883A1 · Reddy et al. · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 20240167813A1 · Gdor et al. · 2024 [cited by applicant]
CN 104346808A · 2015 [cited by applicant]
CN 111766764A · 2020 [cited by applicant]
EP 0532927A2 · 1993 [cited by examiner]
JP 214765Y1 · 1998 [cited by applicant]
JP 10214765A · 1998 [cited by applicant]
JP 2001093820A · 2001 [cited by applicant]
JP 2002134394A · 2002 [cited by applicant]
JP 2007140460 · 2009 [cited by applicant]
JP 2010267682A · 2010 [cited by applicant]
JP 2011243664A · 2011 [cited by applicant]
JP 2012253325A · 2012 [cited by applicant]
JP 2013074258A · 2013 [cited by applicant]
JP 2013254780 · 2015 [cited by applicant]
JP 2015154008A · 2015 [cited by applicant]
KR 101185992B1 · 2012 [cited by applicant]
KR 20150121275A · 2015 [cited by applicant]
KR 1020160121206A · 2016 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2017125352A1 · 2017 [cited by examiner]
WO WO2021012792A1 · 2021 [cited by examiner]
WO WO2021023792A1 · 2021 [cited by examiner]
WO 2023035658A1 · 2023 [cited by applicant]
WO 2025153300A1 · 2025 [cited by applicant]
Korean Intellectual Property Office, International Search Report and Written Opinion received in International Application No. PCT/US2023/036069, Feb. 20, 2024, 8 pages. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Appl. No. 18/110,746, filed Feb. 16, 2023, Amnon Manassen. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Appl. No. 18/230,542, filed Aug. 4, 2023, Jordan Pio. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Appl. No. 18/234,773, filed Aug. 16, 2023, Yuval Lubashevsky. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Appl. No. 18/372,444, filed Sep. 25, 2023, Itay Gdor. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Appl. No. 18/372,531, filed Sep. 25, 2023, Itay Gdor. [cited by applicant]
Buttgereit, et al., “Phame(R)—high resolution off-axis phase shift measurements on 45nm node features,” 24th European Mask and Lithography Conference, 2008, pp. 1-7, doi: 10.1117/12.798805. [cited by applicant]
Di, et al., “Moiré-Based Absolute Interferometry With Large Measurement Range in Wafer-Mask Alignment”, IEEE Photonics Technology Letters, vol. 27, No. 4, pp. 435-438, 2015. doi: 10.1109/LPT.2014.2377037. [cited by applicant]
Fesperman Jr., Ronnie Rex, (2006). Multiscale Alignment and Positioning System. (UMI 3264369) [Doctor of Philosophy, University of North Carolina] ProQuest Information and Learning Company. [cited by applicant]
International Search Report and Written Report in International Application No. PCT/US2021/061296 dated Mar. 24, 2022, 9 pages. [cited by applicant]
Kikuchi et al., “Principle and observation of fluorescence moire fringes for alignment in print and imprint methods” J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 35, 06G303 (2017); https://doi.org/10.1116/1.4990844, Submitted: Jun. 19, 2017… [cited by applicant]
Korean Intellectual Property Office, International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2022/052061, Apr. 24, 2023, 10 pages. [cited by applicant]
Korean Intellectual Property Office, International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2023/013654, Jun. 8, 2023, 12 pages. [cited by applicant]
Korean Intellectual Property Office, International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2023/014005, Jun. 16, 2023, 8 pages. [cited by applicant]
Moon, et al., “Immunity to Signal Degradation by Overlayers Using a Novel Spatial-Phase-Matching Alignment System”, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 13, 2648-2652 (1995). [cited by applicant]
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2021/044111 dated Nov. 22, 2022, 9 pages. [cited by applicant]
Servin, et al., “Mask contribution on CD & OVL errors budgets for Double Patterning Lithography,” 25th European Mask and Lithography Conference, 2009, pp. 1-13. [cited by applicant]
Wu, et al., (2012). Nanoimprint lithography with ≤60 nm overlay precision. Applied Physics A, 106, 767-772. [cited by applicant]
Zhou, et al., “Fourier-based analysis of moire fringe patterns of superposed gratings in alignment of nanolithography”, Optics Express, vol. 16, No. 11, p. 7869, 2008. doi: 10.1364/OE.16.007869. [cited by applicant]
Zhu et al. Four-quadrant gratings moire fringe alignment measurement in proximity lithography. Optics Express. Feb. 2013;21(3):3463-3473. DOI: 10.1364/OE.21.003463. PMID: 23481804. [cited by applicant]
Zhu, et al., (2015). Adjustment Strategy for Inclination Moire Fringes in Lithography by Spatial Frequency Decomposition. IEEE Photonics Technology Letters. 27. 395-398. 10.1109/LPT.2014.2370072. [cited by applicant]
Adel et al., “Diffraction order control in overlay metrology: a review of the roadmap options,” Proc. SPIE. 6922, Metrology, Inspection, and Process Control for Microlithography XXII, pp. 692202-1 to 692202-19, Apr. 200… [cited by applicant]
Zhou et al., “Moiré-Based Interferometry for Magnification Calibration of Bitelecentric Lens System,” IEEE Photonics Journal, vol. 7, No. 6, Dec. 2015, 12 pages. [cited by applicant]
Korean Intellectual Property Office, International Search Report andInternational Application No. PCT/US2024/018577, Jul. 2, 2024, 9 pages. [cited by applicant]