IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,674,662
Granted Patent B2
US 12,674,662 · App. 17/946,935 · Granted Jul 7, 2026

System and method for acquiring alignment measurements of structures of a bonded sample

Inventors: Nimrod Shuall (Beaverton, OR); Jordan Pio (Milpitas, CA); Frank Laske (Weilburg, DE); Stefan Eyring (Weilburg, DE); Ohad Bachar (Timrat, IL)
Assignee: KLA Coporation
G01B11/27G01B15/00
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,674,662
App. No.
17/946,935
Filed
Sep 16, 2022
Granted
Jul 7, 2026
Kind
B2
Art Unit
2878
USPC
250/306
Abstract

Systems and methods for acquiring measurements of structures of a bonded sample are disclosed. Such systems and methods may include determining a first registration measurement of a first registration structure and a first interface target structure of a first sample, and a second registration measurement of a second sample prior to coupling the samples together. Such systems and methods may include, after such a coupling of the samples, determining a third registration measurement of the coupled sample at least partially by measuring the first registration structure through the top face of the first sample. Such systems and methods may include acquiring an overlay measurement based on the first registration measurement, the second registration measurement, and the third registration measurement. Such systems and methods may include adjusting an inter-sample coupling recipe based on the overlay measurement, where the inter-sample coupling recipe may include a final bonding recipe.

Claims (63)

1 . A metrology system comprising:

a metrology sub-system configured to acquire an overlay measurement for an interface target on a coupled sample, wherein the coupled sample, according to a metrology recipe, includes a first sample coupled to a second sample at an interface between couplable faces of the first sample and the second sample, wherein the interface target includes a first interface target structure associated with a couplable face of the first sample and a second interface target structure associated with a couplable face of the second sample; and

a controller communicatively coupled to the metrology sub-system, the controller including one or more processors configured to execute program instructions causing the one or more processors to:

determine, on the first sample prior to coupling with the second sample to form the coupled sample, a first registration measurement between the first interface target structure and a first registration structure located on a different layer than the first interface target structure, wherein the first registration structure is configured to be measured by the metrology sub-system through a top face of the first sample opposite the couplable face of the first sample;

determine, on the second sample prior to the coupling with the first sample to form the coupled sample, a second registration measurement between the second interface target structure and a second registration structure, wherein the second registration structure is configured to be unobstructed by the first sample when the first sample is coupled to the second sample to form the coupled sample;

determine, on the coupled sample after the first sample is coupled to the second sample, a third registration measurement between the second registration structure on the second sample and the first registration structure on the first sample at least in part by measuring the first registration structure through the top face of the first sample; and

acquire the overlay measurement for the interface target based on the first registration measurement, the second registration measurement, and the third registration measurement.

2 . The metrology system of claim 1 , wherein the first registration structure is located closer to the top face of the first sample than the first interface target structure according to the metrology recipe.

3 . The metrology system of claim 1 , wherein the second registration structure comprises an overlay target in a scribe line area of the second sample.

4 . The metrology system of claim 1 , wherein the program instructions are further configured to:

adjust an inter-sample coupling recipe based on the overlay measurement.

5 . The metrology system of claim 4 , wherein the inter-sample coupling recipe includes a final bonding recipe.

6 . The metrology system of claim 1 , wherein the program instructions are further configured to:

adjust a sample manufacturing recipe based on the overlay measurement.

7 . The metrology system of claim 1 , wherein the metrology sub-system is configured to operate in a visible spectral range of light and an infrared spectral range of light.

8 . The metrology system of claim 1 , wherein the determining the second registration measurement comprises measuring both the second interface target structure and the second registration structure via an optical metrology sub-system of the metrology sub-system in a visible spectral range of light.

9 . The metrology system of claim 1 , wherein the metrology sub-system is configured to operate in an infrared spectral range of light.

10 . The metrology system of claim 1 , wherein the measuring the first registration structure through the top face of the first sample is performed via an infrared-capable metrology sub-system of the metrology sub-system in an infrared spectral range of light.

11 . The metrology system of claim 1 , wherein a field of view of the metrology sub-system is sufficiently large to simultaneously measure the second registration structure and the first registration structure.

12 . The metrology system of claim 1 , wherein the determining the second registration measurement comprises a movement of one or more optical elements of the metrology sub-system to deflect illumination from a first field of view (FOV) to a second FOV, wherein the second registration measurement is based on the movement, wherein the second interface target structure is in the first FOV and the second registration structure is in the second FOV.

13 . The metrology system of claim 1 , wherein the determining the second registration measurement comprises: measuring a position of a first structure; moving the second sample relative to the metrology sub-system by a known distance using a sample translation stage; and imaging a second structure, wherein the first structure and the second structure are one of the second interface target structure or the second registration structure.

14 . The metrology system of claim 1 , wherein the determining the first registration measurement comprises measuring performed at one or more after-develop inspection (ADI) steps of one or more layers of the first sample via a scanning electron beam (SEM) metrology sub-system of the metrology sub-system.

15 . The metrology system of claim 1 , wherein the first registration measurement is based on at least one of:

one or more intermediary overlay registration measurements acquired at intermediary manufacturing steps of layers of the first sample; or

one or more intermediary direct overlay measurements acquired at the intermediary manufacturing steps.

16 . The metrology system of claim 15 , wherein the one or more intermediary overlay registration measurements are based on a first scribe line structure.

17 . The metrology system of claim 15 , wherein the one or more intermediary overlay registration measurements are based on a first sample edge of the first sample.

18 . The metrology system of claim 1 , wherein the first sample comprises one or more intermediary structures buried within the first sample at one or more intermediary layers.

19 . The metrology system of claim 18 , wherein the one or more intermediary structures is at least one of an overlay target or a functional device feature.

20 . The metrology system of claim 1 , wherein the first registration structure is smaller than 3 micrometers in width and length as measured within a plane normal to a depth direction of the first sample.

21 . The metrology system of claim 1 , wherein the coupled sample includes a bonded sample such that the first sample is fused to the second sample.

22 . The metrology system of claim 1 , wherein at least one of the first registration measurement, the second registration measurement, or the third registration measurement is based on die-to-database measurements.

23 . A metrology method for acquiring overlay measurements of coupled samples comprising:

determining, via a metrology sub-system, a first registration measurement between a first interface target structure and a first registration structure of a first sample prior to a coupling of the first sample to a second sample to form a coupled sample, wherein the first registration structure is located on a different layer than the first interface target structure, wherein the first registration structure is configured to be measured by the metrology sub-system through a top face of the first sample opposite a couplable face of the first sample, wherein an interface target includes the first interface target structure associated with a couplable face of the first sample and a second interface target structure associated with a couplable face of the second sample;

determining, via the metrology sub-system, a second registration measurement between the second interface target structure and a second registration structure of the second sample prior to the coupling of the first sample to the second sample to form the coupled sample, wherein the second registration structure is configured to be unobstructed by the first sample when the first sample is coupled to the second sample to form the coupled sample;

the coupling the first sample to the second sample to form the coupled sample;

determining, via the metrology sub-system on the coupled sample after the first sample is coupled to the second sample, a third registration measurement between the second registration structure on the second sample and the first registration structure on the first sample at least in part by measuring the first registration structure through the top face of the first sample; and

acquiring the overlay measurement for the interface target based on the first registration measurement, the second registration measurement, and the third registration measurement.

24 . The metrology method of claim 23 , further comprising, before the coupling, flipping the first sample over.

25 . The metrology method of claim 23 , wherein the first registration structure is located closer to the top face of the first sample than the first interface target structure.

26 . The metrology method of claim 23 , wherein the second registration structure comprises an overlay target in a scribe line area of the second sample.

27 . The metrology method of claim 23 , further comprising adjusting an inter-sample coupling recipe based on the overlay measurement.

28 . The metrology method of claim 27 , wherein the inter-sample coupling recipe includes a final bonding recipe.

29 . The metrology method of claim 23 , further comprising adjusting a sample manufacturing recipe based on the overlay measurement.

30 . The metrology method of claim 23 , wherein the metrology sub-system is configured to operate in a visible spectral range of light and an infrared spectral range of light.

31 . The metrology method of claim 23 , wherein the determining the second registration measurement comprises measuring both the second interface target structure and the second registration structure via an optical metrology sub-system of the metrology sub-system in a visible spectral range of light.

32 . The metrology method of claim 23 , wherein the metrology sub-system is configured to operate in an infrared spectral range of light.

33 . The metrology method of claim 23 , wherein the measuring the first registration structure through the top face of the first sample is performed via an infrared-capable metrology sub-system of the metrology sub-system in an infrared spectral range of light.

34 . The metrology method of claim 23 , wherein a field of view of the metrology sub-system is sufficiently large to simultaneously measure the second registration structure and the first registration structure.

35 . The metrology method of claim 23 , wherein the determining the second registration measurement comprises a movement of one or more optical elements of the metrology sub-system to deflect illumination from a first field of view (FOV) to a second FOV, wherein the second registration measurement is based on the movement, wherein the second interface target structure is in the first FOV and the second registration structure is in the second FOV.

36 . The metrology method of claim 23 , wherein the determining the second registration measurement comprises: measuring a position of a first structure; moving the second sample relative to the metrology sub-system by a known distance using a sample translation stage; and imaging a second structure, wherein the first structure and the second structure are one of the second interface target structure or the second registration structure.

37 . The metrology method of claim 23 , wherein the determining the first registration measurement comprises measuring performed at one or more after-develop inspection (ADI) steps of one or more layers of the first sample via a scanning electron beam (SEM) metrology sub-system of the metrology sub-system.

38 . The metrology method of claim 23 , wherein the first registration measurement is based on:

one or more intermediary overlay registration measurements acquired at intermediary manufacturing steps of layers of the first sample; or

one or more intermediary direct overlay measurements acquired at the intermediary manufacturing steps.

39 . The metrology method of claim 38 , wherein the one or more intermediary overlay registration measurements are based on a first scribe line structure.

40 . The metrology method of claim 38 , wherein the one or more intermediary overlay registration measurements are based on a first sample edge of the first sample.

41 . The metrology method of claim 23 , wherein the first sample comprises one or more intermediary structures buried within the first sample at one or more intermediary layers.

42 . The metrology method of claim 41 , wherein the one or more intermediary structures is at least one of an overlay target or a functional device feature.

43 . The metrology method of claim 23 , wherein the first registration structure is smaller than 3 micrometers in width and length as measured within a plane normal to a depth direction of the first sample.

44 . The metrology method of claim 23 , wherein the coupling includes a fusing of the first sample to the second sample.

45 . The metrology method of claim 23 , further comprising, after the coupling and the acquiring the overlay measurement, fusing the first sample to the second sample based on the overlay measurement.

46 . The metrology method of claim 23 , wherein at least one of the first registration measurement, the second registration measurement, or the third registration measurement is based on die-to-database measurements.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Nov 15, 2022
From: SHUALL, NIMROD; PIO, JORDON; LASKE, FRANK; EYRING, STEFAN; BACHAR, OHAD
To: KLA CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 061781/0397 →
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20240093985A1 · Mar 21, 2024
References Cited (279)
US 5202748A · MacDonald et al. · 1993 [cited by applicant]
US 6064486A · Chen et al. · 2000 [cited by applicant]
US 6238939B1 · Wachs et al. · 2001 [cited by applicant]
US 6335791B1 · Miyatake · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 6600565B1 · Suresh et al. · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 6762846B1 · Poris · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 6847458B2 · Freischlad et al. · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 7056751B2 · Faris · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 7079257B1 · Kirkpatrick et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 7433051B2 · Owen · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 7570796B2 · Zafar et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 7676077B2 · Kulkarni et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 7875528B2 · La Tulipe, Jr et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 8163570B2 · Castex et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8394719B2 · Tsen et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8475612B2 · Gaudin · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8575002B2 · Broekaart et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8640548B2 · Wimplinger · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 8703368B2 · Lee et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 8768665B2 · Veeraraghavan et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 8769453B2 · Scheffer et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 8859335B2 · Lee et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 8892237B2 · Vaid et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 8900885B1 · Hubbard et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 8949057B1 · Seong et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9087176B1 · Chang et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9116442B2 · Adel et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9121684B2 · Tang et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9312161B2 · Wimplinger et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9354526B2 · Vukkadala et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9466538B1 · Skordas et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9733075B2 · Broekaart et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9779202B2 · Vukkadala et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9852972B2 · Seddon et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9915625B2 · Gao et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 9935022B2 · Owen · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10024654B2 · Smith et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10234772B2 · Bangar et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10249523B2 · Vukkadala et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10267746B2 · Duffy et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10325798B2 · Wimplinger et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10401279B2 · Vukkadala et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10622233B2 · Hooge et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10649447B2 · Izikson et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10788759B2 · Tsai et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10886256B2 · Guo · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11289422B2 · Yan et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 11335607B2 · Ip · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 11393118B2 · Agarwal et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 11710649B2 · Mizuta · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 11768441B2 · Berge et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 11782411B2 · Zach et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 11829077B2 · Zach et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 12164277B2 · Zach et al. · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 12197137B2 · Zach et al. · 2025 [cited by applicant]
US 20020071112A1 · Smith et al. · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 20020105649A1 · Smith et al. · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 20040023466A1 · Yamauchi · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 20040075825A1 · Suresh et al. · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 20050066739A1 · Gotkis et al. · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 20050087578A1 · Jackson · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 20050147902A1 · Schaar et al. · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 20050254030A1 · Tolsma et al. · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 20050271955A1 · Cherala et al. · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 20060141743A1 · Best et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20060170934A1 · Picciotto et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20060216025A1 · Kihara et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20070037318A1 · Kim · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20070064243A1 · Yunus et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20070212856A1 · Owen · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20070242271A1 · Moon · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20080030701A1 · Lof · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20080057418A1 · Seltmann et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20080106714A1 · Okita · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20080182344A1 · Mueller et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20080188036A1 · Tulipe et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20080199978A1 · Fu et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20080316442A1 · Adel et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20100102470A1 · Mokaberi · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20110172982A1 · Veeraraghavan et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110210104A1 · Wahlsten et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110265578A1 · Johnson et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20120006463A1 · Gaudin · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20120255365A1 · Wimplinger · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20130054154A1 · Broekaart et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130286395A1 · Lee et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20140057450A1 · Bourbina et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140102221A1 · Rebhan et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140209230A1 · Wagenleitner · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20150044786A1 · Huang et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150120216A1 · Vukkadala et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150279709A1 · La Tulipe et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20160005662A1 · Yieh et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160172254A1 · Wimplinger · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20170162456A1 · Owen · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170221856A1 · Yamauchi · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170243853A1 · Huang et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20180165404A1 · Eyring et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180342410A1 · Hooge et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20190122915A1 · Mitsuishi et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190148184A1 · Sugaya et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190206711A1 · Wimplinger et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190257647A1 · Ichinose et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190271542A1 · Shchegrov et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190287854A1 · Miller et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190353582A1 · Vukkadala et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20200018709A1 · Hosler et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200091015A1 · Sugaya et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200328060A1 · Iizuka · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20210296147A1 · Mizuta · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20220034823A1 · Ono et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220187718A1 · Zach et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220230099A1 · Pandith et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220344282A1 · Subrahmanyan et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20230030116A1 · Zach et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20230032406A1 · Zach et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20230035201A1 · Zach et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20240094642A1 · Zach et al. · 2024 [cited by applicant]
CA 2334388A1 · 2000 [cited by applicant]
CN 100552908C · 2009 [cited by applicant]
CN 100562784C · 2009 [cited by applicant]
CN 101727011A · 2010 [cited by applicant]
CN 103378067A · 2013 [cited by applicant]
CN 102656678B · 2015 [cited by applicant]
CN 104977816A · 2015 [cited by applicant]
CN 103283000B · 2016 [cited by applicant]
CN 106547171A · 2017 [cited by applicant]
CN 104658950B · 2018 [cited by applicant]
CN 109451761A · 2019 [cited by applicant]
CN 106887399B · 2020 [cited by applicant]
CN 109891563B · 2021 [cited by applicant]
CN 114361014A · 2022 [cited by applicant]
CN 114361014B · 2024 [cited by examiner]
EP 1829130A1 · 2007 [cited by applicant]
EP 2299472A1 · 2011 [cited by applicant]
EP 2463892A1 · 2012 [cited by applicant]
EP 2463892B1 · 2013 [cited by applicant]
EP 2656378B1 · 2015 [cited by applicant]
EP 2863421A1 · 2015 [cited by applicant]
EP 1829130B1 · 2016 [cited by applicant]
EP 2854157B1 · 2019 [cited by applicant]
EP 3460833A1 · 2019 [cited by applicant]
GB 2462734B · 2010 [cited by applicant]
JP H11135413A · 1999 [cited by applicant]
JP H11176749A · 1999 [cited by applicant]
JP 2001068429A · 2001 [cited by applicant]
JP 2001077012A · 2001 [cited by applicant]
JP 2002118052A · 2002 [cited by applicant]
JP 2002229044 · 2005 [cited by applicant]
JP 2005233928A · 2005 [cited by applicant]
JP 2005251972A · 2005 [cited by applicant]
JP 2006186377A · 2006 [cited by applicant]
JP 2007158200A · 2007 [cited by applicant]
JP 2007173526A · 2007 [cited by applicant]
JP 2009113312A · 2009 [cited by applicant]
JP 2009529785A · 2009 [cited by applicant]
JP 2009239095A · 2009 [cited by applicant]
JP 2009294001B · 2009 [cited by applicant]
JP 2010529659A · 2010 [cited by applicant]
JP 2010272707A · 2010 [cited by applicant]
JP 5611371B2 · 2014 [cited by applicant]
JP 6279324B2 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
JP 2018036317A · 2018 [cited by applicant]
JP 202002176A · 2020 [cited by applicant]
JP 2022098312A · 2022 [cited by applicant]
KR 20040014686A · 2004 [cited by applicant]
KR 20040046696A · 2004 [cited by applicant]
KR 100914446B1 · 2009 [cited by applicant]
KR 20090099871A · 2009 [cited by applicant]
KR 101313909B1 · 2013 [cited by applicant]
KR 20140069352A · 2014 [cited by applicant]
KR 101801409B1 · 2017 [cited by applicant]
KR 101849443B1 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
KR 101866622B1 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
KR 101866719B1 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
KR 20180065033A · 2018 [cited by applicant]
KR 102161093B1 · 2020 [cited by applicant]
SG 181435A1 · 2012 [cited by applicant]
SG 187694A1 · 2013 [cited by applicant]
TW 200421422A · 2004 [cited by applicant]
TW 201322353A · 2013 [cited by applicant]
TW I447842B · 2014 [cited by applicant]
TW 201532165A · 2015 [cited by applicant]
TW 201630217A · 2016 [cited by applicant]
TW I563548B · 2016 [cited by applicant]
TW I563549B · 2016 [cited by applicant]
TW I618130B · 2018 [cited by applicant]
TW 201946099A · 2019 [cited by applicant]
TW I680506B · 2019 [cited by applicant]
TW 202127649A · 2021 [cited by applicant]
WO 2005067046A1 · 2005 [cited by applicant]
WO 2009113312A1 · 2009 [cited by applicant]
WO 2012079786A1 · 2012 [cited by applicant]
WO 2012083978A1 · 2012 [cited by applicant]
WO 2012126752A1 · 2012 [cited by applicant]
WO 2012135513A1 · 2012 [cited by applicant]
WO 2013158039A3 · 2016 [cited by applicant]
WO 2017217431A1 · 2017 [cited by applicant]
WO 2018012300A1 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
WO 2018071716A1 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
WO 2019146427A1 · 2019 [cited by applicant]
WO 2020045158A1 · 2020 [cited by applicant]
WO 2020226152A1 · 2020 [cited by applicant]
WO 2021106527A1 · 2021 [cited by applicant]
WO 2022125343A1 · 2022 [cited by applicant]
Korean Intellectual Property Office, International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2023/032022, Dec. 28, 2023, 9 pages. [cited by applicant]
European Patent Office, Extended European Search Report received in EP Application No. 22850076.5, Feb. 20, 2025, 11 pages. [cited by applicant]
European Patent Office, Extended European Search Report received in EP Application No. 22850101.1, Mar. 5, 2025, 14 pages. [cited by applicant]
Sakanas et al., “Comparison of processing-induced deformations of InP bonded to Si determined by e-beam metrology: direct vs. adhesion bonding,” Dec. 4, 2018, 7 pages. [cited by applicant]
Steen et al., “Overlay as the key to drive wafer scale 3D integration,” Microelectronic Engineering, vol. 84, May 2007, 4 pages. [cited by applicant]
Taiwan Patent Office, Office Action received in TW Application No. 111121141, Nov. 25, 2024, 11 pages. [cited by applicant]
Aitken, et al. “Discussion of tooling solutions for the direct bonding of silicon wafers.” Microsystem Technologies 12 (2006): 413-417. [cited by applicant]
Burns et al., “A wafer-scale 3-D circuit integration technology,” in IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, vol. 53, No. 10, pp. 2507-2516, Oct. 2006, doi: 10.1109/TED.2006.882043. [cited by applicant]
Burns, et al. “An SOI-based three-dimensional integrated circuit technology.” 2000 IEEE International SOI Conference. Proceedings (Cat. No.00CH37125) (2000): 20-21. [cited by applicant]
Chan, et al. “An approach for alignment, mounting, and integration of IXO mirror segments.” Optical Engineering + Applications (2009). [cited by applicant]
Chen, Kuan-Neng (2005). Copper Wafer Bonding in Three-Dimensional Integration [Published Doctoral thesis] Massachusetts Institute of Technology. [cited by applicant]
Choi, et al., Distortion and overlay performance of UV step and repeat imprint lithography, Microelectronic Engineering, vols. 78-79, 2005, pp. 633-640, ISSN 0167-9317, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mee.2004.12.097. [cited by applicant]
Cotte, et al., “Film stress changes during anodic bonding of NGL masks,” Proc. SPIE 3997, Emerging Lithographic Technologies IV, (Jul. 21, 2000); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.390089. [cited by applicant]
Di Cioccio, et al., “Direct bonding for wafer level 3D integration,” 2010 IEEE International Conference on Integrated Circuit Design and Technology, 2010, pp. 110-113, doi: 10.1109/ICICDT.2010.5510276. [cited by applicant]
Feng, et al., (Jan. 14, 2007). “On the Stoney Formula for a Thin Film/Substrate System With Nonuniform Substrate Thickness.” ASME. J. Appl. Mech. Nov. 2007; 74(6): 1276-1281. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2745392. [cited by applicant]
Garnier, et al., “Results on aligned SiO2/SiO2 direct wafer-to-wafer low temperature bonding for 3D integration,” 2009 IEEE International SOI Conference, 2009, pp. 1-2, doi: 10.1109/SOI.2009.5318753. [cited by applicant]
Gegenwarth et al., “Effect of Plastic Deformation of Silicon Wafers on Overlay”, Proc. SPIE 0100, Developments in Semiconductor Microlithography II, (Aug. 8, 1977); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.955355. [cited by applicant]
Goyal, et al., “Solder bonding for microelectromechanical systems (MEMS) applications,” Proc. SPIE 4980, Reliability, Testing, and Characterization of MEMS/MOEMS II, (Jan. 16, 2003); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.478202. [cited by applicant]
Hanna, et al., “Numerical and experimental study of the evolution of stresses in flip chip assemblies during assembly and thermal cycling,” 1999 Proceedings. 49th Electronic Components and Technology Conference (Cat. No… [cited by applicant]
Huston, et al., (2004). Active membrane masks for improved overlay performance in proximity lithography. Proc SPIE. 5388. 11-19. 10.1117/12.546598. [cited by applicant]
Liu, et al., “Application of IVS Overlay Measurement to Wafer Deformation Characterization Study.” (2004). [cited by applicant]
Meinhold, et al., (2004). Sensitive Strain Measurements of Bonded SOI Films Using Moiré. Semiconductor Manufacturing, IEEE Transactions on. 17. 35-41. 10.1109/TSM.2003.823259. [cited by applicant]
Nagarajan, R. (2008). Commercialization of low temperature copper thermocompression bonding for 3D integrated circuits. [Published Masters thesis] Massachusetts Institute of Technology. [cited by applicant]
Nagaswami, et al., “DPL Overlay Components,” 6th International Symp. on Immersion Lithography Extensions, Prague, Nov. 2009. [cited by applicant]
Nagaswami, et al., (2010). Overlay error components in double-patterning lithography. Solid State Technology. 53. 26-28. [cited by applicant]
Raghunathan, et al., (2009). Correlation of overlay performance and reticle substrate non-flatness effects in EUV lithography. Proc SPIE. 7488. 10.1117/12.834746. [cited by applicant]
Rudack, et al., (2010). IR microscopy as an early electrical yield indicator in bonded wafer pairs used for 3D integration. 10.1117/12.848400. [cited by applicant]
Schaper,et al., “Induced thermal stress fields for three-dimensional distortion control of Si wafer topography”, <i>Review of Scientific Instruments</i>, vol. 75, No. 6, pp. 1997-2002, 2004. doi: 10.1063/1.1753101. [cited by applicant]
Shetty, et al., “Impact of laser spike annealing dwell time on wafer stress and photolithography overlay errors,” 2009 International Workshop on Junction Technology, 2009, pp. 119-122, doi: 10.1109/IWJT.2009.5166234. [cited by applicant]
Steen, et al. “Overlay as the key to drive wafer scale 3D integration.” Microelectronic Engineering 84 (2007): 1412-1415. [cited by applicant]
Tippur, Hareesh V . . . “Simultaneous and real-time measurement of slope and curvature fringes in thin structures using shearing interferometery.” Optical Engineering 43 (2004): 3014-3020. [cited by applicant]
Tupek, et al., “Submicron aligned wafer bonding via capillary forces.” Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology B 25 (2007): 1976-1981. [cited by applicant]
Turner, et al., (2002). Modeling of direct wafer bonding: Effect of wafer bow and etch patterns. Journal of Applied Physics. 92. 7658-7666. 10.1063/1.1521792. [cited by applicant]
Turner, et al., (2004). Mechanics of wafer bonding: Effect of clamping. Journal of Applied Physics. 95. 10.1063/1.1629776. [cited by applicant]
Turner, et al., “Mechanics of direct wafer bonding.” Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 462 (2005): 171-188. [cited by applicant]
Turner, Kevin T. et al. “Predicting distortions and overlay errors due to wafer deformation during chucking on lithography scanners.” Journal of Micro-nanolithography Mems and Moems 8 (2009): 043015. [cited by applicant]
Aitken et al., (2006). Discussion of tooling solutions for the direct bonding of silicon wafers. Microsystem Technologies. 12. 413-417. 10.1007/s00542-005-0028-4. [cited by applicant]
Aitken et al., “Glass-Glass Wafer Bonding for Microfluidic Devices.” Proceedings of the 2008 Second International Conference on Integration and Commercialization of Micro and Nanosystems. 2008 Second International Confe… [cited by applicant]
Burns J. et al. (2008) An SOI-Based 3D Circuit Integration Technology. In: Tan C., Gutmann R., Reif L. (eds) Wafer Level 3-D ICs Process Technology. Integrated Circuits and Systems. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org… [cited by applicant]
Burns, J.A., et al., “A wafer-scale 3-D circuit integration technology,” in IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, vol. 53, No. 10, pp. 2507-2516, Oct. 2006, doi: 10.1109/TED.2006.882043. [cited by applicant]
Byelyayev, Anton, “Stress diagnostics and crack detection in full-size silicon wafers using resonance ultrasonic vibrations” (2005).Graduate Theses and Dissertations.http://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd/2969. [cited by applicant]
Chen, Kuan-Neng (2005). Copper Wafer Bonding in Three-Dimensional Integration [Unpublished Doctoral thesis] Massachusetts Institute of Technology. [cited by applicant]
Choi et al., (2005). Distortion and overlay performance of UV step and repeat imprint lithography. Microelectronic Engineering. 78-79. 633-640. 10.1016/j.mee.2004.12.097. [cited by applicant]
De Wolf, “Raman Spectroscopy: About Chips and Stress”, Ramanspectoscopy, IMEC, Kapeldreef 75, B-3001 Leuven, Belgium 2003. [cited by applicant]
Di Cioccio, L. et al., “Direct bonding for wafer level 3D integration,” 2010 IEEE International Conference on Integrated Circuit Design and Technology, 2010, pp. 110-113, doi: 10.1109/ICICDT.2010.5510276. [cited by applicant]
Garnier, A. et al., “Results on aligned SiO2/SiO2 direct wafer-to-wafer low temperature bonding for 3D integration,” 2009 IEEE International SOI Conference, 2009, pp. 1-2, doi: 10.1109/SOI.2009.5318753. [cited by applicant]
Hanna et al., (1999). Numerical and experimental study of the evolution of stresses in flip chip assemblies during assembly and thermal cycling. 1001-1009. 10.1109/ECTC.1999.776308. [cited by applicant]
Horn et al., (2008). Detection and Quantification of Surface Nanotopography-Induced Residual Stress Fields in Wafer-Bonded Silicon. Journal of the Electrochemical Society. 155. H36-H42. 10.1149/1.2799880. [cited by applicant]
International Search Report and Written Opinion in Application No. PCT/US2021/061310 dated Mar. 28, 2022, 8 pages. [cited by applicant]
Lim, et al., “Warpage Modeling and Characterization to Simulate the Fabrication Process of Wafer-Level Adhesive Bonding,” 2007 32nd IEEE/CPMT International Electronic Manufacturing Technology Symposium, 2007, pp. 298-30… [cited by applicant]
Liu et al., Application of IVS Overlay Measurement to Wager Deformation Characterization Study (2004). [cited by applicant]
Meinhold et al., “Sensitive strain measurements of bonded SOI films using Moire/spl acute/,” in IEEE Transactions on Semiconductor Manufacturing, vol. 17, No. 1, pp. 35-41, Feb. 2004, doi: 10.1109/TSM.2003.823259. [cited by applicant]
Nagarajan, R. (2009). Commercialization of low temperature copper thermocompression bonding for 3D integrated circuits. [unpublished Masters thesis] Massachusetts Institute of Technology. [cited by applicant]
Nagaswami et al., Overlay error components in double-patterning lithography, retrieved from Internet Sep. 2010. [cited by applicant]
Nagaswami, et al., “Double Patterning Lithography Overlay Components,” 6th International Symp. on Immersion Lithography Extensions, Prague, Nov. 2009. [cited by applicant]
Raghunathan et al., “Correlation of overlay performance and reticle substrate non-flatness effects in EUV lithography”, Proc. SPIE 7488, Photomask Technology 2009, 748816 (Sep. 30, 2009); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.8347… [cited by applicant]
Rudack et al., “IR microscopy as an early electrical yield indicator in bonded wafer pairs used for 3D integration,” Proc. SPIE 7638, Metrology, Inspection, and Process Control for Microlithography XXIV, 763815 (Apr. 1,… [cited by applicant]
Search Report and Written Opinion in International Application No. PCT/US2022/036745 dated Nov. 9, 2022, 8 pages. [cited by applicant]
Search Report and Written Opinion in International Application No. PCT/US2022/037522 dated Nov. 9, 2022. 9 pages. [cited by applicant]
Search Report and Written Opinion in International Application No. PCT/US2022/038412 dated Nov. 16, 2022, 8 pages. [cited by applicant]
Steen et al., (2007). Overlay as the key to drive wafer scale 3D integration. Microelectronic Engineering. 84. 1412-1415. 10.1016/j.mee.2007.01.231. [cited by applicant]
Tanaka, Tetsu et al., “3D LSI technology and reliability issues”, Digest of Technical Papers—Symposium on VLSI Technology (2011). [cited by applicant]
Tupek, Michael et al., “Submicron aligned wafer bonding via capillary forces.” Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology B 25 (2007): 1976-1981. [cited by applicant]
Turner et al., “Predicting distortions and overlay errors due to wafer deformation during chucking on lithography scanners,” J. Micro/Nanolith. MEMS MOEMS 8(4) 043015 (Oct. 1, 2009) https://doi.org/10.1117/1.3247857. [cited by applicant]
Turner, K. T.et al., “Modeling of direct wafer bonding: Effect of wafer bow and etch patterns”, Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 92, No. 12, pp. 7658-7666, 2002. doi:10.1063/1.1521792. [cited by applicant]
Turner, Kevin T., “Wafer-Bonding: Mechanics-Based Models and Experiments”, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, May 2004, Thesis, 186 pages. [cited by applicant]
Y Gogotsi et al., “Raman Microspectroscopy Study of Processing-Induced Phase Transformations and Residual Stress in Silicon”, Semiconductor Science and Technology, vol. 14, No. 10, Department of Mechanical Engineering, … [cited by applicant]
Asundi et al., “Rapid Defect Detections of Bonded Wafer using near Infrared Polariscope,” Instrumentation, Metrology, and Standards for Nanomanufacturing, Optics, and Semiconductors, Proc. of SPIE, vol. 8105, 2011, 11 p… [cited by applicant]
European Patent Office, Extended European Search Report received in EP Application No. 22850212.6, Jul. 2, 2025, 10 pages. [cited by applicant]
Taiwan Patent Office, Office Action received in TW Application No. 111121774, Jul. 30, 2025, 18 pages (including translation). [cited by applicant]
European Patent Office, Extended European Search Report received in EP Application No. 21904130.8, Sep. 17, 2024, 11 pages. [cited by applicant]
Japanese Patent Office, Office Action received in JP Application No. 2023-533686, Dec. 19, 2024, 15 pages (including translation). [cited by applicant]
Taiwan Patent Office, Office Action received in TW Application No. 110126925, Oct. 25, 2024, 8 pages (including translation). [cited by applicant]
Taiwan Patent Office, Taiwan Office Action for Application No. TW111128372 dated Jan. 5, 2026, 20 pages (with translation). [cited by applicant]