IP Library Granted Patent US 12,201,748
Granted Patent B2
US 12,201,748 · App. 17/552,880 · Granted Jan 21, 2025

Biopolymer scaffold implants and methods for their production

Inventors: Michael P. Francis (Norfolk, VA); Yas Maghdouri-White (Norfolk, VA); Hilary Wriggers (Norfolk, VA); Nardos Sori (Norfolk, VA); Stella Petrova (Norfolk, VA); Seth Polk (Norfolk, VA); Nicholas Thayer (Norfolk, VA)
Assignee: Embody, Inc.
A61L27/3662A61F2/08A61L27/24A61L27/26A61L27/3804A61L27/3834D01D5/003D01D5/0038D01D5/0076D06N3/0043A61L2430/10Y10T428/249921Y10T428/249978Y10T442/2484Y10T442/419
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,201,748
App. No.
17/552,880
Granted
Jan 21, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

Compositions and blends of biopolymers and bio-acceptable polymers are described, along with the use of benign solvent systems to prepare biocompatible scaffolds and surgically implantable devices for use in supporting and facilitating the repair of soft tissue injuries.

Claims (50)

1. A method for producing an implantable biopolymer scaffold comprising the steps of:

dissolving a biopolymer, and optionally a bio-acceptable polymer, in a DMSO solvent system comprising about 40 to 100% by volume of dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO) and about 0 to 60% by volume of a solvent selected from the group consisting of ethanol, tetrahydrofuran and acetic acid to form a biopolymer solution that is not chemically cross-linked;

generating biopolymer fibers from the biopolymer solution; and

collecting the biopolymer fibers to form a biopolymer scaffold,

wherein the biopolymer fibers comprise:

about 10 to 90% by weight of collagen,

about 10 to 90% by weight of a bio-acceptable polymer selected from the group consisting of PDLA, PDLLA, and mixtures thereof, and

a wt:wt ratio of the collagen to bio-acceptable polymer ranges from 10:90 to 50:50.

2. A method of claim 1 , wherein the collagen is selected from the group of type I collagens consisting of atelocollagen, telocollagen, recombinant human collagen and mixtures thereof.

3. A method of claim 1 , wherein the biopolymer fibers are generated by a technique selected from the group consisting of electrospinning and pneumatospinning.

4. An implantable biopolymer scaffold for supporting the repair of a soft tissue injury comprising at least one biopolymer sheet comprising biopolymer fibers,

wherein the biopolymer fibers comprise:

about 10 to 90% by weight of collagen, and

about 10 to 90% by weight of a bio-acceptable polymer selected from the group consisting of PDLA, PDLLA, and mixtures thereof;

a wt:wt ratio of the collagen to bio-acceptable polymer ranges from 10:90 to 50:50, and

wherein the biopolymer scaffold has one or more of the following characteristics:

(i) an average porosity of about 50 to 150 microns as determined by mercury porosimetry;

(ii) an absorbance of about its weight in blood in about 5 min and an absorbance of about twice its weight in blood in about 20 minutes when measured in vitro;

(iii) an average fiber diameter in the range of about 150-4,500 nm;

(iv) substantial in vivo cell infiltration into the scaffold within about two weeks following implantation, and

(v) average configuration of the pores is substantially in the shape of a slit relative to other configurations including elliptical or random pore configurations

wherein the biopolymer scaffold is produced from a DMSO solvent system comprising about 40 to 100% by volume of dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO) and about 0 to 60% by volume of a solvent selected from the group consisting of ethanol, tetrahydrofuran and acetic acid that is not chemically cross-linked.

5. An implantable biopolymer scaffold of claim 4 , wherein the collagen is selected from the group of type I collagens consisting of atelocollagen, telocollagen, recombinant human collagen and mixtures thereof.

6. An implantable biopolymer scaffold of claim 4 , wherein the biopolymer fibers consist essentially of about 20 to 35% by weight of collagen and about 65 to 80% by weight of bio-acceptable polymer or about 27.5 to 32.5% by weight of collagen and about 67.5 to 72.5% by weight of bio-acceptable polymer.

7. An implantable biopolymer scaffold of claim 6 , wherein the bio-acceptable polymer is selected from the group consisting of PDLA, PDLLA, and mixtures thereof.

8. An implantable biopolymer scaffold according to claim 7 , wherein the collagen is type I collagen and the bio-acceptable polymer is high molecular weight PDLLA.

9. An implantable biopolymer scaffold according to claim 8 , wherein the PDLLA has an inherent viscosity of about 1.6-2.4 dl/g.

10. An implantable biopolymer scaffold according claim 4 , wherein the scaffold has an inner surface having substantially aligned biopolymer fibers and an outer surface having fibers that are not substantially aligned.

11. An implantable biopolymer scaffold according to claim 4 , wherein the scaffold is vacuum dried to remove residual solvents.

12. An implantable biopolymer scaffold according to claim 4 , wherein the biopolymer fibers are annealed biopolymer fibers, where the biopolymer fibers are gripped on the edges perpendicular to the aligned fibers axis, as placed in a partially constrained annealing frame that allows the thermal annealing process to controllably mechanically draw and to shrink the scaffold by a set length.

13. An implantable biopolymer scaffold according to claim 4 , wherein the scaffold comprises a single biopolymer sheet.

14. An implantable biopolymer scaffold according to claim 4 , wherein the scaffold comprises a plurality of biopolymer sheets.

15. An implantable biopolymer scaffold according to claim 4 , wherein the scaffold is seeded with cells.

16. An implantable biopolymer scaffold of claim 15 , wherein the cells are selected from the group consisting of tenocytes, myoblasts, myocytes, satellite cells, fibroblasts, osteoblasts, chondrocytes, and vascular cells and stem cells.

17. An implantable biopolymer scaffold according to claim 4 , wherein the injured soft tissue is selected from the group of soft tissues types consisting of tendons and ligaments.

18. An implantable biopolymer scaffold of claim 17 wherein the injured soft tissue is a tendon selected from the group consisting of Achilles tendon, rotator cuff tendon, patellar tendon, biceps tendon, and quadriceps tendon.

19. An implantable biopolymer according to claim 17 , wherein the injured soft tissue is a ligament selected from the group consisting of anterior talofibular ligament, medial collateral ligament, posterior cruciate and the ligaments of the spine and temporomandibular joint.

20. An implantable biopolymer scaffold according to claim 4 , packaged in a sterile container.

21. A method for facilitating repair of a damaged tendon, comprising the step of fastening an implantable biopolymer scaffold according to claim 4 to the injured soft tissue such that the scaffold provides mechanical support to the area of repair.

22. An implantable biopolymer scaffold of claim 4 , wherein the biopolymer scaffold has one or more of the following characteristics:

(i) an average porosity of about 80 to 120 microns as determined by mercury porosimetry;

(ii) an absorbance of about its weight in blood in about 5 min and an absorbance of about twice its weight in blood in about 20 minutes when measured in vitro;

(iii) an average fiber diameter in the range of about 300-3,000 nm;

(iv) in vivo cell infiltration within about two weeks following implantation into about the full thickness of the implanted scaffold; and

(v) average configuration of the pores is substantially in the shape of a slit relative to other configurations including elliptical or random pore configurations.

23. An implantable biopolymer scaffold of claim 4 , wherein the biopolymer scaffold has one or more of the following characteristics:

(i) an average porosity of about 100 microns as determined by mercury porosimetry;

(ii) an absorbance of about its weight in blood in about 5 min and an absorbance of about twice its weight in blood in about 20 minutes when measured in vitro;

(iii) an average fiber diameter in the range of about 700-1,200 nm;

(iv) in vivo cell infiltration within about two weeks following implantation into about the full thickness of the implanted scaffold.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Dec 16, 2021
From: FRANCIS, MICHAEL P.; MAGHDOURI-WHITE, YAS; WRIGGERS, HILARY; SORI, NARDOS; PETROVA, STELLA; POLK, SETH; THAYER, NICHOLAS
To: EMBODY INC.
Reel/Frame 058408/0655 →
Continuity (7)
Continuation 16876744 · May 18, 2020
Division 16222350 · Dec 17, 2018
Continuation PCTUS2018057412 · Oct 24, 2018
Provisional Application 62718694 · Aug 14, 2018
Provisional Application 62714367 · Aug 3, 2018
Provisional Application 62707159 · Oct 24, 2017
Related Publication 20220176017A1 · Jun 9, 2022
References Cited (220)
US 5171273A · Silver et al. · 1992 [cited by applicant]
US 7241736B2 · Hunter et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 7862831B2 · Wang et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 7878786B2 · Yost et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 8048361B2 · Wang et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 8048446B2 · Lelkes et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 8318903B2 · Dong et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8491457B2 · Atala et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8585753B2 · Scanlon et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8586345B2 · Simpson · 2013 [cited by examiner]
US 8697044B2 · Schroeder et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 9034239B2 · Yun et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9198750B2 · Van Kampen et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9393104B2 · Kampen et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9421305B2 · Lee et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9597430B2 · Ratcliffe et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9683011B2 · Wnek et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9757132B2 · Laurencin et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 10617787B2 · Francis · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 10653817B2 · Francis · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 10835639B1 · Francis · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 11116870B2 · Francis · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 11213610B2 · Francis · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 11331410B2 · Francis · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20020090725A1 · Simpson et al. · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 20020100725A1 · Lee et al. · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 20030105528A1 · Shimp et al. · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 20030114937A1 · Leatherbury et al. · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 20050008675A1 · Bhatia et al. · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 20050113938A1 · Jamiolkowski et al. · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 20050277577A1 · Hunter et al. · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 20060154063A1 · Fujihara et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20060204539A1 · Atala et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20060263417A1 · Lelkes et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20070269481A1 · Li · 2007 [cited by examiner]
US 20080051888A1 · Ratcliffe et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20080188936A1 · Ball et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20090202430A1 · Hoemann et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20090240342A1 · Lindh, Sr. et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20100063599A1 · Brunelle et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20100145367A1 · Ratcliffe · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20100191332A1 · Euteneuer et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20100291058A1 · Bowlin et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20100292791A1 · Lu et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20100331980A1 · Lee et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20110238178A1 · Downes et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110293685A1 · Kuo et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20120273993A1 · Shoseyov · 2012 [cited by examiner]
US 20130095167A1 · Warnke · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130149532A1 · Yun et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20140011416A1 · Yang et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140017284A1 · Yang et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140039620A1 · Cantournet et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140051169A1 · Ganey et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140112973A1 · Steinberg et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140296996A1 · Shim et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20150045454A1 · Kong et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150086607A1 · Johnson et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150230918A1 · Detamore · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 20150367030A1 · Murray · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20160015852A1 · Liou et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160022865A1 · Francis · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 20160068654A1 · Huh et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160106548A1 · Li et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160130558A1 · Baer · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160136895A1 · Beyer et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160199179A1 · Atala et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160263280A1 · Harrell · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160279219A1 · Mooney et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160287374A1 · Soletti et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160296627A1 · Garcia et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160317281A1 · Van Kampen et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160325013A1 · Li et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160325022A1 · Liu et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20170233834A1 · Purcell et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170273775A1 · Rocco et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20180193524A1 · Shoseyov et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180368982A1 · Ball · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20190134267A1 · Francis et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20200338232A1 · Francis et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200376162A1 · Francis et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20210308335A1 · Lee · 2021 [cited by examiner]
AU 2018354277A1 · 2020 [cited by applicant]
CA 3079958 · 2019 [cited by applicant]
CN 1596996A · 2005 [cited by applicant]
CN 107261210A · 2017 [cited by applicant]
EP 2322234B1 · 2005 [cited by applicant]
EP 1216296B1 · 2009 [cited by applicant]
EP 1863547B1 · 2016 [cited by applicant]
EP 3700462A1 · 2020 [cited by applicant]
IN 640CHE2013A · 2013 [cited by applicant]
JP 2005120527A · 2005 [cited by applicant]
JP 2008532653A · 2008 [cited by applicant]
JP 2008532654A · 2008 [cited by applicant]
JP 2009524507A · 2009 [cited by applicant]
JP 2014510550A · 2014 [cited by applicant]
JP 2021500160 · 2021 [cited by applicant]
JP 7529567 · 2024 [cited by applicant]
WO 9830252A1 · 1998 [cited by applicant]
WO 9939724A1 · 1999 [cited by applicant]
WO WO03086290A2 · 2003 [cited by examiner]
WO 2007109304A2 · 2007 [cited by applicant]
WO 2008131293A2 · 2008 [cited by applicant]
WO 2009051701A2 · 2009 [cited by applicant]
WO 2009079211A1 · 2009 [cited by applicant]
WO 2009149181A2 · 2009 [cited by applicant]
WO 2010040129A2 · 2010 [cited by applicant]
WO 2013093921A1 · 2013 [cited by applicant]
WO 2013123147A1 · 2013 [cited by applicant]
WO 2013172788A1 · 2013 [cited by applicant]
WO 2014160019A1 · 2014 [cited by applicant]
WO 2015138970A1 · 2015 [cited by applicant]
WO 2016042211A1 · 2016 [cited by applicant]
WO 2016156992A2 · 2016 [cited by applicant]
WO 2017053757A1 · 2017 [cited by applicant]
WO 2018092098A1 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
WO 2018212792A2 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
WO 2019084209A1 · 2019 [cited by applicant]
Qiao, Xiangchen; “Compositional and in Vivo Evaluation of Nonwoven Type | Collagen/Poly-dl-lactic Acid Scaffolds for Bone Regeneration”; Journal of Functional Biomaterials, ISSN 2079-4983 (Year: 2015). [cited by examiner]
Lopez-Calzada et al., “Development of meniscus substitutes suing a mixture of biocompatible polymers and extra cellular matrix components by electrospinning” Apr. 1, 2016. [cited by applicant]
Nam et al., “Materials Selection and Residual Solvent Retention in Biodegradable Electrospun Fibers”, Journal of Applied Polymer Science, Wiley Interscience, 2007. [cited by applicant]
Sean Michael Full et al., “Effect of fiber orientation of collagen-based electrospun meshes on human fibroblasts for ligament tissue engineering applications : Effect of Fiber Orientation of Collagen-Based Electrospun M… [cited by applicant]
Xu et al., “Fabrication of Electrospun Poly(L-Lactide-co-ε-Caprolactone)/Collagen Nanoyarn Network as a Novel, Three-Dimensional, Macroporous, Aligned Scaffold for Tendon Tissue Engineering”, Tissue Engineering Part C, … [cited by applicant]
Eslah et al., “Electrospinning and characterization of poly (vinyl alcohol)-sericin nanofibers as a potential for tissue engineering applications”, The Journal of the Textile Institute, 2016, vol. 107, No. 8, 949-957. [cited by applicant]
Law et al., “Electrospun Collagen Nanofibers and their Applications in Skin Tissue Engineering”, Tissue Eng. Regen. Med. 2017, 14(6): 699-718. [cited by applicant]
Tronci et al., “Wet-spinability and crosslinked fibre properties of two collagen polypeptides with varied molecular weight”, International Journal of Biological Macromolecules 81, 2015, 112-120. [cited by applicant]
Phipps et al., “Increasing the pore sizes of bone-mimetic electrospun scaffolds comprised of polycaprolactone, collagen and hydroxyapatite to enhance cell infiltration”, Biomaterials, 2012, vol. 33, No. 2, 524-534. [cited by applicant]
Cheng et al., “Isolation, Characterization and Evaluation of Collagen from Jellyfish Rhopilema esculentum Kishinouye for Use in Hemostatic Applications”, PLoS One 12(1), Jan. 19, 2017, pp. 1-21. [cited by applicant]
Hochleitner et al., “Melt electrowriting below the critical translation speed to fabricate crimped elastomer scaffolds with non-linear extension behaviour mimicking that of ligaments and tendons”, Acta Biomaterialia 72 … [cited by applicant]
Hochleitner et al., “Melt Electrowriting of Thermoplastic Elastomers”, Macromolecular Rapid Communications, 2018, 39, 1800055, pp. 1-7. [cited by applicant]
Hoque et al., “Extrusion Based Rapid Prototyping Technique: An Advanced Platform for Tissue Engineering Scaffold Fabrication”, Aug. 9, 2011, Biopolymers vol. 97, No. 2, pp. 83-93. [cited by applicant]
Hrynevich et al., “Dimension-Based Design of Melt Electrowritten Scaffolds”, Nano-Micro Small, 2018, 14, 1800232, pp. 1-6. [cited by applicant]
Huang et al., “A review on polymer nanofibers by electrospinning and their applications in nanocomposites”, Composites Science and Technology 63 (2003), pp. 2223-2253. [cited by applicant]
Jha et al., “Electrospun Collagen: A Tissue Engineering Scaffold with Unique Functional Properties in aWide Variety of Applications”, Journal of Nanomaterials, vol. 2011, Article ID 348268, pp. 1-15. [cited by applicant]
Krishnamoorthi et al., “Isolation and partial characterization of collagen from outer skin of Sepia pharaonis (Ehrenberg, 1831) from Puducherry coast”, Biochemistry and Biophysics Reports 10 (2017) pp. 39-45. [cited by applicant]
Li et al., “3D-Printed Biopolymers for Tissue Engineering Application”, International Journal of Polymer Science vol. 2014, Article ID 829145, pp. 1-13. [cited by applicant]
Lin et al., “Functionalized Poly(D,L-lactide) for Pulmonary Epithelial Cell Culture”, Advanced Engineering Materials, Mar. 8, 2010 (Abstract). [cited by applicant]
Lu et al., “Techniques for fabrication and construction of three-dimensional scaffolds for tissue engineering”, International Journal of Nanomedicine, Jan. 17, 2013, vol. 8, pp. 337-350. [cited by applicant]
Ma, “Scaffolds for tissue fabrication”, Materialstoday, May 2004, pp. 30-40. [cited by applicant]
Addad et al., “Isolation, Characterization and Biological Evaluation of Jellyfish Collagen for Use in Biomedical Applications”, Marine Drugs, Jun. 7, 2011, vol. 9, pp. 967-983. [cited by applicant]
Middleton et al., “Synthetic biodegradable polymers as orthopedic devices”, Biomaterials 21 (2000) pp. 2335-2346. [cited by applicant]
Qiao e tal., “Compositional and in Vitro Evaluation of Nonwoven Type I Collagen/Poly-dl-lactic Acid Scaffolds for Bone Regeneration”, Journal of Functional Biomaterials, 2015, vol. 6, pp. 667-686. [cited by applicant]
Rudolph et al., “Surface Modification of Biodegradable Polymers towards Better Biocompatibility and Lower Thrombogenicity”, Plos One, Dec. 7, 2015, pp. 1-17. [cited by applicant]
Sensini et al., “Biofabrication of bundles of poly(lactic acid)-collagen blends mimicking the fascicles of the human Achille tendon”, IOP Publishing, Biofabrication, vol. 9 (2017) 015025. [cited by applicant]
Siow et al., “Plasma Methods for the Generation of Chemically Reactive Surfaces for Biomolecule Immobilization and Cell Colonization—A Review”, Plasma Processes and Polymers, Jun. 2006, vol. 3, pp. 392-418. [cited by applicant]
Yang et al., “Tendon and Ligament Regeneration and Repair: Clinical Relevance and Developmental Paradigm”, Birth Defects Res C Embryo Today, Sep. 2013, vol. 99(3). pp. 203-222. [cited by applicant]
Tham et al., “Surface Modification of Poly (lactic acid) (PLA) via Alkaline Hydrolysis Degradation”, Advanced Materials Research, 2014, vol. 970, pp. 324-327. 4p. (Abstract). [cited by applicant]
Zagho et al., “Recent Trends in Electrospinning of Polymer Nanofibers and their Applications as Templates for Metal Oxide Nanofibers Preparation”, Intech open science, open minds, 2016, pp. 4-24. [cited by applicant]
Zhang et al., “Electrospun scaffolds from silk fibroin and their cellular compatibility”, Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A, 2009, pp. 997-983. [cited by applicant]
Zhong et al., “Isolation and Characterization of Collagen from the Body Wall of Sea Cucumber Stichopus monotuberculatus”, Journal of Food Science, vol. 80, No. 4, 2015, pp. 671-679. [cited by applicant]
Liao et al., “In Vitro and in Vivo Degradation of Mineralized Collagen-Based Composite Scaffold: Nanohydroxyapatite/Collagen/Poly(L-lactide)”, Tissue Engineering Part A, vol. 10, Issue 1-2, 2004, pp. 73-80. [cited by applicant]
Cui et al., “Investigation of Drug Release and Matrix Degradation of Electrospun Poly(DL-lactide) Fibers with Paracetanol Inoculation”, Biomacromolecules, 2006, 7, pp. 1623-1629. [cited by applicant]
D. Garlotta “A Literature Review of Poly(Lactic Acid)”, Journal of Polymers and the Environment, vol. 9, No. 2, 2001, pp. 63-84. [cited by applicant]
Haider et al., “A comprehensive review summarizing the effect of electrospinning parameters and potential applications of nanofibers in biomedical and biotechnology”, Arabian Journal of Chemistry, 2015, pp. 1-24. [cited by applicant]
Jamshidi et al., “Thermal characterization of polylactides”, Polymer, 1988, vol. 29, pp. 2229-2234. [cited by applicant]
Katsogiannis et al., “Porous electrospun polycarprolactone (PCL) fibres by phase separation”, European Polymer Journal, 2015, 69, pp. 284-295. [cited by applicant]
Li et al., “Recent advances in stereocomplexation of enantiomeric PLA-based copolymers and applications”, Progress in Polymer Science, 2016, 62, pp. 22-72. [cited by applicant]
D. Lubasova and L. Martinova “Controlled Morphology of Porous Polyvinyl Butyral Nanofibers”, Hindawi Publishing Corporation Journal of Nanomaterials, vol. 2011, Article ID 292516, 6 pages. [cited by applicant]
H. Tsuji “Poly(lactide) Stereocomplexes: Formation, Structure, Properties, Degradation, and Applications”, Macroomol. Biosci., 2005, 5, pp. 569-597. [cited by applicant]
“U.S. Appl. No. 16/222,350, 312 Amendment filed Nov. 6, 2019”, 7 pgs. [cited by applicant]
“U.S. Appl. No. 16/222,350, 312 Amendment filed Nov. 26, 2019”, 4 pgs. [cited by applicant]
“U.S. Appl. No. 16/222,350, Examiner Interview Summary mailed Jun. 19, 2019”, 3 pgs. [cited by applicant]
“U.S. Appl. No. 16/222,350, Non Final Office Action mailed May 3, 2019”, 10 pgs. [cited by applicant]
“U.S. Appl. No. 16/222,350, Notice of Allowance mailed Mar. 13, 2020”, 2 pgs. [cited by applicant]
“U.S. Appl. No. 16/222,350, Notice of Allowance mailed Oct. 3, 2019”, 7 pgs. [cited by applicant]
“U.S. Appl. No. 16/222,350, PTO Response to Rule 312 Communication mailed Mar. 17, 2020”, 2 pgs. [cited by applicant]
“U.S. Appl. No. 16/222,350, PTO Response to Rule 312 Communication mailed Dec. 4, 2019”, 2 pgs. [cited by applicant]
“U.S. Appl. No. 16/222,350, Response filed Sep. 6, 2019 to Non Final Office Action mailed May 3, 2019”, 13 pgs. [cited by applicant]
“U.S. Appl. No. 16/876,744, Final Office Action mailed Jun. 15, 2021”, 23 pgs. [cited by applicant]
“U.S. Appl. No. 16/876,744, Non Final Office Action mailed Mar. 4, 2021”, 22 pgs. [cited by applicant]
“U.S. Appl. No. 16/876,744, Notice of Allowance mailed Oct. 4, 2021”, 10 pgs. [cited by applicant]
“U.S. Appl. No. 16/876,744, Notice of Non-Compliant Amendment mailed May 11, 2021”, 2 pgs. [cited by applicant]
“U.S. Appl. No. 16/876,744, Response filed May 4, 2021 to Non Final Office Action mailed Mar. 4, 2021”, 14 pgs. [cited by applicant]
“U.S. Appl. No. 16/876,744, Response filed May 11, 2021 to Notice of Non-Compliant Amendment mailed May 11, 2021”, 14 pgs. [cited by applicant]
“U.S. Appl. No. 16/876,744, Response filed Aug. 16, 2021 to Final Office Action mailed Jun. 15, 2021”, 13 pgs. [cited by applicant]
“European Application Serial No. 18870700.4, Communication Pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC mailed Jul. 12, 2023”, 9 pgs. [cited by applicant]
“European Application Serial No. 18870700.4, Extended European Search Report mailed Oct. 15, 2021”, 17 pgs. [cited by applicant]
“European Application Serial No. 18870700.4, Noting of loss of rights mailed Jun. 9, 2022”, 2 pgs. [cited by applicant]
“European Application Serial No. 18870700.4, Partial Supplementary European Search Report mailed Jul. 19, 2021”, 13 pgs. [cited by applicant]
“European Application Serial No. 18870700.4, Response filed Aug. 18, 2022 to Noting of loss of rights mailed Jun. 9, 2022”, 21 pgs. [cited by applicant]
“European Application Serial No. 18870700.4, Response to Communication pursuant to Rules 161(2) and 162 EPC filed Dec. 11, 2020”, 10 pgs. [cited by applicant]
“European Application Serial No. 18870700.4, Voluntary Amendment mailed Feb. 10, 2023”, 7 pgs. [cited by applicant]
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2018/057412, International Preliminary Report on Patentability mailed May 7, 2020”, 15 pgs. [cited by applicant]
“Japanese Application Serial No. 2020-522936, Notification of Reasons for Refusal mailed Jun. 29, 2023”, w/ English Translation, 5 pgs. [cited by applicant]
“Japanese Application Serial No. 2020-522936, Notification of Reasons for Refusal mailed Sep. 30, 2022”, w/ English Translation, 15 pgs. [cited by applicant]
“Japanese Application Serial No. 2020-522936, Response filed Mar. 30, 2023 to Notification of Reasons for Refusal mailed Sep. 30, 2022”, w/ English claims, 17 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Tronci, Giuseppe, et al., “Wet-spinnability and crosslinked fibre properties of two collagen polypeptides with varied molecular weight”, International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, (Jan. 1, 2015), 112-120. [cited by applicant]
Yang, G, et al., “Tendon and ligament regeneration and repair: Clinical relevance and developmental paradigm”, Birth Defects Research Part C—Embryo Today: Reviews, vol. 99(3), (2013), 35 pgs. [cited by applicant]
“European Application Serial No. 18870700.4, Response Filed Nov. 9, 2023 to Communication Pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC mailed Jul. 12, 2023”, 14 pgs. [cited by applicant]
“Japanese Application Serial No. 2020-522936, Decision of Rejection mailed Dec. 26, 2023”, w English Translation, 4 pgs. [cited by applicant]
“Japanese Application Serial No. 2020-522936, Written Amendment filed Oct. 21, 2021”, w English Translation, 9 pgs. [cited by applicant]
“Japanese Application Serial No. 2020-522936, Response filed Sep. 26, 2023 to Notification of Reasons for Refusal mailed Jun. 29, 2023”, w English claims, 11 pgs. [cited by applicant]
“Australian Application Serial No. 2018354277, First Examination Report mailed Sep. 13, 2023”, 4 pgs. [cited by applicant]
“Australian Application Serial No. 2018354277, Response filed Aug. 15, 2024 to First Examination Report mailed Sep. 13, 2023”, 13 pgs. [cited by applicant]
“Australian Application Serial No. 2018354277, Subsequent Examiners Report mailed Aug. 22, 2024”, 4 pgs. [cited by applicant]
International Search Report and Written Opinion in International Application No. PCT/US2018/057412, dated Feb. 27, 2019. [cited by applicant]
“4 Figures: Liquid Crystalline Ordered Collagen Substrates for Applications in Tissue Engineering”, ACS Biomaterials Science and Engineering, Mar. 2016, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/297595398. [cited by applicant]
Bishop et al., “Design of an Extrusion System to Optimize the Production of Self-Assembled Collagen Microthreads”, Degree of Bachelor of Science Paper, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Project No. GXP-0508. [cited by applicant]
Dong et al., “Electrospinning of Collagen Nanofiber Scaffolds from Benign Solvents”, Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2009, 30 pp. 539-542. [cited by applicant]
Gentleman et al., “Mechanical characterization of collagen fibers and scaffolds for tissue engineering”, Biomaterials 2003, 24, pp. 3805-3813. [cited by applicant]
Hwang et al., “Effects of Zero-Length and Non-Zero-Length Cross-Linking Reagents on the Optical Spectral Properties and Structures of Collagen Hydrogels”, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces., 2012, 4, pp. 261-267. [cited by applicant]
Liu et al., “Novel 3D collagen scaffolds fabricated by indirect printing technique for tissue engineering”, Abstract, J. Biomedical Materials Research Part B: Applied Biomaterials, 2008, Issue 2; pp. 519-528. [cited by applicant]
Oryan et al., “Chemical crosslinking of biopolymeric scaffolds: Current knowledge and future directions of crosslinked engineered bone scaffolds”, International Journal of Biological Macromolecules 2018, 107, pp. 678-68… [cited by applicant]
Punnoose et al., “Electrospun Type 1 Collagen matrices using a novel benign solvent for Cardiac tissue engineering”, Journal of Cellular Physiology, 2015. [cited by applicant]
Salgado et al., “Bone Tissue Engineering: State of the Art and Future Trends”, Abstract, Macromolecular Bioscience, 2004, vol. 4, Issue 8, pp. 743-765. [cited by applicant]
Synthasome X-Repair Technology, FAQS, http://www.synthasome.com/xRepair-technology.php; accessed Mar. 22, 2017. [cited by applicant]
Tutak et al., “The support of bone marrow stromal cell differentiation by airbrushed nanofibers scaffolds”, Abstract, Biomaterials, 2013, vol. 34, Issue 10, pp. 2389-2398. [cited by applicant]
Wortmann et al., “New Polymers for Needlesless Electrospinning from Low-Toxic Solvents”, Nanomaterials, 2019, 9, 52, pp. 1-11. [cited by applicant]
Wright Achilles Tendon Information, http://www.wright.com/healthcare-professionals/graftjacket/applications/achilles-tendon; accessed Nov. 12, 2017. [cited by applicant]
Zobitz et al., “Determination of the Compressive Material Properties of the Supraspinatus Tendon”, Journal of Biomechanical Engineering, 2001, vol. 123, pp. 47-51. [cited by applicant]
Delguerra et al., “Optimization if the interaction between ethylene-vinyl alcohol copolymers and human endothelial cells”, Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine 7, 1996, 8-12. [cited by applicant]
Gabler et al., “In Vivo Evaluation of Different Collagen Scaffolds in an Achilles Tendon Defect Model”, BioMed Research International, vol. 2018, Article ID 6432742, pp. 1-11. [cited by applicant]
Van Kampen et al., “Tissue-engineered augmentation of a rotator cuff tendon using a reconstituted collagen scaffold: a histological evaluation in sheep”, Muscles, Ligaments and Tendons Journal, 2013, 3(3): pp. 229-235. [cited by applicant]
Elamparithi et al., “Electrospun type 1 collagen matrices preserving native ultrastructure using benign binary solvent for cardiac tissue engineering”, Artificial Cells, Nanomedicine, and Biotechnology 2016, 44: 1318-13… [cited by applicant]
Elamparithi et al., “Gelatin electrospun nanofibrous matrices for cardiac tissue engineering applications”, International Journal of Polymeric Materials and Polymeric Biomaterials, 2017, vol. 66, No. 1, pp. 20-27. [cited by applicant]
“European Application Serial No. 18870700.4, Communication Pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC mailed Jul. 10, 2024”, 9 pgs. [cited by applicant]
“Japanese Application Serial No. 2020-522936, Response Filed Apr. 26, 2024 to Decision of Rejection mailed Dec. 26, 2023”, W/ English Claims, 12 pgs. [cited by applicant]
“Australian Application Serial No. 2018354277, Response Filed Sep. 10, 2024 to Subsequent Examiners Report mailed Aug. 22, 2024”, 18 pgs. [cited by applicant]
“Canadian Application Serial No. 3,079,958, Examiners Rule 86(2) Report mailed Nov. 6, 2024”, 7 pgs. [cited by applicant]
“European Application Serial No. 18870700.4, Response filed Nov. 11, 24 to Communication Pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC mailed Jul. 10, 2024”, 13 pgs. [cited by applicant]